Mar 27, 2011
Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 03, Issue 04 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Bull or
Bear Part 2
The Mid-term
Indicant is currently tracking 100-mutual funds with a couple of NLT
records. NLT means no longer traded. That occurs when a stock or fund
loses its symbol, which correlates with going out of business or asset
consumption by other organizations. There are a couple of empty spots with
NLT records that will be filled in a few months. Suggestions are welcome.
The Mid-term
Indicant has been tracking several of these funds for several years. One
method for tracking different economic sectors is through mutual fund
research, as opposed to subscribing to economic information regarding
sectors.
Fidelity
Funds were among the first to isolate economic sectors. As the years have
gone by, several other family funds manifested. Vanguard emerged as one of
the better family funds by the mid-1990’s. Since then, Exchange Traded
Funds have been developed, offering greater latitude and liquidity to
investors.
Prior to the
great bear market of 2008 that actually began in 2007, the Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for all the Mutual Funds it tracks except for
the lone short fund,
MF#22-ProShares Ultra Short.
Mutual Fund
tracking by the Mid-term Indicant is much more stable than stocks. There
are fewer buy and sell signals for mutual funds. That is because it is
much more difficult to manipulate their prices. Doing so requires much
more collusion than it takes to manipulate a common stock price. Also
dampening volatility is that plusses and minuses among funds’ holdings
offset one another.
To get a historical glimpse of the Mid-term Indicant’s Mutual Fund
performance tracking, click this sentence.
As you can see from the chart, the average performance of those with hold
signals were up over 125% in mid-2008. Scrolling down a bit, though, you
can see those with hold signals had dwindled down to less than sixty from
the 99 that were being held prior to the beginning of the bear market.
As you can
see from the chart, the Mid-term signaled hold for sixty or more funds
from late 2004 through early 2008. The selling spree ahead of the 2008
bear market began in early 2007 and by September 2008, all 99-mutual funds
were avoided by the Mid-term Indicant.
All strong
bull markets require full sectored support. Although rolling recessions
through various economic sectors occur from time to time, bull markets
endure mere bearish spurts as opposed to shifting to a bearish cycle
within the damaged sectors.
However,
there are two non-contrarian sectors/funds not yet participating in the
stock market bull.
The Mid-term
Indicant is currently avoiding three mutual funds. Two of them relate to
economic sectors and the other is a contrarian fund. The contrarian fund
is the aforementioned Pro Shares Ultra Short Fund.
All three of these funds can be viewed at the webpage by clicking this
sentence. As you can see, the
two bearish economic sectors remaining from the 2008 bear market and
related economic recession are financials and home equities.
MF#42-FDISX-Fidelity Financial Services is down 45.1% since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell on Nov 9, 2007. As you can see from its chart, it
crossed above bearish yellow twice since that sell signal. Each crossing
was confronted with a bearish response. This funds’ holdings consists
primarily of the “too big to fail” banks and related institutions. Of
course, banks do not create wealth. Consequently, the anemic performance
of this fund holdings are for the most part irrelevant to economic
strength.
MF#45-FSVLX-Fidelity Home Finance is down 75.7% since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell on January 26, 2007. As you can see from its
charts, it has not contacted the bearish yellow curve since that sell
signal. It is the most anemic fund among those tracked by the Mid-term
Indicant.
The Indicant Weekly Report of August 24, 2008 describes the nature of the
housing crisis at its very core
of the problem. Currently, one in four U.S. homeowners endures mortgages
far exceeding the market value of their homes. That contrasts
significantly from that of the 1990’s.
Home
valuations in the 1990’s enjoyed the opposite problem from that of today.
Many refinanced their mortgages. Homeowners then propelled their windfall
into the economy and the stock market. This propelled the stock market
bull in the 1990’s at a rate far exceeding any prior historical
performance level. That economic propellant no longer exists.
As stated in
the
August 24, 2008-Weekly Stock Market Report,
the only time real economic wealth was created was when the house was
built. After that, economic overhead members of American society sought
additional financial gains well after the wealth was created. That
leeching behavior was beyond economic normalcy. Most of it was
orchestrated by politicians and their fraternity brothers in those “too
big to fail” organizations.
With all of
the economic meddling by non-economic wealth creators, there remain enough
wealth creators generating real economic growth around the world. They
exist in the only three wealth building sectors; manufacturing,
extraction, and agriculture.
A view of
mutual funds support the idea the bull market remains in tact. That is
because of earnings growth in the many sectors they represent. That
suggests significant bullish economic breadth. The only two weaklings are
the phony ones; leeched home valuations and banks too big to fail.
If sell
signals mount for mutual funds across various sectors, the bull market
will be under a major threat. Configurations along the Mid-term cycle are
nowhere near such behavior. Although the shorter-term cycles suggest
duress, the Mid-term cycle is not nearly as nervous about technical or
fundamental data.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market
report.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
no
buy signals and
no
sell signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 296 of the 340-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
50.7%. That annualizes to 45.7%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 296-stocks and funds for an average of 57.7-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 40-stocks and funds of 340-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 40.7% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 97.2-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Mar 26, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 226-stocks and funds
out of 333 tracked for an average of 38.5-weeks. They were up by an
average of 31.5% (annualized at 42.5%). There were 89-avoided stocks and
funds at that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of
37.3% since their respective sell signals an average of 81.3-weeks earlier
one year ago. There were no buy signals and one sell signal on this
weekend last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for only 22-stocks and funds of the
344-tracked two years ago on Mar 27, 2009. They were up by an average of
106.1% (annualized at 58.6%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 94.2-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 322-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 35.5% since their
respective sell signals an average of 42.7-weeks earlier. There were no
buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2009. The stock market
bear continued dominating on this weekend in 2009, while petitioning a
stock market bottom.
There were
158-stocks and funds with hold signals on Mar 21, 2008 since their buy
signals an average of 159.2-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of
175.3% (annualized at 57.3%). There were 158-avoided stocks and funds at
that time. They were down by an average of 21.6% from their respective
sell signals an average of 23.0-weeks earlier. There were 47-buy signals
and one sell signal on this weekend in 2008 in addition to the 227-sell
signals in the prior 19-weeks, as the bear market was already well
underway at this point in 2008. Although performance levels remained
excellent, many stocks and funds were displaying souring configurations in
early 2008. There was a near-term bullish cycle in March 2008 that
triggered some of the buy signals.
On Mar 23,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 266-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 126.8% (annualized at
63.2%) since their buy signals an average of 104.3-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 68-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 5.9% since their sell signals an average of
13.0-weeks earlier. There were eight buy signals and no sell signals on
this weekend in 2007.
Five years
ago, on Mar 24, 2006, there were 288-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 320 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 115.4% (annualized at 62.3%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 96.1-weeks earlier. There were 57-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 8.0% since their respective sell
signals an average of 23.2-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and no
sell signals on this weekend in 2006.
On Mar 25,
2005, there were 288-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 85.8%, annualizing at 59.3%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 75.3-weeks earlier. There were 84-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 28.6% since their sell signals an
average of 52.3-weeks earlier. There was one buy signal and three sell
signals on this weekend in 2005.
There were
249-stocks and funds with hold signals on Mar 26, 2004. They were up by an
average of 85.8%, annualizing at 59.3%, since their buy signals 52.3-weeks
earlier. The 43-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 24.7%
since their respective sell signals an average of 39.3-weeks earlier.
There were three buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2004.
On Mar 28,
2003, there were 241-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 29.7%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 12.6-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 75.6%. There were 36-avoided stocks at that time. They
were down by an average of 29.7% since their sell signals an average of
27.5-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 296 stocks and
funds in 2002-late 2004. There was one buy signal in addition to 119-buy
signals in the prior week and 18-sell signals on this weekend in 2003. The
2003 bull market was five weeks old on this weekend in 2003.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
Click this link to this week’s buy and sell signals.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Buy and Sell Signals This Weekend
In spite of
the stock market’s short-term bearish concerns, the Mid-term Indicant
continues identifying this as a mere bearish spurt.
The Mid-term
continues with support for the bull, while the Short-term Indicant has
identified some threatening elements. That suggests a mere bearish spurt
may be unfolding, but confronting significant bullish resiliency.
The mid-term
election year continues offering traction toward stock market bullishness.
Much of this gain correlated with political dynamics and was consistent
with historical standards. The stock market remains configured for
classical stock market bullishness during pre-election years, which should
be enjoyed in 2011, albeit with potential near-term bearish expressions.
The stock market’s bull, though, continues to impress with its resilience
with each bearish incursion. That prognosis rests on political dynamics
and historical standards. However, current configurations suggest that
mere bearish spurts may manifest, but none support bearish dominance.
The current
stock market bull originated in anticipation of stalemated politicians.
That has been the historical standard and in this case, history repeats.
Partisanship is expected to heighten and that remains in effect and
therefore bullish in spite of potential for near-term bearish behavior.
Mid-eastern unrest will resume its threat to the stock market bull, as a
function of speculation of those empty souls who are attempting to gain
control of petro flow into the capital markets. The problem with economic
leeches and tyrants is their limited ability to see the big picture. In
the end, their methods result in devolved processes.
The Japanese
nuclear crisis adds a twist.
The Short-term Indicant and daily stock
market report have been closing tracking this new element.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest, but they should be tight. Right
after buying, set the stop loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve
values, depending on your personal preferences. Those stop losses are
visible to floor traders and subject to a bit of unfairness to you and to
their benefit.
For your
longer-term holdings where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are
signaled on the Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are
updated daily. These shorter-term models attempt participation in
significant bullish spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is
focused on fundamentals and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
67.7% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
146.2% and the S&P500 is up 69.1% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 155.5% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months if the stock
market moves bearishly by significant amounts. Such bearishness is
unlikely based on current Mid-term Indicant configurations. Historical
standards and political climate support continued bullishness during 2011.
Much of that depends, however, on unrest in the Middle East, related oil
prices, political mumbo-jumbo by U.S. politicians, and the Japanese
crisis.
The NASDAQ is
down 45.7% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 14.0% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 4.2% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025.
If socialism
continues to expand, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050
and that depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by
politicians. Significant downsizing of federal governments and related
regulations shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous
sentence. If the opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies,
the NASDAQ will never return to its 2000 peak.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 21.9% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness.
The NASDAQ
was down by 7.1% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with the mid-term year’s historical standards of
finding bottoms during mid-term election years.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was up 4.2%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was down on
this weekend in 2004 by 1.8% and finishing up for that year by 1.4%. This
was congruent with election year bullishness, although shy of magnitude
standards.
It was down
8.5% on this weekend in 2005’s post election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during post
election years. This was an excellent year, based on post election year
historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and 2005
were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up 4.9% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%, which
again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was up by 1.7% at this time in 2007, finishing up by
9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The stock
market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took control
of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as opposed to
repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 11.7% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was down
3.0% on this weekend in 2009, but up significantly on this weekending date
in 2009. Keep in mind, the extraordinary bullish cycle in 2009 finished
that year down by 20.6% from its prior Mid-term cyclical peak on October
31, 2007. The 2008 bear market more accurately reflected economic
fundamentals than the 2009 bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 5.7% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%, which
was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially in the
second half of such years.
The Dow is
down 13.7% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 4.1% since its last peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is down 16.1%
since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. The S&P600-small cap index is down 2.0% since
its last closing peak on Jul 19, 2007. Bull market expirations are not as
obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear markets are with
simultaneous bottoming among the major indices.
Interestingly, the NAS100 topped its pre-crash highs of 2007/8 several
weeks ago. It maintained that lofty achievement until last week. It is
now up by 4.7% since its Oct 31, 2007 peak. The S&P400 is the other major
index tracked by the Indicant that is also above pre-2008-crash levels. It
is up by 4.8% since its prior peak on Jul 13, 2007. The remaining indices
remain below their 2007 peaks. The weakest index, S&P100, continues
lagging. It is down by 19.4% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly closing peak.
The current bull will remain suspicious, in character, until all these
major indices cross above their prior peaks.
The Nov 14, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
Most major
indices last cyclical bottom occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the
four major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The
only exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical
bottom on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view, albeit mildly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
The Dow is up
86.7% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 116.2% and the S&P500 is up
94.2% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 139.9% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-January 2010 bull leg was indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. The Mid-term Indicant and Short-term
Indicant are no longer suggesting impending bearishness. However, the
Short-term Indicant is enduring some bearish spurt configurations.
The current
bull cycle is believed to be the classical mid-term election year bullish
starting point ahead of the presidential pre-election year, which is now
underway. The pre-election year is the most bullish along the 4-year
cycle. In essence, the firing of incumbent politicians in the U.S.
generally arouses the bull. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull continues expressing its delight in
that, which is supported by historical standards.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull with pressure to reduce
government waste. Anticipating that is bullish, even though the shorter
near-term cycle is not as supportive of the bull. Middle Eastern unrest,
although, is a bit threatening to the stock market bull, depending though
on the nature of that unrest. If oil prices skyrocket, the bear will be
delighted. If democracy expands in that region, the bull will be
delighted. Current parameters suggest stock market bearishness with
maximal threats to the Saudi Kingdom, which is a stabilizing force in that
region. The Japanese nuclear crisis remains elusive, even though related
Japanese ETF’s received Short-term Indicant sell signal three weeks ago.
Interestingly, all international related ETF’s received sell signals well
ahead of the Japanese nuclear crisis.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
As promised by Bernanke, the discount rate
(and prime) rate continue holding flat from their depressed levels. The
fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and very
depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any other
value.
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
It endured significant bearishness six weeks ago and holding there after a
bit of mild volatility. Bernanke, apparently, remains concerned with the
economic outlook. All of this continues suggesting few demand problems for
the T-Bill. The 2012 forecasted values do not yet indicate any significant
increases. Keep in mind these forecasts are purely statistical, but
qualitative inquiries are not suggesting different projections at this
time.
However, the
6-month CD yield increased significantly 16-weeks ago, suggesting desired
longer-term upward pressures by the banks. Even with all that, it remains
depressed and has been flat since then. It fell 10-basis points five weeks
ago. In essence, a level of stability has been found after wild variations
in such a minor investment vehicle. Anyone buying a 6-month CD at 0.40%
with 2+% CPI is heading to the poor house unless deflationary pressures
manifest. At any rate, all CD’s remain as Yellow Bears.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status nine weeks ago and holding at that level, but
remains with weakening trend and weakening mid-term cycle. There is no
good reason to assume its long-term cyclical decline will reverse.
However, the Bullish Red Curve shifted slightly to the north this past
week. The Canadian dollar, like the Yen, had been stable for several weeks
with a mild strengthening bias, although weakening a bit last week. They
both accelerated their strength from mild status the past three weeks.
Both the Yen and Canadian dollar’s cyclical direction and trend remain
bullish. The CA$ tends to parallel oil prices. The forecast for the CA$
continues with projected strengthening. The Japanese Yen trend and
mid-term cycle continues with strengthening trend, but has been trading in
a shallow zone the past several weeks. The Yen continues to strengthen in
spite of the earthquake and tsunami. G7 intervention is holding it up very
well and it continues to strengthen.
Overall, the
US dollar threatens to continue strengthening, but continues to weaken
against the Japanese Yen (high productivity) and the Canadian dollar
(resource rich).
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull to boot in spite of near-term cyclical bearishness. The
$2,000/oz-forecast by 2014 continues to challenged, based on political
dynamics. However, statistical bullishness remains in tact. At the same
webpage, you will notice oil is less stable, but enjoying steady increases
the past several weeks. Middle Eastern unrest is adding a bit of pizzazz
to those increases.
As stated by
the Indicant for several months, it is priced where the Kingdom finds
comfort at around $80/bbl, albeit departing on the high end of his desired
tolerance levels the past several days. It has been nudging a bit higher
than that for the past several weeks. It achieved Red Bull status a few
weeks ago for the first time since 2007. The high-end forecast continues
to project $120/bbl by 2012. The Saudi Kingdom will have to approve that,
though. Middle Eastern unrest offer additional pizzazz to its recent
bullishness. The King is probably a bit concerned about his job security
and related pleasures, but there is little doubt the kingdom remains in
charge of such matters. Speculators can shift the numbers around and if
oil prices escape his desired targets, rest assured he will take
countermeasures. OPEC has eagerly accelerated production in an attempt to
maintain balance between supply and demand.
Commodity
price’s quick-term cycle continues increasing, although bearish the past
few weeks due to economic threats from the tsunami. Significant bullish
behavior, however, continues along the mid-term to long-term cycle. They
are not yet contributory to inflationary pressures.
The Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index and Spot
Prices are enjoying Red Bull status.
This remains economically bullish. Spot prices have expressed stability
for the past few weeks.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, you will find the
Reuter’s UK Commodities Index continues
moving north since early 2009.
