Nov 27,
2011 Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 11, Issue 04 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Undoing
Prior Political Economic Damage Slows
The
presidential debates suggested heightened political interest of undoing
prior economic damage by politicians. The stock market bull charged ahead
this past September like clockwork with those debates. That is one reason
why the pre-election year is the most bullish one. Politicians openly
attacking incumbent politicians always drive bullish behavior. The louder
and more negative, the more bullish the stock market behaves.
The
presidential debates illustrated an interest in flat tax, simplified
taxes, repealing nationalized healthcare, eliminating federal
bureaucracies, slashing wasteful spending, etc. The current tax code
represents about 200-years of severe political damage to the economy.
Nationalized
healthcare will result in politicians and government bureaucrats going to
the front of the long lines for healthcare. Long lines manifest from any
centralized bureaucracy, regardless of any organization, anywhere in the
world. That is one reason why the S&P100 is the worst performer of the
major indices. Bureaucrats in any organization promulgate slowness and
weakened conclusions, of which most of that slowness is encouraged by the
bureaucrat’s constant questioning of “what is in it for me?”
If you are
sick, you will be given a number and wait your turn. If the bureaucrat
gets sick, immediate medical attention will be granted to that bureaucrat.
That is just human nature. The one with influence and power exercises it.
The only cure is the elimination of bureaucrats. If you are CEO and want
your stock price to go up, fire them and do it today. It is unlikely any
politician would fire federal bureaucrats. Since there is no profit
motive, it will not happen.
All
nationalized processes yield less than 10% productivity relative to the
private sector, which is already low in privatized healthcare.
Nationalizing it will reduce that productivity by another 90%.
The more
vociferous candidates promoting the dismantling of massive ineffectiveness
in Washington DC correlated very well with stock market bullishness during
September and their popularity. The bear was aroused as their popularity
fell. One particular candidate is not a politician. All of the others are
professional politicians. The establishment has done a good job is
deafening popularity
The incumbent
president of the United States is not countering the republican candidates
with leadership. He is lying and attempting to sway enough economic
leeches to vote for him. The scary part of that is how close the polls
are. The United States is very near to having a majority of economic
leeches, combined with massive numbers of economic illiterates.
Politicians work very hard to create a voting majority of those weaklings.
The failure
of MF Global offers evidence of how dangerous politicians are to your
quality of life. Not many will interpret this properly. Here is the proper
interpretation. The former governor of New Jersey, Jon Corzine, bought
European debt after assuming the helm at MF Global after being ousted as
New Jersey’s governor. This highlights one fact. Egomaniacs, who become
politicians, see nothing wrong with debt. If he were highly influential in
government spending, the United States would hasten its road to
bankruptcy. He is no different from any other politician. They are bent on
bankrupting the U.S. They are incapable of proactively understanding this.
They simply see nothing wrong with it as their illusions of majesty drive
their action. It costs a lot of money to appear majestic with a complete
absence of substance. The stock market bear is aroused with related hype
and especially so when a near majority believes the hype.
The incumbent
president of the United States and most Congressmen, who promulgate
increasing debt, enjoy strength in the polls. That, coupled with European
leadership ineptness, appears to have shattered the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality. Bearish behavior in a pre-election year at this time
of year is very unusual.
There were
several Mid-term bear signals for the major indices this weekend. Sell
signals for stocks and funds also continued this weekend. This is caused
by European political ineptness and the closeness of polls in the United
States. If Europeans continue displaying their ineptness and socialists
are re-elected in the 2012-U.S. elections, the stock market could very
easily decay into a secular bear. The stock market will not wait for the
conclusion to all of that. It will anticipate that. If there is no heart
and soul of bullish seasonality, it may be starting now. Current polling
suggests an uneasy probability of re-electing current incumbents. The
quality of life for all will start a steady decline. If economic leeches
expand to a clear majority in the U.S., the best days have come and gone.
Keep in mind
the
Dow Utilities is a Mid-term
Indicant Red Bull. Even though the stock market is encountering bearish
incursions, this Red Bull proves the capital markets have not completely
given up on capitalistic solutions to problems. Unfortunately, it is the
only Red Bull, but as long as it remains bullish, the heart and soul of
bullish seasonality can still manifest.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market report.
Whipsawed
– Review of Wild Swings Last Week
This
section highlights last week’s biggest gainers and losers within each
group of stocks and funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant.
NAS#18-WYNN was down 12.1% last
week. It was the NASDAQ100’s biggest loser, which is not that bad when
considering last week’s strong bearish behavior. It is up 83.0% since the
Mid-term Indicant’s buy signal in Aug 2009.
NAS#86-BIIB was up a paltry
1.4% last week. It was the most bullish of the NASDAQ100 stocks. It is up
88.5% since the MTI buy signal in Sep 2010.
ISTK#88-BRCD was up 10.1% last
week as the Indicant Select Stock’s biggest gainer. It is down 6.8% since
the MTI sell signal last July.
ISTK#25-NOK was down 18.7% last
week. It was this group’s worst loser. It is down 79.0% since the MTI sell
signal on August 29, 2008. This stock succumbed to 2008 bearishness and it
remains bearish.
Interestingly, the Dow30 and Dow Utilities had no gainers last week.
DJIA#06-BAC was down 10.6% last
week, as the Dow’s biggest loser. This stock is down by 85.9% since the
MTI sell signal on January 4, 2008.
DJIA#24-WMT was down 0.6% last
week. It was the least bad Dow stock last week. It is up only 7.3% since
the MTI buy signal in Sep 17, 2010.
DJU#05-AES was down 5.6% last
week. It is now down 0.9% since the MTI buy signal five weeks ago.
