January 29,
2006 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 01, Issue 05 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Bullish Convergence Returns – On a
Short-term Basis
As stated
after last week’s profound contrarian bullish behavior in the energy
sector, one should not overreact. Three or four weeks of bearish
divergence would set off a deep bear cycle. However, this past week
demonstrated a mild bullish convergence with the exception of utilities.
There are
conflicting paradigms tugging at the market. One prognosis is the market
is primed to emulate a 1970’s type of market with deep bearish
expressions. This view is supported by rising interest rates, rising oil
prices, and rising gold prices. It makes sense. As most of you know, the
market does not always make sense with current frames of reference. Recent
behavior suggests the market’s anticipation of declines oil, interest
rates, and precious metals.
Another view
is bullish. It is supported by “where else are you going to put your
money?” Stock prices rise and fall under the simple influence of supply
and demand. Prices rise when the demand for stocks is higher than the
supply. This is influenced by expected corporate earnings, which is a
derivative of the economic outlook. Right now, the economic outlook is
so-so. And the market has been so-so for nearly two years with the
exception of the standard performance during the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality.
The market
seldom dwells on the “now.” It attempts to gauge economic activity well
into the future by about six to nine months. Extreme volatility occurs
when it recognizes its prior economic prognosis was fraught with error.
Rapid dynamic bearish expressions can deflate the demand for stocks and
exacerbate declining stock prices. In other words they can move down more
than economically justified. That is supply and demand at work. Sellers
have to really lower than price offering during deep bear cycles just to
get a nimble.
Those that
faithfully hold onto their possessions during deep bearish cycles
eventually sell. They typically do that near the bottom of the cycle. A
critical mass of investors typically adopts a zero trust tolerance of the
stock market and its shenanigans during such times. If that critical mass
of investors remains on the sidelines for lengthy periods, the demand for
stocks will remain depressed. Long bearish cycles ensue when that happens.
The NASDAQ is
an excellent example of that. During its dynamic bearish behavior in
2000-2002, many investors were burned. They are now out of the market for
life. That same thing occurred in the 1930’s, keeping a lid on stock
prices for an entire generation. The crash of 1987 was a little different
in that many who tried to escape of pains of equity investments simply
could not execute their desired transactions. The market began a slow
incline shortly thereafter. Consequently, stock market investing came back
as the thing to do by the early 1990’s. If you did not have a stock
portfolio in the 1990’s, you were “a nobody” in most social settings.
Unfortunately, nearly everybody was in the stock market by the end of last
century and the stock market will not make everybody rich. It always
punishes whenever that notion becomes pervasive. The stock market is
shrouded in Darwinian principles.
The struggle
between the two paradigms of bullish and bearish outlooks was obivous the
past two weeks. The Dow was down 0.5% for the year a week ago. Last week’s
extraordinary bullish behavior has pushed the Dow up 1.8% for the year.
The Dow and S&P500 are more reflective of economic outlook, while many of
the other indices contain elements of higher speculation. The Dow
Utilities is also representative of general economic outlooks and it did
not participate in last week’s bullishness. It moved somewhat aggressively
to the south. That arouses some suspicion of the bull’s ability to
continue last week’s victory over the bear in the immediate future.
The Dow is
suppose to find a bottom in the presidential mid-term election year.
Political activity in the presidential-post-election-year was consistent
with political manipulation. Rising interest rates is a clear example of
that. Rising interest rates began its aggressive movements out of
historically depressed values just after the last election. Although it
made economic sense to do that with the strong dollar and rising energy
costs, the timing was perfect for the political cycle.
The problem
confronting historical standards is that there is no bottom to be found in
this mid-term election year. The market has not gone down enough to
provide that neat little bottom that is typical of mid-term election
years. The bottom of 2002 was right on par with historical standards and
it was so much fun to be ready for it.
Unless there
is increased bearish activity over the next few months, historical
standards will be shattered. The bull that was born in late 2002 and early
2003 will continue, un-phased by historical standards. The Quick-term,
Short-term, and Mid-term Indicants will keep you informed of this
potential violation of historical standards. However, do not be surprised
at aggressive bearish behavior between now and October.
As of today,
none of the Indicant attributes suggests this. The meandering behavior of
the market since early 2004 with the exception of normal bullishness in
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality is a testament of the strength
of this bull. Its standing up to record high oil prices, war, terrorism
threats, and rising interest rates is indeed impressive. Much of that
strength is tied to “where else are you going to put your money?” The
market will punish that simplicity at some future point. It always does.
That is why the Indicant was invented – avoid shenanigans and deep bearish
expressions.
Weekly Buy/Sell Summary
The Mid-term
Indicant generated five buy signals and two sell signals for stocks and
funds.
In addition to
the sell signals, the Mid-term Indicant is avoiding 58-stocks and funds of
the 345 tracked by the Indicant. The avoided stocks and funds are down an
average of 8.7% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of
19.3-weeks ago.
There were
90-stocks and funds avoided at this time last year. The avoided stocks and
funds one year ago were down an average of 26.8% since their respective
sell signals an average of 49.1-weeks earlier. Two years ago, on January
31 2004, the Mid-term Indicant was avoiding only eight stocks and funds
that were down an average of 27.9% since their respective sell signals an
average of 42.4-weeks earlier. Three years ago on January 31, 2003, there
were only eight avoided stocks and funds. They were down 6.8% from their
respective sell signals an average of 5.3-weeks earlier. There were
57-sell signals in 2003 on this weekend.
In addition to
the buy signals this weekend, the Mid-term Indicant is signaling hold for
280 of the 345-stocks and funds tracked by the Indicant. The stocks and
funds with hold signals are up an average of 118.7%. That annualizes to
66.9%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling hold for these 280-stocks
and funds for an average of 92.3-weeks.
One year ago
on January 28, 2005, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 230-stocks and
funds out of the 320 tracked at that time for an average of 72.6-weeks.
Those 230-stocks and funds were up 90.0% (annualized at 64.5%). The
Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 282-stocks and funds of the 296
tracked two years ago on January 31, 2004. They were up by an average of
67.1% (annualized at 88.0%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 39.7-weeks earlier. There were 137-stocks and funds with hold signals
on January 31, 2003 since their buy signals an average of 19.3-weeks
earlier. They were up 26.5% (annualized at 62.2%).
Quick/Short-term Indicant Stock Market
Report - Punch Lines
NYSE
Indicant Volume Indicator:
Bullish bias strengthening.
NASDAQ
Indicant Volume Indicator: Not
yet obviating market intention; slight bullish bias.
DJIA
Short-term Indicant: Bullish
NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant: Bullish
Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term Indicant ETF:
Bullish bias.
Short-term
Indicant: ETF: Bullish bias.
Quick-term
Indicant ETF: Bullish bias.
Quick-term
Bearish Yellow: High
non-bearishness.
Quick-term
Bullish Red: Several red bulls.
Bullish bias continues.
Quick-term
and Short-term Conflicts:
Bullish harmony.
Robust
Force Vectors: Still mixed.
Early movement toward bullish domains.
Vector
Pressure Position: Bullish
domains.
Short-term
Indicant Breakout (Bullish) Configuration:
Converging bullish movement.
Short-term
Indicant Breakdown (Bearish) Configuration:
Strengthening non-bearishness.
Vector
Pressure Crossings Put Option Activity:
No signals today.
Vector
Pressure Crossings Call Option Activity:
No signals today.
Writing
Covered Call Options: Not
recommended.
Overall
Quick-term Market Bias: Bullish
bias improving.
Overall
Short-term Market Bias: Bullish
bias improving.
Quick-term Short-term Indicant Stock Market
Report Details
Volume was significantly higher on
Friday’s bullish expression. The
Indicant Volume Indicator continues in a robust cycle. The
configurations had been elusive in obviating bias, but after a shaky start
to the year, this configuration is suggesting bullish expectations on a
quick-term basis. As stated last Thursday, the immediate interpretation is
a shift to bullish bias, but don’t get too anxious until the Indicant
Volume Indicator obviates the market’s intention. It eventually will do
that.
The DJIA is up 0.9% since the
Short-term Indicant signaled bull on January 26, 2006.The NASDAQ is up
7.5% (annualized at 31.7%) since the Short-term Indicant signaled bull on
November 2, 2005. This remains configured in support of the Short-term
Bull for the NASDAQ and again for the Dow30. Click here to see the
Short-term Indicant’s history.
SQI Report Card (Consolidated Short/Quick), Status, and Charts
There were no buy signals and no sell
signals today. Although there were no buy signals, the SQI is signaling
hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up 65.5% (annualized at 35.3%) since their
respective buy signals an average of 95.4-weeks ago. The SQI is not
avoiding any of the ETF’s at this time.
The SQI model is the one that most of you will prefer for your trading
decisions. It generates fewer signals than the other two models and
represents consistencies in the Quick-term and Short-term outlooks for the
specific ETF’s. It also beats buy and hold on a regular basis, although
there is only seven years of proof. The quality of that proof is high
since this period includes a powerful bull and bear. The model sours a
little during meandering markets with an excessive number of signals from
time to time. Research toward perfecting continues.
Short-term Indicant Report Card, Status, and Charts
There were no buy signals and no sell
signals. Although there were no buy signals, the Short-term Indicant is
signaling hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up an average of 67.5% (annualized
37.8%) since the STI signaled, buy, an average of 91.8-weeks ago. The
Short-term Indicant is not avoiding any of the ETF’s.
Keep in mind, the Short-term Indicant is
much more active in buying/selling than the Consolidated model, above. The
Quick-term Indicant, which follows, is even more active.
Quick-term Report Card, Status, and Charts
There were no buy signals and no sell
signals today. Although there were no buy signals, the Quick-term Indicant
is signaling hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up 37.2% (annualized at 38.9%)
since the QTI signaled buy an average of 49.1-weeks ago.
Quick-term Indicant Bull/Bear Health Report
All 30-ETF’s are above their respective
bearish yellow curves by average of 12.5%. That is up from significantly
yesterday. This attribute remains non-bearish and now has strong
non-bearish configurations.
Twenty-six ETF’s are above their
respective bullish red curves by 4.1%. The number of ETF’s with red bull
status is up by three from yesterday. This attribute remains with bullish
bias and no longer weakening.
Keep in mind as long as there is one Red
Bull, other than contrarian sectors, the market will not move into a deep
bearish slide.
Short-term Indicant Bull/Bear Health Report
The above heading is linked to the
Short-term Indicant table. This paragraph is repeated daily as a reminder
of accurately interpreting the charts. By clicking the charts on the table
you can review potential contact with the breakdown lines (bearish) and
potential contact with breakout lines (bullish). It is extremely bearish
when several ETF’s are contacting their respective breakdown lines. The
breakdown lines are the yellow lines (bearish). The breakout lines are the
red ones (bullish). Close proximity to breakout implies an increased
probability of an actual breakout occurring. It is certainly bullish and
you will want to be in a hold position for those few days a year when the
breakout occurs. Conversely, significant contact with yellow (breakdown)
suggests “avoid” positions are best. Although meandering markets are safe,
there is an increased probability of dynamic bearishness with yellow
contact.
Ten of the 30-ETF’s are contacting their
breakout lines (bullish). That is up by three from yesterday and up by
seven since last Monday. This has resumed a strong bullish bias on a
short-term basis.
The average distance from breakout contact
is 1.3%, which is 0.5% more bullish than yesterday. This significantly
favors a bullish bias on a short-term basis.
The average distance from the price and
breakdown is 24.4%, which is 3.0% more bullish from last Thursday. None of
the ETF’s are contacting their respective breakdown lines. That is
exceedingly non-bearish even in the face of a weakening bull. The
probability of immediate contact remains low and thus a significant
non-bearish bias prevails. Although the market can be bearish in the
immediate future, this non-bearish bias mitigates threats of dynamic
bearishness (like the 1970’s).
Overall, there is much more gravitational
force from bullish domains than bearish domains on a Short-term Indicant
basis. The Short-term perspective remains bullish for these ETF’s and the
overall stock market. However, as we near the conclusion of the heart and
soul of bullish seasonality, do not be surprised at reduced bullishness
and an increase in bearish expressions in the next few weeks. However,
none of the Quick-term and Short-term attributes support that prognosis at
this time.
Contact with the breakdown lines will
induce dynamic bearish behavior. Keep your eye on this attribute.
Conflicts Between the Short-term and
Quick-term Indicants
There are no conflicting signals between
the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant. Quick cycles and Short-term
inclinations are in harmony with bullish bias.
ETF Robust Force Vector Configurations
You can scan the
Quick-term Indicant for Exchange Traded Funds table and click on the
charts to observe Force Vector configurations. Scroll down each of the
charts, where a quick link has been added to take you to the next series
of Quick-term ETF charts. Use you back arrow on your browser in the event
you want to return to the previous page. As stated last week, Force
Vectors are topped out with some turning to the south. That does not
necessarily mean the market is about to turn bearish, but it does support
some selling off and profit taking. That is exactly what happened today
and late last week.
A robust and deep movement to the south
suggests severe bearish expressions. A protected movement to the southeast
as opposed to due south suggests minor corrections to the underlying bull
market.
Force Vectors movement is now mixed, but
more have shifted back to the north, supporting bullish bias.
To understand potential financial
opportunities,
click here to learn to identify Robust Force Vectors. They are visible
on the
Quick-term Indicant charts.
ETF Force Vectors/Vector Pressure
Crossings/Option Signals
Remember, the links contained herein are
more visible when reading this on the website.
Click this sentence for Vector Pressure Option Signals. There were no
option buy signals today. Yesterday’s report erroneously stated there were
two put option buy signals. The table on the website was accurately
updated.
Make certain you sell naked options when
the Force Vectors shift direction or within two days of the purchase,
whichever occurs first. If you are unfamiliar with this, take the
options tour.
Remember options trading are risky. Never
offer “market prices.” Always bid low in hopes of an intraday contrarian
movement to the underlying assumption in directional behavior. Always
place day-orders only. That keeps the floor folks out of your pocket book.
Do not despair if your order does not take. There are plenty of
opportunities throughout the course of the year. Remember, stalking is the
key to success here. Although not necessary for stock market success,
those of you who have a gambling instinct will enjoy this. For those of
you with a longer-term perspective, it does not hurt to see what the
short-term folks are thinking. The Indicant indicates both perspectives.
Quick-term and Short-term Indicant Summary
As stated the past several weeks,
discontinue writing covered call options. The market’s bullish bias,
although declining, has increased too much risk for this tactic.
This paragraph will remain unchanged until
conditions warrant modifications. The Quick-term Bull remains in tact but
severely weakening. As stated for the past several weeks, do not expect
dynamic bullishness like the past three years during the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality, which is now underway. There are too many issues,
both fundamental and historical, to assume aggressive bullishness.
Regardless, a bull is a bull without regard to magnitude.
Continue avoiding ProFunds Ultra Short
mutual fund. Remember, it moves inversely to the QQQQ by exponential
amounts.
Overall, the bullish bias on a Quick-term
and Short-term basis continues, but not as strongly as it was in early
January.
To familiarize yourself with viewing the
market from an ETF perspective, click the following update links.
Quick-term ETF Options
Quick-term Indicant for ETF’s
Short-term Indicant for ETF’s
Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term Indicant for ETF’s
Click here to the report card, which is updated weekly, to link to related
tours.
Links to the Short-term Indicant and
Indicant Volume Indicator are below:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
The Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular
Market Blend
This section
is a repeat from the last several months with a few modifications,
reflecting recent secular influences. Although appearing redundant at
times, it is important to read this section each week to keep abreast of
secular market shifts. Remember, secular shifts can last twenty-five or
more years. Fortunately, secular market movements do not deter mid-term,
short-term, and quick-term profit opportunities. However, they can wreak
havoc to the long-term investors’ plans.
The current
Mid-term Bull market and buying barrage started over three years ago in
late 2002, the last mid-term election year. We are again inside mid-term
election year. The last one followed the predicted market bottom in 2002.
The mid-term presidential election year phenomenon was consistent with
history in 2002. Will it be consistent in 2006? The last mid-term election
year, 2002, found a cyclical bottom, which is a common attribute in
presidential mid-term election years. Doing so this year, will require
bearish behavior before October.
Even more
impressive was how the market synchronized with near perfection to normal
seasonality in 2002. The April-October period was typically bearish. The
2002 season bear leg was dynamic. The current mid-term election year of
2006, fundamentally, supports historical standards. In other words, expect
no bullish enthusiasm in the first half of 2006 with rising interest rates
and rising energy costs. The political establishment and its ugly
influence on economic activity are typically at its worse in presidential
post election years, which just concluded with large cap meandering
behavior with a slight bearish bias.
The current
Mid-term Bull has been surprisingly strong with weak fundamentals and the
normal political threat of post-election-year traditions. The market was
mixed in 2005 with some bearishness and bullishness in the broader
indices. The lack of dynamic bearishness imposes a historical need to
induce bearishness in the first half of 2006.
Keep in mind,
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality (Nov-Jan) is historically
bullish regardless of fundamental reason. The market can find a cyclical
bottom in this year’s mid-term election year after the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality elevates it. The market, so far, has accommodated with
typical bullishness since last October. As stated for several weeks, it
would not be surprising for a nice rise during the current heart and soul
of bullish seasonality only to be followed with bearish expressions after
January 2006. So far, so good. The current heart and soul of bullish
seasonality has demonstrated normalcy so far with an extremely bullish
November. However, December finished with a bearish conclusion. The
omission of a solid Santa Claus rally this past year is somewhat ominous.
Last week’s bullishness was normal in continuing bullishness during the
heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
January has
been demonstrating a tug-of-war between bull and bear paradigms. So far,
the bull is winning, but it is a healthy battle. The battle is in bullish
domains. The bear needs more energy than the bull to become victorious. So
far, it has not been able to muster up a higher energy level than the
bull. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality has produced gains of
3.2%, 4.5%, and 7.1% for the Dow, S&P500, and NASDAQ so far. The heart and
soul of bullish seasonality has only a few days remaining.
The Dow30
found bottom in the last presidential mid-term election year on October 9,
2002 at 7286.27. The NASDAQ found bottom on the same day at
1114.11.Finding cyclical bottoms in mid-term election years is common. The
Dow is up 49.7% from the last presidential election year bottom. The
NASDAQ is up a whopping 106.8% since October 9, 2002.
Interestingly,
the NASDAQ is down 54.4% from its historical high of 5048.62 on March 9,
2000. The Dow is down 7.0% from its historical high of 11723 on January
13, 2000. So far, the new century, 2000 inclusive, has not been kind to
long-term investors. Historical standards suggest the NASDAQ will not
return to historical high until 2025 or so. Many left the market and will
never return. Those of you still participating avoided the losses earlier
this century and reinvested in late 2002. Your retirement plans or desire
for money is in good shape.
The stock
market’s meteoric rise since 1990 was not supported by economic or
corporate earnings fundamentals. It was stimulated by an unprecedented
demand for stocks. The simple laws supply and demand propelled stock
prices dynamically to the north. The great bear leg of 2001 and 2002 has
permanently depressed sources of demand. The market now has to wait for a
new generation of investors to enjoy dynamic bullish growth. The great
bull leg of 2003 was a relatively short bullish spurt that has not enjoyed
follow-on bullish behavior due to this lack of demand. The market has been
slightly bullish since late 2003 with pronounced meandering behavior. The
only significant bullish expressions not followed by bearish expressions
occurred in the heart and soul of bullish seasonality in 2003, 2004, and
2005. Other than those bullish cycles, the market has been flat since
early 2004.
As earlier
stated, the Indicant began its buying barrage in October – November 2002
just after the market bottomed from the severe 2000-2002 Bear Market.
There were 239 buy signals between October 5, 2002 and November 9, 2002
out of the 296 stocks and funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that
time. Even badly managed companies received a buy signal, which is a
common attribute of sustainable new bull markets. As many of you noticed,
those companies eventually dip back to the south after the euphoria of new
bullishness.
Some of you
recall the Indicant Stock Market Report tracking the
Short-term Indicant Bear for the NASDAQ in 2002. It was the longest in
history. It even exceeded the Dow’s 1929-1932 Short-term Indicant Bear in
breadth and approached it in magnitude. The good news is that the NASDAQ’s
decline did not lead to a depression, which is a clear indication of how
little influence tech stocks have on the economy.