It is a Red Bull. It continues to skyrocket, setting a new all time high
during the week of November 8, 2010. It continued setting new highs until
the past few weeks. Some of this is attributable to the crisis in Japan.
Questionable economic projections and default threats from Portugal
continue to pester. It remains economically bullish with inflationary
considerations later. The
CRB Bridge Futures
continues its shift from waffling to more bullish aggression. It is also a
solid Red Bull in spite of softening last week due to the Japanese crisis.
This
paragraph remains the same. Commodities, overall, discontinued behavior
consistent with uncertainty in favor of outright bullishness several weeks
ago. Recent bearish behavior remains irrelevant. “Extract baby extract”
seems to be an evolving theme as more people around the planet are moving
toward capitalistic progressions in spite of American waffling.
Mortgage rates remain configured with
countering the prevailing bearish trend.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011 and retreated back down to economic neutrality. They
are no longer Red Bulls and configuring with more bearishness.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
continue to be relatively stable.
Overall, hard
economic data continues with stability, although cyclically increasing,
but softening the past several weeks. They could fall a bit in the coming
weeks, but the cycle and trend are nowhere near a state of reversal. That
is non-bearish, but lending support to longer-term inflationary potential.
However, rising productivity from increased interests in capitalism around
the world could significantly dampen inflationary threats. That, coupled
with U.S. political dynamics of potential massive sovereign debt
reductions, suggests dynamic bullishness.
At some
point, the U.S. Congress will learn they have no influence on how China,
India, and other countries manage their economies, which will eventually
enjoy larger economies than the U.S. at some point. If those rapidly
developing economies retain a penchant for capitalism, rest assured prices
for all commodities will escalate. However, rising productivity associated
with capitalists could dampen the effects on consumers. These potential
economic shifts are unparalleled in the annals of history.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 14.2%, annualizing at 27.0% since then. It was solidly bullish
last week. The Mid-term Indicant is no longer detecting a troubling future
for gold.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received a buy signal on Sep 4, 2009. It is up 23.0% since then,
annualizing at 14.6%. This lazy fund has been bearish in seven of the past
eleven weeks. It was also solidly bullish last week.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010 following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late 2008.
It is up 33.1%, annualized at 63.1% since the more recent buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell
cycles since late 2008. It is up 52.2%, annualized at 99.4%, since its Sep
17, 2010 buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct
8, 2010. It is up 36.5% since then, annualizing at 78.3%.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010. It is up 48.8% since that buy signal, annualizing at 92.9%.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled, buy, for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 45.7% since then, annualizing at 86.2%. It was
up 242.4% (annualized at 44.8%) since the buy signal on March 26, 2003
until the September 2008 sell signal.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 72.7% since that buy signal, annualizing at
31.4%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It is up 2.8%, annualizing at
29.2%, since its most recent Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18,
2011.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
All the major
indices are up by an average of 27.2% since their bull signals an average
of 50.6-weeks ago. That annualizes at 27.2%.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$32,050,174. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,859,210 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $155,265. That beats buy and hold’s $128,690 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $226,127. That beats buy and hold’s $91,167 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1623.9%, 20.7%, and 146.7%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid the bear markets. That is why it beat buy and
hold by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post election year, 2009. There will be another bear
cycle at some future point. Boasting will be more available at that time.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 75.7% since then.
The Near-term
and Quick-term Indicant signaled bull for QID on March 18, 2011. This
remains configured as a function of a short-term stock market bearish
spurt. The Mid-term Indicant is not supportive of an aggressive and
sustainable bear at this time. Consequently, the Mid-term Indicant remains
unable to signal buy for MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short at this time.
Although this
is classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable
to signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation
for the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a
thoroughbred in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting
the stock market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal. It is no longer
getting close to a buy signal, as it appears to have succumbed to the
stock market bull for the time being. It may not receive a buy signal
until 2013, which is the next post election year.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
322.2% (annualized at 16.6%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,012-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report - Summary
All Force
Vectors crossed into bullish domains and above Vector Pressure last
Thursday. The major indices and most ETF’s are above NTI Blue. And NTI
Blue is increasing. Normally, that would trigger bull signals and buy
signals. However, there are a couple of concerns that justify delaying
those signals.
The VIX Force
Vector found a common bottom last Thursday. Probabilities exceeded 90%
that it will increase on Friday. However, that did not occur. VIX Force
fell to a two year minimum point. The probability of a bullish bounce has
increased from 90% to 95%. That should occur early next week. Its Vector
Pressure is in bullish domains, suggesting its impending rebound will not
be insignificant. The VIX did not close below NTI Green. It did during
intraday trading on Friday, but quickly rebounding back above the NTI
Green curve. That is ominous on a near-term basis for the stock market and
bullish for the VIX.
The second
variable suggesting additional caution is volume. Volume was again mild on
Thursday’s and Friday’s bullish behavior. That suggests minimal potential
for bullish follow-on even though volume relationships have lost
correlation in this bull cycle. However, it seems there are very few that
are cross trading shares. When a few folks do it, suspicion is not out of
line.
VIX
passiveness in the next day or two will be inspirational to the bull and
the technical bullishness will then obtain enough respect for action.
Friday’s call option buys disappointed, but the April calls still have
three weeks before expiration.
The third
variable confronting the stock market bull is the NASDAQ100’s negative
Vector Pressure. It is just barely inside bearish domains, but it is
enough to remain cautious with respect to stock market bullishness on a
short-term basis. It has been the strongest bull and now the with the
weakest configurations. There is concern when the strongest becomes the
weakest.
As stated the
past few days, there is an absence of consistency, suggesting a lack of
strong bullish or bearish commitment, but with an increasing edge favoring
the bear on the short-term cycle.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
All Force
Vectors are in bullish domains and higher than Pressure. Very few
attributes remain in support of the Near-term bear signal. However, there
are three of them that suggests delaying the bull signal until they no
longer support the stock market bear.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull for contrarian VIX, only. It is down 13.3%
since its bull signal 2.6-weeks ago. It is down well over 50% the past
seven days, but remains configured as a VIX bull, but barely so. As stated
this past Thursday, it is nestled right on top of NTI Green, which is a
solid bouncing point. If it does not bounce, the stock market bear will
acquiesce to bullish ambition. It fell considerably below Green during
intraday trading, but finished up from that intraday low.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bear for all eleven major non-contrarian indices.
They are up by an average of 2.5% since their bear signals 1.7-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant continues signaling bull for ten major non-contrarian
indices and contrarian VIX. They are up by an average of 15.6% since their
bull signals an average of 25.1-weeks ago, annualizing at 32.4%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bear for the weak Dow Utilities. It is up
0.9% since its bear signal on Mar 15, 2011.
Short-term Market Summary
Ten
non-contrarian Red Bull configuration remains supportive of the Quick-term
bull cycle.
The major
indices remain with relatively high Pressure, but the Dow Utilities,
NASDAQ, and NAS100 succumbed to short-term bearish Pressure this past
Tuesday. They are attempting a comeback, but need to do a little more work
to be convincing.
Force Vectors
are moving in a bullish cycle. They are now bullishly mature. They should
shift back to the south early next week. If they do not and start moving
laterally, the Near-term Bear will expire and new Near-term Bull will
begin a new cycle to the northeast.
Discerning is
the VIX’s bearishly mature Force Vector and it setting at a common minimum
point this past Thursday. Also, the VIX is nestled on NTI Green. On
Friday, the VIX dropped below both of those points during intraday
trading, but rebounded strongly before the stock market closed. Last
Thursday, probabilities exceeded 90% of an impending bounce, which should
induce stock market bearishness. As of Friday’s close, that probability of
a bullish VIX recoil and stock market bearishness associated with that
recoil now exceeds 95%. The VIX Force Vector dropped to its lowest point
since May 2009.
Indicant Volume Indicators
Volume is
finally increasing. Unfortunately, this change in cycle correlates with
bearish aggression. That is, indeed, bearish.
The NASDAQ IVI
crossed into high activity domains on Mar 21, 2011. Although the NYSE
Indicant Volume Indicator remains in low interest domains, it is moving
robustly. There is an increasing interest in the stock market. Some could
argue that the earthquake and tsunami did not throw the stock market into
a nasty bearish slide, which is bullish to many. However, the NYSE IVI
recent robustness correlates very well with stock market bearishness.
Statistical bias favors short-term bearishness as opposed to belief
systems.
Mar 25,
2011-Fri-Same as yesterday; low volume on mild bullishness remains without
strong bullish or bearish support.
Mar 24,
2011-Thu-Again mild volume and thus no change with respect to volume’s
influence on stock market directional intensity.
Mar 23,
2011-Wed-Mild volume again does nothing to deter prevailing near-term
stock market bearish expectations.
Mar 22,
2011-Tue-Volume was mild, relative to recent levels, on mild bearishness.
However, both Indicant Volume Indicators continue moving robustly in a
confused state with robustness supporting both bear and bull. The
Quick-term cycle remains solidly bullish, while the near-term cycle
remains pestered by the bear’s ambition.
Mar 21,
2011-Mon-Volume was mild along historical comparisons but up a bit on
recent comparisons. That offers mild support for the bull, but recent
relationships offer a bit more support for bearishness. Volume continues
to not obviate directional stock market intensity.
Mar 18,
2011-Fri-Aggressive volume on passive bullishness is interesting. The
stock market enjoyed aggressive bullishness, but closed downward on this
day. There is no meaningful probabilistic relations with this
configuration. It does nothing to upset the invigorated bear, but also
does nothing toward reclassification from a mere bearish spurt.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for nine ETF’s, consisting of a combination of
contrarians and non-contrarians. They are up by an average of 14.7% since
their buy signals an average of 16.5-weeks ago. This annualizes at 46.4%.
The NTI is
avoiding 23-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 2.1% since their sell
signals an average of 2.5-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 31-ETF’s. They are up 19.7%
since their buy signals an average of 32.1-weeks ago. This annualizes at
32.0%. The Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for both contrarian and
non-contrarian ETF’s. That combination of hold signals will not last too
long. That conflict should find relief within days from now.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding one ETF. It is
ETF-EWJ#06-Japan.
It is up 2.8% since the QTI signaled sell on Mar 14, 2011, although down
6.0% since the Near-term Indicant signaled sell on March 10, 2011.
Technically,
the Near-term Indicant is not supporting a bullish bounce for EWJ at this
time. Its Force Vector expended tremendous energy on its recent bullish
cycle. EWJ will most likely endure solid bearishness in the next few days.
It was mildly bearish last Wed and Thu, but solidly bearish on Fri.
Short-term
Summary: Force Vectors shifted in favor of bullish support last Thu. There
are just few more attributes to offer bullish support.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Near-term and Quick-term Indicant
signaled buy on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 45.7%, annualizing at 86.2% since
then. This ETF remains with Red Bull status, mitigating sustainable
bearish threats. The “energy bear” cannot find sustainable forces with
current bullish attributes. Force climbed into bullish domains, supporting
bullish position.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 72.7% since the QTI signaled buy
on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 31.4%. Bearish yellow is a
good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is at
$125.64 and still rising. Being patient here is important since your buy
price approximates $80.65 versus today’s closing price of $139.26.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Feb 18, 2011. It is up 2.8% since then,
annualizing at 29.2%.
Near-term
attributes for signaling next sell signal will be price below NTI Blue
with negative Vector Pressure.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
All prior
comments in this section remain in effect, but eliminated here for brevity
purposes. You will be notified when and if such commentary requires
adjustment.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received a buy signal from both the
Quick-term Indicant and Short-term Indicant on Mar 10, 2011 after falling
over 8.0% from its Quick-term sell signal on Oct 14, 2010 and basically
flat since the Near-term sell signal on Nov 15, 2010. It is no longer a
Yellow Bear and too many attributes are shifting in favor of bullish
behavior. It is up 0.1% since buy signals on Mar 10, 2011, annualizing at
2.5%. Its bullish configuration and contrarian nature suggests the stock
market bear is not through with its shenanigans. Do not be surprised at
TLT bouncing bullishly early next week.
The Near-term
Indicant and Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on Mar 10, 2011 for
ETF#31-QID.
It was down over 30.0% since its October
14, 2010 sell signal. The overall stock market is somewhat supportive of
QID’s bullish desires. It is down 3.3% since the Mar 10, 2011 buy signal.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled buy on Mar 10, 2011 for
ETF#32-VXX.
It was down over 55.5% since its prior Near-term Indicant sell signal on
Sep 2, 2010. Its Pressure is now positioned to offer a bullish expression
on a short-term horizon. It is down 10.5% since the Mar 10 buy signal. Its
Force Vector fell into bearish domains this past Wednesday, threatening
the hold signal. The Force Vector is bearishly mature, suggesting a
bullish bounce is imminent and potentially very powerful.
Major ETF
Events
Mar 25,
2011-Fri-VIX Force is positioned at a two-year minimum. It should rise
early next week. With that, VIX behavior should be bullish.
Mar 24,
2011-Thu-All contrarian Force Vectors maneuvered in favor of bullish
support. The Force cycle is bullishly mature. That coupled with a few
additional attributes delays buy signals.
Mar 23,
2011-Wed-Several Force Vectors crossed into bullish domains. However,
several continue being shy about that and thus the stock market bear
remains with potential energy to wreak a bit more havoc.
Mar 22,
2011-Tue-There were none, but worthy to note Force Vectors, although
rising, did not cross into bull domains. That discourages potential
near-term bullish cycle.
Mar 21,
2011-Mon-The stock market enjoyed solid bullish behavior. However, Force
Vectors remain in bearish domains. Although bearish aggression is
configured as a bearish spurt, current configurations do not support
resumption of a Near-term bullish cycle.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-
Mar 25, 2011. Force Vectors now support bull signal. If bearish behavior
does not resume on Monday, then buy/bull signals will ensue. The VIX
suggests stock market bearishness early next week on the short-term cycle.
-Reverse
Tangential Bearish Detection –
This phenomenon will continue to be monitored, but its threat has
subsided for the time being. The timing is unknown, but there is 100%
confidence the major indices and ETF’s will eventually fall to those
prices noted in the below link. The presidential pre-election year is the
most bullish of the four years. This phenomenon reduces the risks of
bearish aggression in 2011.
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections. The problem is not knowing when. The stock
market is now in the heart and soul of bullish seasonality. The bear will
have difficulty manifesting with the shifting political cycles.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market enjoyed bullish convergence last week. That follows two consecutive
weeks of combined bearish convergence/divergence. Four consecutive weeks
is indeed bearish. So, the string is broken. Therefore, there is no
imminent threat to the Mid-term Indicant’s bull signal.
Economic
fundamentals continue improving, but international political conflicts are
pestering. The Japanese crisis is discerning, but not completely
configurable.
The overall
stock market has enjoyed bullish convergence in five of the past eight
weeks. The stock market did not deliver the desired four consecutive weeks
in this recent cycle. In spite of less than desired bullish attributes,
there is little reason to fear a dynamic and aggressive bear at this time.
Indicant
Conclusion
The
presidential pre-election year stock market bull remains in tact and in
full conformance to historical standards. There is no technical support
for stock market bearish behavior other than a few pestering short-term
attributes supporting the stock market bear.
The Near-term
Indicant continues signaling bear, but the overall short-term model
remains with bearish spurt configurations as opposed to a dominant
long-lasting bear. Do not be surprised at Near-term bearishness early next
week.
The
Indicant Volume Indicator
remains depressed, as post holiday sessions have yet to produce
significant increases in volume. Volume increases were detected two weeks
ago that correlated with bearish behavior. Even with those increases,
though, that volume behavior was not dynamic.
Volume should
increase in coming weeks and months, offering additional obviations of
directional intensity. The absence of that expectation is somewhat
discerning, as the bull will require significant increases in volume to
sustain itself. At least that is the norm. Regardless, though, of these
extraneous attributes, one cannot argue with a low volume bull.
As stated the
past 77-weeks, low interest rates impose narrowed alternative investment
opportunities. That narrowed alternative suggests more demand for common
stocks. Worldly events may be adjusting in support of the original
premise; that is, where else can one put their money to work? The stock
market, of course! The stock market bull continues expressing support for
this principle. International tensions, however, are adding a mild threat
to bullish commentary.
Political
phenomena in the U.S., coupled with low interest rates, continue in
support of the bull. The world’s third largest economy in Japan is adding
a new twist.