DJU#02-ED was down 1.7% last
week. It was the least bad performer last week. It is up, however, by
43.4% since the MTI signaled buy in Aug 2009.
MF#09-SSGRX was down 9.0% last
week on weak economic projections. This is a bit disappointing. A sell
signal was triggered this weekend.
MF#22-USPIX was up 9.3% last
week on strong stock market bearish behavior. It is down 76.0% since the
MTI sell signal on April 3, 2009.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
no-buy
signals and
twenty-five-sell signals. The 109-buy
signals in the past seven weeks have been interrupted with forty-five sell
signals the past two weekends.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 240 of the 339-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
48.2%. That annualizes to 32.6%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 240-stocks and funds for an average of 76.8-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 58-stocks and funds of 339-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 34.5% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 58.1-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Nov 26, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 286-stocks and funds
out of 339 tracked for an average of 49.6-weeks. They were up by an
average of 39.0% (annualized at 40.9%). There were 50-avoided stocks and
funds at that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of
51.8% since their respective sell signals an average of 100.6-weeks
earlier one year ago. There were three buy signals and no sell signals on
this weekend last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for 189-stocks and funds of the 317-tracked
two years ago on Nov 27, 2009. They were up by an average of 27.4%,
annualized at 48.9%, since their respective buy signals an average of
29.1-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 124-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 36.3% since their
respective sell signals an average of 81.6-weeks earlier. There were no
buy signals, while there were 159-buy signals in the prior 18-weeks. There
were four sell signals on this weekend in 2009.
There were
only 23-stocks and funds with hold signals of the 344-tracked by the
Mid-term Indicant on Nov 21, 2008 since their buy signals an average of
51.4-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of 74.2% (annualized at
75.1%). There were 314-avoided stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 39.6% from their respective sell signals an average
of 26.6-weeks earlier. There were seven sell signals on this weekend in
2008 in addition to the 563-sell signals in the prior 54-weeks, as the
bear market was nearing its ultimate depth, but still incomplete in its
final destruction. There were no buy signals on this weekend in 2008 even
with the weighted influence to do so with the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality.
On Nov 23,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 237-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 145.2% (annualized at
58.6%) since their buy signals an average of 128.9-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 92-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 13.3% since their sell signals an average of
16.9-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and 16-sell signals on this
weekend in 2007 in addition to 44-sell signals in the prior four weeks.
The 2003-Mid-term bull cycle was past its peak at this time in 2007, as
the democratic congress was implementing their “take from the productive
and give to the non-productive” policies. A huge number of sell signals
continued for the next several months as the bear market gained momentum
throughout most of 2008, through early 2009.
Five years
ago, on Nov 24, 2006, there were 311-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 344 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 107.6% (annualized at 67.0%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 83.5-weeks earlier. There were 31-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 12.4% since their respective sell
signals an average of 19.2-weeks earlier. There were two buy signals and
no sell signals on this weekend in 2006. The bull was solid, for the most,
part in 2006.
On Nov 25,
2005, there were 269-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 97.3%, annualizing at 62.5%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 80.9-weeks earlier. There were 51-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 16.5% since their sell signals an
average of 25.8-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and no sell
signal on this weekend in 2005.
There were
301-stocks and funds with hold signals on Nov 26, 2004. They were up by an
average of 70.4%, annualizing at 68.9%, since their buy signals 53.1-weeks
earlier. The 19-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 43.4%
since their respective sell signals an average of 54.8-weeks earlier.
There were no buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend in 2004. The
2004-meandering bear market that pestered throughout most of 2004 was
giving way to the heart and soul of bullish seasonality at this time in
2004.
On Nov 28,
2003, there were 261-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 59.0%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 34.6-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 88.5%. There were only 19-avoided stocks at that time.
They were down by an average of 27.1% since their sell signals an average
of 35.0-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 296 stocks and
funds from 2002 through late 2004. There were 13-buy signals in addition
to 397-buy signals in the prior 36-weeks. There were three-sell signals on
this weekend in 2003, as the stock market concluded its classical late
summer sell-off. The 2003 bull market was 39-weeks old on this weekend in
2003.
On Nov 29,
2002, there were 280-stocks and funds with hold signals. They were up
22.2% since their buy signals an average of 9.6-weeks earlier, annualizing
at 120.0%. There were seven-stocks and funds avoided since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell an average of 9.6-weeks earlier. The avoided stocks
and funds were down 29.8%. There were six-buy signals in addition to
502-buy signals in the prior 18-weeks. Although the stock market bear
remained in effect, it was beginning to display weakness. Some of the Aug.
2002-buy signals retained hold signals through late 2007 and early 2008,
while others endured sell signals before the conclusion of calendar year
2002 and in early 2003. Energy related buy signals in Aug 2002, however,
held strongly through the December 2002-record-bear and lasted until late
2008. There were two-sell signals on this weekend in 2002.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain appropriate security, you can
see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals for stocks and funds for this
week by clicking here. It is in
the member’s only section.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Bull and Bear Signals This Weekend
All major
indices no longer remain configured with bullish attributes.
Unfortunately, they weakened this past week, but still holding with bull
signals. Several stocks and funds reconfigured with solid bearish
attributes, but many remain solidly bullish. Those receiving sell signals
are configured with excessive risks for holding.
Although
mid-term cyclical attributes remain in support of the stock market bull,
the stock market bear is threatening the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest. Right after buying, set the stop
loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve values, depending on your
personal preferences.
For your
longer-term holdings, where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are signaled on the Near-term,
Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are updated daily.