There are two
important axioms to remember. 1) Real economic wealth is created in only
three ways - manufacturing, agriculture, and extraction. 2) The only
positive influence politicians have on the economy is to undo their prior
damage. They are now doing their damage, some of which will be undone in
2007; the next presidential pre-election year. That is why the market
typically finds bottom in the mid-term election year. That is also why the
presidential pre-election year is historically the most bullish on the
four year cycle. If the strength of the current Mid-term Bull can be
subjected only to meandering behavior, like 2004 and 2005, then it is
possible for the current Mid-term Bull to be a record setting one in terms
of duration.
The political
industry reduces wealth. Politicians continually attempt to redistribute
wealth, which flies in the face of the laws of nature. They promote
“middle class” attainment. The larger the middle class, the more power
politicians and their academia brethren have. The communists tried that,
resulting 99% poverty, while the ruling 1% lived like kings. In other
words, socialism rewards an ability to intellectualize, while capitalism
rewards the results of appealing effort.
The remainder
of this section, Secular Market Blend, is repeated, in part, from the past
several months, but it does not hurt to reread it each week. As time
progresses and conditions change, there will be modifications to it to
maintain a balanced frame of reference.
You will
notice many of the
mutual fund buy signals occurred in March 2003. Many of you recall how
the market did not synchronize with the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality from November 2002 through February 2003. December 2002 was
the most bearish since 1931, but not nearly as dynamic as the 1931 bearish
expression. After the asynchronous behavior in the November 2002 rolling
third of the year, the market turned bullish in March 2003 and again did
not synchronize with normal seasonality. The Mid-term Indicant continued
signaling bull during bearish seasonality in 2003. The market continued
moving north during that time, contrary to historical standards. As stated
in most of 2004, bearish expressions on a Mid-term basis between May and
October 2004 should not be surprising. That is exactly what occurred. The
result was a meandering market with a slight bearish bias during most of
2004 and 2005.
As stated
since late October 2005 and early November 2005, do not be surprised at
increasing quick-term and short-term bullish expressions in the immediate
future, followed by increased bearish expressions early next year. So far,
this prognosis is at par with those expectations. It is time for the
market to turn bearish. Fundamentals and historical standards support that
scenario.
The magnitude
of early 2006 bearishness is not predictable. Also, simply wait for the
various Indicant model’s advisement of bull/bear status, as forecasting
the market is a waste of time. However, it is appropriate to anticipate
fundamental shifts before they happen. Keep a close eye on the Fed. It can
damage the underlying bull.
November was
exceedingly bullish and consistent with historical normalcy. The November
– January rolling quarter is the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
However, December 2005 expressed contrary behavior to historical standards
with a bearish conclusion. January 2006 started off with an aggressive
bullish response to December’s bearishness, but it appears January is
threatened with yet more bearish energy.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/History-Seasonal/HS0001.htm
Make certain
you read the entire pages on the above link. You will see there are
exceptions.
Stop Loss Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a stop loss of 8% on recent buys because of the
Quick-term Bull.
Use a 10%
trailing stop loss or the yellow or green values you will find on the
tables for your longer-term hold positions. If your stock or fund is above
the bearish yellow curve and below the green curve, set your stop loss
equal to the greater of the yellow curve and the trailing stop loss. If
your stock or fund is above the green curve, set your stop loss at no less
the value of the green curve or 10% trailing, whichever is greater. If
your stock or fund is above the red curve and you bought at the Mid-term
Buy signal, you should use the 10% trailing stop loss.
If you are up
by triple digit amounts and enjoy your ownership of the stock or fund,
then use a 20% trailing stop loss or the slow moving blue curve price. If
you really enjoy holding the stock, keep a close eye on the management.
Dilettante managers have a way of worming into the business. Watch closely
for cronyism and lazy-hazy management dialog. Keep your eye on lavish
spending and excessive concerns about social issues. Those types are more
interested in burning your money for their pleasures, as opposed to making
you money. High performing companies remain focused on honoring the
investments made by their shareholders.
In a few
instances, you will see a hold signal for a stock or fund that is down
from its buy signal or below one of the above conditions for selling. If
you are more of a trader than an investor, feel free to buy stocks and
funds with those “bearish” attributes. They are configured for a possible
rebound, while at the same time, it is important to set the stop losses
mentioned in this report. Use the Quick-term Indicant as a guide in your
decision-making processes. If the stock price is falling in a Quick-term
Bear market, it is not advisable to buy.
Do not short
on stocks if they are up from an avoid signal. Stocks go up more often
than they go down. Stocks have a tendency to march to their own drumbeat
when rising. Some stocks rise and continue to rise in the most severe of
bear markets. Short selling opens up an opportunity for the snakes on Wall
Street to take everything you own. They can cause a stock to rise at their
whim and without any regard to fundamental reason. It usually does not
make sense to bet against the sweat and toil of hard-working people.
Stock and Fund Update
Click the
following link to see sorted performance of stocks and funds with
hold/avoid signals. In the past, they were included them in this email
message but now display them on the website. This is available to the
public, while the specific buy and sell transactions are limited to
members only.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Performance/Top-Bot.htm
Summary of Stocks and Funds with Buy and
Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/Buy-Sell%20Summary%20This%20Week.htm
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time.
All updated
information can be found from a single page at Indicant.Net. Click the
below link to that page. You will need your login ID and password.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Divergence versus Convergence
As stated the
past eleven weeks, there is no bullish convergence, until last week. There
was solid bullish convergence, which followed the prior week’s solid
bearish divergence. This is reflective of tug-of-war battling between
bullish and bearish paradigms. Keep your eye on the daily stock market
report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation, Currency,
Interest Rates
There is
little difference from the last few weeks. Most world currencies continue
in their cyclical shift in support of a strengthening U.S. Dollar.
Although the cyclical direction remains in favor of a strengthening U.S.
Dollar, behavior the past few weeks has been of a meandering nature.
However, continued strengthening is expected as long as interest rates
continue rising.
There is
nothing new. This paragraph remains unchanged from the past few weeks. As
repeatedly stated, the only exception to this is the
Canadian Dollar. It has not yet made this cyclical mid-term commitment
to weaken against the greenback. It continues to strengthen against the
U.S. Dollar. As stated the past several months and first mentioned in
2003, the Athabasca Tar Sand Oil potential continues to threaten the
Canadian cost advantage. The perception of huge imports to the U.S. and
around the globe will provide increased difficulty for the Canadian Dollar
to weaken. This should hurt Canadian manufacturing. The Canadian
government is going to attempt to weaken the Canadian dollar, most likely
at the request of General Motors, but $60+ oil will make that difficult.
General Motors can benefit tremendously with a weaker Canadian dollar with
their massive manufacturing capacity in Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Unfortunately, the strengthening Canadian dollar has hurt GM’s bottom line
and consequently, much of the Canadian capacity is earmarked for closure.
This paragraph will remain unchanged until such time conditions change.
The folks in Oshawa do not believe their manufacturing capacity will be
closed.
Commodity prices continue rising. Some are vacillating around all time
peaks. Overall, this behavior will eventually induce bearishness on the
stock market. Again, this paragraph will remain unchanged until conditions
change. The rise in commodity prices is unprecedented.
As stated the
past few weeks, OPEC does not want encourage Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
competitiveness. They also do not want to see dynamic energy conservation
measures in the Western Hemisphere. OPEC will not consider a long-term
strategy due to their inherent incapability to do so. Consequently, it is
possible, although not likely, OPEC will force oil price reductions to
mitigate growing competitiveness. Even OPEC cannot alter the dynamics of
supply/demand laws. Keep your eye on this, as rapidly declining oil prices
will catapult the market into another strong bull leg. Equally, do not be
surprised at a dynamic bear in the event that high oil prices penetrate
the consumer price index.
Nothing has
changed here. The trend in interest rates continues in an unfavorable
direction for the stock market. Interest rates continue their incline,
which is politically congruent. Even a lame duck president wants his party
to retain power after his departure. President Bush’s job is to gain seats
in Congress right now. Do not be surprised at economically friendly
policies in the second half of this year. Expect accelerated troop
reductions in Iraq, as well.
The market’s
bullishness so far this year is due, in part, to a “perception” of slowing
in the Federal Reserve Board interest rate hikes. That makes the market
vulnerable in the event the Fed “disappoints” with a rate hike in excess
of the market’s speculation. Such disappointment would result in a sharp
decline in stock prices. This scenario is congruent with historical
standards.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Econ.htm
Fear Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) - #19 was up 75.2%
one-hundred and eighty-eight weeks ago since the MTI buy signal on April
13, 2001. One-hundred and eighty-one weeks ago, it closed up 30.1%. Last
week it closed up 264.0%. The current annualized growth rate since the
April 13, 2001 buy signal is 54.3%. After falling sharply 32-weeks ago, it
bounced north in 26-weeks of the past 32-weeks. This fund moved
aggressively to the north last week after posting solid gains in the
previous three weeks.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28, is up 48.6% since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on August 26, 2005. That annualizes to 113.5%, which is not
an impossible performance level if oil prices resume their advance. This
fund should do well in the event this market turns into a 1970’s type of
market. This moved solidly to the north last week.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX, which is isolated in the
energy sector, is up 275.6% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on
August 16, 2002. It is annualizing at 78.7%. This fund moved north the
past four weeks after falling sharply in four of the last nine weeks.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX, is up 169.0% (annualized at 59.2%) since
the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on April 5, 2003.
Fidelity Energy Services #40, FSESX, is up 154.8% (annualized at
71.2%) since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December 6, 2003.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX, is up 141.1% since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on August 16, 2003. It is annualized at 56.9%. All energy
related funds moved north the last four weeks after falling in four of the
last nine weeks. They are paralleling gold and precious metals. Investors
in these funds are supporting a 1970’s type of market with high inflation
and high oil prices. Energy and gold always do well during such times.
These funds
should do well even if the market turns extremely bearish. Continue to
hold them until the Mid-term Indicant signals sell.
The SQI
(Consolidated Short-term and Quick-term Indicant) model signaled buy for
the
GLD-ETF#11 on August 3, 2005. It is up 27.8% since then. It is
annualized at 56.5%. This ETF continues to be bullishly biased.
The SQI
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources on March 26, 2003. It is up
163.5% (annualized at 56.7%). This fund moved solidly north last week
after expressing bearishness in three of the seven preceding weeks.
The contrarian
sector, commodities and petroleum, were up last week while general
equities were also up. That suggests bullish convergence which is opposite
from last week’s bearish divergence. The battle between bull and bear is
heating up.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new bull signals and no new bear signals.
All ten major
indices are bulls. They are up by an average of 45.4% since the MTI-RYS
signaled bull an average of 100-weeks ago. That annualizes to 23.6%, which
is up from last week. The strongest bull is the
Dow Utilities. It is up 118.6% since the October 25, 2002 bull signal.
The utilities moved slightly south last week even though general equities
moved sharply to the north. Your utility hold positions remain safe, but
keep your eye on this particular index. Severe bears show little mercy,
regardless of dividend yields.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial Average performance is now
at $33,040,553. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,669,396 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500 is at $165,476. That beats buy and hold’s $125,744 on a
December 31, 1971 $10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ is at $192,797. That beats buy and hold’s $79,897 on an
October 18, 1985 $10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy
and hold by 1,879.0%, 31.8%, and 141.3%, respectively, for these indices
as of this past week.
The Indicant’s
percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during bull
signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is because
the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the MTI-RYS model avoids
bear markets. The only purpose of the MTI-RYS model is to avoid the bear
markets. That is why it beat buy and hold by nearly 2000% over the past
100+ years.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100
Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card history.
Click the
following link to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-NAS100-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30
Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJIA-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15
Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card history.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJU-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Indicant
Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock Report Card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card history.
The Mid-term
Indicant continues avoiding
ProFunds Ultra Short due, in part, to the Quick-term Indicant’s bull
signal and the heart and soul of bullish seasonality. The SQI
(Consolidated Quick-term and Short-term Indicant) is signaling hold for
the QQQQ, which is why ProFunds Ultra Short is avoided. It is down 10.6%
since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell on November 11, 2005. This fund
may show some significant promise this year. The last time this fund was
very profitable was in the first half of 2002, which was also a mid-term
election year. This fund disappointed in the meandering markets of 2004
and 2005.
Click here to see all Mutual Funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant.
Always
remember never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good
way to mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
276.8% (annualized at 19.4%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
743-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. The recession, deflation, and inflation have not been strong
enough to signal bear. A link to the Long-term Indicant is below:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/LTI-Markets-DJIA/DJIA.htm
Indicant Conclusion
The Quick-term
Indicant and Short-term Indicant continues signaling bull for all major
indices and related Exchange Traded Funds. Quick-term and Short-term
attributes continue with a bullish bias. That bullish bias weakened two
weeks ago, but reasserted its dominance last week.
As stated last
week, do not be surprised at meandering behavior with possible bearish
bias in the immediate future. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality is
about to expire at January’s conclusion. The past two years heart and soul
bullishness have been followed by pathetic meandering behavior. Historical
standards and economic fundamentals do not support a repeat this year. On
the contrary, there is much in favor of bearish dominance between now and
October.
Keep in mind
this is the mid-term election year, which historically finds a market
bottom. Since predecessor years leading up to the upcoming presidential
mid-term election year have not demonstrated dynamic bearishness, do not
be surprised at a bearish cycle early this year. As always, await guidance
from the various Indicant models. They will let you know when or if this
expected bearishness occurs.
Read your
daily reports, as quick-term attributes can shift quickly. As stated the
past several weeks, the market lacks bullish convergence, even though last
week expressed bullish convergence. A lack of consistent bullish
convergence suggests the market is having trouble finding and making a
directional commitment. Too many sectors are not participating in the
current heart and soul of bullish seasonality. Gold’s strong bullish
presence with mounting commodity prices and interest rates, if continued,
will slap this bull out of influence.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
In addition,
once you are inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log
in. It is on the top of every page in the web site so you can always find
your way back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
01/29/06
January 22,
2006 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 01, Issue 04 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Dear Indicant
Members:
This Week’s
Report
1970’s Like Divergence Pattern – Do Not
Overreact
Energy sector
stocks and funds skyrocketed on Friday’s aggressive bearish expression. Do
not overreact to this, as one day’s behavior is not a trend. One day’s
behavior is not even a cycle or market spurt. It is just one day of
fundamental interpretation and emotional follow-on to that interpretation.
However, there is some substance to this pattern.
Rising oil
prices and interest rates have been in clear view for quite some time. The
market conformed to the heart and soul of bullish seasonality like
clockwork. Friday’s bearish behavior brought the market back to the theme
the Indicant has been advising of since late last year. That is,
fundamentals and historical normalcy will prevent “heart and soul”
aggressive bullishness that you have seen the past few years.
Historical
standards require the market to express a cyclical bottom in mid-term
election years. Several indices have been meandering since early 2004 with
a slight bullish bias. That meandering behavior followed the explosive
bullish leg that began in October 2002 and resumed in March 2003.
Meandering behavior following an explosive bull disfigured the required
cyclical bottom in the current mid-term election year. Therefore, the
market appears to be priming to establish a historical standard. Of
course, there are variances to historical standards from time to time, but
the various Indicant models will detect those variances or identify
conformance to standards.
Fundamentally,
the stock market has never liked rising interest rates and rising energy
costs. Both are unfavorable to corporate earnings. Larger companies tend
to contain more debt and thus one possible reason for the blue chip sell
off last Friday. Most large companies are inefficient, which means they
are incapable of adjusting to rising energy costs. Their employees work at
large companies, primarily for “perceived” security. That means they like
comfort. That means the thermostats will be set at their desired
temperature, regardless of energy costs.
Ominous
attributes on Friday’s sell off include an obvious shift from general
equities to petroleum related securities. That has a tinge of a 1970’s
type of market. Although the current Mid-term Indicant Bull and Long-term
Indicant Bull have expressed impressive tenacity in the face of rising
energy costs, rising interest rates, terrorism, war, and a so-so economy,
the market will quickly adjust its temperance and apply punishment for its
prior tolerance to these sour fundamentals.
For example
Schlumberger, Halliburton’s biggest competitor, skyrocketed last week.
Its stock price moved up nearly 15-points or almost 14%, while general
equities expressed aggressive bearishness. That has a 1970’s tinge to it.
Another
ominous attribute confronting the bull was Friday’s volume. It was high on
deep bearish expressions. Although one day will not tilt the
Indicant Volume Indicator into a bearishly robust configuration, keep
your eye on this. Although the Indicant Volume Indicator appears to be in
the early stage of a robust cycle, some of that movement is coupled to
recent bullish spurts that complied with seasonal expectations of bullish
bias.
Why should you
not overreact to Friday’s sell off? First, you must identify your relative
frame of reference. Let’s use a couple of common mutual funds to
understand this.
Fidelity Contra (MF#12) is 16.4% above its long-term blue curve. The
buy signal occurred on March 22, 2003, which coincides with most of the
funds buy signals. The Indicant occasionally suggests the blue curve is a
good point to sell, depending on the configuration of the other Indicant
models. This is an easy decision for those of you who bought on the March
22, 2003 buy signal. You are up 71.1% since then. Most of you would not
mind selling with a 45% profit in a few weeks if, in fact, the market
simulates a 1970’s type of configuration.
Some of you
are not positioned to enjoy that relative frame of reference. Suppose you
bought
Vanguard Growth, MF#4, on its last buy signal of July 15, 2005. This
fund is up only 3.7% since then and it is above its long-term blue curve
by 4.5%. If you wait for it to fall below its long-term blue curve, you
will lose money. Although you made significant profit on the buy and sell
cycles since March 2003 on this fund, you do not want to lose money on
this cycle. For those of you in this short-term relative frame of
reference, you need to look to the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant for
guidance. It is discussed later in this report.
The decision
is much easier for those of you who bought in November 1991 on the
Indicant’s
Long-term Bull Signal. You are up 268.5% since then. And the Long-term
Indicant is nowhere near signaling bear.
Unfortunately,
those November 1991 long-term investors are in a minority of investors.
Also, those who are long-term oriented are not always successful. A 1900
long-term investor had to wait over twenty years to break even. A 1929
thirty-year old investor was in his late fifties before breaking even. A
NASDAQ long-term investor is still down by 55.5% since their investments
on March 9, 2000. That investment requires a NASDAQ bull leg of 124.6% to
breakeven since their March 9, 2000 investment. It will take a long time
for that to happen; most likely over twenty years.
Please read on
to assess the market with respect to your individual relative frames of
reference.
Weekly Buy/Sell Summary
The Mid-term
Indicant generated two buy signals and eleven sell signals for stocks and
funds.
In addition to
the sell signals, the Mid-term Indicant is avoiding 52-stocks and funds of
the 345 tracked by the Indicant. The avoided stocks and funds are down an
average of 11.4% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of
24.7-weeks ago.
There were
85-stocks and funds avoided at this time last year. The avoided stocks and
funds one year ago were down an average of 27.5% since their respective
sell signals an average of 48.7-weeks earlier. Two years ago, on January
17 2004, the Mid-term Indicant was avoiding only eight stocks and funds
that were down an average of 28.9% since their respective sell signals an
average of 37.4-weeks earlier. Three years ago on January 18, 2003, there
were only six avoided stocks and funds. They were down 33.8% from their
respective sell signals an average of 25.8-weeks earlier.
In addition to
the buy signals this weekend, the Mid-term Indicant is signaling hold for
279 of the 345-stocks and funds tracked by the Indicant. The stocks and
funds with hold signals are up an average of 116.9%. That annualizes to
65.3%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling hold for these 279-stocks
and funds for an average of 93.1-weeks.
One year ago
on January 21, 2005, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 230-stocks and
funds out of the 320 tracked at that time for an average of 71.6-weeks.
Those 230-stocks and funds were up 88.6% (annualized at 64.4%). The
Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 288-stocks and funds of the 296
tracked two years ago on January 17, 2004. They were up by an average of
67.5% (annualized at 93.8%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 37.4-weeks earlier. There were 289-stocks and funds with hold signals
on January 18, 2003 since their buy signals an average of 16.1-weeks
earlier. They were up 19.6% (annualized at 63.4%).
Quick/Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report - Punch Lines
NYSE
Indicant Volume Indicator:
Bullish bias weakening and non bearish bias diminishing.
NASDAQ
Indicant Volume Indicator:
Bullish bias weakening and non-bearish bias diminishing.
DJIA
Short-term Indicant: Signaled
bear; bearish bias now dominant.
NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant: Bullish
bias continuing, but weakening.
Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term Indicant ETF:
Bullish bias continuing, but weakening.
Short-term
Indicant: ETF: Bullish bias
continuing, but weakening.
Quick-term
Indicant ETF: Bullish bias
continuing, but weakening.