Inflationary
threats continue. Stagflation is an accurate descriptor of the current
economy. That, coupled with unrest in the Middle East and the Japanese
nuclear crisis, could inspire the bear to gain traction. Keep in mind,
though, inflation is inevitable in the future unless Congress is
successful in reducing 2.5-trillion dollars from the national debt. Recent
political rhetoric is increasingly passive toward that amount. Executed
passivity toward debt reductions will continue to feed inflationary
potential. That is the hidden tax, imposed by those, who you elected as
your representatives to the U.S. Congress and the executive branches of
government.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
03/27/2011
Mar 20, 2011
Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 03, Issue 03 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Bull or
Bear and Orangutan Punditry
There are
only two kinds of people; you and third person(s). The third person could
be anyone or a portion of the six to seven billion people inhabiting the
earth. Some of those six billion are constantly conveying information to
you, just as yours truly, as you read this. Of that small subset of
communicative people, most are attempting to get something from you. None,
other than loving family members, attempts to give you something.
Marketers
often use the word, free, in their promotions. It is one of the words that
work for advertising purposes. That is amazing because universal law holds
that nothing is free. Every asset creation is accompanied by a
corresponding liability; not just in accounting but in physical law. In
spite of that, marketers continue to use that word, free. If it did not
work, they would not use it. So, whenever you see the word, free, in
promotions, recognize it is not so. We at the Indicant even do it because
the marketing folks tell us to from time to time. We do not like doing it
because it takes time and money and rest assured that cost is recovered in
desired margins. So, it is not really free.
Much of the
news you read is not really news. It is press releases and other
promotional gimmicks. Sometimes, there is white space capacity that needs
filling. It is always filled, regardless of credibility, integrity, or
source identification. The blogger industry evolved due to massive
nonsensicality in conventional news media. The problem with bloggers is
their DNA is very similar to those of conventional media. The motivation
is the same; that is, get something although a few do it for higher causes
than chasing money.
Nearly every
time the market moves over 2% or so in a day, the advertisers and
marketers sense opportunity. Orangutan punditry manifests. This
manifestation appears to have one purpose but the opposite is the real
purpose. They are not aiming to help you. Their aim is to help themselves.
Recent
commentary from stock market pundits advise us the bull market is up over
80% since its inception on March 9, 2009. This orangutan punditry attempts
to makes many among the masses feel bad for not enjoying those gains.
Stimulating bad feelings includes the fear element. Fear is also a good
seller although not quite a good as the “free” element, but a close
second. Major news networks search for fear. If they cannot find it, they
will create it. Fear sells. That is part of the “taking” process by the
third person. In this case, orangutan punditry does in fact manifest.
Every now and
then orangutan punditry advises the stock market is actually a bear
market. The S&P500 is down 16.3% since its weekly closing peak on March
23, 2000. That adds a bit of meritocracy to bearish orangutan punditry. It
also invokes fear. Others add delight to their imposing fear by factually
stating the NASDAQ is down 47.6% since its weekly closing peak on March 9,
2000.
Some claim we
have been in a bear market since Y2K, while others claim we have been
enjoying a bull market since October 2002. Some even do both; pointing to
bear and bull. They are serving two purposes; filling white space and
attempting to gain something.
Both points
are inarguable when conveying a moment of origin to the current moment. It
is similar to global warming arguments. The game played is determining
where to plot the first data point. Hannibal crossed the Swiss Alp on his
march to military victories in Italy against the Roman Empire about two
thousand years ago. There was no snow on the Alps at that time. If we
decide to plot the first data point at the time of Hannibal, then solid
arguments favoring global cooling would be difficult to defeat since the
Alps are now covered with plenty of snow. If one wants to convey a time
series argument of any kind, all one has to do is select a convenient data
point from the past and pontificate from that point forward.
Marketers and
advertisers, for the most part, are among the liberal artsy types.
Although not very scientific or deep thinking, they do understand two
dimensional, if-then statements. They will pick a “convenient originating
data point” and then, with their mastery of language, fill available white
spaces. It is easy to do and it must work because they keep on doing it in
spite of massive and continuous nonsensicality.
The bear
pontificators ask, “Why would anyone want to invest in the stock market
after being flat to bearish for the past eleven years?” CD’s would do
better. Bankers tend to convey that message to get your money, pay you
less than 1% for that money, and loan it out to others at 20% plus for a
nice 19% plus profit on short-term money flows. That element of fear must
work because there remains an investment security called CD’s and people,
in fact, buy them.
The bankers
will not tell you that earning less than 1% with a CPI of 4% means you are
losing 3%. Wall Street, on the other hand, will let you know that because
it invokes a fear element favoring their message to gain something. Wall
Street will advise you the stock market goes up more than it goes down.
That is a valid claim when looking a history. However, it is not possible
to make that claim for the future even though many do project the future
in spite of its impossibility.
Bankers, Wall
Street, and others who promote their businesses constantly promote bull
and bear themes. Some will compare Japan’s nuclear crisis to the U.S.
financial crisis. They are merely attempting to gain attention. Their
purpose; get something.
Looking at the NYSE, the Near-term Indicant, based on cycle, is signaling
bear. The near-term cycle
points to price less than NTI Green, Force Vectors in bearish domains, and
declining Vector Pressure. The NYSE is down 1.0% since that bear signal on
March 10, 2011. The Quick-term Indicant continues signaling bull since the
NYSE remains well above the QTI bearish yellow curve and with positive
Vector Pressure. The NYSE is up 13.3% since the QTI signaled bull on
September 14, 2011. Those terms are mean nothing to the public, but mean
quite a bit to you. There is no marketing hype here. This message is
directed only to you; not the conventional press.
Now let’s
play the game with the NYSE.
Click this sentence to view the Indicant Volume Indicator Chart for the
NYSE. You can see it has not
yet returned to its pre-crash peak. Therefore, one could successfully
argue the NYSE is enduring a bear market. If one were to choose its March
2009 low point as the origination of message or argument, one could easily
convey bull market status. Is that helpful to you? We do not think so.
Nevertheless, many fill white space on that subject.
Scrolling down on the same page,
you will notice the NASDAQ Indicant Volume Indicator Chart. It is a bit
more interesting. You will notice the NASDAQ nudged up to its pre crash
high. However, it never passed it, while its cousin, the NASDAQ100, did in
fact pass its pre-crash high. The NASDAQ100 passage above pre-crash highs
is discussed later in this report. Passing a pre-crash high is sometimes
newsworthy to many, but is it helpful? The DJIA passed its pre-crash 2000
high a few years ago and held there for several months. The S&P500 did the
same, but only held for a few weeks. The NASDAQ remains nearly 50% below
its 2000 pre-crash highs.
As you can see, the NASDAQ is also enduring a Near-term Indicant bear
signal for reasons similar to the NYSE, while enjoying a Quick-term bull
signal. It is down 2.1% since
the Near-term bear signal on March 10, 2011, while is it up 14.9% since
the Quick-term bull signal last September.
So, is the
stock market a bull or bear? Rest assured many will attempt to answer that
question based on the Japanese crisis. Hopefully, you will find literary
entertainment, which is all that can be offered. We will signal bear when
configurations confirm bear, based on cyclical configurations.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market
report.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
no
buy signals and
no
sell signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 296 of the 340-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
45.4%. That annualizes to 41.7%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 296-stocks and funds for an average of 56.7-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 40-stocks and funds of 340-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 41.7% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 96.2-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Mar 19, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 227-stocks and funds
out of 333 tracked for an average of 37.0-weeks. They were up by an
average of 30.8% (annualized at 43.2%). There were 89-avoided stocks and
funds at that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of
34.9% since their respective sell signals an average of 80.3-weeks earlier
one year ago. There were no buy signals and no sell signals on this
weekend last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for only 22-stocks and funds of the
344-tracked two years ago on Mar 20, 2009. They were up by an average of
103.9% (annualized at 57.9%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 93.4-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 322-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 38.3% since their
respective sell signals an average of 41.7-weeks earlier. There were no
buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2009. The stock market
bear continued dominating on this weekend in 2009, while petitioning a
stock market bottom.
There were
155-stocks and funds with hold signals on Mar 14, 2008 since their buy
signals an average of 159.8-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of
182.8% (annualized at 59.5%). There were 186-avoided stocks and funds at
that time. They were down by an average of 17.2% from their respective
sell signals an average of 18.4-weeks earlier. There were four buy signals
and no sell signals on this weekend in 2008 in addition to the 223-sell
signals in the prior 18-weeks, as the bear market was already well
underway at this point in 2008. Although performance levels remained
excellent, many stocks and funds were displaying souring configurations in
early 2008.
On Mar 16,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 266-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 118.9% (annualized at
59.9%) since their buy signals an average of 103.3-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 44-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 10.4% since their sell signals an average of
17.3-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and 35-sell signals on this
weekend in 2007.
Five years
ago, on Mar 17, 2006, there were 286-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 320 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 117.6% (annualized at 63.6%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 96.1-weeks earlier. There were 53-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 8.8% since their respective sell
signals an average of 23.2-weeks earlier. There were two buy signals and
four sell signals on this weekend in 2006.
On Mar 18,
2005, there were 235-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 88.6%, annualizing at 62.0%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 74.4-weeks earlier. There were 77-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 28.7% since their sell signals an
average of 52.6-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and eight sell
signals on this weekend in 2005.
There were
249-stocks and funds with hold signals on Mar 19, 2004. They were up by an
average of 71.1%, annualizing at 77.4%, since their buy signals 47.8-weeks
earlier. The 16-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 25.4%
since their respective sell signals an average of 38.7-weeks earlier.
There was one buy signal and 16-sell signals on this weekend in 2004.
On Mar 21,
2003, there were 141-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 29.8%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 20.7-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 74.8%. There were 141-avoided stocks at that time. They
were down by an average of 28.3% since their sell signals an average of
26.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 296 stocks and
funds in 2002-late 2004. There were 119-buy signals and no sell signals on
this weekend in 2003. The 2003 bull market was four weeks old on this
weekend in 2003.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
Click this link to this week’s buy and sell signals.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Buy and Sell Signals This Weekend
In spite of
the stock market’s short-term bearish behavior, the Mid-term Indicant
continues identifying this as a mere bearish spurt.
The Mid-term
continues with support for the bull, while the Short-term Indicant has
identified some threatening elements. That suggests a mere bearish spurt
may be unfolding.
The mid-term
election year continues offering traction toward stock market bullishness.
Much of this gain correlated with political dynamics and was consistent
with historical standards. The stock market remains configured for
classical stock market bullishness during pre-election years, which should
be enjoyed in 2011, albeit with potential near-term bearish expressions.
The stock market’s bull, though, continues to impress with its resilience
with each bearish incursion. That prognosis rests on political dynamics
and historical standards. However, current configurations suggest that
mere bearish spurts may manifest, but none support bearish dominance.
The current
stock market bull originated in anticipation of stalemated politicians.
That has been the historical standard and in this case, history repeats.
Partisanship is expected to heighten and that remains in effect and
therefore bullish in spite of potential for near-term bearish behavior.
Mid-eastern unrest will resume its threat to the stock market bull, as a
function of speculation of those empty souls who are attempting to gain
control of petro flow into the capital markets. The problem with economic
leeches and tyrants is their limited ability to see the big picture.
The Japanese
nuclear crisis adds a twist.
The Short-term Indicant and daily stock market report have been closing
tracking this new element.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest, but they should be tight. Right
after buying, set the stop loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve
values, depending on your personal preferences. Those stop losses are
visible to floor traders and subject to a bit of unfairness to you and to
their benefit.
For your
longer-term holdings where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are
signaled on the Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are
updated daily. These shorter-term models attempt participation in
significant bullish spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is
focused on fundamentals and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
62.8% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
137.3% and the S&P500 is up 64.7% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 147.2% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months if the stock
market moves bearishly by significant amounts. Such bearishness is
unlikely based on current Mid-term Indicant configurations. Historical
standards and political climate support continued bullishness during 2011.
Much of that depends, however, on unrest in the Middle East, related oil
prices, political mumbo-jumbo by U.S. politicians, and the Japanese
crisis.
The NASDAQ is
down 47.6% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 16.3% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 1.2% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025.
If socialism
continues to expand, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050
and that depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by
politicians. Significant downsizing of federal governments and related
regulations shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous
sentence. If the opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies,
the NASDAQ will never return to its 2000 peak.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 23.5% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness.
The NASDAQ
was down by 3.8% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with the mid-term year’s historical standards of
finding bottoms during mid-term election years.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was up 4.9%. (Note that it was up a whopping 8% on
this weekending date in 2003). It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which was
consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was down on this
weekend in 2004 by 2.0% and finishing up for that year by 1.4%. This was
congruent with election year bullishness, although shy of magnitude
standards.
It was down
7.7% on this weekend in 2005’s post election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during post
election years. This was an excellent year, based on post election year
historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and 2005
were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up 4.6% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%, which
again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was down by 1.8% at this time in 2007, finishing up by
9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The stock
market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took control
of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as opposed to
repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 14.5% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was down
5.4% on this weekend in 2009, but up significantly on this weekending date
in 2009. Keep in mind, the extraordinary bullish cycle in 2009 finished
that year down by 20.6% from its prior Mid-term cyclical peak on October
31, 2007. The 2008 bear market more accurately reflected economic
fundamentals than the 2009 bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 5.4% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%, which
was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially in the
second half of such years.
The Dow is
down 16.3% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 7.5% since its last peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is down 18.3%
since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. The S&P600-small cap index is down 5.2% since
its last closing peak on Jul 19, 2007. Bull market expirations are not as
obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear markets are with
simultaneous bottoming among the major indices.
Interestingly, the NAS100 topped its pre-crash highs of 2007/8 several
weeks ago. It maintained that lofty achievement until last week. It is
now down by 0.8% since its Oct 31, 2007 peak. The S&P400 is the other
major index tracked by the Indicant that is also above pre-2008-crash
levels. It is up by 1.8% since its prior peak on Jul 13/2007. The
remaining indices remain below their 2007 peaks. The weakest index,
S&P100, continues lagging. It is down by 21.5% since its Oct 9, 2007
weekly closing peak. The current bull will remain suspicious, in
character, until all these major indices cross above their prior peaks.
The Nov 14, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
Most major
indices last cyclical bottom occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the
four major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The
only exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical
bottom on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view, albeit mildly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
The Dow is up
81.1% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 108.4% and the S&P500 is up
89.1% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 132.2% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-January 2010 bull leg was indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. The Mid-term Indicant and Short-term
Indicant are no longer suggesting impending bearishness. However, the
Short-term Indicant is enduring some bearish spurt configurations.
The current
bull cycle is believed to be the classical mid-term election year bullish
starting point ahead of the presidential pre-election year, which is now
underway. The pre-election year is the most bullish along the 4-year
cycle. In essence, the firing of incumbent politicians in the U.S.
generally arouses the bull. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull continues expressing its delight in
that, which is supported by historical standards.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull with pressure to reduce
government waste. Anticipating that is bullish, even though the shorter
near-term cycle is not as supportive of the bull. Middle Eastern unrest,
although, is a bit threatening to the stock market bull, depending though
on the nature of that unrest. If oil prices skyrocket, the bear will be
delighted. If democracy expands in that region, the bull will be
delighted. Current parameters suggest stock market bearishness with
maximal threats to the Saudi Kingdom, which is a stabilizing force in that
region. The Japanese nuclear crisis remains elusive, even though related
Japanese ETF’s received Short-term Indicant sell signal two weeks ago.
Interestingly, all international related ETF’s received sell signals well
ahead of the Japanese nuclear crisis.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
As promised by Bernanke, the discount rate
(and prime) rate continue holding flat from their depressed levels. The
fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and very
depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any other
value.
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
It endured significant bearishness five weeks ago, held flat the past
three weeks, and dropped significantly the past two weeks. Bernanke,
apparently, remains concerned with the economic outlook. All of this
continues suggesting few demand problems. The 2012 forecasted values do
not yet indicate any significant increases. Keep in mind these forecasts
are purely statistical, but qualitative inquiries are not suggesting
different projections at this time.
However, the
6-month CD yield increased significantly 15-weeks ago, suggesting desired
longer-term upward pressures by the banks. Even with all that, it remains
depressed and has been flat since then. It fell 10-basis points four weeks
ago. In essence, a level of stability has been found after wild variations
in such a minor investment vehicle. Anyone buying a 6-month CD at 0.40%
with 2+% CPI is heading to the poor house unless deflationary pressures
manifest. At any rate, all CD’s remain as Yellow Bears. China is enduring
CPI’s ranging above 4.0% and increasing interest rates because of that.
That could change, though, as the world economy is slowing.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status eight weeks ago and holding at that level, but
remains with weakening trend and weakening mid-term cycle. There is no
good reason to assume its long-term cyclical decline will reverse. The
Canadian dollar, like the Yen, had been stable for several weeks with a
mild strengthening bias, although weakening a bit last week. They both
accelerated their strength from mild status the past two weeks. Both the
Yen and Canadian dollar’s cyclical direction and trend remain bullish. The
CA$ tends to parallel oil prices. The forecast for the CA$ continues with
projected strengthening. The Japanese Yen trend and mid-term cycle
continues with strengthening trend, but has been trading in a shallow zone
the past several weeks. The Yen did not react too bearishly with its
earthquake and tsunami. G7 intervention is holding it up very well and in
fact strengthened a bit last week.