These shorter-term models attempt participation in significant bullish
spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is focused on fundamentals
and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
54.1% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
119.1% and the S&P500 is up 49.2% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 117.5% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months.
Configurations shifted in support of normal pre-election year bullishness
three weeks ago, but now being challenged by the stock market bear.
The NASDAQ is
down 51.6% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 24.1% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
down by 4.2% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025. One should
note that buy and hold so far this century is a loser, as the stock market
has been flat to bearish the last eleven years. Technically, one could
call that a secular bear; albeit a mild one.
The Dow has
stumbled three times when encountering its 2000 peak value. Will it do
that again? The S&P500 topped its 2000 peak for a few brief weeks in 2007.
The NASDAQ has never come close, as its prior peak price was hype driven.
The DOTCOM sector does not perform agriculture, manufacture, or extract.
Therefore, most companies within that index created no wealth. It remains
appropriately bearish relative to the 2000 phony peak prices.
If socialism
expands, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050 and that
depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by politicians.
Significant downsizing of federal governments and related regulatory
shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous sentence. If the
opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies, the NASDAQ will
never return to its 2000 peak. Look at the resumes of intellectual elites
who argue against these points. You will detect they are pure economic
leeches arguing on behalf of such regulations, which is a source of their
livelihoods. None has ever produced anything of value.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 23.0% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness. The heart and soul of bullish
seasonality manifested at this time of year in spite of dynamic
bearishness in 2001. However, it was a weak expression, but bullish
nonetheless.
The NASDAQ
was down by 24.0% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with historical standards of finding bottoms during
mid-term election years. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality was
solid at this time in 2002, but endured a couple of disruptive incursions
by the stock market bear in December and again in Feb-Mar 2003.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was up 45.5%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was up on
this weekend in 2004 by a paltry 5.0% from that year’s meandering bear
market, but finished up by 8.6%. This was congruent with election year
bullishness, although shy of magnitude standards.
It was up
4.0% on this weekend in 2005’s post-election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during
post-election years. This was an excellent year, based on post-election
year historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and
2005 were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up by 11.6% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%,
which again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was up by 7.5% at this time in 2007, finishing that year
up by 9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The
stock market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took
control of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as
opposed to repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to
its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 44.8% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was up
38.0% on this weekend in 2009 and finishing that year up by 43.9%. Keep in
mind, the extraordinary bullish cycle in 2009 finished that year down by
20.6% from its prior Mid-term cyclical peak on October 31, 2007. The 2008
bear market more accurately reflected economic fundamentals than the 2009
bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 12.1% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%,
which was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially
in the second half of such years.
The Dow is
down 3.0% this year. The S&P500 is down 7.9% and the NASDAQ is down 8.0%,
respectively, this year. As you can see, the stock market bull has been
shying away from the idea that historical standards of stock market
bullishness should repeat this year.
The Dow is
down 20.7% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 14.6% since its last cyclical peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is
down 26.0% since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. This coincides with political
coziness in Washington D.C., which solidified in early 2007.
Bull market
expirations are not as obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear
markets are with simultaneous bottoming among the major indices. As you
can see, the stock market continues to struggle beyond where it was prior
to the great bear market of 2007-2008. In spite of that, though, a few
indices have eclipsed pre-crash highs, as noted by the S&P600 21-weeks
ago. That was the second time this year such accomplishment was enjoyed.
Eclipsing and holding above 2007 cyclical peaks remains elusive with the
exception of the NAS100. It is now down by 3.9% since its cyclical peak of
Oct 31, 2007. As of this past weekend, all major indices are below their
2007 peaks. They are simply having difficulty justifying an escape from
those 2007-peak prices.
Several
indices have never challenged those peak prices. The weakest index,
S&P100,
continues lagging. It is down by 28.4% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly
closing peak and nearing Yellow Bear status. As you can see from recent
stock market behavior, suspicions about the 2009-2011 bull leg had merit.
It still does. The reason for those suspicions was near maximal
incongruence between political leadership and the underlying principles of
capital markets.
The Dec 12, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
The
NASDAQ100
catapulted above its 2007 peak eight weeks ago along the Mid-term cycle.
It is the only major index conquering that configuration. It is now 3.9%
below that weekly closing peak on Oct 31, 2007. It is disappointing it
cannot hold above those 2007 peak levels. Bearish aggression the past two
weeks demonstrates the difficulty in holding above that 2007 peak.
Most major
last cyclical bottoms occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the four
major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The only
exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical bottom
on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view and increasingly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
If prices fall below reverse tangential
projections, new pivot points will be defined.
The Dow is up
71.6% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 92.5% and the S&P500 is up
71.3% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 104.3% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-current bull leg was/is indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. Such a successor bear cycle may now
be underway, although not expected to continue as Washington DC has a
propensity to stalemate during presidential pre-election years. This is
especially true when the president is unpopular. Both of those conditions
persist and favorable to the stock market bull, but polls are suggesting
it is too close to inspire the stock market bull. That, coupled with
European weakness, confronts the stock market bull.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
Although this
paragraph has remained unchanged for a couple of years, do not fall
asleep. It will change. It will be significant and dramatic when it does
change. The markets both free and controlled are not constant. This will
result in a massive bear market, depending on the magnitude of combined
interest rates and inflation. As you have seen the past several weeks, the
potential for a massive and long-lasting bear is possible, as dilettantes,
worldwide, continue converting their currencies to meaningless
expressions. Interestingly, an “instinctive” resistance to this is
manifesting, which could obsolete the previous sentence. Unfortunately,
the dilettantes have not been locked-up, yet. The rate of undoing prior
economic damage by politicians is slowing and may not manifest.