Quick-term
Bearish Yellow: High
non-bearishness, but diminishing.
Quick-term
Bullish Red: Several red bulls.
Bullish bias continues.
Quick-term
and Short-term Conflicts:
Bullish harmony.
Robust
Force Vectors: Several moving
south. Limited naked options opportunity.
Short-term
Indicant Breakout (Bullish) Configuration:
Bullish bias expired. Non-bearish bias continues, but weakening.
Short-term
Indicant Breakdown (Bearish) Configuration:
Diminishing non-bearishness.
Vector
Pressure Crossings Put Option Activity:
Five
Vector
Pressure Crossings Call Option Activity:
None
Writing
Covered Call Options: Not
recommended.
Overall
Quick-term Market Bias: Bullish
bias weakening.
Overall
Short-term Market Bias: Bullish
no longer exists. Only contrarian ETF contacting breakout.
Quick-term Short-term Indicant Stock Market
Report Details
Volume was relatively healthy today’s
aggressive bearish expression. That is slightly ominous to the underlying
bullish theme. As stated since last Wednesday and appropriate again for
today, the
Indicant Volume Indicator robust movement with continuing bearish
expressions will lead to an early expiration to the underlying Quick-term
and Short-term Bulls. Fundamentals and historical standards support
significant bearish behavior over the next few months. However, this is a
mere observation; not a forecast. Simply wait for the various Indicant
models to advise.
The
Short-term Indicant signaled bear last Friday for the Dow Jones
Industrial Average. Click here to see the
Short-term Indicant’s history. The NASDAQ is up 4.8% (annualized at
22.3%) since the Short-term Indicant signaled bull on November 2, 2005.
This remains configured in support of the Short-term Bull, although
weakening somewhat.
SQI Report Card (Consolidated Short/Quick), Status, and Charts
There were no buy signals and no sell
signals today. Although there were no buy signals, the SQI is signaling
hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up 60.2% (annualized at 32.8%) since their
respective buy signals an average of 94.4-weeks ago. The SQI is not
avoiding any of the ETF’s at this time.
The SQI model is the one that most of you will prefer for your trading
decisions. It generates fewer signals than the other two models and
represents consistencies in the Quick-term and Short-term outlooks for the
specific ETF’s. It also beats buy and hold on a regular basis, although
there is only seven years of proof. The quality of that proof is high
since this period includes a powerful bull and bear. The model sours a
little during meandering markets with an excessive number of signals from
time to time. Research toward perfecting continues.
Short-term Indicant Report Card, Status, and Charts
There were no buy signals and no sell
signals. Although there were no buy signals, the Short-term Indicant is
signaling hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up an average of 62.1% (annualized
35.1%) since the STI signaled, buy, an average of 90.9-weeks ago. The
Short-term Indicant is not avoiding any of the ETF’s.
Keep in mind, the Short-term Indicant is
much more active in buying/selling than the Consolidated model, above. The
Quick-term Indicant, which follows, is even more active.
Quick-term Report Card, Status, and Charts
There were no buy signals and no sell
signals today. Although there were no buy signals, the Quick-term Indicant
is signaling hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up 33.1% (annualized at 35.4%)
since the QTI signaled buy an average of 48.1-weeks ago.
Quick-term Indicant Bull/Bear Health Report
All 30-ETF’s are above their respective
bearish yellow curves by average of 9.8%. That is down significantly from
last Thursday. This attribute remains non-bearish, but no longer
exceedingly so.
Twenty-one ETF’s are above their
respective bullish red curves by 1.8%, which down significantly from
yesterday. The number of ETF’s with red bull status is down by five from
last Thursday. This attribute remains bullish on a quick-term basis, but
weakening considerably from two weeks ago.
Keep in mind as long as there is one Red
Bull, other than contrarian sectors, the market will not move into a deep
bearish slide.
Short-term Indicant Bull/Bear Health Report
The above heading is linked to the
Short-term Indicant table. This paragraph is repeated daily as a reminder
of accurately interpreting the charts. By clicking the charts on the table
you can review potential contact with the breakdown lines (bearish) and
potential contact with breakout lines (bullish). It is extremely bearish
when several ETF’s are contacting their respective breakdown lines. The
breakdown lines are the yellow lines (bearish). The breakout lines are the
red ones (bullish). Close proximity to breakout implies an increased
probability of an actual breakout occurring. It is certainly bullish and
you will want to be in a hold position for those few days a year when the
breakout occurs. Conversely, significant contact with yellow (breakdown)
suggests “avoid” positions are best. Although meandering markets are safe,
there is an increased probability of dynamic bearishness with yellow
contact.
Only one of the 30-ETF’s is contacting its
breakout line. That is down by seven from last Thursday. This
configuration no longer remains with a bullish bias since the only
“contacting” ETF is a contrarian one. It is ETF#3, XLE, Natural Resources.
That is an ominous configuration to the Short-term Bull now underway.
The average distance from breakout contact
is 3.1%, which is 1.9% less bullish than last Thursday. As stated last
Thursday, the perspective has shifted significantly, since fewer ETF’s are
now making contact on bullish spurts. That does not bode well for the
current Short-term bulls.
The average distance from the price and
breakdown is 21.5%, which is down by 2.0% from last Thursday. None of the
ETF’s are contacting their respective breakdown lines. That is exceedingly
non-bearish even in the face of a weakening bull. The probability of
immediate contact remains low and thus a significant non-bearish bias
prevails.
Overall, there is much more gravitational
force from bullish domains than bearish domains on a Short-term Indicant
basis. The Short-term perspective remains bullish for these ETF’s and the
overall stock market. However, as we near the conclusion of the heart and
soul of bullish seasonality, do not be surprised at reduced bullishness
and an increase in bearish expressions.
Contact with the breakdown lines will
induce dynamic bearish behavior. Keep your eye on this attribute.
Conflicts Between the Short-term and
Quick-term Indicants
There are no conflicting signals between
the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant. Quick cycles and Short-term
inclinations are in harmony with bullish bias.
ETF Robust Force Vector Configurations
You can scan the
Quick-term Indicant for Exchange Traded Funds table and click on the
charts to observe Force Vector configurations. Scroll down each of the
charts, where a quick link has been added to take you to the next series
of Quick-term ETF charts. Use you back arrow on your browser in the event
you want to return to the previous page. As stated last week, Force
Vectors are topped out with some turning to the south. That does not
necessarily mean the market is about to turn bearish, but it does support
some selling off and profit taking. That is exactly what happened today
and late last week.
Nothing is different from yesterday. The
configuration of this newly forming southerly movement will allow some
prognosis of the impending bearish cycle. A robust and deep movement to
the south suggests severe bearish expressions. A protected movement to the
southeast as opposed to due south suggests minor corrections to the
underlying bull market.
The majority of Force Vectors are moving
south, some of which are expressing a robust configuration. Red bulls do
not crash. However, they will collapse from bull to neutral. There is an
increasing probability of this occurring. Positive Vector Pressure is
protecting right now, but these declining Force Vectors are dragging
Vector Pressure toward negativity (bearishness).
To understand potential financial
opportunities,
click here to learn to identify Robust Force Vectors. They are visible
on the
Quick-term Indicant charts.
ETF Force Vectors/Vector Pressure
Crossings/Option Signals
Remember, the links contained herein are
more visible when reading this on the website.
Click this sentence for Vector Pressure Option Signals. There were
five put option buy signals this weekend, bringing the total to seven in
the last two trading days. As stated in last Thursday’s daily stock market
report, this is signaling growing bearish ambition. Red bulls minimize put
option successes and that is the case right now. Put options are more
profitable during yellow bears. Although last Thursday’s put option buy
signals produced a nice profit, keep in mind there is a higher probability
of put option profits during yellow bears.
Make certain you sell naked options when
the Force Vectors shift direction or within two days of the purchase,
whichever occurs first. If you are unfamiliar with this, take the
options tour.
Remember options trading are risky. Never
offer “market prices.” Always bid low in hopes of an intraday contrarian
movement to the underlying assumption in directional behavior. Always
place day-orders only. That keeps the floor folks out of your pocket book.
Do not despair if your order does not take. There are plenty of
opportunities throughout the course of the year. Remember, stalking is the
key to success here. Although not necessary for stock market success,
those of you who have a gambling instinct will enjoy this. For those of
you with a longer-term perspective, it does not hurt to see what the
short-term folks are thinking. The Indicant indicates both perspectives.
Quick-term and Short-term Indicant Summary
As stated the past several weeks,
discontinue writing covered call options. The market’s bullish bias,
although declining, has increased too much risk for this tactic.
This paragraph will remain unchanged until
conditions warrant modifications. The Quick-term Bull remains in tact but
severely weakening. As previously stated for the past several weeks, do
not expect dynamic bullishness like the past three years during the heart
and soul of bullish seasonality, which is now underway. There are too many
issues, both fundamental and historical, to assume aggressive bullishness.
Regardless, a bull is a bull without regard to magnitude.
Continue avoiding ProFunds Ultra Short
mutual fund. Remember, it moves inversely to the QQQQ by exponential
amounts.
Overall, the bullish bias on a Quick-term
and Short-term basis continues.
To familiarize yourself with viewing the
market from an ETF perspective, click the following update links.
Quick-term ETF Options
Quick-term Indicant for ETF’s
Short-term Indicant for ETF’s
Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term Indicant for ETF’s
Click here to the report card, which is updated weekly, to link to related
tours.
Links to the Short-term Indicant and
Indicant Volume Indicator are below:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
For more
information about the Short-term Indicant, refer to
stock market daily reports.
Click here for the last 12-months daily reports.
Members can click here to see current month’s daily reports.
The Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular
Market Blend
This section
is a repeat from the last several months with a few modifications,
reflecting recent secular influences. Although appearing redundant at
times, it is important to read this section each week to keep abreast of
secular market shifts. Remember, secular shifts can last twenty-five or
more years. Fortunately, secular market movements do not deter mid-term,
short-term, and quick-term profit opportunities. However, they can wreak
havoc to the long-term investors’ plans.
The current
Mid-term Bull market and buying barrage started over three years ago in
late 2002, the last mid-term election year. We are again inside mid-term
election year. The last one followed the predicted market bottom in 2002.
The mid-term presidential election year phenomenon was consistent with
history in 2002. Will it be consistent in 2006? The last mid-term election
year, 2002, found a cyclical bottom, which is a common attribute in
presidential mid-term election years.
Even more
impressive was how the market synchronized with near perfection to normal
seasonality in 2002. The April-October period was typically bearish. The
2002 season bear leg was dynamic. The current mid-term election year of
2006, fundamentally, supports historical standards. In other words, expect
no bullish enthusiasm in the first half of 2006 with rising interest rates
and rising energy costs. The political establishment and its ugly
influence on economic activity are typically at its worse in presidential
post election years, which just concluded with large cap meandering
behavior with a slight bearish bias.
The current
Mid-term Bull has been surprisingly strong with weak fundamentals and the
normal political threat of post election year traditions. The market was
mixed in 2005 with some bearishness and bullishness in the broader
indices. The lack of dynamic bearishness imposes a historical need to
induce bearishness in the first half of 2006.
Keep in mind,
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality (Nov-Jan) is historically
bullish regardless of fundamental reason. The market can find a cyclical
bottom in this year’s mid-term election year after the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality elevates it. As stated for several weeks, it would not
be surprising for a nice rise during the current heart and soul of bullish
seasonality only to be followed with bearish expressions after January
2006. The current heart and soul of bullish seasonality has demonstrated
normalcy so far with an extremely bullish November. However, December
finished with a bearish conclusion. The omission of a solid Santa Claus
rally this past year is somewhat ominous.
However,
January got off to a solid bullish start, but last Friday’s aggressive
bearish behavior should not have been surprising. January’s Dow was up
2.3% last week and is now down 0.5% for the year. January’s NASDAQ was up
aggressively by 4.5%, but now is up 1.9%.
The heart and
soul of bullish seasonality has produced gains of 2.5%, 4.5%, and 6.0% for
the Dow, S&P500, and NASDAQ so far. The heart and soul of bullish
seasonality has less than two weeks remaining.
The Dow30
found bottom in the last presidential mid-term election year on October 9,
2002 at 7286.27. The NASDAQ found bottom on the same day at
1114.11.Finding cyclical bottoms in mid-term election years is common. The
Dow is up 35.9% from the last presidential election year bottom. The
NASDAQ is up a whopping 85.7% since then. As earlier stated, the NASDAQ is
down 55.5% from its historical high of 5048.62 on March 9, 2000. The Dow
is down 9.0% from its historical high of 11723 on January 13, 2000. So
far, the new century, 2000 inclusive, has not been kind to long-term
investors.
The stock
market’s meteoric rise since 1990 was not supported by economic or
corporate earnings fundamentals. It was stimulated by an unprecedented
demand for stocks. The simple laws supply and demand propelled stock
prices dynamically to the north. The great bear leg of 2001 and 2002 has
permanently depressed sources of demand. The market now has to wait for a
new generation of investors to enjoy dynamic bullish growth. The great
bull leg of 2003 was a relatively short bullish spurt that has not enjoyed
follow-on bullish behavior due to this lack of demand.
As earlier
stated, the Indicant began its buying barrage in October – November 2002
just after the market bottomed from the severe 2000-2002 Bear Market.
There were 239 buy signals between October 5, 2002 and November 9, 2002
out of the 296 stocks and funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that
time. Even badly managed companies received a buy signal, which is a
common attribute of sustainable new bull markets. As many of you noticed,
those companies eventually dip back to the south after the euphoria of new
bullishness.
Some of you
recall the Indicant Stock Market Report tracking the
Short-term Indicant Bear for the
NASDAQ in 2002. It was the longest in history. It even exceeded the Dow’s
1929-1932 Short-term Indicant Bear in breadth and approached it in
magnitude. The good news is that the NASDAQ’s decline did not lead to a
depression, which is a clear indication of how little influence tech
stocks have on the economy.
There are two
important axioms to remember. 1) Real economic wealth is created in only
three ways - manufacturing, agriculture, and extraction. 2) The only
positive influence politicians have on the economy is to undo their prior
damage. They are now doing their damage, some of which will be undone in
2007; the next presidential pre-election year. That is why the market
typically finds bottom in the mid-term election year. That is also why the
presidential pre-election year is historically the most bullish on the
four year cycle. If the strength of the current Mid-term Bull can be
subjected only to meandering behavior, like 2004 and 2005, then it is
possible for the current Mid-term Bull to be a record setting one in terms
of duration.
The political
industry reduces wealth. Politicians continually attempt to redistribute
wealth, which flies in the face of the laws of nature. They promote
“middle class” attainment. The larger the middle class, the more power
politicians and their academia brethren have. The communists tried that,
resulting 99% poverty, while the ruling 1% lived like kings. In other
words, socialism rewards an ability to intellectualize, while capitalism
rewards the results of appealing effort.
The remainder
of this section, Secular Market Blend, is repeated, in part, from the past
several months, but it does not hurt to reread it each week. As time
progresses and conditions change, there will be modifications to it to
maintain a balanced frame of reference.
You will
notice many of the
mutual fund buy signals occurred
in March 2003. Many of you recall how the market did not synchronize with
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality from November 2002 through
February 2003. December 2002 was the most bearish since 1931, but not
nearly as dynamic as the 1931 bearish expression. After the asynchronous
behavior in the November 2002 rolling third of the year, the market turned
bullish in March 2003 and again did not synchronize with normal
seasonality. The Mid-term Indicant continued signaling bull during bearish
seasonality in 2003. The market continued moving north during that time,
contrary to historical standards. As stated in most of 2004, bearish
expressions on a Mid-term basis between May and October 2004 should not be
surprising. That is exactly what occurred. The result was a meandering
market with a slight bearish bias during most of 2004 and 2005.
As stated
since late October 2005 and early November 2005, do not be surprised at
increasing quick-term and short-term bullish expressions in the immediate
future, followed by increased bearish expressions early next year. So far,
this prognosis is at par with those expectations. Fundamentals and
historical standards support that scenario. The magnitude of early 2006
bearishness is not predictable. Also, simply wait for the various Indicant
model’s advisement of bull/bear status, as forecasting the market is a
waste of time. However, it is appropriate to anticipate fundamental shifts
before they happen. Keep a close eye on the Fed. It can damage the
underlying bull.
November was
exceedingly bullish and consistent with historical normalcy. The November
– January rolling quarter is the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
However, December 2005 expressed contrary behavior to historical standards
with a bearish conclusion. January 2006 started off with an aggressive
bullish response to December’s bearishness, but it appears January is
threatened with yet more bearish energy.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/History-Seasonal/HS0001.htm
Make certain
you read the entire pages on the above link. You will see there are
exceptions.
Stop Loss Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a stop loss of 8% on recent buys because of the
Quick-term Bull.
Use a 10%
trailing stop loss or the yellow or green values you will find on the
tables for your longer-term hold positions. If your stock or fund is above
the bearish yellow curve and below the green curve, set your stop loss
equal to the greater of the yellow curve and the trailing stop loss. If
your stock or fund is above the green curve, set your stop loss at no less
the value of the green curve or 10% trailing, whichever is greater. If
your stock or fund is above the red curve and you bought at the Mid-term
Buy signal, you should use the 10% trailing stop loss.
If you are up
by triple digit amounts and enjoy your ownership of the stock or fund,
then use a 20% trailing stop loss or the slow moving blue curve price. If
you really enjoy holding the stock, keep a close eye on the management.
Dilettante managers have a way of worming into the business. Watch closely
for cronyism and lazy-hazy management dialog. Keep your eye on lavish
spending and excessive concerns about social issues. Those types are more
interested in burning your money for their pleasures, as opposed to making
you money. High performing companies remain focused on honoring the
investments made by their shareholders.
In a few
instances, you will see a hold signal for a stock or fund that is down
from its buy signal or below one of the above conditions for selling. If
you are more of a trader than an investor, feel free to buy stocks and
funds with those “bearish” attributes. They are configured for a possible
rebound, while at the same time, it is important to set the stop losses
mentioned in this report. Use the Quick-term Indicant as a guide in your
decision-making processes. If the stock price is falling in a Quick-term
Bear market, it is not advisable to buy.
Do not short
on stocks if they are up from an avoid signal. Stocks go up more often
than they go down. Stocks have a tendency to march to their own drumbeat
when rising. Some stocks rise and continue to rise in the most severe of
bear markets. Short selling opens up an opportunity for the snakes on Wall
Street to take everything you own. They can cause a stock to rise at their
whim and without any regard to fundamental reason. It usually does not
make sense to bet against the sweat and toil of hard-working people.
Stock and Fund Update
Click the
following link to see sorted performance of stocks and funds with
hold/avoid signals. In the past, they were included them in this email
message but now display them on the website. This is available to the
public, while the specific buy and sell transactions are limited to
members only.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Performance/Top-Bot.htm
Summary of Stocks and Funds with Buy and
Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/Buy-Sell%20Summary%20This%20Week.htm
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time.
All updated
information can be found from a single page at Indicant.Net. Click the
below link to that page. You will need your login ID and password.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Divergence versus Convergence
As stated the
past ten weeks, there is no bullish convergence. As previously stated in
the Indicant Stock Market Report, this lack of bullish convergence is
increasing the probability of increased bearish expressions. Last week
contained complete divergence with contrarian sectors rising and general
equities falling. That increased divergence is somewhat ominous.
Economic Conditions – Inflation, Currency,
Interest Rates
There is
little difference from the last few weeks. Most world currencies continue
in their cyclical shift in support of a strengthening U.S. Dollar.
Although the cyclical direction remains in favor of a strengthening U.S.
Dollar, behavior the past few weeks has been of a meandering nature.
However, continued strengthening is expected as long as interest rates
continue rising.
There is
nothing new. This paragraph remains unchanged from the past few weeks. As
repeatedly stated, the only exception to this is the
Canadian Dollar. It has not yet
made this cyclical mid-term commitment to weaken against the greenback. It
continues to strengthen against the U.S. Dollar. As stated the past
several months and first mentioned in 2003, the Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
potential continues to threaten the Canadian cost advantage. The
perception of huge imports to the U.S. will provide increased difficulty
for the Canadian Dollar to weaken. This should hurt Canadian
manufacturing. The Canadian government is going to attempt to weaken the
Canadian dollar, most likely at the request of General Motors, but $60+
oil will make that difficult. General Motors can benefit tremendously with
a weaker Canadian dollar with their massive manufacturing capacity in
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada. Unfortunately, the strengthening Canadian dollar
has hurt GM’s bottom line and consequently, much of the Canadian capacity
is earmarked for closure.