Overall, the
US dollar threatens to continue strengthening, but continues to weaken
against the Japanese Yen (high productivity) and the Canadian dollar
(resource rich).
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull to boot in spite of near-term cyclical bearishness. The
$2,000/oz-forecast by 2014 continues to challenged, based on political
dynamics. However, statistical bullishness remains in tact. At the same
webpage, you will notice oil is less stable, but enjoying steady increases
the past several weeks. Middle Eastern unrest is adding a bit of pizzazz
to those increases.
As stated by
the Indicant for several months, it is priced where the Kingdom finds
comfort at around $80/bbl, albeit departing on the high end of his desired
tolerance levels the past several days. It has been nudging a bit higher
than that for the past several weeks. It achieved Red Bull status a few
weeks ago for the first time since 2007. The high-end forecast continues
to project $120/bbl by 2012. The Saudi Kingdom will have to approve that,
though. Middle Eastern unrest offer additional pizzazz to its recent
bullishness. The King is probably a bit concerned about his job security
and related pleasures, but there is little doubt the kingdom remains in
charge of such matters. Speculators can shift the numbers around and if
oil prices escape his desired targets, rest assured he will take
countermeasures. OPEC has eagerly accelerated production in an attempt to
maintain balance between supply and demand.
The Saudi
Kingdom is under attack. It appears Middle Easterners are attempting to
dishevel their kingdoms and dictators. The stock market does not mind the
collapse of dictatorships, but it will react bearishly to the fall of
Saudi Kingdom if that, in fact, occurs. The kingdom has been a stabilizing
force to oil prices since WWII.
Commodity
price’s quick-term cycle continues increasing, although bearish the past
few days due to souring economic projections around the world. Significant
bullish behavior continues, however, continues along the mid-term to
long-term cycle. They are not yet contributory to inflationary pressures.
The Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index and Spot
Prices are enjoying Red Bull status.
This remains economically bullish. Spot prices have expressed stability
for the past few weeks.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, you will find the
Reuter’s UK Commodities Index continues
moving north since early 2009.
It is a Red Bull. It continues to skyrocket, setting a new all time high
during the week of November 8, 2010. It continued setting new highs until
the past few days. Some of this is attributable to the crisis in Japan.
Questionable economic projections and default threats from Spain continue
to pester. It remains economically bullish with inflationary
considerations later. The
CRB Bridge Futures
continues its shift from waffling to more bullish aggression. It is also a
solid Red Bull in spite of softening last week due to the Japanese crisis.
This
paragraph remains the same. Commodities, overall, discontinued behavior
consistent with uncertainty in favor of outright bullishness several weeks
ago. Recent bearish behavior remains irrelevant. “Extract baby extract”
seems to be an evolving theme as more people around the planet are moving
toward capitalistic progressions in spite of American waffling.
Mortgage rates remain configured with
countering the prevailing bearish trend.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011 and retreated back down to economic neutrality. They
are no longer Red Bulls and configuring with more bearishness.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
continue to be relatively stable.
Overall, hard
economic data continues with stability, albeit with increasing commodity
prices. They could fall a bit in the coming weeks, but the cycle and trend
are nowhere near a state of reversal. That is non-bearish, but lending
support to longer-term inflationary potential. However, rising
productivity from increased interests in capitalism around the world could
significantly dampen inflationary threats. That, coupled with U.S.
political dynamics of potential massive sovereign debt reductions,
suggests dynamic bullishness.
At some
point, the U.S. Congress will learn they have no influence on how China,
India, and other countries manage their economies, which will eventually
enjoy larger economies than the U.S. at some point. If those rapidly
developing economies retain a penchant for capitalism, rest assured prices
for all commodities will escalate. However, rising productivity associated
with capitalists could dampen the effects on consumers. These potential
economic shifts are unparalleled in the annals of history.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 6.6%, annualizing at 13.1% since then. It was solidly bearish the
past two weeks. As stated the past six weeks, gold could be in trouble,
while displaying periodic resistance to that prognosis.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received a buy signal on Sep 4, 2009. It is up 16.7% since then,
annualizing at 10.7%. This lazy fund has been bearish in seven of the past
ten weeks. It was also solidly bearish the past two weeks.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010 following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late 2008.
It is up 29.3%, annualized at 58.0% since the more recent buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell
cycles since late 2008. It is up 46.8%, annualized at 92.5%, since its Sep
17, 2010 buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct
8, 2010. It is up 30.5% since then, annualizing at 68.3%.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010. It is up 42.7% since that buy signal, annualizing at 84.4%.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled, buy, for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 39.2% since then, annualizing at 76.6%. It was
up 242.4% (annualized at 44.8%) since the buy signal on March 26, 2003
until the September 2008 sell signal.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 71.6% since that buy signal, annualizing at
31.2%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It is up 2.2%, annualizing at
28.1%, since its most recent Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18,
2011.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
All the major
indices are up by an average of 23.4% since their bull signals an average
of 49.6-weeks ago. That annualizes at 24.6%.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$31,100,095. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,804,126 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $151,177. That beats buy and hold’s $125,302 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $226,127. That beats buy and hold’s $91,167 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1623.9%, 20.7%, and 146.7%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid the bear markets. That is why it beat buy and
hold by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post election year, 2009. There will be another bear
cycle at some future point. Boasting will be more available at that time.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 73.4% since then.
The Near-term
and Quick-term Indicant signaled bull for QID on March 18, 2011. This
remains configured as a function of a short-term stock market bearish
spurt. The Mid-term Indicant is not supportive of an aggressive and
sustainable bear at this time. Consequently, the Mid-term Indicant remains
unable to signal buy for MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short at this time.
Although this
is classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable
to signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation
for the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a
thoroughbred in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting
the stock market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal. It is no longer
getting close to a buy signal, as it appears to have succumbed to the
stock market bull for the time being. It may not receive a buy signal
until 2013, which is the next post election year.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
309.7% (annualized at 15.9%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,011-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report - Summary
Last
Thursday’s bullish aggression was accompanied with passive volume,
relative to recent bearish volume. Friday’s mild bullish behavior was
accompanied with increased volume with most of that increase paralleling
late day bearish behavior. In other words, volume remains supportive of
the bear. Most prices remain below NTI Green, which is bearish on the
near-term cycle. None of the non-contrarian ETF’s are above the NTI
bearish green curve.
The Quick-term
cycle is with minimal Red Bull support. The region between QTI Red and QTI
Yellow generally invites turbulence. Until Red Bulls manifest again, do
not be surprised at price volatility.
Such bearish
commentary does not mean the stock market bear is about to unleash a solid
and long lasting attack on the bull. However, this bearish spurt is
gaining momentum in spite of bullish behavior this past Thu and Fri.
Interestingly,
nature’s force is influential to the underlying bearish spurt, as opposed
to economic reason. Even more interestingly, bearish configurations first
appeared before Japan’s earthquake and tsunami. Most of the
internationally related ETF sell signals occurred weeks before Japan’s
earthquake and tsunami struck.
Quick-term
cycle sell signals will not occur until price fall below the QTI bearish
yellow curve.
ETF#06-EWJ-Japan
endured that this past Tuesday.
Major indices
and most non-contrarian ETF’s remain with relatively high Vector Pressure,
including those with Near-term bear/avoid signals. Therefore, the bull
still has some weapons to unleash toward the bear. However, contrarian
ETF’s Force Vectors continue rising in bullish domains. Non contrarians
were falling in bearish domains, but most are reversing as the cycle is
mature.
There is an
absence of consistency, suggesting a lack of strong bullish or bearish
commitment, but with an increasing edge favoring the bear on the
short-term cycle.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The major
indices continue highlighting bearish unanimity. That is bearish, as the
stronger near-term bulls expired this past Wednesday. Keep in mind,
configurations suggest this is a mere bearish spurt, but also keep in mind
all major bear markets originate as a bearish spurt. As long as the major
indices remain above QTI Bearish Yellow, it is a spurt and not a major
bear market.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull for contrarian VIX, only. It is up 18.3% since
its bull signal on 1.6-weeks ago, annualizing at 598.8%. It is down nearly
20% the past two days, but remains configured as a VIX bull.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bear for all eleven major non-contrarian indices.
They are down by an average of 0.5% since their bear signals 0.8-weeks
ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant continues signaling bull for ten major non-contrarian
indices and contrarian VIX. They are up by an average of 15.2% since their
bull signals an average of 24.1-weeks ago, annualizing at 32.9%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bear for the weak Dow Utilities. It is
down 1.0% since its bear signal on Mar 15, 2011.
Short-term Market Summary
Only two
non-contrarian Red Bull configuration remains supportive of the Quick-term
bull cycle. They are the more dynamic S&P400 and S&P600 Indices.
The major
indices remain with relatively high Pressure, including those with
Near-term Bear signals. In other words, the bull remains armed and capable
of counter attacking the bear on the near-term cycle. Technically, this
remains a bearish spurt in spite of Japan’s problems.
Force Vectors
are bearishly mature. The nature of their inevitable rise and magnitude
will add additional analyses to measure the nature of this bearish spurt
and determine if it has designs to expanding from a bearish spurt to an
outright bear. Of course, it is possible for the Force Vectors to trigger
a new Near-term bullish cycle, but to do that, they must cross into
bullish domains. Right now, they remain in bearish domains.
Indicant Volume Indicators
Volume is
finally increasing. Unfortunately, this change in cycle correlates with
bearish aggression. That is, indeed, bearish.
Mar 18,
2011-Fri-Aggressive volume on passive bullishness is interesting. The
stock market enjoyed aggressive bullishness, but closed downward on this
day. There is no meaningful probabilistic relations with this
configuration. It does nothing to upset the invigorated bear, but also
does nothing toward reclassification from a mere bearish spurt.
Mar 17,
2011-Thu-Reduced volume on bullish aggression is not inspirational to the
bull.
Mar 16,
2011-Wed-Volume was again more aggressive on bearish aggression, fostering
an increase in bearish interest.
Mar 15,
2011-Tue-Volume was more aggressive today on bearish aggression. This
lends support for continuation of bearish bias, but it remains as a
bearish spurt for the time being.
Mar 14,
2011-Mon-Volume was up today, but less than what occurred last Thursday on
more aggressive bearishness. Bias a bit tricky right now as the underlying
bearish spurt gains traction.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for nine ETF’s, consisting of a combination of
contrarians and non-contrarians. They are up by an average of 14.9% since
their buy signals an average of 15.5-weeks ago. This annualizes at 49.9%.
The NTI is
avoiding 23-ETF’s. They are down by an average of 0.6% since their sell
signals an average of 1.5-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 31-ETF’s. They are up 17.4%
since their buy signals an average of 31.1-weeks ago. This annualizes at
29.2%. The Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for both contrarian and
non-contrarian ETF’s. That combination of hold signals will not last too
long.
Current
near-term bias favors more sell signals for non-contrarians. That occurred
last Tue and Wed. More should be expected, but attributes must justify, as
opposed to forecasting.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding one ETF. It is
ETF-EWJ#06-Japan.
It is up 3.2% since the QTI signaled sell on Mar 14, 2011. It enjoyed a
solid bullish bounces last Thu/Fri. That is a typical response to falling
below QTI bearish yellow curve. Sometimes a thorough bullish cycle
manifests with that response and at other times it descends below yellow
and stays there with declining values for long periods. Current
configurations support the latter at this time. Theses configurations are
not static, though. The Japanese remain very industrious and their economy
should not be underestimated.
Short-term
Summary: Non-contrarian Red Bulls (lost 13-this past Wed) remain as a
minority even though there was a gain of eight today. All of the all
contrarian ETF’s are Red Bulls. Last Wed/Thu suggested the absence of
non-contrarian Red Bulls were no longer mitigating dynamic and sustainable
bearish behavior. However, bullish behavior the past two days offer some
protection against dynamic and sustainable bearish behavior. Last Wed/Thu
included no non-contrarian NTI Blue Bulls offering little inspiration for
a new Near-term bullish cycle. However, bullish behavior the past two days
has produced five non-contrarian NTI Blue Bulls. The near-term cycle is
also adding protection against any terrorizing bear market.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Near-term and Quick-term Indicant
signaled buy on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 39.2%, annualizing at 76.6%, since
then. This ETF remains with Red Bull status, mitigating sustainable
bearish threats. The “energy bear” cannot find sustainable forces with
current bullish attributes. This remains bullish, but no longer solid, as
Force remains in bearish domains. However, Pressure is too high to allow
massive bearish influences in this sector. There should be a rebound,
offering greater obviations of directional intensity. Its NTI Bullish Blue
Curve collapsed this past Thursday, but not enough other attributes
support bearish behavior.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 71.6% since the QTI signaled buy
on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 31.2%. Bearish yellow is a
good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is at
$125.09 and still rising, albeit slowing down. Being patient here is
important since your buy price approximates $80.65.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Feb 18, 2011. It is up 2.2% since then,
annualizing at 28.1%. It was again not contrarian. That has occurred for
four consecutive days, paralleling stock market behavior but paling in
magnitude.
Near-term
attributes for signaling next sell signal will be price below NTI Blue
with negative Vector Pressure. It is below NTI Blue, but Pressure remains
positive.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
As stated
since late 2008, gold remains fundamentally sound for long-term holding
and a technical measure of authenticity in that assessment is in its
bearish yellow curve. If it crosses below bearish yellow, you will not
want to be holding. The Quick-term Indicant will advise of that potential
when it occurs. Keep in mind, currencies can be manipulated for a period.
However, currencies decoupled from production and related productivity
will endure inflation regardless of political witch doctoring. Keep in
mind, GLD tracks the price of gold in U.S. dollars. A strengthening dollar
will have a depressing effect on the price of gold. Please read on, as
this paragraph is now being challenged.
A sound
fundamental persists in continued threats to the gold bull.
In reference to the Indicant Weekly Report
of January 16, 2011, political influences may be gold’s worst enemy, as it
is approaching its prior peak from 1492.
If political forces result in shifting sovereign debt loads to the south,
currencies will strengthen, dampening the “emotional” value of gold. The
Tea Party movement may invoke this shift, as that political pressure
strongly supports dynamic cuts in Federal spending. Perceptions hold that
will dampen inflationary threats and thus depress the price of Gold in
U.S. dollars.
The above
fundamental commentaries conflict. However, the Tea Party movement must
manifest its desires into laws and real budgets before the bearish
fundamental can occur. If Federal spending continues, gold will skyrocket
in U.S. dollars.
Those
$3,000,000 retirement accounts people worked hard to save can become
worthless, even if you own Boardwalk and Park Place, where the weekly rent
will be a hundred grand or two. Politicians can destroy that without even
taxing it. Their inflationary policies will do the trick.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received a buy signal from both the
Quick-term Indicant and Short-term Indicant on Mar 10, 2011 after falling
over 8.0% from its Quick-term sell signal on Oct 14, 2010 and basically
flat since the Near-term sell signal on Nov 15, 2010. It is no longer a
Yellow Bear and too many attributes are shifting in favor of bullish
behavior. It is up 1.5% since buy signals on Mar 10, 2011, annualizing at
67.7%.
Interestingly, TLT was also not contrarian today with mild bullishness
paralleling mild stock market bullishness.
The Near-term
Indicant and Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on Mar 10, 2011 for
ETF#31-QID.
It was down over 30.0% since its October
14, 2010 sell signal. The overall stock market is somewhat supportive of
QID’s bullish desires. It is up 5.6% since the Mar 10, 2011 buy signal,
annualizing at 253.3%
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled buy on Mar 10, 2011 for
ETF#32-VXX.
It was down over 55.5% since its prior Near-term Indicant sell signal on
Sep 2, 2010. Its Pressure is now positioned to offer a bullish expression
on a short-term horizon. It is up 4.2% since the Mar 10 buy signal,
annualizing at 190.8%.
Major ETF
Events
Mar 18,
2011-Fri-A mild bullish bounce closed after being aggressively bullish
earlier in the sessions. Most non-contrarians were also mildly bullish,
suggesting stock market confusion. It seldom remains confused too long,
though.
Mar 17,
2011-ThuBullish expression is configured as a reverberation, but within a
bearish spurt, as opposed to a sustainable bear.
Mar 16,
2011-All non-contrarian Quick-term Red Bulls expired.
Mar 15,
2011-All non-contrarian Near-term Blue Bulls expired.