As promised by Bernanke in late 2008, the
discount rate (and prime) rate continue holding flat in their depressed
levels. The fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and
very depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any
other value. Bernanke continues
with his promise of more of the same for through 2012. Policy settings
typically remain fixed during the second half of a president’s term. That
stability is one reason why the historical record demonstrates stock
market bullishness from the mid-term election year through the election
year. Fortunately, U.S. politicians are losing influence on the shrinking
world stage. Unfortunately, foreign politicians are made of the same DNA,
which is unfavorable to any economic activity. Unfortunately, the paper
currency basis of worldwide economies is under threat, as the culmination
of
OPM disease
by politicians may be approaching the “critical dimension.”
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
They have been yielding zero for the past 16-weeks.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status 45-weeks ago. It lost that Red Bull status ten
weeks ago with a continuing sharp drop against the greenback. You can see
it has a triple camelback with negative (bearish) trend.
The
Canadian dollar
also strengthened the past few days, but remains within the tolerances of
its weakening cycle. It is more solidly resuming a cycle of weakness. The
CA$ moved in the neutral zone (between Red and Yellow) eleven weeks ago.
It remains as a Red Bull (bearish for the CA$), which threatens its cycle
of strengthening. The
Japanese Yen
continued its strengthening cycle. The Japanese yen remains
extraordinarily strong due to that country’s superior management in the
private sector.
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull. Despite solid bearish behavior in six of the past ten weeks, it
continues trading well above the 2012 yearend forecast curve. The
$2,000/oz.-forecast by 2014 remains challenged, based on political
dynamics. For example, reduced government spending should strengthen paper
currencies and with that, the price of gold would decrease. So far, this
thesis remains weak. It may take a few more years before this political
influence manifests. Statistical bullishness remains intact along the
mid-term cycle. At the same webpage, you will notice oil is less stable
with a mild, but with deepening bearish bias. It fell below yellow
16-weeks ago on souring economic news, but rebounded the five weeks ago
and weakening again the past three weeks. It escaped Yellow Bear status,
as expected. It is now in the neutral zone.
Commodity
prices continue falling from their recent record highs due to souring
economic forecast. None are Red Bulls. Their potential contribution to
inflationary pressures remains absent, as most are now Yellow Bears or
within the zone of neutrality. Their mid-term cycle remains bullish but
under attack by the commodities bear.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, the
CRB Bridge Futures
fell prey to bearish economic pressures the past few weeks. It is
approaching Yellow Bear status, but it continues resisting that condition
with a strong rebound in two of the last four weeks. It fell last week on
the U.S. strengthening behavior.
Commodity
prices, overall, are favoring potential for a bearish cycle. If it
manifests, some elements of inflationary threats will be dampened.
Mortgage rates are moving bearishly.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011. They continue along a bearish cycle.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
are computing unfavorable results. Inflationary threats are now being
computed. However, the combined absolute value of interest rates and
inflation or deflation remains relatively safe at this time.
Overall, hard
economic data is supportive of lackluster economic behavior and currently
non-threatening toward inflation or deflation.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is down 7.9% since then. Gold has demonstrated lackluster performance
the past several weeks.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received an MTI buy signal on Jul 22, 2011. It is down 12.6% since that
buy signal. If Force falls into bearish domains, it will receive a sell
signal. It resisted that this past week, offering some mild hope for the
gold bull.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late
2008. It received a buy signal on Oct 28, 2011 after missing an 18%
opportunity in the last 12-months with most due to rapid bullishness ahead
of Force Vector justification to signal buy. It is down 13.3% since that
buy signal. It has not yet qualified for a sell signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 28, 2011 after missing about 20% of
opportunity. It is down 14.0% since that buy signal but resisting
configurations supporting a sell signal. One could add more investment
here, but with the idea a sell signal could occur in the next week or two.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled sell on this
past Friday, Nov 25, 2011.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010 and was basically flat until the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell
on Sep 30, 2011. It again signaled buy on Oct 28, 2011 after missing about
24% of opportunity. It is down 14.8% since that buy signal and also does
not qualify for a sell signal.
The Near-term
and Quick-term signaled sell for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Nov 23, 2011. It is down by 0.7% since then. It was up 242.4%
(annualized at 44.8%) since the Quick-term buy signal on March 26, 2003
until the September 2008 sell signal. It was up over 25.0%, annualized at
29.0% from its Quick-term buy signal on Sep 15, 2010 and the Quick-term
sell signal on Aug 8, 2011.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 102.6% since that buy signal, annualizing
at 34.2%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It enjoyed an approximate 7.0%
gain since the Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18, 2011. The NTI
signaled buy on Jul 6, 2011. It was up about 10% until the NTI signaled
sell on Sep 23, 2011. It was flat since that sell signal and its most
recent buy signal on Oct 26, 2011. It is down 2.6% since that buy signal.
Call options are attractive at this point.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and four new bear signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling bull for all, but four, of the major indices. They are down by an
average of 4.9%, since their bull signals an average of 14.2-weeks ago.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$29,548,441. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,708,775 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $132,633. That beats buy and hold’s $113,495 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $208,435. That beats buy and hold’s $84,657 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1,570.7%, 16.9%, and 146.7%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid bear markets. That is why it beat buy and hold
by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post-election year, 2009, which is the historical
standard.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 76.0% since then. Although this is
classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable to
signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation for
the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a thoroughbred
in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting the stock
market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal, which approximates the normal
time to buy this fund.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
288.0% (annualized at 14.3%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,047-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report – Summary
A short-term
bearish convergent cycle is configured in favor of the stock market bear.