Commodity prices continue
rising. Some are vacillating around all time peaks. Overall, this behavior
will eventually induce bearishness on the stock market.
As stated the
past few weeks, OPEC does not want encourage Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
competitiveness. They also do not want to see dynamic energy conservation
measures in the Western Hemisphere. OPEC will not consider a long-term
strategy due to their inherent incapability to do so. Consequently, it is
possible, although not likely, OPEC will force oil price reductions to
mitigate growing competitiveness. Even OPEC cannot alter the dynamics of
supply/demand laws. Keep your eye on this, as rapidly declining oil prices
will catapult the market into another strong bull leg. Equally, do not be
surprised at a dynamic bear in the event that high oil prices penetrate
the consumer price index.
Nothing has
changed here. The trend in interest rates continues in an unfavorable
direction for the stock market. Interest rates continue their incline,
which is politically congruent. Even a lame duck president wants his party
to retain power after his departure. President Bush’s job is to gain seats
in Congress right now. Do not be surprised at economically friendly
policies in the second half of this year. Expect accelerated troop
reductions in Iraq, as well.
The market’s
bullishness so far this year is due, in part, to a “perception” of slowing
in the Federal Reserve Board interest rate hikes. That makes the market
vulnerable in the event the Fed “disappoints” with a rate hike in excess
of the market’s speculation. Such disappointment would result in a sharp
decline in stock prices. This scenario is congruent with historical
standards.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Econ.htm
Fear Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 75.2% one-hundred and eighty-seven weeks ago since
the MTI buy signal on April 13, 2001. One-hundred and eighty weeks ago, it
closed up 30.1%. Last week it closed up 245.8%. The current annualized
growth rate since the April 13, 2001 buy signal is 50.8%. After falling
sharply 31-weeks ago, it bounced north in 25-weeks of the past 31-weeks.
This fund moved slightly north last week after posting solid gains in the
previous two weeks.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28, is up
44.0% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 26, 2005. That
annualizes to 107.8%, which is not an impossible performance level if oil
prices resume their advance. This fund should do well in the event this
market turns into a 1970’s type of market. This fund moved south last week
after moving solidly north the previous four weeks.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
which is isolated in the energy sector, is up 273.0% since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2002. It is annualizing at 78.4%. This
fund moved north the past three weeks after falling sharply in four of the
last eight weeks.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX, is
up 164.1% (annualized at 58.0%) since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy
on April 5, 2003.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, is up 154.3% (annualized at 71.6%) since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on December 6, 2003.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX, is
up 139.1% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003. It
is annualized at 56.4%. All energy related funds moved north the last
three weeks after falling in four of the last eight weeks. They are
paralleling gold and precious metals. Investors in these funds are
supporting a 1970’s type of market with high inflation and high oil
prices. Energy and gold always do well during such times.
These funds
should do well even if the market turns extremely bearish. Continue to
hold them until the Mid-term Indicant signals sell.
The SQI
(Consolidated Short-term and Quick-term Indicant) model signaled buy for
the
GLD-ETF#11 on August 3, 2005. It
is up 23.4% since then. It is annualized at 54.0%. This ETF continues to
be bullishly biased.
The SQI
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on March 26, 2003. It is up 162.4% (annualized at 56.7%). This fund moved
solidly north last week after expressing bearishness in three of the six
preceding weeks.
The contrarian
sector, commodities and petroleum, were up last week while general
equities were down by significant amounts. That suggests the market’s
anticipation of a bullish economic outlook but also expresses inflationary
threats will manifest.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new bull signals and no new
bear signals.
All ten major
indices are bulls. They are up by an average of 42.7% since the MTI-RYS
signaled bull an average of 99-weeks ago. That annualizes to 22.4%, which
is down from last week. The strongest bull is the
Dow Utilities. It is up 121.4%
since the October 25, 2002 bull signal. The utilities moved slightly north
last week in the face of aggressive bearish expressions. Your utility hold
positions remain safe, but keep your eye on this particular index. Severe
bears show little mercy, regardless of dividend yields.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is now at $32,314,081. That beats buy and
hold performance of $1,632,910 on a $10,000 investment in the Dow stocks
in 1900. The
MTI S&P500 is at $162,876. That
beats buy and hold’s $123,566 on a December 31, 1971 $10,000 investment.
The
MTI-NASDAQ is at $188,067. That
beats buy and hold’s $77,937 on an October 18, 1985 $10,000 investment.
The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by 1,879.0%, 31.8%, and
141.3%, respectively, for these indices as of this past week.
The Indicant’s
percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during bull
signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is because
the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the MTI-RYS model avoids
bear markets. The only purpose of the MTI-RYS model is to avoid the bear
markets. That is why it beat buy and hold by nearly 2000% over the past
100+ years.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100
Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click the
following link to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-NAS100-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30
Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJIA-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15
Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJU-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Indicant
Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
The Mid-term
Indicant continues avoiding
ProFunds Ultra Short due, in
part, to the Quick-term Indicant’s bull signal and the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality. The SQI (Consolidated Quick-term and Short-term
Indicant) is signaling hold for the QQQQ, which is why ProFunds Ultra
Short is avoided. It is down 6.9% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled
sell on November 11, 2005. This fund may show some significant promise
early this year. The last time this fund was very profitable was in the
first half of 2002, which was also a mid-term election year. This fund
disappointed in the meandering markets of 2004 and 2005.
Click here to see all Mutual Funds tracked
by the Mid-term Indicant.
Always
remember never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good
way to mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
268.5% (annualized at 18.8%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
742-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. The recession, deflation, and inflation have not been strong
enough to signal bear. A link to the Long-term Indicant is below:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/LTI-Markets-DJIA/DJIA.htm
Indicant Conclusion
The Quick-term
Indicant and Short-term Indicant continues signaling bull for all major
indices and related Exchange Traded Funds. Quick-term and Short-term
attributes continue with a bullish bias, but starting last Tuesday, that
bullish bias was obviously weakening. As stated last week, do not be
surprised at meandering behavior with possible bearish bias in the
immediate future. As stated last week, the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality is now here and should last through January. Historically, it
concludes at the end of January. Keep your eye on the daily stock market
reports. Fundamentals and disappointing volume threaten a bullish
conclusion to this month.
Keep in mind
this is the mid-term election year, which historically finds a market
bottom. Since predecessor years leading up to the upcoming presidential
mid-term election year have not demonstrated dynamic bearishness, do not
be surprised at a bearish cycle early this year. As always, await guidance
from the various Indicant models. They will let you know when or if this
expected bearishness occurs.
Read your
daily reports, as quick-term attributes can shift quickly. As stated the
past several weeks, the market lacks bullish convergence, which suggests
bearish influences can occur quickly. Too many sectors are not
participating in the current heart and soul of bullish seasonality. Gold’s
strong bullish presence with mounting commodity prices and interest rates,
if continued, will slap this bull out of influence.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
In addition,
once you are inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log
in. It is on the top of every page in the web site so you can always find
your way back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
01/22/06
January 15,
2006 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 01, Issue 03 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Dear Indicant
Members:
This Week’s
Report
The Problem with Forecasting
There are two
datasets employed in forecasting the stock market (or anything else). The
first dataset is intrinsic. This is using two or more dimensional data
internal to the phenomenon under study. Intrinsic data is purely
quantitative. The Dow’s value each day, week, month, or even hour is
quantifiable. The time-series is also quantifiable and the most often used
since most forecasters are interested in not only what the market will be,
but when. Time series data is the independent variable, while the
forecasted value is the dependent variable. In other words, the value of
the stock market is dependent on time in this example.
Time-series
does not have to be the only independent variable. Economists use economic
data as an independent variable. They correlate the value of the stock
market as a function of economic activity. For example, they may use Net
National Product (NNP) as the independent variable. The always know the
historical relationship between NNP and the stock market. The process
typically involves forecasting NNP with time series data as the
independent variable. Then they apply NNP as the independent variable to
compute the dependent value of the stock market. Sounds complicated, but
this is a common exercise and corporations even pay money for this.
All forecasts
have error. That is because the number of independent variables driving
any phenomenon approaches infinity. Computers are not yet big enough to
accommodate near infinite independent variables. And if they were big
enough, the data would not be readily available and if so, the independent
variables would contain error. For example, a cycle of stock market
lethargy from individual investors would not be immediately available to a
computer with infinite database capacity. Another example is the forecast
of NNP, mentioned earlier, would contain error and thus introduce more
error in the stock market forecast.
Those involved
in forecasting work hard at minimizing error. Many models apply prior
error as an independent variable. In other words, some portend that the
error is predictable. The act of modification for error induces yet
another variable that can induce yet more error.
There are
thousands of mathematical forecasting techniques. All will produce error.
If one turns out be accurate, chalk it up to luck.
The second
type of model is extrinsic forecasting. Although, it can be quantifiably
based, it usually qualitatively based. Extrinsic data is external to the
phenomena being forecasted. For example, Bill Gates had no historical data
available for forecasting sales of MS-DOS disks in the early 1980’s. He
qualitatively estimated the sales volume of those disks. As historical
data of non-Apple computer sales became available, he learned to use
historical sales data of non-Apple computer sales and his MS-DOS disks
along with growth factors to forecast the sales volume of those disks.
Many employ
both broad types of forecasting; intrinsic modeling and extrinsic
modeling. The Indicant does not bother forecasting with either model type.
It uses heuristics to identify buy, hold, sell, avoid, bull, and bear. The
Indicant is not concerned about how long bulls or bears last. It simply
avoids the bears. It does not care how long to hold or avoid a stock or
fund. All it focuses on is avoiding stocks and funds moving down and
holding those moving up. It identifies if the market is a bear or bull on
a quick-term, short-term, mid-term, and long-term basis. Indicant members
range in age from 18 to 97 years old as far as we know. The eighteen year
old is interested in the long-term, while the 97 year old is more
interested in the short-term.
Although the
Indicant does not forecast, from time to time it is important to take a
qualitative view of the market’s independent variables. So, here are a few
of them.
The market’s
aggressive bullish action in early January was due to the underlying
assumption the Fed will relax interest rate increases. The market always
anticipates things like that. If it anticipates wrongly, as it does quite
often, it corrects very quickly to back where it should be. It usually
adds a penalty as it seems to be angry at itself for being wrong in its
prior anticipation. That is why you see sharp rises and declines in a
single day from time to time. Sometimes these sharp adjustments lead to
protracted continuation of the underlying direction.
Here is the
problem. If the Fed “disappoints” in the next few days, the market will
react with a violent bearish expression. If the Fed performs to
expectations, the market will most likely stay flat and continue along its
current bullish quick-term cycle. The market from time to time will second
guess its prior assumption and induce corrective behavior before the
moment of revelation. That is why there is significant substance to the
old saying, “buy on the rumor and sell on the news.”
The market
continually monitors inflation and deflation. It sometimes ignores Fed
policy in the short-term knowing the obvious Fed response to inflationary
or deflationary threats. The market does not like inflation or deflation.
Excessive monetary direction either way invokes bearish behavior.
The market’s
interpretation and reaction to the values of inflation, deflation, and
interest rates can change. For example, if inflation seems to be maxing
out, the market may react bullishly, knowing the Fed will be accommodative
to the market’s latent bullish potential.
The concern
now is the magnitude of the bearish response in the event the Fed
“disappoints” with another healthy rate hike. That behavior is pronounced
in presidential post election years, as opposed to mid-term election
years. The market typically finds a bottom in presidential mid-term
election years, following the normally bearish presidential post election
years. Common attributes are evasive in this political cycle with a
meandering to mildly bullish 2005.
There is no
need to forecast though. The Quick-term, Short-term, Mid-term, and
Long-term Indicant were invented to prevent the need to forecast. However,
from time to time, it is good to anticipate behavior so the mind can be
set for swift and profitable action at the right time. Anticipation is not
forecasting. It is merely asking a “what if” and preparing oneself
emotionally and mechanically to take the proper action when the various
Indicant models obviate bearish behavior.
Weekly Buy/Sell Summary
The Mid-term
Indicant generated one buy signal and two sell signals for stocks and
funds.
In addition to
the sell signals, the Mid-term Indicant is avoiding 52-stocks and funds of
the 345 tracked by the Indicant. The avoided stocks and funds are down an
average of 10.6% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of
23.7-weeks ago.
There were
only 84-stocks and funds avoided at this time last year. The avoided
stocks and funds one year ago were down an average of 28.2% since their
respective sell signals an average of 48.1-weeks earlier. Two years ago,
on January 10 2004, the Mid-term Indicant was avoiding only six stocks and
funds that were down an average of 29.0% since their respective sell
signals an average of 39.4-weeks earlier. Three years ago on January 11,
2003, there were only six avoided stocks and funds. They were down 31.6%
from their respective sell signals an average of 24.9-weeks earlier.
In addition to
the buy signal this weekend, the Mid-term Indicant is signaling hold for
290 of the 345-stocks and funds tracked by the Indicant. The stocks and
funds with hold signals are up an average of 113.0%. That annualizes to
67.1%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling hold for these 290-stocks
and funds for an average of 87.6-weeks.
One year ago
on January 15, 2005, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 235-stocks and
funds out of the 320 tracked at that time for an average of 69.6-weeks.
Those 235-stocks and funds were up 89.2% (annualized at 66.6%). The
Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 288-stocks and funds of the 296
tracked two years ago on January 10, 2004. They were up by an average of
63.5% (annualized at 90.8%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 39.4-weeks earlier. There were 284-stocks and funds with hold signals
on January 11, 2003 since their buy signals an average of 15.0-weeks
earlier. They were up 22.2% (annualized at 76.6%).
Exchange Traded Fund Buy/Sell Summary and
Analysis
The
SQI (Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term
Indicant) generated no buy or sell signals last Friday. Read
the daily stock market newsletter for more analysis. The SQI is signaling
hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 62.3%, which is up by 1.2
percentage points from last week. That is a nice bullish follow-on to the
prior week’s aggressive bullish behavior. This is annualized at 34.3%
since their respective buy signals an average of 93.4-weeks ago. The SQI
is not avoiding any ETF’s at this time.
Remember, the
SQI model signals buy or sell when both the Short-term and Quick-term
Indicant are signaling the same. Keep in mind the
Quick-term Indicant is the most
volatile, but it will help you with successive buying opportunities during
various stages of an advancing bull. It also shows Force Vectors and
Vector Pressure, providing you greater insight of the ETF’s quick-term
bias.
The
Short-term Indicant generated no
buy signals and no sell signals last Friday. Although there were no buy
signals, the Short-term Indicant is signaling hold for 30-Exchange Traded
Funds. They are up by an average of 64.2%, which is up slightly from last
week. This is annualized at 36.7% since their respective buy signals an
average of 89.9-weeks ago. The Short-term Indicant is not avoiding any of
the 30-ETF’s at this time.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no
buy signals and no sell signals last Friday. Although there were no buy
signals, the Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 30-Exchange Traded
Funds (ETF’s). They are up by an average of 34.9%. This annualizes at
38.1% since their respective buy signals an average of 47.1-weeks ago. The
Quick-term Indicant is not avoiding any ETF’s at this time.
Twenty-seven
ETF’s are Quick-term Indicant Red Bulls. That is up from twenty-six last
week. That reflects significant strengthening in the Quick-term Bull. The
ETF’s are above their respective bullish red curves by an average of 3.9%,
which is down by 0.1%-age point since last week. The Quick-term Indicant
Bull continues with solid bullishness.
None of the
ETF’s are below their respective bearish yellow curves, highlighting
absolute non-bearishness on a Quick-term Indicant basis. Overall, they are
above bearish yellow by 11.9%, which is exceedingly non-bearish on a
quick-term basis. That is up by 0.2%-age points from last week.
Non-bearish attributes continues with a near zero threat of dynamic
bearish expressions.
The
Short-term Indicant reveals
individual Indicant Volume Indicators. Although the ETF’s Indicant Volume
Indicators are not as conclusive as that of the major market indices, it
sometimes obviates the market’s short-term intentions. Look for robustness
in the individual Indicant Volume Indicators, coupled with dynamic
behavior. Robust volume cycles during dynamic bearish or bullish cycles
indicate the breadth of the continuation of that cycle. The more
pronounced they are, the greater the lingering effect of the underlying
bullish or bearish direction.
The Short-term
Indicant also identifies the breakout lines and breakdown lines for
Exchange Traded Funds. Two of the 30-ETF’s are contacting their breakout
lines. That is down from eighteen last weekend, citing a mild rest period
for the Short-term Indicant Bull.
The average
distance of all 30-ETF’s between their current price and their respective
breakout lines is a mere 1.3%, which is 0.4% lower than last week. It is
significantly bullish when even just one ETF is contacting its breakout
down other than those of a contrarian nature. Solid bullishness continues
on a Short-term Indicant basis.
The average
distance between the current price and the ETF’s breakdown lines is a
whopping 23.5%, which is up by significantly from last week. This
configuration remains non-bearish.
The overall
relationship between breakout and breakdown lines is configured with a
significant bullish bias on a Short-term basis. Contact with breakdown
lines is extremely bearish and contact with the breakout lines are
extremely bullish. As you can see, there is absolutely no threat of
breakdown contact in the near future. Thus, there is little opportunity
for the bear to dominate market behavior on a short-term basis.
Unfortunately, bearish expressions can occur before contact is made. But
your longer term hold positions are safe.
There are no
conflicts between the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant at this time.
There is complete bullish harmony between the Short-term Indicant and the
Quick-term Indicant.
There were no
buy signals for
ETF options this past Friday.
Last week’s market meandered somewhat, triggering little activity for
options buying.
Several ETF
Force Vectors completed their bullish cycle last week and are now shifting
to a southerly direction. That suggests a pause in bullish activity. It
does not yet suggest the beginning of a bearish cycle, although that could
happen. Vector Pressure remains positive, protecting against dynamic
bearish behavior.
Secular Market Blend
This section
is a repeat from the last several months with a few modifications,
reflecting recent secular influences. Although appearing redundant at
times, it is important to read this section each week to keep abreast of
secular market shifts. Remember, secular shifts can last twenty-five or
more years. Fortunately, secular market movements do not deter mid-term,
short-term, and quick-term profit opportunities.
The current
Mid-term Bull market and buying barrage started over three years ago in
late 2002, the last mid-term election year. We are now entering the next
mid-term election year. The last one followed the predicted market bottom
in 2002. The mid-term presidential election year phenomenon was consistent
with history in 2002. Will it be consistent in 2006? The last mid-term
election year, 2002, found a cyclical bottom, which is a common attribute
in presidential mid-term election years.
Even more
impressive was how the market synchronized with near perfection to normal
seasonality in 2002. The April-October period was typically bearish. That
bear leg was a deep one in 2002. The upcoming mid-term election year of
2006, fundamentally, supports historical standards. In other words, expect
no bullish enthusiasm with rising interest rates and rising energy costs
as we head into the mid-term election year. The political establishment
and its ugly influence on economic activity are typically at its worse in
presidential post election years, which just concluded with large cap
bearishness.
The current
Mid-term Bull has been surprisingly strong with weak fundamentals and the
normal political threat in this post election year. The market was mixed
this past year with some bearishness and bullishness in the broader
indices.
Keep in mind,
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality (Nov-Jan) is historically
bullish regardless of fundamental reason. The market can find a cyclical
bottom in this year’s mid-term election year after the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality elevates it. As stated for several weeks, it would not
be surprising for a nice rise during the current heart and soul of bullish
seasonality only to be followed with bearish expressions after January
2006. The current heart and soul of bullish seasonality has demonstrated
normalcy so far with an extremely bullish November. However, December
finished with a bearish conclusion. The omission of a solid Santa Claus
rally this past year is somewhat ominous. However, January has gotten off
to a solid bullish start. It appears bent on supporting historical
normalcy in the face of December’s disappointment. January’s Dow is up
2.3% while the NASDAQ is up more aggressively by 4.5%. The heart and soul
of bullish seasonality has produced gains of 5.0%, 6.7%, and 9.3% for the
Dow, S&P500, and NASDAQ so far. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality
has only two weeks remaining this year.
The Dow30
found bottom in the last presidential mid-term election year on October 9,
2002 at 7286.27. The NASDAQ found bottom on the same day at
1114.11.Finding cyclical bottoms in mid-term election years is common. As
earlier stated, the Indicant began its buying barrage in October –
November 2002 just after the market bottomed from the severe 2000-2002
Bear Market. There were 239 buy signals between October 5, 2002 and
November 9, 2002 out of the 296 stocks and funds tracked by the Mid-term
Indicant at that time. Even badly managed companies received a buy signal,
which is a common attribute of sustainable new bull markets. As many of
you noticed, those companies eventually dip back to the south after the
euphoria of new bullishness.