Mar 14,
2011-ETF#06-Japan fell below QTI Bearish Yellow and received a Quick-term
bear signal. It received a Near-term sell signal on Mar 10, 2011. It is
down 8.6% since that Near-term sell signal with its collapse today. The
Quick-term Indicant had to signal sell even though its Force Vector is
bearishly mature, which is invitational to a bullish response.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-
Mar 18, 2011. Several prices fell below NTI Green the past several days
with declining and weakening Force. Although Vector Pressure still
supports the bull, risks of holding remain too high for those receiving
sell signals. For those of you who bought GLD on the Dec 2008 buy signal,
wait for the price to fall below Yellow before selling.
-Reverse
Tangential Bearish Detection –
This phenomenon will continue to be monitored, but its threat has
subsided for the time being. The timing is unknown, but there is 100%
confidence the major indices and ETF’s will eventually fall to those
prices noted in the below link. The presidential pre-election year is the
most bullish of the four years. This phenomenon reduces the risks of
bearish aggression in 2011.
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections. The problem is not knowing when. The stock
market is now in the heart and soul of bullish seasonality. The bear will
have difficulty manifesting with the shifting political cycles.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market endured bearish divergence last week. Most sectors were bearish.
The energy sector was bullish. That is two consecutive weeks of combined
bearish convergence/divergence. Four consecutive weeks is indeed bearish,
but two more weeks remain open to this attribute.
Economic
fundamentals continue improving, but international political conflicts are
pestering. The Japanese crisis is discerning, but not completely
configurable.
The overall
stock market has enjoyed bullish convergence in four of the past seven
weeks. The stock market did not deliver the desired four consecutive weeks
in this recent cycle. In spite of less than desired bullish attributes,
there is little reason to fear a dynamic and aggressive bear at this time.
Indicant
Conclusion
The
presidential pre-election year stock market bull remains in tact and in
full conformance to historical standards. There is no technical support
for stock market bearish behavior other than a few pestering short-term
attributes supporting the stock market bear.
The Near-term
Indicant continues signaling bear, but the overall short-term model
remains with bearish spurt configurations as opposed to a dominant
long-lasting bear.
The
Indicant Volume Indicator
remains depressed, as post holiday sessions have yet to produce
significant increases in volume. Volume increases were detected last week
that correlated with bearish behavior. Even with those increases, though,
that volume behavior was not dynamic.
Volume should
increase in coming weeks and months, offering additional obviations of
directional intensity. The absence of that expectation is somewhat
discerning, as the bull will require significant increases in volume to
sustain itself. At least that is the norm. Regardless, though, of these
extraneous attributes, one cannot argue with a low volume bull.
As stated the
past 76-weeks, low interest rates impose narrowed alternative investment
opportunities. That narrowed alternative suggests more demand for common
stocks. Worldly events may be adjusting in support of the original
premise; that is, where else can one put their money to work? The stock
market, of course! The stock market bull continues expressing support for
this principle. International tensions, however, are adding a mild threat
to bullish commentary.
Political
phenomena in the U.S., coupled with low interest rates, continue in
support of the bull. The world’s third largest economy in Japan is adding a new
twist.
Inflationary
threats continue. Stagflation is an accurate descriptor of the current
economy. That, coupled with unrest in the Middle East and the Japanese
nuclear crisis, could inspire the bear to gain traction. Keep in mind,
though, inflation is inevitable in the future unless Congress is
successful in reducing 2.5-trillion dollars from the national debt. Recent
political rhetoric is increasingly passive toward that amount. Executed
passivity toward debt reductions will continue to feed inflationary
potential. That is the hidden tax, imposed by those, who you elected as
your representatives to the U.S. Congress and the executive branches of
government.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
03/20/2011
Mar 13, 2011
Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 03, Issue 02 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Mid-term
and Short-term Cycles
The Mid-term
Indicant cycle moves slower than the Short-term Indicant cycle. The
Mid-term Indicant uses weekly data, while the Short-term uses daily data.
Weekly data, when considering a longer-term view of the stock market,
dampens daily stock market nervousness. In essence, the Mid-term Indicant
minimizes the effects of those nervous short-term traders who “trade on
the news.”
Consequently,
the Mid-term Indicant is slower in buying and selling, while it tends to
signal hold and avoid for much longer periods than the Short-term
Indicant. Over the years of tracking stocks and funds, we have learned
that open ended mutual funds offer added stability to stock market
tracking with the Mid-term Indicant model. Index funds provide the
greatest stability, while actively managed funds offer a pleasurable
degree of stability via the Mid-term Indicant.
The Mid-term
Indicant’s purpose is to avoid significant bear cycles. For example, the
Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 99 of the 100-mutual funds
tracked by the Mid-term Indicant on January 5, 2007. By January 4, 2008,
the Mid-term Indicant hold signals had dropped to 60. Interestingly, there
were 18-mutual fund sell signals on that date in 2008, well ahead of the
stock market bear. By July 4, 2008, there were only 28-mutual funds with a
Mid-term Indicant hold signal. A bullish spurt triggered a few buy signals
during late summer and early fall of 2008. By October 3, 2008, the
Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for only four mutual funds. The Dow
plummeted over 2,000 points between October 3, 2008 and October 27, 2008.
By October 10, 2008, the Mid-term Indicant was holding only one mutual
fund and it was contrarian.
The 2007/2009
bear cycle ended in March 2009, but the Mid-term Indicant did not start
signaling buy until August 7, 2009. However, the Short-term Indicant
started buying ETF’s in March/April 2009. The Short-term Indicant, which
is more sensitive to stock market nervousness, endured sell signals in
July 2009, while the Mid-term Indicant remained suspicious of the stock
market’s bullish behavior at that time. However, the Mid-term Indicant
acquiesced to bullish sentiment in August 2009 and started signaling buy
for mutual funds and stocks, accordingly. By January 29, 2010, the
Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 76-mutual funds after avoiding
nearly all of them between September 2008 and July 2009.
After the
2010 state of the union speech, the stock market reacted bearishly and
sort of meandered through the first half of 2010. Commentary in that state
of the union speech was similar of that from the pulpits of a 1950’s
politburo. Fundamentally, the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell for several
months following that speech, most of which was justified with technical
data. By September 2010, the Mid-term Indicant had reduced hold signals to
41-mutual funds. About that time, though, the capital markets were
recognizing a very high probability of the Tea Party’s movement against
politburo politics. The Mid-term Indicant, not arguing with the stock
market’s anticipatory skill, signaled buy for several more mutual funds.
By November 12, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 96 of
the 100-mutual funds it tracks.
You can see how the Mid-term Indicant has signaled hold and avoid with a
simple chart since 1998 by clicking this sentence.
Many of you
recall, during 2009 and 2010 there were several more buy/sell signals by
the Short-term Indicant. Also, the Short-term Indicant triggered a
regrettable October 2008 buy signal due to influences by the heart and
soul of bullish seasonality. The Near-term Indicant has since replaced
that variable, which is esoteric to avoid the pitfalls of the phenomenon
of commonality. However, the Mid-term Indicant continued avoidance in
October 2008.
To understand
the relationships between the Mid-term Indicant and Short-term Indicant,
look at
MTI-MF#01-DIA and MTI-MF#02-USSPX.
You will a small drop in the prices of those two funds this past week. You
should also notice those two funds are nowhere near receiving a sell
signal from the Mid-term Indicant. The short-term pestering by the bear is
barely visible on the Mid-term Indicant charts, while the Short-term model
suggests a significant threat to the stock market bull. Looking back in
time at those two funds, you can see prices commonly fall to the Green
curve and then bounce to the north. That is a classical bearish spurt and
the Mid-term Indicant typically ignores those spurts depending on its
position relative to the buy price.
Click this sentence to view comparable Short-term models.
ETF#07-DIA is the same fund as
MTI-MF#01. Although the Short-term
Indicant has not yet signaled sell for ETF#07-DIA, it is nearing that
potential. You will notice its Force Vector clinging barely into bullish
domains. That is delaying short-term sell signals. But, you can also
detect the daily nervousness inherent in the short-term model.
Click this
sentence
ETF#02-SPY, which tracks the
same index as
MTI-MF#02-USSPX. Again, the
small dip on the Mid-term chart takes on a benign appearance. Technically,
the Mid-term Indicant will not consider selling
MTI-MF#02 until its price interacts
with Green and depending on other attributes. However, the Near-term
Indicant signaled sell this past week for
ETF#02-SPY. You will notice SPY’s
Force deeper inside bearish domains with its price below Green.
Interestingly, both the MTI Green Curves and STI Green Curves offer
bullish response points to incursions by the bear. This statistical
anomaly is enjoyed in spite to two different data sets. However, from time
to time, those Green curves do not protect bullish cycles. That can
trigger sell signals, depending on other variables.
There is an
above average probability the Short-term Indicant avoid-signal for SPY and
other ETF’s will be short-lived. That is because the Short-term Vector
Pressure remains high, which is a bullish attribute. The problem is that
is probabilistic. Determinism or obviation of directional intensity is a
bit more difficult without volume support. That has plagued this bull
since its inception in March 2009.
Fundamentally, political noise about massive deficit reductions is
shifting toward minor deficit reductions. That, coupled with an attack on
the Saudi Kingdom, the only related source of Middle Eastern stability,
threatens Short-term stock market bullish behavior. The bear finds those
two “political” elements invigorating. However, the Mid-term Indicant will
allow those two elements and other day-to-day nervousness to proceed
without triggering buy/sell decisions until prices fall below MTI Yellow
and in some cases below their Green curves with obviating weak force and
pressure.
Although
rarely influencing the Short-term Indicant with its many variables, some
of which conflict from time to time, one very interesting observation is
worth mentioning here.
Click this sentence to view the NASDAQ Indicant Volume Indicator.
You may have to scroll down past the mundane NYSE chart.
You should
notice a line extending rightward from the NASDAQ’s 2007 peak to current
time. You will notice the so-called Tea Party bullish cycle originating in
August 2010 did not push the NASDAQ above the Democratic Party’s
contribution to the NASDAQ peak in late 2007. Clarifying, the Democrats
took control of Congress in January 2007. It took them awhile, but they
eventually organized their activities to expire the stock market bull from
2003. Technically, the NASDAQ’s inability to match that 2007 peak is a bit
discerning. Keep in mind the NASDAQ100 has exceeded its prior 2007 peak,
but barely.
On the same
webpage, scrolling upward, you will notice the NYSE is nowhere near
matching its 2007-peak and thus technically remaining in a severe bear
market in spite of pundits constantly promoting the vast range of history
as beginning in March 2009.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market
report.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
no
buy signals and
one
sell signal.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 296 of the 340-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
49.2%. That annualizes to 46.0%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 296-stocks and funds for an average of 55.7-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 38-stocks and funds of 340-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 41.2% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 98.5-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Mar 12, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 227-stocks and funds
out of 333 tracked for an average of 36.0-weeks. They were up by an
average of 30.6% (annualized at 44.1%). There were 89-avoided stocks and
funds at that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of
33.2% since their respective sell signals an average of 79.3-weeks earlier
one year ago. There were no buy signals and no sell signals on this
weekend last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for only 22-stocks and funds of the
344-tracked two years ago on Mar 6, 2009. They were up by an average of
102.8% (annualized at 57.7%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 92.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 322-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 38.6% since their
respective sell signals an average of 40.7-weeks earlier. There were no
buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2009. The stock market
bear continued dominating on this weekend in 2009.
There were
148-stocks and funds with hold signals on Mar 7, 2008 since their buy
signals an average of 168.7-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of
190.7% (annualized at 58.8%). There were 190-avoided stocks and funds at
that time. They were down by an average of 16.4% from their respective
sell signals an average of 17.2-weeks earlier. There were seven buy
signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2008 in addition to the
216-sell signals in the prior 17-weeks, as the bear market was already
well underway at this point in 2008. Although performance levels remained
excellent, many stocks and funds were displaying souring configurations in
early 2008.
On Mar 9,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 300-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 111.2% (annualized at
58.6%) since their buy signals an average of 98.6-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 42-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 9.9% since their sell signals an average of
17.0-weeks earlier. There was one buy signal and 2-sell signals on this
weekend in 2007. (Note: An error in sell signals last week was corrected
on the website. It said there were “no 15-sell signals.” It should have
stated there were “no sell signals”).
Five years
ago, on Mar 10, 2006, there were 290-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 320 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 111.0% (annualized at 61.0%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 94.6-weeks earlier. There were 54-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 9.6% since their respective sell
signals an average of 23.0-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and
one sell signal on this weekend in 2006.
On Mar 11,
2005, there were 241-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 86.2%, annualizing at 61.9%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 72.4-weeks earlier. There were 68-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 28.9% since their sell signals an
average of 52.4-weeks earlier. There were two buy signals and nine sell
signals on this weekend in 2005.
There were
263-stocks and funds with hold signals on Mar 12, 2004. They were up by an
average of 68.4%, annualizing at 77.2%, since their buy signals 46.1-weeks
earlier. The 15-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 27.4%
since their respective sell signals an average of 39.2-weeks earlier.
There were two buy signals and 16-sell signals on this weekend in 2004.
On Mar 14,
2003, there were 124-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 25.3%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 23.3-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 56.7%. There were 141-avoided stocks at that time. They
were down by an average of 11.0% since their sell signals an average of
8.3-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 296 stocks and
funds in 2002-late 2004. There were 17-buy signals and 14-sell signals on
this weekend in 2003. The 2003 bull market was three weeks old on this
weekend in 2003. More buy signals were to follow in subsequent weeks.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
Click this link to this week’s buy and sell signals.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Buy and Sell Signals This Weekend
There was one
sell signal this weekend.
In spite of
the stock market’s short-term bearish behavior, the Mid-term Indicant has
computed this as a mere bearish spurt. There was only one stock with high
risk holding configurations, triggering a sell signal. Several others are
troubled, but remain configured as spurt activity as opposed to
establishing a sustainable bearish cycle.
The Mid-term
continues with support for the bull, while the Short-term Indicant has
identified some threatening elements. That suggests a mere bearish spurt
may be unfolding.
The mid-term
election year continues offering traction toward stock market bullishness.
Much of this gain correlated with political dynamics and was consistent
with historical standards. The stock market remains configured for
classical stock market bullishness during pre-election years, which should
be enjoyed in 2011, albeit with potential near-term bearish expressions.
The stock market’s bull, though, continues to impress with its resilience
with each bearish incursion. That prognosis rests on political dynamics
and historical standards. However, current configurations suggest that
mere bearish spurts may manifest, but none support bearish dominance.
The current
stock market bull originated in anticipation of stalemated politicians.
That has been the historical standard and in this case, history repeats.
Partisanship is expected to heighten and that remains in effect and
therefore bullish in spite of potential for near-term bearish behavior.
Mid-eastern unrest will resume its threat to the stock market bull, as a
function of speculation of those empty souls who are attempting to gain
control of petro flow into the capital markets. The problem with economic
leeches and tyrants is their limited ability to see the big picture.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest, but they should be tight. Right
after buying, set the stop loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve
values, depending on your personal preferences. Those stop losses are
visible to floor traders and subject to a bit of unfairness to you and to
their benefit.
For your
longer-term holdings where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are
signaled on the Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are
updated daily. These shorter-term models attempt participation in
significant bullish spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is
focused on fundamentals and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
65.3% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
143.7% and the S&P500 is up 67.9% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 149.6% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months if the stock
market moves bearishly by significant amounts. Such bearishness is
unlikely based on current Mid-term Indicant configurations. Historical
standards and political climate support continued bullishness during 2011.
Much of that depends, however, on unrest in the Middle East, related oil
prices, and political mumbo-jumbo by U.S. politicians.
The NASDAQ is
down 46.2% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 14.6% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 2.7% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025.
If socialism
continues to expand, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050
and that depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by
politicians. Significant downsizing of federal governments and related
regulations shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous
sentence. If the opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies,
the NASDAQ will never return to its 2000 peak.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 16.9% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness.
The NASDAQ
was down by 1.1% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with the mid-term year’s historical standards of
finding bottoms during mid-term election years.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was down 4.8%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was down on
this weekend in 2004 by 3.0% and finishing up for that year by 1.4%. This
was congruent with election year bullishness, although shy of magnitude
standards.
It was down
6.2% on this weekend in 2005’s post election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during post
election years. This was an excellent year, based on post election year
historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and 2005
were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up 2.6% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%, which
again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was down by 1.1% at this time in 2007, finishing up by
9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The stock
market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took control
of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as opposed to
repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 15.0% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was down
13.0% on this weekend in 2009. Keep in mind, the extraordinary bullish
cycle in 2009 finished that year down by 20.6% from its prior Mid-term
cyclical peak on October 31, 2007. The 2008 bear market more accurately
reflected economic fundamentals than the 2009 bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 4.4% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%, which
was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially in the
second half of such years.
The Dow is
down 15.0% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 5.0% since its last peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is down 16.7%
since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. The S&P600-small cap index is down 4.3% since
its last closing peak on Jul 19, 2007. Bull market expirations are not as
obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear markets are with
simultaneous bottoming among the major indices.