As stated last
Thursday, “the Force Vector cycle is bearishly mature. That should trigger
a bullish response. If not, the bear will rejoice and gain yet more
momentum. If there is no bullish response on Friday, the Mid-term cycle
may be configure in support of the bear. If that occurs mid-term sell
signals will be triggered.”
There were
indeed some sell/bear signals by the Mid-term Indicant. However, bearish
convergence along the Mid-term cycle has not yet manifested. That is a bit
disappointing to the stock market bear, but the battle is not over.
Remaining are
several stocks and funds with strong bullish configurations. As long as
the exists, recent bearish intrusions may be limited to just the
short-term cycle. If those intrusions penetrate the mid-term cycle en
mass, a secular stock market bear may be forming. The bear has a lot of
work to accomplish to do that. It will be interesting to see if it can
muster enough energy to pull that off.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
Index
Report Card Summary
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull only for contrarian VIX. It is down by 0.6%
since the NTI bull signal 1.1-weeks ago. The short-term cycle no longer
contains divergent attributes. It is solidly bearish.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bear for all eleven major non-contrarian indices.
They are down by an average of 2.2% since their bear signals an average of
0.5-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears. Contrarian VIX
is the only bull. Its performance is the same as the near-term cycle. The
eleven major bears are down 1.9% since their bear signals an average of
0.4-weeks ago.
Indicant Volume Indicators
Both IVI’s
sloped downward on recent bullishness, which suggests a lack of bullish
inspiration. This is troubling. Adding to that concern is the NASDAQ’s IVI
falling into low interest domains during the current near-term bull cycle.
Some of that, however, is due to seasonal volume.
Nov
25-Fri-Light seasonal volume offers nothing.
Nov
23-Wed-Again light holiday volume on an aggressive bear offers little
evidentiary support for the bear, but volume is of little consequence if
those holding decide to discontinue doing so in a few weeks.
Nov
22-Tue-Light holiday volume on mild bearishness offers no obviation of
directional intensity.
Nov
21-Mon-Volume was seasonally high on bearish aggression, increasingly in
support of stock market bearishness.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 5-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 1.8%
since their buy signals an average of 1.6-weeks ago, annualizing at 58.3%.
The NTI is
avoiding 27-ETF’s. They are down by an average of 2.7% since their
near-term sell signals an average of 0.5-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and three sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for nine-ETF’s. They are up by an
average of 11.1% since their buy signals an average of 21.1-weeks ago.
This annualizes at 27.2%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding 20-ETFs. They are down 3.2% since the QTI
sell signals an average of 0.7-weeks ago.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Quick-term Indicant and Near-term
Indicant signaled sell this past Thursday. Price fell below both bearish
curves with declining Pressure and Force deep inside bearish domains. The
Force Vector cycle is mature, offering a potential bullish bounce with a
day or two. However, configurations are too bearish to continue holding.
It is down 0.7% since those sell signals.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 102.6% since the QTI signaled
buy on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 34.2%. Bearish yellow is
a good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is
at $150.41 and still rising. Relaxation remains in order, since your buy
price approximates $80.65 versus today’s closing price of $163.40. The
Quick-term Indicant will not signal sell until interaction with QTI Yellow
Curve.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 26, 2011, as Force catapulted itself into
bullish domains and above Pressure. Since then Force has fallen below
both, enhancing a near-term bearish bias. It is down 2.4% since that buy
signal. It will be interesting if this near-term bullish cycle can hold up
in the face of potential profit taking. Near-term bullish configurations
are being challenged by the NTI gold bear. Judgments on the bear’s success
or failure cannot be assessed until price falls below NTI Green. That is
when a near-term sell signal will occur. It is above green by 21-cents.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
All prior comments in this section remain
in effect, but eliminated here for brevity purposes. You will be notified
when and if such commentary requires adjustment.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received buy signals from the Near-term
Indicant and Quick-term Indicant this past Thursday. It is up 1.2% since
those buy signals, annualizing at 53.9%.
The former
forecast of TLT falling to QTI Yellow by Dec 31, 2011 had to be withdrawn
this past week, as the stock market bear should shift this fund into a new
bullish cycle.
ETF#31-QID
received a buy signal this past Thursday
from the Quick-term Indicant as price crossed above QTI Yellow. It is up
1.5% since then, annualizing at 261.9%. The Near-term Indicant signaled
buy on Nov 17, 2011, as price climbed above NTI Blue with rising Force in
bullish domains. Keep in mind, its Force Vector was disfigured and
passive. However, it accelerated on Friday, Nov 18 with noticeable
behavior consistent with bullish robustness. It is up 11.2% since then,
annualizing at 505.5%.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct 17, 2011 for
ETF#32-VXX.
It is up 1.6% since then, annualizing at 70.6%.
Major ETF
Events
Nov
25-Fri-Three major ETF’s fell below QTI Yellow. Some Force Vectors are
starting to shift north, offering bullish potential next week. However,
there will be no bull/buy signals until Force crosses above Pressure and
into bullish domains.
Nov
23-Wed-More indices and ETF’s fell below NTI Green and QTI Yellow.
Although Force Vector cycles are maturing, excessive risks in holding
suggest you need to be selling.
Nov
22-Tue-Several more indices and ETF’s fell below NTI Green and QTI Yellow.
However, some are displaying significant resistance to bearish desires.
Also, ETF#10-IBB displayed enough bullish attributes to trigger a buy
signal.