Some of you
recall the
Short-term Indicant Bear for the
NASDAQ was the longest in history. It even exceeded the Dow’s 1929-1932
Short-term Indicant Bear in breadth and approached it in magnitude. The
good news is that the NASDAQ’s decline did not lead to a depression, which
is a clear indication of how little influence tech stocks have on the
economy.
There are two
important axioms to remember. 1) Real economic wealth is created in only
three ways - manufacturing, agriculture, and extraction. 2) The only
positive influence politicians have on the economy is to undo their prior
damage. They are now doing their damage, some of which will be undone in
2007; the next presidential pre-election year. That is why the market
typically finds bottom in the mid-term election year. That is also why the
presidential pre-election year is historically the most bullish on the
four year cycle. If the strength of the current Mid-term Bull can be
subjected only to meandering behavior, like 2004 and 2005, then it is
possible for the current Mid-term Bull to be a record setting one in terms
of duration.
The political
industry reduces wealth. Politicians continually attempt to redistribute
wealth, which flies in the face of the laws of nature. They promote
“middle class” attainment. The larger the middle class, the more power
politicians and their academia brethren have. The communists tried that,
resulting 99% poverty, while the ruling 1% lived like kings. In other
words, socialism rewards an ability to intellectualize, while capitalism
rewards the results of appealing effort.
The remainder
of this section, Secular Market Blend, is repeated, in part, from the past
several months, but it does not hurt to reread it each week. As time
progresses and conditions change, there will be modifications to it to
maintain a balanced frame of reference.
You will
notice many of the
mutual fund buy signals occurred
in March 2003. Many of you recall how the market did not synchronize with
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality from November 2002 through
February 2003. December 2002 was the most bearish since 1931. After the
asynchronous behavior in the November 2002 rolling third of the year, the
market turned bullish in March 2003 and again did not synchronize with
normal seasonality. The Mid-term Indicant continued signaling bull during
bearish seasonality in 2003. The market continued moving north during that
time, contrary to historical standards. As stated in most of 2004, bearish
expressions on a Mid-term basis between May and October 2004 should not be
surprising. That is exactly what occurred. The result was a meandering
market with a slight bearish bias during most of 2004 and 2005.
As stated
since late October and early November, do not be surprised at increasing
quick-term and short-term bullish expressions in the immediate future,
followed by increased bearish expressions early next year. So far, this
prognosis is at par with those expectations. Fundamentals and historical
standards support that scenario. The magnitude of early 2006 bearishness
is not predictable. Also, simply wait for the various Indicant model’s
advisement of bull/bear status, as forecasting the market is a waste of
time. But it is appropriate to anticipate fundamental shifts before they
happen. Keep a close eye on the Fed. It can damage the underlying bull.
November was
exceedingly bullish and consistent with historical normalcy. The November
– January rolling quarter is the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
However, December 2005 expressed contrary behavior to historical standards
with a bearish conclusion. January seems bent on slapping December’s
dismal performance.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/History-Seasonal/HS0001.htm
Make certain
you read the entire pages on the above link. You will see there are
exceptions.
Stop Loss Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a stop loss of 8% on recent buys because of the
Quick-term Bull.
Use a 10%
trailing stop loss or the yellow or green values you will find on the
tables for your longer-term hold positions. If your stock or fund is above
the bearish yellow curve and below the green curve, set your stop loss
equal to the greater of the yellow curve and the trailing stop loss. If
your stock or fund is above the green curve, set your stop loss at no less
the value of the green curve or 10% trailing, whichever is greater. If
your stock or fund is above the red curve and you bought at the Mid-term
Buy signal, you should use the 10% trailing stop loss.
If you are up
by triple digit amounts and enjoy your ownership of the stock or fund,
then use a 20% trailing stop loss or the slow moving blue curve price. If
you really enjoy holding the stock, keep a close eye on the management.
Dilettante managers have a way of worming into the business. Watch closely
for cronyism and lazy-hazy management dialog. Keep your eye on lavish
spending and excessive concerns about social issues. Those types are more
interested in burning your money for their pleasures, as opposed to making
you money. High performing companies remain focused on honoring the
investments made by their shareholders.
In a few
instances, you will see a hold signal for a stock or fund that is down
from its buy signal or below one of the above conditions for selling. If
you are more of a trader than an investor, feel free to buy stocks and
funds with those “bearish” attributes. They are configured for a possible
rebound, while at the same time, it is important to set the stop losses
mentioned in this report. Use the Quick-term Indicant as a guide in your
decision-making processes. If the stock price is falling in a Quick-term
Bear market, it is not advisable to buy.
Do not short
on stocks if they are up from an avoid signal. Stocks go up more often
than they go down. Stocks have a tendency to march to their own drumbeat
when rising. Some stocks rise and continue to rise in the most severe of
bear markets. Short selling opens up an opportunity for the snakes on Wall
Street to take everything you own. They can cause a stock to rise at their
whim and without any regard to fundamental reason. It usually does not
make sense to bet against the sweat and toil of hard-working people.
There are some
instances where stocks rise during bear markets due to legitimate
fundamental reasons. If the market emulates a 1970’s configuration, most
stocks will plummet, but energy related stocks will skyrocket. It is
unusual that energy has been skyrocketing the past three years, of which
two of those years enjoyed bullish market behavior. The coexistence of a
bullish energy sector and general equities does not make much fundamental
sense, but the underlying economic fundamentals have supported this
phenomenon. There is good reason to expect an abandonment of this
phenomenon with record setting oil prices and rising interest rates.
However, the heart and soul of bullish seasonality, more often than not,
excludes fundamental reason in its normally bullish behavioral patterns.
You are enjoying that now. There are two weeks of the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality remaining.
Stock and Fund Update
Click the
following link to see sorted performance of stocks and funds with
hold/avoid signals. In the past, they were included them in this email
message but now display them on the website. This is available to the
public, while the specific buy and sell transactions are limited to
members only.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Performance/Top-Bot.htm
Summary of Stocks and Funds with Buy and
Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/Buy-Sell%20Summary%20This%20Week.htm
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time.
All updated
information can be found from a single page at Indicant.Net. Click the
below link to that page. You will need your login ID and password.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Divergence versus Convergence
As stated the
past nine weeks, there is no bullish convergence. That is a common
attribute with meandering behavior. Several stocks are not moving up even
during the bullish spurts we have enjoyed the past several weeks. Force
Vectors have started shift downward but a few continue moving north. This
lack of bullish convergence suggests a reduce probability of dynamic
bullish expressions in the immediate future.
Economic Conditions – Inflation, Currency,
Interest Rates
There is
little difference from the last few weeks. Most world currencies continue
in their cyclical shift in support of a strengthening U.S. Dollar.
Although the cyclical direction remains in favor of a strengthening U.S.
Dollar, behavior the past few weeks has been of a meandering nature.
However, continued strengthening is expected as long as interest rates
continue rising.
There is
nothing new. This paragraph remains unchanged from the past few weeks. As
repeatedly stated, the only exception to this is the
Canadian Dollar. It has not yet
made this cyclical mid-term commitment to weaken against the greenback. It
continues to strengthen against the U.S. Dollar. As stated the past
several months and first mentioned in 2003, the Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
potential continues to threaten the Canadian cost advantage. The
perception of huge imports to the U.S. will provide increased difficulty
for the Canadian Dollar to continue weakening. This should hurt Canadian
manufacturing. The Canadian government is going to attempt to weaken the
Canadian dollar, most likely at the request of General Motors, but $60 oil
will make that difficult. General Motors can benefit tremendously with a
weaker Canadian dollar with their massive manufacturing capacity in
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada. Unfortunately, the strengthening Canadian dollar
has hurt GM’s bottom line and consequently, much of the Canadian capacity
is earmarked for closure.
Commodity prices continue
rising. Some are vacillating around all time peaks. Overall, this behavior
will eventually induce bearishness on the stock market.
As stated the
past few weeks, OPEC does not want encourage Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
competitiveness. They also do not want to see dynamic energy conservation
measures in the Western Hemisphere. OPEC will not consider a long-term
strategy due to their inherent incapability to do so. Consequently, it is
possible, although not likely, OPEC will force oil price reductions to
mitigate growing competitiveness. Even OPEC cannot alter the dynamics of
supply/demand laws. Keep your eye on this, as rapidly declining oil prices
will catapult the market into another strong bull leg. Equally, do not be
surprised at a dynamic bear in the event that high oil prices penetrate
the consumer price index.
Nothing has
changed here. The trend in interest rates continues in an unfavorable
direction for the stock market. Interest rates continue their incline,
which is politically congruent. Even a lame duck president wants his party
to retain power after his departure. President Bush’s job is to gain seats
in Congress right now. Do not be surprised at economically friendly
policies in the second half of this year. Expect accelerated troop
reductions in Iraq, as well.
The market’s
bullishness so far this year is due, in part, to a slowing of the Federal
Reserve Board interest rate hikes. That makes the market vulnerable in the
event the Fed “disappoints” with a rate hike in excess of the market’s
speculation. Such disappointment would result in a sharp decline in stock
prices. This scenario is congruent with historical standards.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Econ.htm
Fear Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 75.2% one-hundred and eighty-six weeks ago since the
MTI buy signal on April 13, 2001. One-hundred and seventy-nine weeks ago,
it closed up 30.1%. Last week it closed up 244.4%. The current annualized
growth rate since the April 13, 2001 buy signal is
50.7%. After falling sharply 30-weeks ago, it bounced north in 24-weeks of
the past 30-weeks. This fund moved solidly to the north the past two weeks
after several weeks of bearish expressions.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28, is up
44.3% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 26, 2005. That
annualizes to 113.9%, which is not an impossible performance level if oil
prices resume their advance. This fund should do well in the event this
market turns into a 1970’s type of market. This fund moved north the past
four weeks.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
which is isolated in the energy sector, is up 263.1% since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2002. It is annualizing at 76.0%. This
fund moved north the past two weeks after falling sharply in four of the
last seven weeks.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX, is
up 157.1% (annualized at 55.8%) since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy
on April 5, 2003.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, is up 139.9% (annualized at 65.5%) since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on December 6, 2003.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX, is
up 129.8% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003. It
is annualized at 53.0%. All energy related funds moved north the last two
weeks after falling in four of the last seven weeks. They are paralleling
gold and precious metals. Investors in these funds are supporting a 1970’s
type of market with high inflation and high oil prices. Energy and gold
always do well during such times.
These funds
should do well even if the market turns extremely bearish. Continue to
hold them until the Mid-term Indicant signals sell.
The SQI
(Consolidated Short-term and Quick-term Indicant) model signaled buy for
the
GLD-ETF#11 on August 3, 2005. It
is up 23.4% since then. It is annualized at 54.0%. This ETF continues to
be bullishly biased.
The SQI
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on March 26, 2003. It is up 153.3% (annualized at 53.9%). This fund moved
solidly north last week after expressing bearishness in three of the five
preceding weeks.
The contrarian
sector, commodities and petroleum, were up last week while general
equities were up slightly. That suggests the market’s anticipation of a
bullish economic outlook but also expresses inflationary threats will
manifest. At any rate, contrarian and general equities moving in a bullish
direction is the best of both worlds. Do not believe that relationship
will last too long. One or the other has a high probability of giving in
to bearish influences this year.
Short-term Indicant Update for Major Market
Indices
The
Indicant Volume Indicator is in
the embryonic stages of expressing a robust cycle. Volume was not that
robust last week. That suggests the possibility of a return to meandering
behavior.
The
Short-term Indicant signaled bull for the Dow30 on November 3, 2005
and the NASDAQ on November 2, 2005. They are up 4.2% and 8.1%,
respectively since then. That annualizes to 21.4% and 40.8% respectively.
It is not likely those annualized expressions will manifest by this time
next year.
For more
information about the Short-term Indicant, refer to
last week’s daily reports.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new bull signals and no new
bear signals.
All ten major
indices are bulls. They are up by an average of 44.4% since the MTI-RYS
signaled bull an average of 98-weeks ago. That annualizes to 23.5%, which
is down by 0.1% from last week. The strongest bull is the
Dow Utilities. It is up 118.5%
since the October 25, 2002 bull signal. The utilities moved slightly north
last week. Your utility hold positions remain safe, but keep your eye on
this particular index. Severe bears show little mercy, regardless of
dividend yields.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is now at $33,200,073. That beats buy and
hold performance of $1,677,408 on a $10,000 investment in the Dow stocks
in 1900. The
MTI S&P500 is at $165,249. That
beats buy and hold’s $125,125 on a December 31, 1971 $10,000 investment.
The
MTI-NASDAQ is at $193,869. That
beats buy and hold’s $80,341 on an October 18, 1985 $10,000 investment.
The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by 1,879.0%, 31.8%, and
141.3%, respectively, for these indices as of this past week.
The Indicant’s
percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during bull
signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is because
the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the MTI-RYS model avoids
bear markets. The only purpose of the MTI-RYS model is to avoid the bear
markets. That is why it beat buy and hold by nearly 2000% over the past
100+ years.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100
Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click the
following link to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-NAS100-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30
Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJIA-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15
Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJU-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Indicant
Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
The Mid-term
Indicant continues avoiding
ProFunds Ultra Short due, in
part, to the Quick-term Indicant’s bull signal and the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality. The SQI (Consolidated Quick-term and Short-term
Indicant) is signaling hold for the QQQQ, which is why ProFunds Ultra
Short is avoided. It is down 14.1% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled
sell on November 11, 2005. This fund may show some significant promise
early this year. The last time this fund was very profitable was in the
first half of 2002, which was also a mid-term election year. This fund
disappointed in the meandering markets of 2004 and 2005.
Click here to see all Mutual Funds tracked
by the Mid-term Indicant.
Always
remember never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good
way to mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
278.6% (annualized at 19.5%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
741-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. The recession, deflation, and inflation have not been strong
enough to signal bear. A link to the Long-term Indicant is below:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/LTI-Markets-DJIA/DJIA.htm
Indicant Conclusion
The Quick-term
Indicant and Short-term Indicant continues signaling bull for all major
indices and related Exchange Traded Funds. Quick-term and Short-term
attributes continue with a bullish bias. The shifting Force Vectors to the
south is of little concern at this time, but do not be surprised at
meandering behavior with possible bearish bias in the immediate future. As
stated last week, the heart and soul of bullish seasonality is now here
and should last through January. Historically, it concludes at the end of
January. Keep your eye on the daily stock market reports. Fundamentals
and disappointing volume threaten a bullish conclusion to this month.
Keep in mind
this is the mid-term election year, which historically finds a market
bottom. Since predecessor years leading up to the upcoming presidential
mid-term election year have not demonstrated dynamic bearishness, do not
be surprised at a bearish cycle early this year. As always, await guidance
from the various Indicant models. They will let you know when or if this
expected bearishness occurs.
As stated last
weekend, the current Quick-term and Short-term Bulls remains possessed
with bullish configurations.
Read your
daily reports, as quick-term attributes can shift quickly. As stated the
past several weeks, the market lacks bullish convergence, which suggests
bearish influences can occur quickly. Too many sectors are not
participating in the current heart and soul of bullish seasonality. Gold’s
strong bullish presence with mounting commodity prices and interest rates,
if continued, will slap this bull out of influence.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
In addition,
once you are inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log
in. It is on the top of every page in the web site so you can always find
your way back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
01/15/06
January 08,
2006 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 01, Issue 02 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Dear Indicant
Members:
This Week’s
Report
Neutrality, YYY5, and YYY6
It was noted
last week that the Dow is down 0.7% this century, as of the end of last
year. The dilettante infested S&P100 is down 17.0% during this same time
span. The bubble-infected NASDAQ100 is down 29.7% from
December 31, 2000 through
December 31, 2005.
The bluest of
blue chips, the Dow30, is now up this century. And it did all that just
last week, moving bullishly by a whopping 2.3% in the first four days of
this new year. The Dow is now up 1.6% since December 31, 2000. The heart
and soul of bullish seasonality prevails, which is where this bullish
domain was built. Or does it?
Earlier this
past week, Wall Street optimism compelled bullish behavior on the premise
the Federal Reserve was about to adopt an accommodative stance. In other
words, the prior “measured” interest rate hikes would about to be
abolished. This perception carried bullish momentum all week.
Unfortunately,
the market periodically moves on emotion. An emotional-based market cycle
self-corrects when the market detects an erroneous cycle to impending
reality. Reality detection occurs when the Fed shows its hand. If the hand
demonstrates variance from emotional-based market levels and
“disappoints,” the market will wipe out every bit of the emotion based
gains of this past week. It will most likely wipe more than these gains
because negative emotion punishes prior positive emotion. It is the
market’s way of punishing false emotion (mysticism). Free markets
consistently impose zero tolerance with penalties for any mysticism.
However, since people are involved in the market, that aspect of the
market generates the vicissitudes that comes with life itself. The stock
market can be cruel to those who are based in emotion.
The market
anticipates; sometimes wrongly. The market adjusts quickly and sometimes
violently at the first moment of recognition of its prior error. Although
the Fed has yet to play its cards, watch out if it disappoints. That
disappointment, if indeed that is the conclusion, may also be anticipated,
as opposed to the formal announcement by the Fed. If disappointment is
“anticipated,” the market will adjust bearishly. If that turns out to be a
false anticipation, the market will adjust bullishly.
Right now,
economists suggest the stock market has adjusted to neutrality, where
interest rates are neither accommodative nor restrictive to the economy.
That means the interpretation by the Fed is to let the economy drive
itself without interference from policy makers. Who knows if all that
jibber-jabber is accurate? However, if it is accurate and the Fed displays
“restrictive” policies in a few weeks, the market will most certainly
offset this past week’s gains, plus penalty.
History
supports a “restrictive” policy by the Fed. That is because the market
typically finds a bottom in presidential mid-term election years. There is
little pressure to be economically friendly in presidential post election
years, but that changes during mid-term election years. Political clout is
lost when the incumbent president loses too many congressional seats in
mid-term election years.
Americans
typically penalize the incumbent by politically aligning with the other
party, but an excessive loss of seats is a slap in the face of the
incumbent. Political leaders hate losing power, for power is what drove
them to that lifestyle. Many people know this and by virtue of this, it
could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. This prophecy is what usually
drives the market south during presidential post election years. Policy
makers adjust to more economic accommodative positions in the mid-term
election year, which is why the market typically finds bottoms in those
years.
Although the
majority is usually wrong, wicked cyclical adjustments can occur when the
majority holds similar consensus. The first wave of sellers is followed by
the second wave of sellers, and so on. This is a common attribute an
emotional-based market. The final few waves of sellers are the followers,
who bought near the top and sold near the bottom. Those typically stay out
of the market for the rest of their lives. When that occurs, equities lose
a source of demand and thus the reason bear markets last a long time.
Although
several Indicant models, as well as others, suggest the current bull
market started in March 2003, it remains a bear market in terms of
historical standards. That is because the major indices are below their
peaks. History suggests that a generation of investors has to pass on
before the major indices return to their historical peaks. That means the
NASDAQ will not see 4,000 until around 2020 or so.
For those who
bought in March 2003, this is certainly a bull market. For those who set
on the sidelines in 2003 when the current bull did all of its movement,
the interpretation is different. Those folks feel the sting of the bear.
They did not enjoy the fruits of the bull. The meandering behavior of 2004
and 2005 has been a little too scary for many. That prevents an increased
demand for stocks, which is the most fundamental cause of market movement.
Fundamentalists will be waiting and watching for the Fed to show its hand.
If the Fed truly adopts an accommodative stance, then the early January
barometer will hold true. According to the Stock Trader’s Almanac, the
year is bullish when the first few days of January are bullish. Historical
evidence is pretty solid. But as always, there are exceptions to
historical standards.
Early last
year, a member of the Indicant wrote and asked about the historical record
for years, ending in the number 5. He advised he listened to a TV stock
market expert telling the whole world how bullish years ending in the
number 5 were. Geese, if someone knows something that works, the best way
to have it not work is to tell the whole world. The Indicant advises its
members only – not the whole world.