Interestingly, the NAS100 topped its pre-crash highs of 2007/8 several
weeks ago. It continues maintaining that lofty achievement. It is up by
2.7% since its Oct 31, 2007 peak. The S&P400 is the other major index
tracked by the Indicant that is also above pre-2008-crash levels. It is up
by 2.9% since its prior peak on Jul13/2007. The remaining indices remain
below their 2007 peaks. The weakest index, S&P100, continues lagging. It
is down by 19.8% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly closing peak. The current
bull will remain suspicious, in character, until all these major indices
cross above their prior peaks.
The Nov 14, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
Most major
indices last cyclical bottom occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the
four major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The
only exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical
bottom on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view, albeit mildly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
The Dow is up
84.0% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 114.1% and the S&P500 is up
92.8% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 134.5% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-January 2010 bull leg was indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. The Mid-term Indicant and Short-term
Indicant are no longer suggesting impending bearishness. However, the
Short-term Indicant is enduring some bearish spurt configurations.
The current
bull cycle is believed to be the classical mid-term election year bullish
starting point ahead of the presidential pre-election year, which is now
underway. The pre-election year is the most bullish along the 4-year
cycle. In essence, the firing of incumbent politicians in the U.S.
generally arouses the bull. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull continues expressing its delight in
that, which is supported by historical standards.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull with pressure to reduce
government waste. Anticipating that is bullish, even though the shorter
near-term cycle is not as supportive of the bull. Middle Eastern unrest,
although, is a bit threatening to the stock market bull, depending though
on the nature of that unrest. If oil prices skyrocket, the bear will be
delighted. If democracy expands in that region, the bull will be
delighted. Current parameters suggest stock market bearishness with
maximal threats to the Saudi Kingdom, which is a stabilizing force in that
region.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
As promised by Bernanke, the discount rate
(and prime) rate continue holding flat from their depressed levels. The
fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and very
depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any other
value.
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
It endured significant bearishness four weeks ago, held flat the past
three weeks, and dropped significantly last week. Bernanke, apparently,
remains concerned with the economic outlook. All of this continues
suggesting few demand problems. The 2012 forecasted values do not yet
indicate any significant increases. Keep in mind these forecasts are
purely statistical, but qualitative inquiries are not suggesting different
projections at this time.
However, the
6-month CD yield increased significantly 13-weeks ago, suggesting desired
longer-term upward pressures by the banks. Even with all that, it remains
depressed and has been flat since then. It fell 10-basis points three
weeks ago. In essence, a level of stability has been found after wild
variations in such a minor investment vehicle. Anyone buying a 6-month CD
at 0.40% with 2+% CPI is heading to the poor house unless deflationary
pressures manifest. At any rate, all CD’s remain as Yellow Bears. China is
enduring CPI’s ranging above 4.0% and increasing interest rates because of
that.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status seven weeks ago and holding at that level, but
remains with weakening trend and weakening mid-term cycle. There is no
good reason to assume its long-term cyclical decline will reverse. The
Canadian dollar, like the Yen, had been stable for several weeks with a
mild strengthening bias. They both accelerated their strength from mild
status the past two weeks. Both the Yen and Canadian dollar’s cyclical
direction and trend remain bullish. The CA$ tends to parallel oil prices.
The forecast for the CA$ continues with projected strengthening. The
Japanese Yen trend and mid-term cycle continues with strengthening trend,
but has been trading in a shallow zone the past several weeks. The Yen did
not react too bearishly with its earth quake and tsunami.
Overall, the
US dollar threatens to continue strengthening, but continues to weaken
against the Japanese Yen (high productivity) and the Canadian dollar
(resource rich).
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull to boot in spite of near-term cyclical bearishness. The
$2,000/oz-forecast by 2014 continues to challenged, based on political
dynamics. However, statistical bullishness remains in tact. At the same
webpage, you will notice oil is less stable, but enjoying steady increases
the past several weeks. Middle Eastern unrest is adding a bit of pizzazz
to those increases.
As stated by
the Indicant for several months, it is priced where the Kingdom finds
comfort at around $80/bbl, albeit departing on the high end of his desired
tolerance levels the past several days. It has been nudging a bit higher
than that for the past several weeks. It achieved Red Bull status this
week for the first time since 2007. The high-end forecast continues to
project $120/bbl by 2012. The Saudi Kingdom will have to approve that,
though. Middle Eastern unrest offer additional pizzazz to its recent
bullishness. The King is probably a bit concerned about his job security
and related pleasures, but there is little doubt the kingdom remains in
charge of such matters. Speculators can shift the numbers around and if
oil prices escape his desired targets, rest assured he will take
countermeasures.
The Saudi
Kingdom is under attack. It appears Middle Easterners are attempting to
dishevel their kingdoms and dictators. The stock market does not mind the
collapse of dictatorships, but it will react bearishly to the fall of
Saudi Kingdom if that, in fact, occurs. The kingdom has been a stabilizing
force to oil prices since WWII.
Commodity
price’s quick-term cycle continues increasing, although bearish the past
few days due to souring economic projections around the world. Significant
bullish behavior continues, however, continues along the mid-term to
long-term cycle. They are not yet contributory to inflationary pressures.
The Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index and Spot
Prices are enjoying Red Bull status.
This remains economically bullish. Spot prices have expressed stability
for the past few weeks.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, you will find the
Reuter’s UK Commodities Index continues
moving north since early 2009.
It is a Red Bull. It continues to skyrocket, setting a new all time high
during the week of November 8, 2010. It continued setting new highs until
the past few days; again to souring economic projections and default
threats from Spain. It remains economically bullish with inflationary
considerations later. The
CRB Bridge Futures
continues its shift from waffling to more bullish aggression. It is also a
solid Red Bull.
This
paragraph remains the same. Commodities, overall, discontinued behavior
consistent with uncertainty in favor of outright bullishness. Recent
bearish behavior remains irrelevant. “Extract baby extract” seems to be an
evolving theme as more people around the planet are moving toward
capitalistic progressions in spite of American waffling.
Mortgage rates remain configured with
countering the prevailing bearish trend.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011 and retreated back down to economic neutrality.
However, they again achieved Red Bull status the past two weeks.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
continue to be relatively stable.
Overall, hard
economic data continues with stability, albeit with increasing commodity
prices. They could fall a bit in the coming weeks, but the cycle and trend
are nowhere near a state of reversal. That is non-bearish, but lending
support to longer-term inflationary potential. However, rising
productivity from increased interests in capitalism around the world could
significantly dampen inflationary threats. That, coupled with U.S.
political dynamics of potential massive sovereign debt reductions,
suggests dynamic bullishness.
At some
point, the U.S. Congress will learn they have no influence on how China,
India, and other countries manage their economies, which will eventually
enjoy larger economies than the U.S. at some point. If those rapidly
developing economies retain a penchant for capitalism, rest assured prices
for all commodities will escalate. However, rising productivity associated
with capitalists could dampen the effects on consumers. These potential
economic shifts are unparalleled in the annals of history.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 7.5%, annualizing at 15.5% since then. It was solidly bearish
last week. As stated the past six weeks, gold could be in trouble, while
displaying periodic resistance to that prognosis. If there is no retreat
in the next week or two, it will most likely continue moving to the north.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received a buy signal on Sep 4, 2009. It is up 19.3% since then,
annualizing at 12.6%. This lazy fund has been bearish in six of the past
nine weeks. It was solidly bearish last week.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010 following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late 2008.
It is up 27.7%, annualized at 56.9% since the more recent buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell
cycles since late 2008. It is up 47.1%, annualized at 97.0%, since its Sep
17, 2010 buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct
8, 2010. It is up 27.1% since then, annualizing at 63.4%.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010. It is up 42.3% since that buy signal, annualizing at 87.0%.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled, buy, for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 38.7% since then, annualizing at 78.6%. It was
up 242.4% (annualized at 44.8%) since the buy signal on March 26, 2003
until the September 2008 sell signal.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 71.4% since that buy signal, annualizing at
31.3%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It is up 2.1%, annualizing at
35.6%, since its most recent Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18,
2011.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
All the major
indices are up by an average of 26.1% since their bull signals an average
of 48.6-weeks ago. That annualizes at 27.9%.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$31,588,091. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,832,405 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $154,140. That beats buy and hold’s $127,758 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $232,280. That beats buy and hold’s $94,161 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1623.9%, 20.7%, and 146.7%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid the bear markets. That is why it beat buy and
hold by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post election year, 2009. There will be another bear
cycle at some future point. Boasting will be more available at that time.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 75.2% since then. It will receive a buy
signal only if the Quick-term Indicant signals buy for QID, which occurred
last August, but quickly endured “fluttering” behavior, followed by
bearish aggression. A sell signal quickly ensued. That fluttering
prevented the buy signal for MF#22.
Although this
is classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable
to signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation
for the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a
thoroughbred in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting
the stock market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal. It is no longer
getting close to a buy signal, as it appears to have succumbed to the
stock market bull for the time being. It may not receive a buy signal
until 2013, which is the next post election year.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
316.1% (annualized at 16.3%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,010-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report - Summary
Recent
comments about the bear’s inspiration manifested this past Thursday.
Although this is most likely a bearish spurt, it appears to have some
tenacity.
Such bearish
commentary does not mean the stock market bear is about to unleash a solid
and long lasting attack on the bull. However, there is an increasing
probability a bearish spurt may be in the offing.
The Quick-term
Indicant continues signaling hold for all the ETF’s it tracks on a daily
basis. A sell signal will not occur until prices fall below the QTI
bearish yellow curve.
Major indices
and most non-contrarian ETF’s remain with relatively high Vector Pressure,
including those with bear/avoid signals. Therefore, the bull still has
some weapons to unleash toward the bear. However, contrarian ETF’s Force
Vectors continue rising in bullish domains. Non contrarians are falling in
bearish domains. There is an absence of consistency, suggesting a lack of
strong bullish or bearish commitment, but with a mild edge favoring the
bear on the short-term cycle.
The Mid-term
Indicant remains with solid bullish configurations and will be discussed
in the weekly report.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bull and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull for six of the non-contrarian indices and
contrarian VIX. They are up 12.6% since the NTI signaled bull an average
of 19.0-weeks ago. That annualizes to 34.5%. These performance statistics
include contrarian VIX. The bull signals for both contrarian (VIX) and the
non-contrarians will not last long. As stated since last Monday, either
the VIX will quickly receive a bear signal or the non-contrarian indices
will receive a bear signal. As you can see, some of the major indices
received a bear signal this past Thursday, while contrarian VIX retained
its bull signal.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bear for six indices. They are up 0.6% since their
bear signals on May 10, 2011. NTI is a common response point to bearish
aggression and that occurred this past Friday. Unfortunately, the stock
market does not always bounce back into bullish glee. Sometimes it bounces
to the north but cannot fully recover from damages inflicted by the bear.
Configurations remains supportive of the latter, but that can quickly
change.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bull for all eleven major non-contrarian
indices and contrarian VIX. All 12-major indices are up by an average of
14.5% since their bull signals an average of 23.7-weeks ago, annualizing
at 31.8%. The VIX will receive a bear signal when it falls below QTI
Yellow. The Near-term signal will also occur then.
Short-term Market Summary
In spite of
last Thursday’s Near-term Indicant bear signals, eleven Red Bull
configurations remain supportive of the Quick-term bull cycle. Although
some of these Red Bull configurations have Near-term bear signals, they
remain as Quick-term bulls. The Near-term cycle remains a bit distressed
with only four non-contrarian Blue Bulls.
VIX Force
reversed direction last Monday from its prior bearish cycle. That is
bullish for the VIX and one reason for its bull signal last Monday. If
this VIX cycle turns out to be profitable, the stock market will require a
short-term bearish cycle. The major indices remain bullish to the extent
their respective NTI Green curves are continuing to rise. Bear signals
will occur if they fall below their green curves. And that occurred last
Thursday for six of them.
The bull and
bear are engaging in battle. The bear dealt a significant blow to the bull
last Thursday, but rest assured the battle has only begun. The bull
responded this Friday to that bearish aggression, but puny when
considering the bear’s blow on Thursday.
The major
indices remain with relatively high Pressure, including those with
Near-term Bear signals. In other words, the bull remains armed and capable
of counter attacking the bear on the near-term cycle.
Indicant Volume Indicators
This has been
a low volume bull since inception in May 2009 with occasional volume
surges in support of the bull. The NASDAQ IVI is rising with mixed
correlation to bull/bear expressions. The big board’s IVI remains
lethargic.
Mar 11,
2011-Fri-Flat volume on the passive side of it suggests the stock market
lacks commitment to either bullish or bearish directional intensity.
Mar 10,
2011-Thu-Volume was up, but not dramatically, on today’s bearish
aggression. Near-term bullish bias, however, has been shaken. There were
some bear/sell signals on today’s aggression. Many fell below their
Near-term Bearish Green Curve with declining Force and Pressure.
Mar 9,
2011-Wed-Low volume on mixed behavior is not enlightening. Bullish bias
prevails.
Mar 8,
2011-Tue-Apologies for not reviewing yesterday. However, it would seem
redundant as passive volume accompanied bearish aggression; same on
today’s bullish aggression. It is almost not worthy of mention. However,
there has not been sufficient volume to challenge prevailing bullish bias.
Mar 4,
2011-Fri-Intraday bearish aggression was accompanied with low volume. The
bull and bear battles are pretty much limited to reactionary floor
traders. At any rate, bullish bias prevails with respect to volume
correlations.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 21-ETF’s. They are up by an average of
14.8% since their buy signals an average of 20.1-weeks ago. This
annualizes at 38.3%.
The NTI is
avoiding eleven ETF’s. They are up by an average of 0.5% since their sell
signals an average of 1.8-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 32-ETF’s. They are up 18.6%
since their buy signals an average of 29.9-weeks ago. This annualizes at
32.3%. The Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for both contrarian and
non-contrarian ETF’s. That combination of hold signals will not last too
long.
The
Quick-term Indicant is not avoiding any ETF’s, including contrarian ones.
Short-term
Summary: There are 21-Red Bulls (lost four last Wed/Thu), mitigating
dynamic and sustainable bearish behavior. The 7-Blue Bulls continue
mitigating dominance by the stock market bear (gained one today, but lost
six last Wed/Thu). Many ETF’s are enduring difficulties in holding their
Blue Bull status. That suggests the Near-term bullish cycle is tiring. In
spite of that, though, it only takes one NTI Blue Bull to discourage
excesses by near-term bear cycles. There are only seven, but only four of
them are non-contrarians.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Near-term and Quick-term Indicant
signaled buy on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 38.7%, annualizing at 78.6%, since
then. This ETF remains with Red Bull status, mitigating sustainable
bearish threats. The “energy bear” cannot find sustainable forces with
current bullish attributes. This remains bullish, but no longer solid, as
Force remains in bearish domains. However, Pressure is too high to allow
massive bearish influences in this sector.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 71.4% since the QTI signaled buy
on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 31.3%. Bearish yellow is a
good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is at
$124.52 and still rising, albeit slowing down. Being patient here is
important since your buy price approximates $80.65.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Feb 18, 2011. It is up 2.1% since then,
annualizing at 35.6%.
Near-term
attributes for signaling next sell signal will be price below NTI Blue
with negative Vector Pressure.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
As stated
since late 2008, gold remains fundamentally sound for long-term holding
and a technical measure of authenticity in that assessment is in its
bearish yellow curve. If it crosses below bearish yellow, you will not
want to be holding. The Quick-term Indicant will advise of that potential
when it occurs. Keep in mind, currencies can be manipulated for a period.
However, currencies decoupled from production and related productivity
will endure inflation regardless of political witch doctoring. Keep in
mind, GLD tracks the price of gold in U.S. dollars. A strengthening dollar
will have a depressing effect on the price of gold. Please read on, as
this paragraph is now being challenged.
A sound
fundamental persists in continued threats to the gold bull.
In reference to the Indicant Weekly Report
of January 16, 2011, political influences may be gold’s worst enemy, as it
is approaching its prior peak from 1492.
If political forces result in shifting sovereign debt loads to the south,
currencies will strengthen, dampening the “emotional” value of gold. The
Tea Party movement may invoke this shift, as that political pressure
strongly supports dynamic cuts in Federal spending. Perceptions hold that
will dampen inflationary threats and thus depress the price of Gold in
U.S. dollars.
The above
fundamental commentaries conflict. However, the Tea Party movement must
manifest its desires into laws and real budgets before the bearish
fundamental can occur. If Federal spending continues, gold will skyrocket
in U.S. dollars.