Nov
21-Mon-Several bear/sell signals occurred today, as prices fell below NTI
Green.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-Nov
25, 2011-Bearish divergence has been replaced with bearish convergence
along the short-term cycle. It will be interesting if the bearishly mature
Force Vectors trigger a bullish response. If not, the bear will rejoice.
Reverse
Tangential Projections
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market enjoyed bullish convergence for four consecutive weeks through
week-ending Oct 28, 2011. That would normally influence continued bullish
behavior. That bullish phenomenon is now irrelevant. Unfortunately, the
stock market has endured four consecutive weeks of combined bearish
convergent and bearish divergent behavior with the last two weeks with
convergent bearishness.
Indicant
Conclusion
As stated
last week, the NASDAQ100 again toppled its 2007 peak seven weeks ago along
the Mid-term cycle. That was the third time in the past year this has
occurred. Each time it retreated. It did so again, making such a retreat
for the fourth time in this cycle. That is adding credence to the idea of
a secular bear market. However, the Dow Utilities continues arguing that
point.
Political
stalemate and austerity against nonsensical waste in Europe should
encourage the stock market bull. Unfortunately, that desired conclusion
may not manifest. The stock market bull may not continue for the next
three to five months. In addition to European problems, California is now
imposing problems similar to that of Greece.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
11/27/2011
Nov 20, 2011
Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 11, Issue 03 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Confronting the Heart and Soul of Bullish Seasonality
In the wild,
the weak perish. It does not take long for predators to single the weak
out and eat. The human species is different, where politicians placate the
weak and attack the strong. That is because the human species produces
more weak than strong. Thus more votes.
Pareto’s law
may be universal. That is, it is impossible for all humans to compete with
equal outcomes. History suggests when people attempt to adjust this
theoretical universal law, economic and social calamity follows. Pareto’s
Law recognized that 20% of the people own 80% of the wealth. The universal
interpretation is that maybe it should be that way, since it typically
manifests naturally in pure laissez faire economic policies. If it is
truly a natural manifestation, then one could argue it is a universal
requirement. Attempting to manipulate an outcome different from this
natural manifestation, through coercive economic policies, results in
societies similar to the long lines in Russia or the city of Detroit.
Politicians
have twisted the 80-20 rule by invoking a phony 99-1 rule. Deep into
psyche of all politicians is their desire to be the 1%, who have all
power, while the other 99% service their needs. The rich 1% are smart
about making money, but maybe not that familiar with history. They will
not be in the 1% group if politicians gain absolute power. They will
quickly fall into the masses of the 99% with equal servitude capacity.
History
clearly demonstrates attempts to alter the 80-20 phenomena results in
social chaos and economic decline and/or nightmarish conditions for the
altered society.
Societal
calamity has been increasing the past several months with “Occupy Wall
Street.” Rapes, murders, and the destruction of assets are clear elements
of social calamity. Although most are dope heads, expressing lunacy, their
message centers on a desire to disrupt the theoretical universal law. The
capital markets know that only 20% of the people are productive. The stock
market bear will be thoroughly aroused if the 80%-weaklings gang up on the
20%, who offer most economic viability. Although in the end, the
80%-weaklings will eventually lose, as they always have, the disruption to
universal law could induce a long lasting bear market and related economic
collapses.
Some U.S.
politicians are supporting the “Occupy Wall Street” protestors. That
highlights how they support the weak. Spoon-feeding the masses to support
their innate egomaniacal desires for wearing a crown is at the heart of
the problem. Of course, the conclusion to this nonsensical behavior
results in nothing to feed. That is a generational element with each
generation not knowing when it is the last generation in the process of
nonsensicality. Societal threats are indeed bearish and even more so when
established political leaders support it. That is one of those tyranny by
the majority notions. As Ben Franklin once said, “a democracy is two
wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for lunch.”
Adding
bearish inspiration was Spain’s failure in selling all of its bond
offerings last week. The markets did not find it attractive to buy
sovereign bonds with seemingly attractive interest rates to support yet
more debt for Spain. When a sovereign nation, where revenue increases are
very easy, cannot sell its bonds, trouble looms. Confiscation of private
property should not viewed as an option. It always is in the minds of the
evil.
California,
like most of Europe and especially Greece, is nearing default potential.
If the U.S. government has to bail out California, do not be surprised at
significant inflationary pressures and a solidly bearish stock market.
Triggers to such a bear may not be limited to inflation.
The highly
productive are leaving California. The lazy and non-productive are moving
to California to enjoy well-known benefits. Of course, simple arithmetic
clearly demonstrates declining revenues and increasing outflows. Most
politicians do not understand the arithmetic of economics. The only
arithmetic they understand is vote counting.
On a smaller
scale is Detroit. It will be unable to pay its bills within a year. The
deadbeats started heading to Detroit years ago when success in the
automotive industry produced massive amounts of wealth. That supported
social welfare and yet more lazy arrived to Detroit. Now, the automotive
sector is scattered across the nation, avoiding the lazy, including
unions. Detroit has and will continue paying the price for generations of
wasteful policies.
All
politicians have an inherent desire to wear a crown. That is a primary
source of their motivations. Kings of the past typically had to earn that
right on the battle field. Contemporary aristocrats simply jawbone anyone
willing to listen to them. Rather than listening to them, it would be
better to laugh at them for their behavior is meaningless to the
underlying cause of humanity; that is to increase productivity, which is
the sole source of the quality of life for all. Politicians are the
antithesis to productivity. Politician’s rhetoric and behavior concludes
consistently with economic destruction. It is impossible for it to be
otherwise.