At any rate,
the member asked me to research stock market performance for years ending
in the number 5. Sure enough, since 1900, nearly every year ending in the
number 5 was profoundly bullish. The Indicant never mentioned in any of
its weekly or daily stock market reports in 2005. It did not want to
distract members from the Indicant’s predominant theme; a meanderer until
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
Now that 2005
is over, here is the performance of years ending in the number 5 from last
century:
1905, +38.5%;
1915, +81.7%; 1925, +30.0%; 1935, +38.5%; 1945, +26.6%; 1955, +20.8%;
1965, +10.9%; 1975, +38.3%; 1985, +27.7%; 1995, +33.5%. The average
performance for years ending in the number 5 is 34.6%.
So, how did
2005 do? Answer: -0.6%. That’s right. That is a minus sign. Last year was
the first down year, ending in the number 5, since 1875. Did the
discoverer of this destroy such a beautiful model?
There is a
physical law that some of you may be familiar with. An object you are
looking at changes by virtue of simply looking at it. There is another law
about the stock market. If you find something that works, it will quit
working when everyone learns about it. The market will not tolerate mass
distribution of its secrets. It always adjusts. The Stock Traders Almanac
even admits this.
The Indicant
prefers logical explanations. There is logic in presidential
post-election-year bearishness. There is also a logical explanation in the
extreme bullishness in presidential pre-election years, With a few
exceptions, overall behavior in last year’s presidential
post-election-year bearishness was right on cue with historical standards.
The reason that always works is based in logic. Politicians strong-arm
policy makers into accommodative stances leading up to elections. The
presidential mid-term election year precedes the presidential pre-election
year where nearly 80% of all stock market growth occurred since the
beginning of recorded capitalizations in the U.S.
The Indicant
staff could come up with no logical explanation for the number 5. The
relationship between 5 and profound bullishness was impressive, as you can
see. But, there was not any logical explanation and not worthy of mention
last year. The Indicant, in hindsight, is happy with its decision to not
mention this to members. Although the Indicant ignores press
pontificators, one cannot help but hear it.
The
pontificating evangelist kept promoting the bullish relationship to number
5 early in 2005 and the corresponding bullishness to be expected in 2005.
It was unbelievable that he could even get airtime and he got a lot of it.
Others even plagiarized his work, as if they were the discoverer. It is
difficult to copyright such a simple thing. Enough people heard it and
sure enough, it quit working. At least it did not work in 2005. You can
check it again in 2015. The Indicant has no plans to remind you, though.
Did the YYY5
quit working because it was over-marketed? One has a solid argument that
record high oil prices and corresponding inflationary threats induced
meandering market behavior with mild bearishness more than any other
single reason. Technically, the Indicant reminded you almost daily that
the underlying theme in nearly all of 2005 was with meandering
inclinations.
We waited
until the year was over to mention YYY5’s correlation to massive
bullishness. The message is this; if information is publicly conveyed and
massively marketed, the system being conveyed will cease working. The
presenter destroys their own discovery in doing so. The phenomenon of
commonality has always prevailed and will continue to do so. This holds
true even if other variables can logically explain the underlying
phenomenon being conveyed to the masses. It is unbelievable that CNBC
exists. You are better off playing golf than watching that nonsense, where
pontificators appear for self-promotion purposes and CEO’s appear to
embellish egos and have a digital recording for their grandkids.
Please, do not
ask about years ending in the number, 6. We are not even going to research
it even though it takes less than five minutes.
Here’s some
good thoughts about the stock market.
Do not be
surprised at a bearish reaction if the Fed adopts a restrictive policy. Do
not be surprised if the market not only punishes the gains last week but
gets revenge for the underlying mysticism.
The heart and
soul of bullish seasonality has delivered right on cue and it is not over
yet. Three more weeks of this wonderful time of year remain. However, even
bearish expressions in the next three weeks should wind up with a bullish
conclusion since the heart and soul of bullish seasonality began in late
October. The Dow is up 5.0% since October 31, 2005. The NASDAQ is up a
whopping 8.7% since then. Even the dilettante infested S&P500 is up 6.5%
since then.
Finally, do
not worry about forecasting any of this stuff because The Indicant Stock
Market Report will let you know the underlying trend and cycles in the
market. It will signal bull, bear, buy, hold, sell, and avoid at the
appropriate times. You will never see insight, techniques, or signals from
The Indicant Stock Market Reports on television or any other publicly
displayed media. It is only for those of you who are members of The
Indicant.
Weekly Buy/Sell Summary
The Mid-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals for stocks and
funds. December bearishness and January bullishness to date have resulted
in the same old meandering results. Thus there were no signals this past
weekend. Also, there is little bullish convergence since bullish
expressions were primarily in those securities enjoying a hold signal. The
avoided securities tend to be listing aimlessly in their depressed
condition.
Although there
were no sell signals, the Mid-term Indicant is avoiding 53-stocks and
funds of the 345 tracked by the Indicant. The avoided stocks and funds are
down an average of 10.5% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an
average of 22.5-weeks ago.
There were
only 15-stocks and funds avoided at this time last year. The avoided
stocks and funds one year ago were down an average of 41.1% since their
respective sell signals an average of 61.1-weeks earlier. Two years ago,
on January 3, 2004, the Mid-term Indicant was avoiding only six stocks and
funds that were down an average of 28.6% since their respective sell
signals an average of 38.6-weeks earlier. Three years ago on January 4,
2003, there were only 12-avoided stocks and funds. They were down 25.9%
from their respective sell signals an average of 23.0-weeks earlier.
Although there
were no buy signals this weekend, the Mid-term Indicant is signaling hold
for 292 of the 345-stocks and funds tracked by the Indicant. The stocks
and funds with hold signals are up an average of 110.8%. That annualizes
to 66.8%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling hold for these
292-stocks and funds for an average of 86.3-weeks.
One year ago
on January 7, 2005, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 236-stocks and funds
out of the 320 tracked at that time for an average of 68.4-weeks. There
were 69-sell signals last year as the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality expired early. Those 236-stocks and funds were up 86.7%
(annualized at 65.9%). The Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for
286-stocks and funds of the 296 tracked two years ago on January 3, 2004.
They were up by an average of 57.7% (annualized at 83.9%) since their
respective buy signals an average of 35.8-weeks earlier. There were
277-stocks and funds with a hold signal on January 4, 2003 since their buy
signals an average of 14.3-weeks earlier. They were up 19.1% (annualized
at 69.3%).
Exchange Traded Fund Buy/Sell Summary and
Analysis
The
SQI (Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term Indicant) generated no buy or
sell signals last Friday. Read the daily stock market newsletter for more
analysis. The SQI is signaling hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up by an
average of 61.2%, which is up by 8.9% from last week. That is an impressive
bullish expression. This is annualized at 34.1% since their respective buy
signals an average of 92.4-weeks ago. The SQI is not avoiding any ETF’s at
this time.
Remember, the
SQI model signals buy or sell when both the Short-term and Quick-term
Indicant are signaling the same. Keep in mind the
Quick-term Indicant is the most volatile, but it will help you with
successive buying opportunities during various stages of an advancing
bull. It also shows Force Vectors and Vector Pressure, providing you
greater insight of the ETF’s quick-term bias.
The
Short-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals last
Friday. Although there were no buy signals, the Short-term Indicant is
signaling hold for 30-Exchange Traded Funds. They are up by an average of
63.1%, which is up by 7.0%-age points from last week. This is
annualized at 36.5% since their respective buy signals an average of
88.9-weeks ago. The Short-term Indicant is not avoiding any of the
30-ETF’s tracked at this time.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals last
Friday. Although there were no buy signals, the Quick-term Indicant is
signaling hold for 30-Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s). They are up by an
average of 34.1%, which is up by 5.5%-age points from last week. This
annualizes at 38.1% since their respective buy signals an average of
46.1-weeks ago. The Quick-term Indicant is not avoiding any ETF’s at this
time.
Twenty-six
ETF’s are Quick-term Indicant Red Bulls. That is up from only eleven last
week. That reflects significant strengthening in the Quick-term Bull. The
ETF’s are above their respective bullish red curves by an average of 4.0%,
which is up by 3.6%-age points since last week. The Quick-term Indicant
Bull has resumed a category of solid bullishness.
None of the
ETF’s are below their respective bearish yellow curves, highlighting absolute
non-bearishness on a Quick-term Indicant basis. Overall, they are above
bearish yellow by 11.7%, which is exceedingly non-bearish on a quick-term
basis. That is up by 4.0%-age points from last week. Non-bearish
attributes has resumed near zero threat of dynamic bearish expressions.
The
Short-term Indicant reveals individual Indicant Volume Indicators.
Although the ETF’s Indicant Volume Indicators are not as conclusive as
that of the major market indices, it sometimes obviates the market’s
short-term intentions. Look for robustness in the individual Indicant
Volume Indicators, coupled with dynamic behavior. Robust volume cycles
during dynamic bearish or bullish cycles indicate the breadth of the
continuation of that cycle. The more pronounced they are, the greater the
lingering effect of the underlying bullish or bearish direction.
The Short-term
Indicant also identifies the breakout lines and breakdown lines for
Exchange Traded Funds. Eighteen of the 30-ETF’s are contacting their
breakout lines. That is up from zero last weekend This non-bearish
attribute strengthened significantly this past week. The market reacted by
countering the unseasonable bearishness of December.
The average
distance of all 30-ETF’s between their current price and their respective
breakout lines is a mere 0.9%, which is 2.9% higher than last week. It is
significantly bullish when even just one ETF is contacting its breakout
down other than those of a contrarian nature. Solid bullishness has
resumed on a Short-term Indicant basis.
The average
distance between the current price and the ETF’s breakdown lines is a
whopping 18.2%, which is down by 1.3% from last week. Although bearish
expressions dominated this past week, this configuration remains
non-bearish.
The overall
relationship between breakout and breakdown lines is configured with a
significant bullish bias on a Short-term basis. Contact with breakdown
lines is extremely bearish and contact with the breakout lines are
extremely bullish. As you can see, there is absolutely no threat of
breakdown contact in the near future. Thus, there is little opportunity
for the bear to dominate market behavior on a short-term basis.
Unfortunately, bearish expressions can occur before contact is made. But
your longer term hold positions are safe.
There are no
conflicts between the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant at this time.
There were no
buy signals for
ETF options this past Friday. Meandering markets are not good for
options traders. December, coupled to last week, still has the effects of
meandering behavior. Thus market volatility is not ripe for options
trading. It is interesting to note that there was a call option buy signal
last week for QQQQ. That was the first call option buy signal since early
November 2005.
ETF Force
Vectors remain directionally mixed with some moving south and some moving
north. However, the QQQQ call option buy signal in the middle of last week
was prompted by Vector Pressure moving back into bullish domains. It was
recommended to be conservative, but a profit was indeed enjoyed if you
benefited from a intraday contrarian move relative to your offering price.
Never offer market prices. Do not despair if you miss out on a good
opportunity. They are presented regularly throughout the year. Option
stalking is the only way if you cannot be on the floor with the traders.
The Quick-term
and Short-term Bulls were apparently annoyed by their reclassification
from solid bullish bias to slight bullish bias last week. That angered the
bulls to return to solid bullish bias with last week’s aggressive bullish
behavior.
Secular Market Blend
This section
is a repeat from the last several months with a few modifications,
reflecting recent secular influences. Although appearing redundant at
times, it is important to read this section each week to keep abreast of
secular market shifts. Remember, secular shifts can last twenty-five or
more years. Fortunately, secular market movements do not deter mid-term,
short-term, and quick-term profit opportunities.
The current
Mid-term Bull market and buying barrage started over three years ago in
late 2002, the last mid-term election year. We are now entering the next
mid-term election year. The last one followed the predicted market bottom
in 2002. The mid-term presidential election year phenomenon was consistent
with history in 2002. Will it be consistent in 2006? The last mid-term
election year, 2002, found a cyclical bottom, which is a common attribute
in presidential mid-term election years.
Even more
impressive was how the market synchronized with near perfection to normal
seasonality in 2002. The April-October period was typically bearish. That
bear leg was a deep one in 2002. The upcoming mid-term election year of
2006, fundamentally, supports historical standards. In other words, expect
no bullish enthusiasm with rising interest rates and rising energy costs
as we head into the mid-term election year. The political establishment
and its ugly influence on economic activity are typically at its worse in
presidential post election years, which just concluded with large cap
bearishness.
The current
Mid-term Bull has been surprisingly strong with weak fundamentals and the
normal political threat in this post election year. The market was mixed
this past year with some bearishness and bullishness in the broader
indices.
Keep in mind,
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality (Nov-Jan) is historically
bullish regardless of fundamental reason. The market can find a cyclical
bottom in this mid-term election year after the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality elevates it. As stated for several weeks, tt would not
be surprising for a nice rise during the current heart and soul of bullish
seasonality only to be followed with bearish expressions after January
2006. The current heart and soul of bullish seasonality has demonstrated
normalcy so far with an extremely bullish November. However, December
finished with a bearish conclusion. The omission of a solid Santa Claus
rally this past year is somewhat ominous. However, January has gotten off
to a solid bullish start. It appears bent on supporting historical
normalcy in the face of December’s disappointment.
The Dow30
found bottom over three years ago on October 9, 2002 at 7286.27. The
NASDAQ found bottom on the same day at 1114.11.Finding cyclical bottoms in
mid-term election years is common. As earlier stated, the Indicant began
its buying barrage in October – November 2002 just after the market
bottomed from the severe 2000-2002 Bear Market. There were 239 buy signals
between October 5, 2002 and November 9, 2002 out of the 296 stocks and
funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. Even badly managed
companies received a buy signal, which is a common attribute of
sustainable new bull markets. As many of you noticed, those companies
eventually dip back to the south after the euphoria of new bullishness.
Some of you
recall the
Short-term Indicant Bear for the NASDAQ was the longest in history. It
even exceeded the Dow’s 1929-1932 Short-term Indicant Bear in breadth and
approached it in magnitude. The good news is that the NASDAQ’s decline did
not lead to a depression, which is a clear indication of how little
influence tech stocks have on the economy.
There are two
important axioms to remember. 1) Real economic wealth is created in only
three ways - manufacturing, agriculture, and extraction. 2) The only
positive influence politicians have on the economy is to undo their prior
damage. They are now doing their damage, some of which will be undone in
2007; the next presidential pre-election year. That is why the market
typically finds bottom in the mid-term election year. That is also why the
presidential pre-election year is historically the most bullish on the
four year cycle. If the strength of the current Mid-term Bull can be
subjected only to meandering behavior, like 2004 and 2005, then it is
possible for the current Mid-term Bull to be a record setting one in terms
of duration.
The political
industry reduces wealth. Politicians continually attempt to redistribute
wealth, which flies in the face of the laws of nature. They promote
“middle class” attainment. The larger the middle class, the more power
politicians and their academia brethren have. The communists tried that,
resulting 99% poverty, while the ruling 1% lived like kings. In other
words, socialism rewards an ability to intellectualize, while capitalism
rewards the results of appealing effort.
The remainder
of this section, Secular Market Blend, is repeated, in part, from the past
several months, but it does not hurt to reread it each week. As time
progresses and conditions change, there will be modifications to it to
maintain a balanced frame of reference.
You will
notice many of the
mutual fund buy signals occurred in March 2003. Many of you recall how
the market did not synchronize with the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality from November 2002 through February 2003. December 2002 was
the most bearish since 1931. After the asynchronous behavior in the
November 2002 rolling third of the year, the market turned bullish in
March 2003 and again did not synchronize with normal seasonality. The
Mid-term Indicant continued signaling bull during bearish seasonality in
2003. The market continued moving north during that time, contrary to
historical standards. As stated in most of 2004, bearish expressions on a
Mid-term basis between May and October 2004 should not be surprising. That
is exactly what occurred. The result was a meandering market with a slight
bearish bias during most of 2004 and 2005.
As stated
since late October and early November, do not be surprised at increasing
quick-term and short-term bullish expressions in the immediate future,
followed by increased bearish expressions early next year. So far, this
prognosis is at par with those expectations. Fundamentals and historical
standards support that scenario. The magnitude of early 2006 bearishness
is not predictable. Also, simply wait for the various Indicant model’s
advisement of bull/bear status, as forecasting the market is a waste of
time.
November was
exceedingly bullish and consistent with historical normalcy. The November
– January rolling quarter is the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
However, December 2005 was contrary to historical standards with a bearish
conclusion. January seems bent on slapping December’s dismal performance.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/History-Seasonal/HS0001.htm
Make certain
you read the entire pages on the above link. You will see there are
exceptions.
Stop Loss Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a stop loss of 8% on recent buys because of the
Quick-term Bull.
Use a 10%
trailing stop loss or the yellow or green values you will find on the
tables for your longer-term hold positions. If your stock or fund is above
the bearish yellow curve and below the green curve, set your stop loss
equal to the greater of the yellow curve and the trailing stop loss. If
your stock or fund is above the green curve, set your stop loss at no less
the value of the green curve or 10% trailing, whichever is greater. If
your stock or fund is above the red curve and you bought at the Mid-term
Buy signal, you should use the 10% trailing stop loss.
If you are up
by triple digit amounts and enjoy your ownership of the stock or fund,
then use a 20% trailing stop loss or the slow moving blue curve price. If
you really enjoy holding the stock, keep a close eye on the management.
Dilettante managers have a way of worming into the business. Watch closely
for cronyism and lazy-hazy management dialog. Keep your eye on lavish
spending and excessive concerns about social issues. Those types are more
interested in burning your money for their pleasures, as opposed to making
you money. High performing companies remain focused on honoring the
investments made by their shareholders.
In a few
instances, you will see a hold signal for a stock or fund that is down
from its buy signal or below one of the above conditions for selling. If
you are more of a trader than an investor, feel free to buy stocks and
funds with those “bearish” attributes. They are configured for a possible
rebound, while at the same time, it is important to set the stop losses
mentioned in this report. Use the Quick-term Indicant as a guide in your
decision-making processes. If the stock price is falling in a Quick-term
Bear market, it is not advisable to buy.
Do not short
on stocks if they are up from an avoid signal. Stocks go up more often
than they go down. Stocks have a tendency to march to their own drumbeat
when rising. Some stocks rise and continue to rise in the most severe of
bear markets. Short selling opens up an opportunity for the snakes on Wall
Street to take everything you own. They can cause a stock to rise at their
whim and without any regard to fundamental reason. It usually does not
make sense to bet against the sweat and toil of hard-working people.
There are some
instances where stocks rise during bear markets due to legitimate
fundamental reasons. If the market emulates a 1970’s configuration, most
stocks will plummet, but energy related stocks will skyrocket. It is
unusual that energy has been skyrocketing the past three years, of which
two of those years enjoyed bullish market behavior. The coexistence of a
bullish energy sector and general equities does not make much fundamental
sense, but the underlying economic fundamentals have supported this
phenomenon. There is good reason to expect an abandonment of this
phenomenon with record setting oil prices and rising interest rates.
However, the heart and soul of bullish seasonality, more often than not,
excludes fundamental reason in its normally bullish behavioral patterns.
You are enjoying that now. There are three weeks of the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality remaining.
Stock and Fund Update
Click the
following link to see sorted performance of stocks and funds with
hold/avoid signals. In the past, they were included them in this email
message but now display them on the website. This is available to the
public, while the specific buy and sell transactions are limited to
members only.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Performance/Top-Bot.htm
Summary of Stocks and Funds with Buy and
Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/Buy-Sell%20Summary%20This%20Week.htm
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time.
All updated
information can be found from a single page at Indicant.Net. Click the
below link to that page. You will need your login ID and password.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Divergence versus Convergence
As stated the
past eight weeks, there is no bullish convergence. That is a common
attribute with meandering behavior. Although last week’s bullish behavior
was impressive, it did not generate any new buy signals. In other words,
the weaker stocks did not rise that much. The bullish behavior was pretty
much limited to those stocks already riding high. The current Quick-term
and Short-term Bull markets did, however, regain solid bullish biases.
This lack of bullish convergence suggests an increasing possibility the
current Quick-term and Short-term bulls will peter out early this year;
most likely in the next few weeks. Such a scenario would result in
political normalcy, when the market finds a bottom in the mid-term
election year. Keep in mind, though, that forecasting is not The
Indicant’s model.
Economic Conditions – Inflation, Currency,
Interest Rates
There is
little difference from the last few weeks. Most world currencies continue
in their cyclical shift in support of a strengthening U.S. Dollar.
Although the cyclical direction remains in favor of a strengthening U.S.
Dollar, behavior the past few weeks has been of a meandering nature.
However, continued strengthening is expected as long as interest rates
continue rising.