Those
$3,000,000 retirement accounts people worked hard to save can become
worthless, even if you own Boardwalk and Park Place, where the weekly rent
will be a hundred grand or two. Politicians can destroy that without even
taxing it. Their inflationary policies will do the trick.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received a buy signal from both the
Quick-term Indicant and Short-term Indicant on Mar 10, 2011 after falling
over 8.0% from its Quick-term sell signal on Oct 14, 2010 and basically
flat since the Near-term sell signal on Nov 15, 2010. It is no longer a
Yellow Bear and too many attributes are shifting in favor of bullish
behavior.
The Near-term
Indicant and Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on Mar 10, 2011 for
ETF#31-QID.
It was down over 30.0% since its October
14, 2010 sell signal. The overall stock market is somewhat supportive of
QID’s bullish desires.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled buy on Mar 10, 2011 for
ETF#32-VXX.
It was down over 55.5% since its prior Near-term Indicant sell signal on
Sep 2, 2010. Its Pressure is now positioned to offer a bullish expression
on a short-term horizon. Its Force Vector rebounded like that of the VIX.
Major ETF
Events
Mar 11,
2011-Fri-None
Mar 10,
2011-Thu-There were several bear/sell signals today. Several prices fell
below NTI Green with Force in bearish domains. Those Force cycles are not
bearishly mature. There will be a rebound within days, but too many
configurations are not supportive of waiting for that rebound.
Mar 9,
2011-Wed-ETF#12-XLU,
reflecting the
Utilities Index,
was very bullish on today’s mostly bearish behavior, although a bit mixed.
Some argue that is bearish for the stock market.
ETF#14-TLT
NTI Green Curve is rising and its Force Vector is mature. That is somewhat
bullish for TLT. However, it will not receive a buy signal until the stock
market shows more interest in becoming bearish.
Mar 8,
2011-Tue-Today’s bullish bounce was accompanied with solid bullish news.
That is not bullish. Prices are having difficulty holding NTI Bullish
blue. If they do, then that is bullish. If not, then the bear will be
inspired.
Mar 7,
2011-Mon-Several contrarians were not. The stock market is struggling with
commitment to bull or bear, but as long as prices remain above NTI Green,
bear/sell signals will not be generated.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-
Mar 11, 2011. Several prices fell below NTI Green with declining and weak
Force. Although Vector Pressure still supports the bull, risks of holding
are too high for those receiving a sell signal. For those of you who
bought GLD on Dec 2008 buy signal, wait for the price to fall below Yellow
before selling.
-Reverse
Tangential Bearish Detection –
This phenomenon will continue to be monitored, but its threat has
subsided for the time being. The timing is unknown, but there is 100%
confidence the major indices and ETF’s will eventually fall to those
prices noted in the below link. The presidential pre-election year is the
most bullish of the four years. This phenomenon reduces the risks of
bearish aggression in 2011.
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections. The problem is not knowing when. The stock
market is now in the heart and soul of bullish seasonality. The bear will
have difficulty manifesting with the shifting political cycles.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market endured bearish convergence last week. Most sectors were bearish.
Commodities and even precious metals endured bearishness this past week.
That offers some mild suppression to inflationary concerns, while a
continuation of such configurations would introduce deflationary concerns.
Economic
fundamentals continue improving, but international political conflicts are
pestering.
The overall
stock market has enjoyed bullish convergence in four of the past six
weeks. The stock market did not deliver the desired four consecutive weeks
in this recent cycle. In spite of less than desired bullish attributes,
there is little reason to fear a dynamic and aggressive bear at this time.
Indicant
Conclusion
The
presidential pre-election year stock market bull remains in tact and in
full conformance to historical standards. There is no technical support
for stock market bearish behavior other than a few pestering short-term
attributes supporting the stock market bear.
The
Indicant Volume Indicator
remains depressed, as post holiday sessions have yet to produce
significant increases in volume. Volume should increase in coming weeks
and months, offering additional obviations of directional intensity. The
absence of that expectation is somewhat discerning, as the bull will
require significant increases in volume to sustain itself. At least that
is the norm. Regardless, though, of these extraneous attributes, one
cannot argue with a low volume bull.
As stated the
past 75-weeks, low interest rates impose narrowed alternative investment
opportunities. That narrowed alternative suggests more demand for common
stocks. Worldly events may be adjusting in support of the original
premise; that is, where else can one put their money to work? The stock
market, of course! The stock market bull continues expressing support for
this principle. International tensions, however, are adding a mild threat
to bullish commentary.
Political
phenomena in the U.S., coupled with low interest rates, continue in
support of the bull.
Inflationary
threats continue. Stagflation is an accurate descriptor of the current
economy. That, coupled with unrest in the Middle East, could inspire the
bear to gain traction. Keep in mind, though, inflation is inevitable in
the future unless Congress is successful in reducing 2.5-trillion dollars
from the national debt. Recent political rhetoric is increasingly passive
toward that amount. Executed passivity toward debt reductions will
continue to feed inflationary potential.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
03/13/2011
Mar 6,
2011 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 03, Issue 01 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Configurations Similar to 1970’s
Oil is a Red Bull for first time since late 2007.
The chart is on the right side of the page that displays upon clicking the
prior sentence. All major commodity indices are Red Bulls and aggressively
so. All of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac mortgage rates are Red Bulls in
spite of the winding down of those two organizations.
Adding fuel
to rising oil prices is continued unrest in the Middle East. Gadhafi wants
to keep his kingdom, which is always the most important thought of any
king. People in the Middle East are expressing significant disliking to
their kingdoms.
After all,
monarchies are irrational. Even with that, though, another one typically
replaces existing monarchies. The Saudi Kingdom appears to be solid. Saudi
Arabia is the petro swing nation. In other words, the Saudis tend to
increase production and the supply of oil when other sources are shutdown.
In essence, Saudi Arabia is friendly to stabilizing oil prices.
Although the
Saudi Kingdom appears solid, Middle Eastern unrest threatens the supply
lines from Saudi Arabia. The stock market gets a bit jittery with such
threats from time to time. This can cause stock market volatility, which
you saw last week.
Military
conflicts, regardless of their location or cause, can and generally do
create resource shortages. The laws of supply and demand always prevail.
Capital markets do not wait for the ratio of demand over supply to
increase. Much of this is anticipatory. When the anticipation is wrong,
capital markets quickly adjust to new evolving themes and projections.
However, when
such anticipations are accurate, prices will rise. Sometimes the
anticipations will drive prices higher than fundamentally justified at a
moment in time. Eventually, fundamentals assume control and prices
manifest purely to fundamental levels. The simple law of supply and demand
has no legislative solution. It is what it is. Political interference only
worsens it.
Once
undesirable inflationary levels occur, the stock market bear is
increasingly aroused. The Federal Reserve in the U.S. and other countries
raise interest rates. They will do this to depress demand in hopes of
fending off unacceptable levels of inflation. Interest rates remain low
for the purposes of stimulating demand. It takes very little energy and
zero capital to increase interest rates. If interest rates start rising,
do not assume it will be a slow path upward. They can be raised by
tremendous amounts in a short period.
Inflation or
high interest rates and/or both can stimulate the stock market bear.
Historical standards suggest the stock market bear dominates when the
combination of inflation and interest rates sum to eight percent or more.
This also occurs when the absolute value of deflation and interest rates
exceed eight percent. Deflation, however, is not threatening at this time.
Combined
inflation and interest rates are nowhere near the eight percent number.
The stock market bear does not wait for that eight percent bogie to occur.
The capital markets anticipate that and with that, the stock market bear
can start its dominance well ahead of less than desired inflation and/or
interest rate levels.
Although the
stock market was mildly bullish last week, it endured significant
bearishness on a few days. Some of that bearishness was based on
anticipation, as opposed to prevailing inflation and interest rates.
Accompanying those bearish days were increases in all commodities,
including gold. There have been several such days the past few weeks that
have configured similarly to that of the 1970’s stock market.
Click this sentence to view the Dow’s behavior from 1972 through 1976.
This sentence will take you to the Dow’s 1976-1980 behavior.
The
short-term bull and bear are battling. These battles are not minor ones,
but they are increasingly lending support to near-term bearishness. If
short-term Force Vectors retreat early next week, the probability of a
near-term bear will increase significantly. Much of this is based on
declining Vector Pressure. If short-term Force Vectors continue moving
north early next week, the probability of continued bullishness will more
than offset those favoring the bear.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market
report.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
no
buy signals and
no sell signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 298 of the 340-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
51.4%. That annualizes to 49.1%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 298-stocks and funds for an average of 54.5-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 38-stocks and funds of 340-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 41.2% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 97.5-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Mar 5, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 209-stocks and funds out
of 333 tracked for an average of 40.1-weeks. They were up by an average of
32.0% (annualized at 41.5%). There were 89-avoided stocks and funds at
that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 31.3%
since their respective sell signals an average of 78.3-weeks earlier one
year ago. There were 18-buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend
last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for only 23-stocks and funds of the
344-tracked two years ago on Mar 6, 2009. They were up by an average of
102.5% (annualized at 58.1%) since their respective buy signals an average
of 91.8-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 321-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 44.6% since their
respective sell signals an average of 39.3-weeks earlier. There were no
buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2009. The stock market
bear continued dominating on this weekend in 2009.
There were
145-stocks and funds with hold signals on Feb 29, 2008 since their buy
signals an average of 170.0-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of
198.8% (annualized at 60.8%). There were 195-avoided stocks and funds at
that time. They were down by an average of 11.4% from their respective
sell signals an average of 16.5-weeks earlier. There were three buy
signals and two sell signals on this weekend in 2008 in addition to the
214-sell signals in the prior 16-weeks, as the bear market was already
well underway at this point in 2008. Although performance levels remained
excellent, many stocks and funds were displaying souring configurations in
early 2008.
On Mar 2,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 301-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 108.8% (annualized at
57.7%) since their buy signals an average of 98.0-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 28-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 12.7% since their sell signals an average of
21.6-weeks earlier. There was one buy signal and no sell signals on
this weekend in 2007.
Five years
ago, on Mar 3, 2006, there were 290-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 320 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 115.4% (annualized at 64.1%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 93.6-weeks earlier. There were 54-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 9.4% since their respective sell
signals an average of 22.0-weeks earlier. There was one buy signal and no
sell signals on this weekend in 2006.
On Mar 4,
2005, there were 249-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 87.3%, annualizing at 64.8%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 70.1-weeks earlier. There were 67-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 29.3% since their sell signals an
average of 53.6-weeks earlier. There was one buy signal and three sell
signals on this weekend in 2005.
There were
275-stocks and funds with hold signals on Feb 27, 2004. They were up by an
average of 73.1%, annualizing at 85.1%, since their buy signals 53.6-weeks
earlier. The 17-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 26.2%
since their respective sell signals an average of 44.7-weeks earlier.
There were four buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2004.
On Mar 7,
2003, there were 135-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 22.5%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 21.1-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 55.6%. There were 131-avoided stocks at that time. They
were down by an average of 12.0% since their sell signals an average of
7.9-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 296 stocks and
funds in 2002-late 2004. The 2003 bull market was two weeks old on this
weekend in 2003. More buy signals were to follow in subsequent weeks.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain
appropriate security, you can see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals
for stocks and funds for this week by clicking the following link. It is
in the member’s only section.
Click this link to this week’s buy and sell signals.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Buy and Sell Signals This Weekend
There were no
signals this weekend.
The Mid-term
and Short-term Indicant continue with support for the bull. The mid-term
election year continues offering traction toward stock market bullishness.
Much of this gain correlated with political dynamics and was consistent
with historical standards. The stock market remains configured for
classical stock market bullishness during pre-election years, which should
be enjoyed in 2011, albeit with potential near-term bearish expressions.
The stock market’s bull, though, continues to impress with its resilience
with each bearish incursion. Keep in mind configurations do not yet
support such bearishness. That prognosis rests on political dynamics and
historical standards. However, current configurations suggest that mere
bearish spurts may manifest, but none support bearish dominance.
The current
stock market bull originated in anticipation of stalemated politicians.
That has been the historical standard and in this case, history repeats.
Partisanship is expected to heighten and that remains in effect and
therefore bullish in spite of potential for near-term bearish behavior.
Mid-eastern unrest will resume its threat to the stock market bull, as a
function of speculation of those empty souls who are attempting to gain
control of Mubarak’s revenue stream.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest, but they should be tight. Right
after buying, set the stop loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve
values, depending on your personal preferences. Those stop losses are
visible to floor traders and subject to a bit of unfairness to you and to
their benefit.
For your
longer-term holdings where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are
signaled on the Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are
updated daily. These shorter-term models attempt participation in
significant bullish spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is
focused on fundamentals and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
67.0% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
149.9% and the S&P500 is up 70.1% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 155.5% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months if the stock
market moves bearishly by significant amounts. Such bearishness is
unlikely based on current configurations. Historical standards and
political climate support continued bullishness during 2011. Much of that
depends, however, on unrest in the Middle East and related oil prices.
The NASDAQ is
down 44.8% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 13.5% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 3.8% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025.
If socialism
continues to expand, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050
and that depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by
politicians. Significant downsizing of federal governments and related
regulations shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous
sentence. If the opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies,
the NASDAQ will never return to its 2000 peak.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 14.3% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness.
The NASDAQ
was down by 4.7% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with the mid-term year’s historical standards of
finding bottoms during mid-term election years.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was down 2.1%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was up on
this weekend in 2004 by 2.6% and finishing up for that year by 1.4%. This
was congruent with election year bullishness, although shy of magnitude
standards.
It was down
4.8% on this weekend in 2005’s post election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during post
election years. This was an excellent year, based on post election year
historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and 2005
were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up 4.4% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%, which
again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was down by 2.0% at this time in 2007, finishing up by
9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The stock
market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took control
of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as opposed to
repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 14.8% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was down
14.2% on this weekend in 2009. Keep in mind, the extraordinary bullish
cycle in 2009 finished that year down by 20.6% from its prior Mid-term
cyclical peak on October 31, 2007. The 2008 bear market more accurately
reflected economic fundamentals than the 2009 bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 1.0% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%, which
was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially in the
second half of such years.
The Dow is
down 14.1% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 2.6% since its last peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is down 15.6%
since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. The S&P600-small cap index is down 2.0% since
its last closing peak on Jul 19, 2007. Bull market expirations are not as
obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear markets are with
simultaneous bottoming among the major indices.
Interestingly, the NAS100 topped its pre-crash highs of 2007/8 a several
weeks ago. It continues maintaining that lofty achievement. It is up by
5.4% since its Oct 31, 2007 peak. The S&P400 is the other major index
tracked by the Indicant that is also above pre-2008-crash levels. It is up
by 4.6% since its prior peak on 7/13/2007. The remaining indices remain
below their 2007 peaks. The weakest index, S&P100, continues lagging. It
is down by 18.8% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly closing peak. The current
bull will remain suspicious, in character, until all these major indices
cross above their prior peaks.
The Nov 14, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
Most major
indices last cyclical bottom occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the
four major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The
only exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical
bottom on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view, albeit mildly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
The Dow is up
85.9% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 119.5% and the S&P500 is up
95.3% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 140.0% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-January 2010 bull leg was indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. The Mid-term Indicant and Short-term
Indicant are no longer suggesting impending bearishness.
The current
bull cycle is believed to be the classical mid-term election year bullish
starting point ahead of the presidential pre-election year, which is now
underway. The pre-election year is the most bullish along the 4-year
cycle. In essence, the firing of incumbent politicians in the U.S.
generally arouses the bull. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull continues expressing its delight in
that, which is supported by historical standards.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull with pressure to reduce
government waste. Anticipating that is bullish, even though the shorter
near-term cycle is not as supportive of the bull. Middle Eastern unrest,
although, is a bit threatening to the stock market bull, depending though
on the nature of that unrest. If oil prices skyrocket, the bear will be
delighted. If democracy expands in that region, the bull will be
delighted.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
As promised by Bernanke over a year ago,
the discount rate (and prime) rate are holding flat from their depressed
levels. The fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and
very depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any
other value.
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
It endured significant bearishness three weeks ago and held flat the past
three weeks. That suggests little demand problems. The 2012 forecasted
values do not yet indicate any significant increases. Keep in mind these
forecasts are purely statistical, but qualitative inquiries are not
suggesting different projections at this time. However, the 6-month CD
yield increased significantly twelve weeks ago, suggesting desired
longer-term upward pressures. Even with all that, it remains depressed and
has been flat since then. It fell 10-basis points two weeks ago. In
essence, a level of stability has been found after wild variations in such
a minor investment vehicle. Anyone buying a 6-month CD at 0.40% with 2+%
CPI is heading to the poor house unless deflationary pressures manifest.