There is an
upward limit to leeching. A leech is only a leech. In other words, even if
a rational person proved to an economic leech they are within days of
sucking their host completely dry, the leech will keep on sucking. You
have heard them talk. They are completely irrational. For example, Barnie
Frank once said, “we could do more if we had more power.” Rest assured he
actually believes that in spite of the swelling chaos that would follow.
So, do not expect your political leaders to suddenly shift their direction
from irrational to rational. On the contrary, under threat, they will
promulgate yet more irrationality even during the last breadth of the
hosts they leech from.
Political
corruption in Washington DC is expanding. Politicians write laws and then
buy or sell stocks well ahead of the publication of those laws.
Politicians loan companies money, like Solyndra, in return for campaign
contributions. The Solyndra executives are dilettantes. The complying
politicians are dilettantes. Both groups cannot do what they do without
taking monies from you. They are at the top of the hierarchy of economic
leeches. The Occupy Wall Street crowd is too stupid to identify the real
enemy. They are actually puppets of the real enemy. That is a threat to
the stock market bull, as fringe groups supported by the establishment.
The Nazi Party manifested from similar relationships.
Is the stock
market in a secular bear cycle? Based on the above, one could argue on
behalf of that. Until the major indices cross above and hold above their
2007-cyclical peaks, there is no possible argument against that
proposition. The bull cycle, originating in March 2009, has not yet
constructed an escape from secular bear considerations.
So, what we
have here are 1) corrupt politicians, 2) sovereign countries who cannot
sell bonds, 3) states that cannot pay its bills, 4) a federal government
that is in more debt than the states, 5) irrational protests by some the
80%, and 6) a stock market with significant demonstrated inabilities to
pass above 2007 peaks.
Polls are
surprisingly close with respect to firing all incumbent politicians. As
long as the polls are close, the stock market bull will not be inspired.
The bull prefers high personnel turnover in Washington D.C.
All of the
above is subjective with respect to external forces influencing the stock
market’s future behavior. It took as much effort to record that as any
political speech or news broadcaster’s yip-yap. Constructing any
subjective position is always effortless and for the most part
meaningless. So, take a look at some objective observations that can
identify bull or bear, backed by a significant amount of effort.
First, as
long as the Dow Utilities does not succumb to bearish ambition, the bear
should not be able to mount a long-lasting and deep bear market.
As you can see from the chart, it remains clearly bullish.
It is a solid Mid-term bull and a Red Bull at that. Keep in mind, it can
lag cyclical shifts, which brings up the next point.
Notice the S&P500’s Force Vector.
It is on the top of the chart. It fell sharply last week from a bullishly
mature position. If it falls below Pressure and/or into bearish domains, a
bear signal will be triggered. Most of the other major indices are
similarly configured. When that bear signal is issued, it is simply a
bear. It could last ten years or more or just one week. Regardless of how
long it last, it is a bear.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market report.
Whipsawed
– Review of Wild Swings Last Week
This
section highlights last week’s biggest gainers and losers within each
group of stocks and funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant.
The biggest
gainer last week was
NAS100#47-DTV, which was up a
paltry 1.7%. It is up 92.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy in
April 2009. The NAS100’s biggest loser was
NAS#71-NTAP, which was down
17.6%. However, It is up 54.7% since the MTI buy signal in July 2009.
ISTK#38-ENER was up 16.7%, as
the Indicant Select Stock’s biggest gainer. That solid gain did nothing to
trigger a buy signal. It is down 99.0% since the MTI sell signal in Oct
2008. ISTK#47-ENZ
was the biggest loser, as it was down 15.0%. It is down 35.8% since the
MTI sell signal this past August. Even the slightest hint of stock market
bearishness triggers massive bearishness on negatively trending stocks.
The weak are punished more than the strong during troubling times.
DJIA#18-HPQ was the Dow’s
biggest gainer. It was up by a miniscule amount of 1.5%. It is down 22.2%
since the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell this past May.
DJIA#01-AA was the Dow’s
biggest loser. It was down by 8.6%. It is down 34.2% since the Mid-term
Indicant sell signal this past July.
The Dow
Utilities had no gainers last week. The least worse was
DJU#05-AES. It was down 0.3%
last week. It is up 5.0% since the MTI buy signal four weeks ago.
Utility’s biggest loser was
DJU#12-DUK. It was down 4.0%
last week, but up 30.3% since the MTI signaled buy in July 2009.
MF#22-USPIX was mutual fund’s
biggest gainer, which was up 8.6%. It is down, however, by 78.1% since the
MTI sell signal in April 2009.
MF#28-FSAGX was the biggest
loser, being down by 7.9% last week. It is down by 8.2% since the MTI buy
signal this past July. It is hovering above the shorter-term green curve,
which prevents a sell signal.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
no-buy
signals and
twenty-sell
signals. The 109-buy signals
in the past six weeks were interrupted with the twenty sell signals this
week.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 265 of the 339-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
49.1%. That annualizes to 36.2%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 265-stocks and funds for an average of 70.5-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 50-stocks and funds of 339-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 40.9% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 77.5-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Nov 19, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 286-stocks and funds
out of 339 tracked for an average of 48.6-weeks. They were up by an
average of 39.1% (annualized at 41.9%). There were 53-avoided stocks and
funds at that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of
48.4% since their respective sell signals an average of 99.6-weeks earlier
one year ago. There were no buy signals and no sell signals on this
weekend last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for 193-stocks and funds of the 317-tracked
two years ago on Nov 20, 2009. They were up by an average of 26.4%,
annualized at 49.9%, since their respective buy signals an average of
27.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 123-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 35.7% since their
respective sell signals an average of 80.6-weeks earlier. There were no
buy signals, while there were 159-buy signals in the prior 17-weeks. There
was one sell signal on this weekend in 2009.