There is
nothing new. This paragraph remains unchanged from the past few weeks. As
repeatedly stated, the only exception to this is the
Canadian Dollar. It has not yet made this cyclical mid-term commitment
to weaken against the greenback. It continues to strengthen against the
U.S. Dollar. As stated the past several weeks, the Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
potential continues to threaten the Canadian cost advantage. The
perception of huge imports to the U.S. will provide increased difficulty
for the Canadian Dollar to continue weakening. This should hurt Canadian
manufacturing. The Canadian government is going to attempt to weaken the
Canadian dollar, most likely at the request of General Motors, but $60 oil
will make that difficult. Detroit may learn the economic benefits of
elevating carburetor efficiency. General Motors can benefit tremendously
with a weaker Canadian dollar with their massive manufacturing capacity in
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada. Unfortunately, the strengthening Canadian dollar has hurt GM’s bottom
line and consequently, much of the Canadian capacity is ear-marked for
closure.
Commodity prices are again rising and approaching recent cyclical
peaks.
As stated the
past few weeks, OPEC does not want encourage Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
competitiveness. They also do not want to see dynamic energy conservation
measures in the Western Hemisphere. OPEC will not consider a long-term
strategy due to their inherent incapability to do so. Consequently, it is
possible, although not likely, OPEC will force oil price reductions to
mitigate growing competitiveness. Even OPEC cannot alter the dynamics of
supply/demand laws. Keep your eye on this, as rapidly declining oil prices
will catapult the market into another strong bull leg. Equally, do not be
surprised at a dynamic bear in the event that high oil prices penetrate
the consumer price index.
Interest rates
continue their incline, which is politically congruent. Even a lame duck
president wants his party to retain power after his departure. President
Bush’s job is to gain seats in Congress right now. So do not be surprised
at economically friendly policies in the second half of this year. Expect
accelerated troop reductions in Iraq, as well.
The market’s
bullishness in the first week of this year is due, in part, to a slowing
of the interest rate hikes. That makes the market vulnerable in the event
the Fed “disappoints” with a rate hike in excess of the market’s
speculation. Such disappointment would result in a sharp decline in stock
prices. This scenario is congruent with historical standards.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Econ.htm
Fear Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) - #19 was up 75.2%
one-hundred and eighty-five weeks ago since the MTI buy signal on April
13, 2001. One-hundred and seventy-eight weeks ago, it closed up 30.1%.
Last week it closed up 241.5%. The current annualized growth rate since
the April 13, 2001 buy signal is 50.3%. After falling sharply 29-weeks
ago, it bounced north in 23-weeks of the past 29-weeks. This fund moved
solidly to the north last week after several weeks of bearish expressions.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28, is up 41.6% since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on August 26, 2005. That annualizes to 112.5%, which is not
an impossible performance level if oil prices resume their advance. This
fund should do well in the event this market turns into a 1970’s type of
market. This fund moved north the past three weeks.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX, which is isolated in the
energy sector, is up 255.9% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on
August 16, 2002. It is annualizing at 74.4%. This fund moved sharply to
the north last week after falling sharply in four of the last six weeks.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX, is up 152.3% (annualized at 55.4%) since
the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on April 5, 2003.
Fidelity Energy Services #40, FSESX, is up 135.4% (annualized at
64.0%) since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December 6, 2003.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX, is up 125.2% since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on August 16, 2003. It is annualized at 51.6%. All energy
related funds moved solidly to the north after falling in four of the last
six weeks. They are paralleling gold and precious metals. Investors in
these funds are supporting a 1970’s type of market with high inflation and
high oil prices. Energy and gold always do well during such times.
These funds
should do well even if the market turns extremely bearish. Continue to
hold them until the Mid-term Indicant signals sell.
The SQI
(Consolidated Short-term and Quick-term Indicant) model signaled buy for
the
GLD-ETF#11 on August 3, 2005. It is up 23.4% since then. It is
annualized at 54.0%. This ETF continues to be bullishly biased.
The SQI
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources on March 26, 2003. It is up
148.7% (annualized at 52.6%). This fund moved solidly north last week
after expressing bearishness in three of the four preceding weeks.
The contrarian
sector, commodities and petroleum, were up last week while general
equities were also up. Both sectors were dynamically bullish. That
suggests a bullish economic outlook but also expresses inflationary
threats will manifest. At any rate, contrarian and general equities moving
in a bullish direction is the best of both worlds. Don’t believe that
relationship will last too long. One or the other has a high probability
of giving in to bearish influences this year.
Short-term Indicant Update for Major Market
Indices
The
Indicant Volume Indicator is in the embryonic stages of expressing a
robust cycle. It is potentially bullish on a short-term basis that last
week’s bullish expression was coupled with increased volume. However, more
robustness is need to conclude longevity for the Short-term Indicant Bull
that is now underway. Last week’s rise in volume followed holiday
lethargic volume and on the surface could be misleading. It was a little
disappointing that volume was not higher on last week’s bullish behavior.
The
Short-term Indicant signaled bull for the Dow30 on November 3, 2005
and the NASDAQ on November 2, 2005. They are up 4.2% and 7.5%,
respectively since then. That annualizes to 23.7% and 42.2% respectively.
It is not likely those annualized expressions will manifest by this time
next year.
For more
information about the Short-term Indicant, refer to
last week’s daily reports.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new bull signals and no new bear signals.
All ten major
indices are bulls. They are up by an average of 44.2% since the MTI-RYS
signaled bull an average of 97-weeks ago. That annualizes to 23.6%, which
is up significantly from last week. The strongest bull is the
Dow Utilities. It is up 118.2% since the October 25, 2002 bull signal.
The utilities moved north last week after falling in the last two weeks of
December. Your utility hold positions remain safe, but keep your eye on
this particular index. Severe bears show little mercy, regardless of
dividend yields.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial Average performance is now
at $33,198,377. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,677,322 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500 is at $165,970. That beats buy and hold’s $125,913 on a
December 31, 1971 $10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ is at $192,913. That beats buy and hold’s $79,945 on an
October 18, 1985 $10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy
and hold by 1,879.0%, 31.8%, and 141.3%, respectively, for these indices
as of this past week.
The Indicant’s
percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during bull
signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is because
the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the MTI-RYS model avoids
bear markets. The only purpose of the MTI-RYS model is to avoid the bear
markets. That is why it beat buy and hold by nearly 2000% over the past
100+ years.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100
Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card history.
Click the
following link to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-NAS100-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30
Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJIA-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15
Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card history.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJU-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Indicant
Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock Report Card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card history.
The Mid-term
Indicant continues avoiding
ProFunds Ultra Short due, in part, to the Quick-term Indicant’s bull
signal and the heart and soul of bullish seasonality. The SQI
(Consolidated Quick-term and Short-term Indicant) is signaling hold for
the QQQQ, which is why ProFunds Ultra Short is avoided. It is down 13.1%
since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell on November 11, 2005. This fund
may show some significant promise early this year. The last time this fund
was very profitable was in the first half of 2002, which was also a
mid-term election year. This fund disappointed in the meandering markets
of 2004 and 2005.
Click here to see all Mutual Funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant.
Always
remember never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good
way to mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
278.6% (annualized at 19.6%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
740-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. The recession, deflation, and inflation have not been strong
enough to signal bear. A link to the Long-term Indicant is below:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/LTI-Markets-DJIA/DJIA.htm
Indicant Conclusion
The Quick-term
Indicant and Short-term Indicant continues signaling bull for all major
indices and related Exchange Traded Funds. Quick-term and Short-term
attributes returned with a bullish bias last week after reclassifying to
mild bullish bias at the close of last year. As stated last week, the
heart and soul of bullish seasonality is now here and should last through
January. Keep your eye on the daily stock market reports, as the market
from time to time aborts historical standards. Fundamentals and
disappointing volume threaten a bullish conclusion to this month. Last
weekends favoring of bearish attributes ignited a bullish response this
past week.
Keep in mind
this is the mid-term election year, which historically finds a market
bottom. Since predecessor years leading up to the upcoming presidential
mid-term election year have not demonstrated dynamic bearishness, do not
be surprised at a bearish cycle early this year. As always, await guidance
from the various Indicant models. They will let you know when or if this
expected bearishness occurs.
As stated last
weekend, the current Quick-term and Short-term Bulls remains possessed
with bullish configurations. Last week’s performance was exceedingly
bullish in response to three consecutive weeks of bearish expressions.
None of the Quick-term, Short-term, and Mid-term attributes suggest
dynamic bearish influences, although current configurations may be an
embryonic prelude to what will occur in the first half of this year.
Read your
daily reports, as quick-term attributes can shift quickly. As stated the
past several weeks, the market lacks bullish convergence, which suggests
bearish influences can occur quickly. Too many sectors are not
participating in the current heart and soul of bullish seasonality. Gold’s
strong bullish presence with mounting commodity prices and interest rates,
if continued, will slap this bull out of influence.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
In addition,
once you are inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log
in. It is on the top of every page in the web site so you can always find
your way back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
01/08/06
January 01,
2006 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 01, Issue 01 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Dear Indicant
Members:
This Week’s
Report
The Notoriously Bearish Presidential Post
Election Year Ends Harmlessly
As stated last
week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and older market indices have a
history of solid bearish expressions during presidential post election
years. A $10,000 investment in 1832, only in presidential post election
years, shriveled to $8,758 as of the end of 2005. That is a reduction of
12.4% from an investment made over 170-years ago. Not too many folks would
do this, but the consistent degradation of a post election year only
investment should not go unnoticed.
Politicians
know that Americans vote their pocket books on Election Day. Policies are
economically friendly in a timely manner so that American wallets are
flush with cash on Election Day. The economy is too dynamic for perfect
political manipulations, but those poor souls who enter politics to tell
everyone else how to behave try. The stock market understands this,
knowing that policies are generally business-friendly leading up to
election years. The stock market anticipates economic activity by six to
nine months most of the time. It also tries and when it is wrong for a
period, it adjusts quickly. That is why there are a few days each year
when the market zooms north or south by a bunch. The market does not like
being wrong and shows it.
Using the
Dow30, the presidential post election year of 2005 was down slightly by
0.6%. It was congruent with historical standards, albeit mildly. However,
with historical accuracy, the Dow lost money in the 2005 post election
year. It does that more than not in presidential post election years.
Interestingly, the S&P100 was down even more by 0.9%. All other broad
market indices were up this past year. The most bullish was the S&P400,
Mid-caps. Small-caps were up also, but gained too much popularity by the
masses to continue leading the bullish behavioral patterns. The phenomenon
of commonality will act as a depressant on small caps until the masses are
burned enough to stay out for a while. The masses will be burned since not
everyone is allowed to make money in the stock market. The stock market’s
design is to ensure the forces of capitalism; winners and losers.
The largest of
the large caps, DJIA and S&P100, represent companies with the greatest
percentage of dilettante managers on the payrolls. Those companies will
continue with dismal performance more so than the other indices due to
massive incompetence that pervades the blue chips. It is not surprising
those are the only two indices expressing bearish behavior this past year.
So much for
history and who really cares anyway? Historical patterns can be
misleading, but it is hard to ignore a 12.4% loss since 1832. Most of the
money made in the stock market occurs in the presidential pre-election
year, which occurs next in 2007. It is in a league by itself in terms of
bullish behavior. A $10,000 investment in 1832 would amount to $283,810 if
only invested in the presidential pre-election year.
We now have to
contend with the mid-term election year, which is begins today. A $10,000
in 1832 only in mid-term election years grew to a meager $24,313 by 2002.
CD’s or even a simple bank savings account during the same period would
have beaten that performance by a significant amount. The last
presidential mid-term election year was extremely bearish. The Dow
finished down 15.9%. It was a continuation of the bear market that began
in early 2000. Other indices fared worse. At one point prior to bullish
seasonality in 2002, the NASDAQ100 was down over 50% in 2002 alone and by
nearly 80% since it pinnacled in March 2000.
The Dow is
down 0.7% so far this century. It has been meandering for five years after
a profound, unprecedented, never-happened-before, rise that began in 1980.
The S&P100 (large caps) is down a whopping 17.0% so far this century,
while the S&P600 (small caps) are up a whopping 59.7% this century. Do not
expect that level of performance in small caps this coming year, as the
masses are now into small caps. They will get burned by the phenomenon of
commonality. It is a requirement of capitalism. And it is good. It allows
those who work to be rewarded more than those with passive interest are.
Politicians generally favor everyone being the same, which would lower the
standard of living for all.
The NASDAQ100
is down 29.7% this century. The market appropriately punished those late
arrivers into the NASDAQ bubble late last century. A 30-year old NASDAQ
bubble buy-and-hold investor will most likely be over sixty before
breaking even. That lengthy financial pain occurs about every
1.5-generations. Those buy and holders in between decades of stock market
grief are lucky. Simple buying and holding cannot always work. It is too
simple. And what does one buy and hold? As companies and funds become
successful, the dilettante population increases disproportionately with
those seeking “security” and that by its very nature causes the
organization’s collapse. The small caps are not infested with dilettante
management. That is why they are so popular right now. People are learning
this. The problem is the phenomenon of commonality.
This past
presidential post election year was a meanderer. It actually started
meandering in early 2004 after the nice bull leg in 2003. The Dow is up by
a mere 2.5% the past two years but down this century. CD’s and simple
savings accounts beat it during that time. The S&P600, Small Caps, are up
29.7% during the same period. Small cap bullishness can be rationalized by
virtue of fewer dilettante managers. Corporate politics and the resultant
stupidity are not predominant venues in small cap companies. However, as
earlier stated, small cap investing is becoming too popular and the
phenomenon of commonality will eventually inflict financial pain on many.
As soon as the market weeds them out, small caps will again rise
dramatically.
Now, back to
the impending mid-term election year. First, let’s point out one major
issue. The Indicant does not forecast the market. That is a waste of time.
Forecasts are always wrong. If one does forecast the market successfully,
chalk it up to luck. Each success in forecasting will be followed with an
increased probability of error and with wider error bands. With that mind,
let’s take a look at the typical mid-term election year.
Although the
market has expressed mild bullishness during mid-term election years, most
of that bullishness occurred in the last third of the year. The heart and
soul of bullish seasonality does most of the bullish work in any year,
including the mid-term election years.
The market
typically finds a bottom in mid-term election years, which leads to the
most bullish presidential pre-election year, which next occurs in 2007.
The last pre-election year of 2003 brings pleasant memories. There was
nothing tricky about it, as the Indicant staff did not even have to work
hard signaling bull during the most part of that great bull leg. The
market found bottom in October 2002 (mid-term year) and zoomed north, like
clockwork, in the presidential pre-election year of 2003. This job was
easy in 2003. Red bulls are a no-brainer.
The last
presidential mid-term election year was also easy as the market was
congruently bearish to historical standards. However, the mid-term
election year of 2005 will not be easy unless there is aggressive
bearishness coupled with a robust Indicant Volume Indicator. That
combination is also a no-brainer, as it is nearly 100% accurate in
predicting immediate cyclical behavior.
Rising
interest rates is not uncommon during post election years and early into
the mid-term election year. That is part of the political model. Cooling
the economy leading into post election years is common. Rising interest
rates and rising energy costs threaten the existing Mid-term Indicant bull
markets. The charts, which are discussed later in this report, appear to
have pinnacled. It would not be surprising to see those Mid-term Indicant
bulls perish early this year. They are very mature in terms of historical
standards.
The Quick-term
and Short-term Indicant bulls weakened considerably in December, which is
typically the most bullish month of the year. The Dow was down 0.8% this
past month. December 2005 was only the sixth bearish December in the last
25-years. The last time was in December 2002, which was followed by
explosive bullish behavior in March 2003. Interestingly, that coincided
with the beginning of the war in Iraq. That war that did not depress the
historical standards of presidential pre-election year bullishness.
The first few
days of this New Year should reveal market inclinations until the next
heart and soul of bullish seasonality later this year. A bearish start
will continue the erosion of the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant bulls.
That could prompt historical congruency with bearish expressions. In other
words, the market may find a bottom in this mid-term election year. The
market needs to turn bearish in the first half of this year to support
historical congruency. The Indicant Volume Indicator will help identify
this possibility a few days into the year. It first needs to shed the
lethargy brought on by holiday apathy. Keep your eyes on the Quick-term
and Short-term Indicant in January, which is the final month of the heart
and soul of bullish seasonality.
Weekly Buy/Sell Summary
The Mid-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and one sell signal for stocks and
funds.
In addition to
the sell signal, the Mid-term Indicant is avoiding 50-stocks and funds of
the 320 tracked by the Indicant. The avoided stocks and funds are down an
average of 16.0% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of
27.2-weeks ago.
There were
only 15-stocks and funds avoided at this time last year. The avoided
stocks and funds one year ago were down an average of 39.6% since their
respective sell signals an average of 60.1-weeks earlier. Two years ago,
on January 3, 2004, the Mid-term Indicant was avoiding only six stocks and
funds that were down an average of 28.6% since their respective sell
signals an average of 38.6-weeks earlier. Three years ago on December 28,
2002, there were only sixteen avoided stocks and funds. They were down
25.6% from their respective sell signals an average of 21.9-weeks earlier.
Although there
were no buy signals this weekend, the Mid-term Indicant is signaling hold
for 269 of the 320 stocks and funds tracked by the Indicant. The stocks
and funds with hold signals are up an average of 94.8%. That annualizes to
57.5%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling hold for these 269-stocks
and funds for an average of 85.8-weeks.
One year ago,
the Mid-term Indicant was holding 304-stocks and funds out of the 320
tracked at that time for an average of 57.6-weeks. They were up 73.3%
(annualized at 66.2%). The Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for
286-stocks and funds of the 296 tracked two years ago on January 3, 2004.
They were up by an average of 57.7% (annualized at 83.9%) since their
respective buy signals an average of 35.8-weeks earlier. There were
274-stocks and funds with a hold signal on December 28, 2002 since their
buy signals an average of 13.5-weeks earlier. They were up 14.2%
(annualized at 54.7%).
Exchange Traded Fund Buy/Sell Summary and
Analysis
The
SQI (Consolidated Quick-term/Short-term
Indicant) generated no buy or sell signals last Friday. Read
the daily stock market newsletter for more analysis. The SQI is signaling
hold for 30-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 54.3%, which is down by
2.1% from last week. This is annualized at 30.6% since their respective
buy signals an average of 91.4-weeks ago. The SQI is not avoiding any
ETF’s at this time.
Remember, the
SQI model signals buy or sell when both the Short-term and Quick-term
Indicant are signaling the same. Keep in mind the
Quick-term Indicant is the most
volatile, but it will help you with successive buying opportunities during
various stages of an advancing bull. It also shows Force Vectors and
Vector Pressure, providing you greater insight of the ETF’s quick-term
bias.
The
Short-term Indicant generated no
buy signals and no sell signals last Friday. Although there were no buy
signals, the Short-term Indicant is signaling hold for 30-Exchange Traded
Funds. They are up by an average of 56.1%, which is down by 2.1% from last
week. This is annualized at 32.8% since their respective buy signals an
average of 87.9-weeks ago. The Short-term Indicant is not avoiding any of
the 30-ETF’s tracked at this time.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no
buy signals and no sell signals last Friday. Although there were no buy
signals, the Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 30-Exchange Traded
Funds (ETF’s). They are up by an average of 28.6%, which is down by over
2.0% from last week. This annualizes at 32.7% since their respective buy
signals an average of 45.1-weeks ago. The Quick-term Indicant is not
avoiding any ETF’s at this time.
Eleven ETF’s
are Quick-term Indicant Red Bulls. That is down from twenty-seven last
week. That reflects a significant weakening in the Quick-term Bull. The
ETF’s are above their respective bullish red curves by an average of 0.4%,
which is down by 1.7% since last week. Although this remains a bullish
configurations, it is no longer solidly bullish.
None of the
ETF’s are below their respective bearish yellow curves, highlight absolute
non-bearishness on a Quick-term Indicant basis. Overall, they are above
bearish yellow by 7.7%, which is exceedingly non-bearish on a quick-term
basis. However, that is down by 1.0% from last week. Non-bearish
attributes are considerably weakening.
The
Short-term Indicant reveals
individual Indicant Volume Indicators. Although the ETF’s Indicant Volume
Indicators are not as conclusive as that of the major market indices, it
sometimes obviates the market’s short-term intentions. Look for robustness
in the individual Indicant Volume Indicators, coupled with dynamic
behavior. Robust volume cycles during dynamic bearish or bullish cycles
indicate the breadth of the continuation of that cycle. The more
pronounced they are, the greater the lingering effect of the underlying
bullish or bearish direction.