At any rate, all CD’s remain as Yellow Bears. China is enduring CPI’s
ranging above 4.0% and increasing interest rates because of that.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status six weeks ago and holding at that level, but
remains with weakening trend and weakening mid-term cycle. There is no
good reason to assume its long-term cyclical decline will reverse. The
Canadian dollar, like the Yen, had been stable for several weeks with a
mild strengthening bias. Last week, though, they both accelerated their
strength from mild status. Both the Yen and Canadian dollar’s cyclical
direction and trend remain bullish. The CA$ tends to parallel oil prices.
The forecast for the CA$ continues with projected strengthening. The
Japanese Yen trend and mid-term cycle continues with strengthening trend,
but has been trading in a shallow zone the past several weeks.
Overall, the
US dollar threatens to continue strengthening, but continues to weaken
against the Japanese Yen (high productivity) and the Canadian dollar
(resource rich).
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull to boot in spite of near-term cyclical bearishness. The prior
$2,000/oz-forecast by 2014 continues to challenged, based on political
dynamics. However, statistical bullishness remains in tact. At the same
webpage, you will notice oil is less stable, but enjoying steady increases
the past several weeks. Middle Eastern unrest is adding a bit of pizzazz
to those increases.
As stated by
the Indicant for several months, it is priced where the Kingdom finds
comfort at around $80/bbl, albeit departing on the high end of his desired
tolerance levels the past several days. It has been nudging a bit higher
than that for the past several weeks. It achieved Red Bull status this
week for the first time since 2007. The high-end forecast continues to
project $120/bbl by 2012. The Saudi Kingdom will have to approve that,
though. Middle Eastern unrest offer additional pizzazz to its recent
bullishness. The King is probably a bit concerned about his job security
and related pleasures, but there is little doubt the kingdom remains in
charge of such matters. Speculators can shift the numbers around and if
oil prices escape his desired targets, rest assured he will take
countermeasures.
Commodity
price’s quick-term cycle continues increasing. Significant bullish
behavior continues. They are not yet contributory to inflationary
pressures.
The Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index and Spot
Prices are enjoying Red Bull status.
This remains economically bullish. Spot prices have expressed stability
for the past few weeks.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, you will find the
Reuter’s UK Commodities Index continues
moving north since early 2009.
It is a Red Bull. It continues to skyrocket, setting a new all time high
during the week of November 8, 2010 and continues to set new highs. It
remains economically bullish with inflationary considerations later. The
CRB Bridge Futures
continues its shift from waffling to more bullish aggression. It is also a
solid Red Bull.
This
paragraph remains the same. Commodities, overall, discontinued behavior
consistent with uncertainty in favor of outright bullishness. “Extract
baby extract” seems to be an evolving theme as more people around the
planet are moving toward capitalistic progressions in spite of American
waffling.
Mortgage rates remain configured with
countering the prevailing bearish trend.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011 and retreated back down to economic neutrality.
However, they again achieved Red Bull status this past week.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
continue to be relatively stable.
Overall, hard
economic data continues with stability, albeit with increasing commodity
prices. That is non-bearish, but lending support to longer-term
inflationary potential. However, rising productivity from increased
interests in capitalism around the world could significantly dampen
inflationary threats. That, coupled with U.S. political dynamics of
potential massive sovereign debt reductions, suggests dynamic
bullishness.
At some
point, the U.S. Congress will learn they have no influence on how China,
India, and other countries manage their economies, which will enjoy larger
economies than the U.S. at some point. If those rapidly developing
economies retain a penchant for capitalism, rest assured prices for all
commodities will escalate. However, rising productivity associated with
capitalists could dampen the effects on consumers. These potential
economic shifts are unparalleled in the annals of history.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 15.5%, annualizing at 33.2% since then. It was mildly bearish
last week. As stated the past five weeks, gold could be in trouble, but it
displayed some resistance to that prognosis the past four weeks. If there
is no retreat in the next week or two, it will most likely continue moving
to the north. It was bullish last week.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received a buy signal on Sep 4, 2009. It is up 23.8% since then,
annualizing at 15.7%. This lazy fund has been bearish in five of the past
eight weeks, but mildly bullish last week.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010 following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late 2008.
It is up 33.0%, annualized at 70.7% since the more recent buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell
cycles since late 2008. It is up 54.6%, annualized at 117.0%, since its
Sep 17, 2010 buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct
8, 2010. It is up 34.5% since then, annualizing at 84.5%.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010. It is up 49.8% since that buy signal, annualizing at 106.7%.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled, buy, for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 44.6% since then, annualizing at 94.5%. It was
up 242.4% (annualized at 44.8%) since the buy signal on March 26, 2003
until the September 2008 sell signal.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 72.8% since that buy signal, annualizing at
32.2%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It is up 2.9%, annualizing at
74.8%, since its most recent Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18,
2011.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
All the major
indices are up by an average of 27.4% since their bull signals an average
of 47.6-weeks ago. That annualizes at 29.9%.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$31,917,180. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,851,496 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $156,134. That beats buy and hold’s $129,410 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $238,188. That beats buy and hold’s $96,556 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1623.9%, 20.7%, and 146.7%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid the bear markets. That is why it beat buy and
hold by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post election year, 2009. There will be another bear
cycle at some future point. Boasting will be more available at that time.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 76.6% since then. It will receive a buy
signal only if the Quick-term Indicant signals buy for QID, which occurred
last August, but quickly endured “fluttering” behavior, followed by
bearish aggression. A sell signal quickly ensued. That fluttering
prevented the buy signal for MF#22.
Although this
is classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable
to signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation
for the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a
thoroughbred in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting
the stock market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal. It is no longer
getting close to a buy signal, as it appears to have succumbed to the
stock market bull for the time being. It may not receive a buy signal
until 2013, which is the next post election year.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
320.4% (annualized at 16.5%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,009-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report - Summary
Several more
Force Vectors crossed into bullish domains, supporting the stock market
bull this past Thursday. However, many found resistance to their desire to
penetrate bullish domains on Friday. Even more endured difficulty crossing
above Pressure. That is inspirational to the stock market bear.
Also,
non-contrarian ETF’s are having difficulty holding their Blue Bull status.
This suggests the near-term bull cycle is tiring. That is understandable.
It is the most impressive near-term bullish cycle since the bull’s
inception in May 2009.
Such bearish
commentary does not mean the stock market bear is about to unleash a solid
and long lasting attack on the bull. However, there is an increasing
probability a bearish spurt may be in the offing. A long as prices remain
above their respective Near-term Green curves, any bearish expressions
should be considered as spurts. Sustainable and deep bearish behavior
cannot occur as long as prices remain above the green curve.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The
Short-term Indicant is signaling bull for all eleven non-contrarian
indices. These bulls are up 15.5% since the NTI signaled bull an average
of 20.8-weeks ago. That annualizes to 38.7%. The lone bear is contrarian
VIX. It is down 12.2% since its bear signal 24.1-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled bear for contrarian VIX on Sep 16, 2010. It
is down 12.2% since that bear signal.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bull for all eleven major non-contrarian
indices. The eleven major indices are up by an average of 17.4% since
their bull signals an average of 24.8-weeks ago, annualizing at 36.5%.
Short-term Market Summary
Ten Red Bulls
remain supportive of the Quick-term bull cycle. The Near-term cycle
remains a bit distressed with only two Blue Bulls. Four of them were lost
today after gaining four this past Thursday. The Dow Transports is the
lone major index that is not a Red Bull. It is struggling to retain its
bull status.
All
non-contrarian Force Vectors remain in bearish domains. However, they are
increasing bullish Force. That should dampen the bear’s ambition. Most
remain in bearish domains, but as long as they continue to increase, the
bear will acquiesce to the bull’s desired dominance. Some short-term
bullish support has been lost, but not enough to signal bears for the
major indices. Vector Pressure remains relatively high and protective of
bull’s ambition. However, the transport’s Pressure is nearing bearish
domains. If it dips into bearish domains, the other major indices will be
rattled.
VIX Force
continues its decline, which supports VIX bearishness and stock market
bullishness. Its Force cycle bearishly mature, but until it reverses, the
stock market bull remains in tact. If it reverses early next week, do not
be surprised at bearish stock market spurt behavior.
Indicant Volume Indicators
This has been
a low volume bull since inception in May 2009 with occasional volume
surges in support of the bull. The NASDAQ IVI is rising with mixed
correlation to bull/bear expressions. The big board’s IVI remains
lethargic.
Mar 4,
2011-Fri-Intraday bearish aggression was accompanied with low volume. The
bull and bear battles are pretty much limited to reactionary floor
traders. At any rate, bullish bias prevails with respect to volume
correlations.
Mar 3,
2011-Thu-Although volume was up on today’s bullish aggression, it remains
subdued. However, bullish bias prevails.
Mar 2,
2011-Wed-Volume again depressed on mild bullish behavior. Although a
bearish spurt can occur, it has no significant support for a sustainable
bear market.
Mar 1,
2011-Tue-Volume was mildly up on bearish aggression. A few more like that
will influence short-term bias shift from bullish.
Feb 28,
2011-Mon-Volume remains subdued, which does nothing to threaten bullish
bias.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 25-ETF’s. They are up by an average of
18.8% since their buy signals an average of 23.0-weeks ago. This
annualizes at 42.6%.
The NTI is
avoiding seven ETF’s. They are down by an average of 13.4% since their
sell signals an average of 12.2-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 29-ETF’s. They are up 22.6%
since their buy signals an average of 32.0-weeks ago. This annualizes at
36.8%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding 3-ETF’s (QID, VXX, TLT). They are all
contrarian ETF’s. They are down by an average of 43.5% since their sell
signals an average of 46.2-weeks ago.
Short-term
Summary: There are 25-Red Bulls (held flat since last Tue), mitigating
dynamic and sustainable bearish behavior. The 12-Blue Bulls continue
mitigating dominance by the stock market bear. Friday’s bearish behavior
wiped out nine of them. Many ETF’s are enduring difficulties in holding
their Blue Bull status. That suggests the Near-term bullish cycle is
tiring. In spite of that, though, it only takes one NTI Blue Bull to
discourage excesses by the bear.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Near-term and Quick-term Indicant
signaled buy on Sep 15, 2010. It is up 44.6%, annualizing at 94.5%, since
then. This ETF remains with Red Bull status, mitigating sustainable
bearish threats. The “energy bear” cannot find sustainable forces with
current bullish attributes. This remains solidly bullish, although with
mild concerns with its Force falling below Vector Pressure. That suggests
some Middle Eastern softening and some profit taking possibilities on the
short-term horizon.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 72.8% since the QTI signaled buy
on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 32.2%. Bearish yellow is a
good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is at
$124.02 and still rising, albeit slowing down. Being patient here is
important since your buy price approximates $80.65.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Feb 18, 2011. It is up 2.9% since then,
annualizing at 74.8%.
Near-term
attributes for signaling next sell signal will be price below NTI Blue
with negative Vector Pressure.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
As stated
since late 2008, gold remains fundamentally sound for long-term holding
and a technical measure of authenticity in that assessment is in its
bearish yellow curve. If it crosses below bearish yellow, you will not
want to be holding. The Quick-term Indicant will advise of that potential
when it occurs. Keep in mind, currencies can be manipulated for a period.
However, currencies decoupled from production and related productivity
will endure inflation regardless of political witch doctoring. Keep in
mind, GLD tracks the price of gold in U.S. dollars. A strengthening dollar
will have a depressing effect on the price of gold. Please read on, as
this paragraph is now being challenged.
A sound
fundamental persists in continued threats to the gold bull.
In reference to the Indicant Weekly Report
of January 16, 2011, political influences may be gold’s worst enemy, as it
is approaching its prior peak from 1492.
If political forces result in shifting sovereign debt loads to the south,
currencies will strengthen, dampening the “emotional” value of gold. The
Tea Party movement may invoke this shift, as that political pressure
strongly supports dynamic cuts in Federal spending. Perceptions hold that
will dampen inflationary threats and thus depress the price of Gold in
U.S. dollars.
The above
fundamental commentaries conflict. However, the Tea Party movement must
manifest its desires into laws and real budgets before the bearish
fundamental can occur. If Federal spending continues, gold will skyrocket
in U.S. dollars.
Those
$3,000,000 retirement accounts people worked hard to save can become
worthless, even if you own Boardwalk and Park Place, where the weekly rent
will be a hundred grand or two. Politicians can destroy that without even
taxing it. Their inflationary policies will do the trick.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received a sell signal from Quick-term
Indicant on Nov 15, 2010, as price fell below QTI-Yellow. It is down 1.9%
since that sell signal. It is a Yellow Bear, which offers no bullish
support.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled sell on Oct 14, 2010. It is down 9.0% since then. It was
solidly bearish last Wed-Thu, but enjoyed a bullish rebound on Fri.
Its
configuration, as a stand alone observation, suggests near-term
bearishness. Its contrarian nature supports stock market bullish bias.
However, its Force Vector is configured with a possibility to support its
bullishness. Early next week will offer greater obviations of directional
intensity.
The Near-term
Indicant and Quick-term Indicant signaled sell for
ETF#31-QID
on Sep 13, 2010. It is down 36.6% since then. As stated the past several
days, attributes are no longer solidly bearish, while not yet strongly
supporting the “short-bull.” The overall stock market is not yet
supportive of QID’s bullish desires. Interestingly, it received a reverse
stock split one week ago. Its bearish performance had it in single digit
ranges a few days week before last. (Less than $10). Now it is above $50
due to the reverse split.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled sell on Sep 2, 2010 for
ETF#32-VXX.
It is down 60.5% since then. Its Pressure is now positioned to offer a
bullish expression on a short-term horizon. Interestingly, its Force
Vector is bearishly mature.
Major ETF
Events
Mar 4,
2011-Fri-Technical indicators shifted to support short-term bull and bear
expressions. One or the other will win early next week. If the bear wins,
configurations suggest it will be a mere bearish spurt.
Mar 3,
2011-Thu-TLT again solidly bearish.
Mar 2,
2011-Wed-TLT was solidly bearish. It remains configured to continue its
bearish position and direction.
Mar 1,
2011-Tue-TLT was not contrarian. Also, today’s stock market bearish
aggression should be considered as a mere spurt.
Feb 28,
2011-Mon-No major events; a minor one is worth noting. TLT crossed QTI
Yellow. Current configurations suggest TLT will soon return to its
prevailing bearish cycle.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-
Mar 04, 2011-Holding remains safe, relative to NTI Green prices. Prices
remain above Green, for the most part, and Green is well above the buy
prices. Falling below Green with minimal Force will trigger the next sell
signals. International related ETF’s remain configured with weak bullish
support. Some have endured recent sell signals and are being avoided. For
those of you who bought GLD on Dec 2008 buy signal, wait for the price to
fall below Yellow before selling.
-Reverse
Tangential Bearish Detection –
This phenomenon will continue to be monitored, but its threat has
subsided for the time being. The timing is unknown, but there is 100%
confidence the major indices and ETF’s will eventually fall to those
prices noted in the below link. The presidential pre-election year is the
most bullish of the four years. This phenomenon reduces the risks of
bearish aggression in 2011.
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections. The problem is not knowing when. The stock
market is now in the heart and soul of bullish seasonality. The bear will
have difficulty manifesting with the shifting political cycles.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market enjoyed mild bullish convergence last week. Economic fundamentals
continue improving and thus supportive. However, commodity prices are also
increasing. This is inflationary. The stock market expressed concerns
about potential inflationary pressures a few days last week.
The overall
stock market has enjoyed bullish convergence in four of the past five
weeks. The stock market did not deliver the desired four consecutive
weeks. In spite of less than desired bullish attributes, there is little
reason to fear a dynamic and aggressive bear at this time.
Indicant
Conclusion
The
presidential pre-election year stock market bull remains in tact and in
full conformance to historical standards. There is no technical support
for stock market bearish behavior.
The
Indicant Volume Indicator
remains depressed, as post holiday sessions have yet to produce
significant increases in volume. Volume should increase in coming weeks
and months, offering additional obviations of directional intensity. The
absence of that expectation is somewhat discerning, as the bull will
require significant increases in volume to sustain itself. At least that
is the norm. Regardless, though, of these extraneous attributes, one
cannot argue with a low volume bull.
As stated the
past 74-weeks, low interest rates impose narrowed alternative investment
opportunities. That narrowed alternative suggests more demand for common
stocks. Worldly events may be adjusting in support of the original
premise; that is, where else can one put their money to work? The stock
market, of course! The stock market bull continues expressing support for
this principle.
Political
phenomena in the U.S., coupled with low interest rates, continue in
support of the bull.
Inflationary
threats continue. Stagflation is an accurate descriptor of the current
economy. That, coupled with Libya, could inspire the bear to gain
traction. Keep in mind, though, inflation is inevitable in the future
unless Congress is successful in reducing 2.5-trillion dollars from the
national debt. Recent political rhetoric is increasingly passive toward
that amount. Executed passivity toward debt reductions will continue to
feed inflationary potential.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
03/06/2011