The Short-term
Indicant also identifies the breakout lines and breakdown lines for
Exchange Traded Funds. None of the 30-ETF’s are contacting their breakout
lines. That is down from three last weekend This non-bearish attribute
weakened considerably. This is down by 20 funds from five weeks ago when
the current Quick-term Bull last pinnacled. Since then the overall market
has been cooling.
The average
distance of all 30-ETF’s between their current price and their respective
breakout lines is a mere 3.8%, which is 1.1% lower than last week. It is
significantly bullish when even just one ETF is contacting its breakout
down other than those of a contrarian nature. Unfortunately, the solid
bullishness has been lost on a Short-term Indicant basis.
The average
distance between the current price and the ETF’s breakdown lines is a
whopping 18.2%, which is down by 1.3% from last week. Although bearish
expressions dominated this past week, this configuration remains
non-bearish.
The overall
relationship between breakout and breakdown lines is no longer configured
with a significant bullish bias on a Short-term basis. Contact with
breakdown lines is extremely bearish and contact with the breakout lines
are extremely bullish. As you can see, there is absolutely no threat of
breakdown contact in the near future. Thus, there is little opportunity
for the bear to dominate market behavior on a short-term basis.
Unfortunately, bearish expressions can occur before contact is made.
There are no
conflicts between the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant at this time.
There were
four put option buy signals for
ETF options this past Friday.
There were a few put option buy signals throughout this past week, as
well. As indicated in the daily stock market reports, conditions were not
ripe for profitability. Meandering markets are not good for options
traders. Volatility is a requirement for profitability and that missing
right now.
ETF Force
Vectors remain directionally mixed with some moving south and some moving
north. Many are now inside bearish domains. Vector Pressure, which had
been in bullish domains is approaching bearish domains. Some have even
fallen into bearish domains, which triggered the put option buy signals.
As sated last
week, there is no bullish or bearish convergence, which supports
meandering behavior. This configuration has shifted away from a solid
bullish bias to a slight bullish bias on a quick-term and short-term
basis. Never buy a put option when the underlying security is a red bull.
There are only four red bulls, which even one supports a bullish bias. The
problem is the huge drop of red bulls from last week.
Secular Market Blend
This section
is a repeat from the last several months with a few modifications,
reflecting recent secular influences. Although appearing redundant at
times, it is important to read this section each week to keep abreast of
secular market shifts. Remember, secular shifts can last twenty-five or
more years. Fortunately, secular market movements do not deter mid-term,
short-term, and quick-term profit opportunities.
The current
Mid-term Bull market and buying barrage started over three years ago in
late 2002, the last mid-term election year. We are now entering the next
mid-term election year. The last one followed the predicted market bottom
in 2002, which was a mid-term election year. The mid-term presidential
election year phenomenon was consistent with history in 2002. Will it be
consistent in 2006? The last mid-term election year, 2002, found a
cyclical bottom, which is a common attribute in presidential mid-term
election years.
Even more
impressive was how the market synchronized with near perfection to normal
seasonality in 2002. The April-October period was typically bearish. That
bear leg was a deep one in 2002. The upcoming mid-term election year of
2006, fundamentally, supports historical standards. In other words, expect
no bullish enthusiasm with rising interest rates and rising energy costs
as we head into the mid-term election year. The political establishment
and its ugly influence on economic activity are typically at its worse in
the presidential post election year, which just concluded with large cap
bearishness. The current Mid-term Bull has been surprisingly strong with
weak fundamentals and the normal political threat in this post election
year. The market was mixed this past year with some bearishness and
bullishness in the broader indices.
Keep in mind,
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality (Nov-Jan) is historically
bullish regardless of fundamental reason. The market can find a cyclical
bottom in next year’s mid-term election year after the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality elevates it. It would not be surprising for a nice
rise during this year’s heart and soul of bullish seasonality only to be
followed with bearish expressions after January 2006. The recent weakening
in the Quick-term and Short-term Indicant suggests such bearishness. The
current heart and soul of bullish seasonality has demonstrated normalcy so
far with an extremely bullish November. However, December finished with a
bearish conclusion. The omission of a solid Santa Claus rally this past
year is somewhat ominous.
The Dow30
found bottom over three years ago on October 9, 2002 at 7286.27. The
NASDAQ found bottom on the same day at 1114.11.Finding cyclical bottoms in
mid-term election years is common. As earlier stated, the Indicant began
its buying barrage in October – November 2002 just after the market
bottomed from the severe 2000-2002 Bear Market. There were 239 buy signals
between October 5, 2002 and November 9, 2002 out of the 296 stocks and
funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. Even badly managed
companies received a buy signal, which is a common attribute of
sustainable new bull markets. As many of you noticed, those companies
eventually dip back to the south after the euphoria of new bullishness.
Some of you
recall the
Short-term Indicant Bear for the
NASDAQ was the longest in history. It even exceeded the Dow’s 1929-1932
Short-term Indicant Bear in breadth and approached it in magnitude. The
good news is that the NASDAQ’s decline did not lead to a depression, which
is a clear indication of how little influence tech stocks have on the
economy.
There are two
important axioms to remember. 1) Real economic wealth is created in only
three ways - manufacturing, agriculture, and extraction. 2) The only
positive influence politicians have on the economy is to undo their prior
damage. They are now doing their damage, some of which will be undone in
2007; the next presidential pre-election year. That is why the market
typically finds bottom in the mid-term election year. That is also why the
presidential pre-election year is historically the most bullish on the
four year cycle. If the strength of the current Mid-term Bull can be
subjected only to meandering behavior, like 2004 and 2005, then it is
possible for the current Mid-term Bull to be a record setting one in terms
of duration.
The political
industry reduces wealth. Politicians continually attempt to redistribute
wealth, which flies in the face of the laws of nature. They promote
“middle class” attainment. The larger the middle class, the more power
politicians and their academia brethren have. The communists tried that,
resulting 99% poverty, while the ruling 1% lived like kings. In other
words, socialism rewards an ability to intellectualize, while capitalism
rewards the results of appealing effort.
The remainder
of this section, Secular Market Blend, is repeated, in part, from the past
several months, but it does not hurt to reread it each week. As time
progresses and conditions change, there will be modifications to it to
maintain a balanced frame of reference.
You will
notice many of the
mutual fund buy signals occurred
in March 2003. Many of you recall how the market did not synchronize with
the heart and soul of bullish seasonality from November 2002 through
February 2003. December 2002 was the most bearish since 1931. After the
asynchronous behavior in the November 2002 rolling third of the year, the
market turned bullish in March 2003 and again did not synchronize with
normal seasonality. The Mid-term Indicant continued signaling bull during
bearish seasonality in 2003. The market continued moving north during that
time, contrary to historical standards. As stated in most of 2004, bearish
expressions on a Mid-term basis between May and October 2004 should not be
surprising. That is exactly what occurred. The result was a meandering
market with a slight bearish bias during most of 2004 and 2005.
As stated
since late October and early November, do not be surprised at increasing
quick-term and short-term bullish expressions in the immediate future,
followed by increased bearish expressions early next year. So far, this
prognosis is at par with those expectations. Fundamentals and historical
standards support that scenario. The magnitude of early 2006 bearishness
is not predictable. Also, simply wait for the various Indicant model’s
advisement of bull/bear status, as forecasting the market is a waste of
time.
November was
exceedingly bullish and consistent with historical normalcy. The November
– January rolling quarter is the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
However, December 2005 was contrary to historical standards with a bearish
conclusion.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/History-Seasonal/HS0001.htm
Make certain
you read the entire pages on the above link. You will see there are
exceptions.
Stop Loss Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a stop loss of 8% on recent buys because of the
Quick-term Bull.
Use a 10%
trailing stop loss or the yellow or green values you will find on the
tables for your longer-term hold positions. If your stock or fund is above
the bearish yellow curve and below the green curve, set your stop loss
equal to the greater of the yellow curve and the trailing stop loss. If
your stock or fund is above the green curve, set your stop loss at no less
the value of the green curve or 10% trailing, whichever is greater. If
your stock or fund is above the red curve and you bought at the Mid-term
Buy signal, you should use the 10% trailing stop loss.
If you are up
by triple digit amounts and enjoy your ownership of the stock or fund,
then use a 20% trailing stop loss or the slow moving blue curve price. If
you really enjoy holding the stock, keep a close eye on the management.
Dilettante managers have a way of worming into the business. Watch closely
for cronyism and lazy-hazy management dialog. Keep your eye on lavish
spending and excessive concerns about social issues. Those types are more
interested in burning your money for their pleasures, as opposed to making
you money. High performing companies remain focused on honoring the
investments made by their shareholders.
In a few
instances, you will see a hold signal for a stock or fund that is down
from its buy signal or below one of the above conditions for selling. If
you are more of a trader than an investor, feel free to buy stocks and
funds with those “bearish” attributes. They are configured for a possible
rebound, while at the same time, it is important to set the stop losses
mentioned in this report. Use the Quick-term Indicant as a guide in your
decision-making processes. If the stock price is falling in a Quick-term
Bear market, it is not advisable to buy.
Do not short
on stocks if they are up from an avoid signal. Stocks go up more often
than they go down. Stocks have a tendency to march to their own drumbeat
when rising. Some stocks rise and continue to rise in the most severe of
bear markets. Short selling opens up an opportunity for the snakes on Wall
Street to take everything you own. They can cause a stock to rise at their
whim and without any regard to fundamental reason. It usually does not
make sense to bet against the sweat and toil of hard-working people.
There are some
instances where stocks rise during bear markets due to legitimate
fundamental reasons. If the market emulates a 1970’s configuration, most
stocks will plummet, but energy related stocks will skyrocket. It is
unusual that energy has been skyrocketing the past three years, of which
two of those years enjoyed bullish market behavior. The coexistence of a
bullish energy sector and general equities does not make much fundamental
sense, but the underlying economic fundamentals have supported this
phenomenon. There is good reason to expect an abandonment of this
phenomenon with record setting oil prices and rising interest rates.
However, the heart and soul of bullish seasonality, more often than not,
excludes fundamental reason in its normally bullish behavioral patterns.
You are enjoying that now.
Stock and Fund Update
Click the
following link to see sorted performance of stocks and funds with
hold/avoid signals. In the past, they were included them in this email
message but now display them on the website. This is available to the
public, while the specific buy and sell transactions are limited to
members only.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Performance/Top-Bot.htm
Summary of Stocks and Funds with Buy and
Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/Buy-Sell%20Summary%20This%20Week.htm
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time.
All updated
information can be found from a single page at Indicant.Net. Click the
below link to that page. You will need your login ID and password.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Divergence versus Convergence
As stated the
past seven weeks, there is no bullish convergence. That is a common
attribute with meandering behavior. The current Quick-term and Short-term
Bull markets, although maintaining non-bearish configurations, have
weakened considerably. This lack of bullish convergence suggests an
increasing possibility the current Quick-term and Short-term bulls will
peter out early this year. Such a scenario would result in political
normalcy, when the market finds a bottom in the mid-term election year.
Economic Conditions – Inflation, Currency,
Interest Rates
There is
nothing different from the last few weeks. Most world currencies continue
in their cyclical shift in support of a strengthening U.S. Dollar.
Although the cyclical direction remains in favor of a strengthening U.S.
Dollar, behavior the past few weeks has been of a meandering nature.
However, continued strengthening is expected as long as interest rates
continue rising.
There is
nothing new. This paragraph remains unchanged from the past few weeks. As
repeatedly stated, the only exception to this is the
Canadian Dollar. It has not yet
made this cyclical mid-term commitment to weaken against the greenback. It
continues to strengthen against the U.S. Dollar. As stated the past
several weeks, the Athabasca Tar Sand Oil potential continues to threaten
the Canadian cost advantage. The perception of huge imports to the U.S.
will provide increased difficulty for the Canadian Dollar to continue
weakening. This should hurt Canadian manufacturing. The Canadian
government is going to attempt to weaken the Canadian dollar, most likely
at the request of General Motors, but $60 oil will make that difficult.
Detroit may learn the economic benefits of elevating carburetor
efficiency. General Motors can benefit tremendously with a weaker Canadian
dollar with their massive manufacturing capacity in Oshawa, Ontario,
Canada. Unfortunately, the strengthening Canadian dollar has hurt GM’s bottom
line and consequently, much of the Canadian capacity is earmarked for
closure.
Commodity prices continue
holding at near cyclical peaks. Some are falling due to profit-taking, but
their cyclical nature remains bullish. That does not bode well for general
equities.
As stated the
past few weeks, OPEC does not want encourage Athabasca Tar Sand Oil
competitiveness. They also do not want to see dynamic energy conservation
measures in the Western Hemisphere. OPEC will not consider a long-term
strategy due to their inherent incapability to do so. Consequently, it is
possible, although not likely, OPEC will force oil price reductions to
mitigate growing competitiveness. Even OPEC cannot alter the dynamics of
supply/demand laws. Keep your eye on this, as rapidly declining oil prices
will catapult the market into another strong bull leg. Equally, do not be
surprised at a dynamic bear in the event that high oil prices penetrate
the consumer price index.
Interest rates
continue their incline, which is politically congruent. Even a lame duck
president wants his party to retain power after his departure. President
Bush’s job is to gain seats in Congress right now. So do not be surprised
at economically friendly policies in the second half of this year. Expect
accelerated troop reductions in Iraq, as well.
The Quick-term
Indicant is keeping a daily eye on Gold. Its recent quick-term bullishness
suggests increasing expectations of inflationary threats. Read your daily
stock market newsletters to monitor this dynamic.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Econ.htm
Fear Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 75.2% one-hundred and eighty-four weeks ago since
the MTI buy signal on April 13, 2001. One-hundred and seventy-seven weeks
ago, it closed up 30.1%. Last week it closed up 217.8%. The current
annualized growth rate since the April 13, 2001 buy signal is 45.5%. After
falling sharply 28-weeks ago, it bounced north in 22-weeks of the past
28-weeks. This fund has fallen sharply in two of the last three weeks.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28, is up
31.9% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 26, 2005. That
annualizes to 91.0%, which is not an impossible performance level if oil
prices resume their advance. This fund should do well in the event this
market turns into a 1970’s type of market. This fund moved north the past
two weeks.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
which is isolated in the energy sector, is up 237.2% since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2002. It is annualizing at 69.3%. This
fund has moved down significantly in four of the last five weeks.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX, is
up 137.8% (annualized at 49.6%) since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy
on April 5, 2003.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, is up 117.3% (annualized at 55.9%) since the Mid-term Indicant
signaled buy on December 6, 2003.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX, is
up 111.3% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003. It
is annualized at 46.2%. All energy related funds moved south in four of
the last five weeks. However, they remain with a solid hold position.
These funds
should do well even if the market turns extremely bearish. Continue to
hold them until the Mid-term Indicant signals sell. If litigation and
voodoo brokering brings these funds down, the Mid-term Indicant will
advise of appropriate actions.
The SQI
(Consolidated Short-term and Quick-term Indicant) model signaled buy for
the
CLD-ETF#11 on August 3, 2005. It
is up 18.5% since then. It is annualized at 44.7%. Interestingly, it moved
north last week, even though the related Vanguard fund fell sharply to the
south.
The SQI
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on March 26, 2003. It is up 134.0% (annualized at 47.8%). This fund moved
south consistent with a general bearish attitude toward the energy sector.
Remember, the markets anticipate by six to nine months ahead of actual
events.
The contrarian
sector, commodities and petroleum, were down last week while general
equities were also down slightly. One does not want to see declines in
general equities and contrarian industries at the same time. That suggests
a sour economic outlook. Last weeks convergent bearishness is a little
discerning. As stated last week, there is simply not enough optimism to
propel a dynamic bullish spurt on a quick-term basis at this time.
Short-term Indicant Update for Major Market
Indices
Read your
daily reports. The
Quick-term Indicant signaled
bull 8.3-weeks ago after signaling bear since January 4, 2005. The eight
major indices are up 2.7% since the Quick-term Indicant’s bull signal on
November 2, 2005. The Dow is up 2.3% since the
Short-term Indicant signaled
bull on November 3, 2005. The NASDAQ is up 2.8% since the
Short-term Indicant signaled
bull on November 2, 2005. Last week’s bearish expressions is a little
concerning about the 2006 first quarter.
The
Indicant Volume Indicator is
expressing a lethargic cycle due to holiday apathy. As stated last week
this indicator should resurface into a meaningful observation the first
week of January 2006.
The
Short-term Indicant signaled bull for the Dow30 on November 3, 2005
and the NASDAQ on November 2, 2005. They are up 1.9% and 2.8%,
respectively since then.
For more
information about the Quick-term Indicant, refer to
last week’s daily reports.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new bull signals and no new
bear signals.
All ten major
indices are bulls. They are up by an average of 40.2% since the MTI-RYS
signaled bull an average of 96-weeks ago. That annualizes to 21.7%, which
is down from last week. The strongest bull is the
Dow Utilities. It is up 112.9%
since the October 25, 2002 bull signal. The utilities moved south the last
two weeks after moving north in the prior two weeks. Your utility hold
positions remain safe, but keep your eye on this particular index. Severe
bears show little mercy, regardless of dividend yields.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is now at $32,465,876. That beats buy and
hold performance of $1,640,534 on a $10,000 investment in the Dow stocks
in 1900. The
MTI S&P500 is at $161,172. That
beats buy and hold’s $122,273 on a December 31, 1971 $10,000 investment.
The
MTI-NASDAQ is at $184,521. That
beats buy and hold’s $76,467 on an October 18, 1985 $10,000 investment.
The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by 1,879.0%, 31.8%, and
141.3%, respectively, for these indices as of this past week.
The Indicant’s
percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during bull
signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is because
the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the MTI-RYS model avoids
bear markets. The only purpose of the MTI-RYS model is to avoid the bear
markets. That is why it beat buy and hold by nearly 2000% over the past
100+ years.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100
Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click the
following link to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-NAS100-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30
Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJIA-STKS.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15
Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-DJU-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Indicant
Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click the
following hyperlink to view this group of stocks:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20MTI-Stks.htm
Mid-term Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
The Mid-term
Indicant continues avoiding
ProFunds Ultra Short due, in
part, to the Quick-term Indicant’s bull signal and the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality. The SQI (Consolidated Quick-term and Short-term
Indicant) is signaling hold for the QQQQ, which is why ProFunds Ultra
Short is avoided. It is down 3.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled
sell on November 11, 2005. This fund may show some significant promise
early this year. The last time this fund was very profitable was in the
first half of 2002, which was also a mid-term election year. This fund
disappointed in the meandering markets of 2004 and 2005.
Click here to see all Mutual Funds tracked
by the Mid-term Indicant.
Always
remember never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good
way to mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
270.2% (annualized at 19.0%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
739-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. The recession, deflation, and inflation have not been strong
enough to signal bear. A link to the Long-term Indicant is below:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/LTI-Markets-DJIA/DJIA.htm
Indicant Conclusion
The Quick-term
Indicant and Short-term Indicant continues signaling bull for all major
indices. Quick-term and Short-term attributes remain with a bullish bias,
but it is no longer significant. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality
is now here and should last through January. Keep your eye on the daily
stock market reports, as the market from time to time aborts historical
standards. Fundamentals and volume lethargy threaten a bullish conclusion
to this month. Several Quick-term and Short-term attributes no longer
favor bullish expressions. Conversely, there is a slight increase in those
favoring bearish expressions.
Keep in mind
this is the mid-term election year, which historically finds a market
bottom. Since predecessor years leading up to the upcoming presidential
mid-term election year have not demonstrated dynamic bearishness, do not
be surprised at a bearish cycle in early 2006. As always, await guidance
from the various Indicant models. They will let you know when or if this
expected bearishness will occur.
The current
Quick-term and Short-term Bulls remains possessed with bullish
configurations, but again no longer solidly bullish. Last week’s
performance was bearish. That has now occurred for three consecutive
weeks. Although the market has demonstrated no bullish expressions the
past three weeks, there is no dynamic bearish threat on the immediate
horizon. None of the Quick-term, Short-term, and Mid-term attributes
suggest dynamic bearish influences, although current configurations may be
an embryonic prelude to what will occur in the first half of this year.
Read your
daily reports, as quick-term attributes can shift quickly. As stated last
week, the market lacks bullish convergence, which suggests bearish
influences can occur quickly. Too many sectors are not participating in
the current heart and soul of bullish seasonality. Gold’s strong bullish
presence with mounting commodity prices and interest rates, if continued,
will slap this bull out of influence.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
In addition,
once you are inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log
in. It is on the top of every page in the web site so you can always find
your way back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
01/01/06