There were
only 30-stocks and funds with hold signals of the 344-tracked by the
Mid-term Indicant on Nov 14, 2008 since their buy signals an average of
41.2-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of 60.7% (annualized at
76.5%). There were 313-avoided stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 35.3% from their respective sell signals an average
of 25.7-weeks earlier. There was one sell signal on this weekend in 2008
in addition to the 562-sell signals in the prior 53-weeks, as the bear
market was nearing its ultimate depth, but still incomplete in its final
destruction. There were no buy signals on this weekend in 2008 even with
the weighted influence to do so with the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality.
On Nov 16,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 253-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 141.1% (annualized at
59.6%) since their buy signals an average of 123.2-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 84-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 10.9% since their sell signals an average of
17.0-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and eight-sell signal on
this weekend in 2007. The 2003-Mid-term bull cycle was past its peak at
this time in 2007, as the democratic congress was implementing their “take
from the productive and give to the non-productive” policies. A huge
number of sell signals continued for the next several months as the bear
market gained momentum from this point through early 2009.
Five years
ago, on Nov 17, 2006, there were 310-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 345 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 109.7% (annualized at 68.9%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 82.8-weeks earlier. There were 33-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 11.9% since their respective sell
signals an average of 18.7-weeks earlier. There was one buy signal and no
sell signals on this weekend in 2006. The bull was solid, for the most,
part in 2006.
On Nov 18,
2005, there were 265-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 94.6%, annualizing at 60.9%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 80.7-weeks earlier. There were 50-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 17.7% since their sell signals an
average of 24.8-weeks earlier. There were four-buy signals and one sell
signal on this weekend in 2005.
There were
299-stocks and funds with hold signals on Nov 19, 2004. They were up by an
average of 67.6%, annualizing at 67.1%, since their buy signals 52.4-weeks
earlier. The 16-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 45.4%
since their respective sell signals an average of 52.4-weeks earlier.
There were two-buy signals and three sell signals on this weekend in 2004.
The 2004-meandering bear market that pestered throughout most of 2004 was
giving way to the heart and soul of bullish seasonality at this time in
2004.
On Nov 21,
2003, there were 262-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 51.7%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 33.6-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 79.9%. There were only 29-avoided stocks at that time.
They were down by an average of 25.2% since their sell signals an average
of 33.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 296 stocks and
funds from 2002 through late 2004. There was one-buy signal in addition to
396-buy signals in the prior 35-weeks. There were four-sell signals on
this weekend in 2003, as the stock market concluded its classical late
summer sell-off. The 2003 bull market was 38-weeks old on this weekend in
2003.
On Nov 22,
2002, there were 268-stocks and funds with hold signals. They were up
20.9% since their buy signals an average of 9.4-weeks earlier, annualizing
at 115.0%. There were eleven-stocks and funds avoided since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell an average of 21.8-weeks earlier. The avoided
stocks and funds were down 30.5%. There were 15-buy signals in addition to
487-buy signals in the prior 17-weeks. Although the stock market bear
remained in effect, it was beginning to display weakness. Some of the Aug.
2002-buy signals retained hold signals through late 2007 and early 2008,
while others endured sell signals before the conclusion of calendar year
2002 and in early 2003. Energy related buy signals in Aug 2002, however,
held strongly through the December 2002-record-bear and lasted until late
2008. There were two-sell signals on this weekend in 2002.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain appropriate security, you can
see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals for stocks and funds for this
week by clicking here. It is in
the member’s only section.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Bull and Bear Signals This Weekend
All major
indices remain configured with bullish attributes. Unfortunately, they
weakened this past week, but still holding with bull signals. Several
stocks and funds reconfigured with solid bearish attributes. Those
receiving sell signals are configured with excessive risks for holding.
Although
mid-term cyclical attributes remain in support of the stock market bull,
the stock market bear is threatening the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest. Right after buying, set the stop
loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve values, depending on your
personal preferences.
For your
longer-term holdings, where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are signaled on the Near-term,
Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are updated daily.
These shorter-term models attempt participation in significant bullish
spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is focused on fundamentals
and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
61.9% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
130.9% and the S&P500 is up 56.5% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 134.2% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months.
Configurations shifted in support of normal pre-election year bullishness
two weeks ago, but now being challenged by the stock market bear.
The NASDAQ is
down 49.0% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 20.4% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 0.6% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025. One should
note that buy and hold so far this century is a loser, as the stock market
has been flat to bearish the last eleven years.
The Dow has
stumbled three times when encountering its 2000 peak value. Will it do
that again? The S&P500 topped its 2000 peak for a few brief weeks in 2007.
The NASDAQ has never come close, as its prior peak price was hype driven.
The DOTCOM sector does not perform agriculture, manufacture, or extract.
Therefore, most companies within that index created no wealth. It remains
appropriately bearish relative to the 2000 phony peak prices.
If socialism
expands, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050 and that
depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by politicians.
Significant downsizing of federal governments and related regulatory
shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous sentence. If the
opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies, the NASDAQ will
never return to its 2000 peak. Look at the resumes of intellectual elites
who argue against these points. You will detect they are pure economic
leeches arguing on behalf of such regulations, which is a source of their
livelihoods. None has ever produced anything of value.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 23.2% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness. The heart and soul of bullish
seasonality manifested at this time of year in spite of dynamic
bearishness in 2001. However, it was a weak expression, but bullish
nonetheless.
The NASDAQ
was down by 28.5% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with historical standards of finding bottoms during
mid-term election years. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality was
solid at this time in 2002, but endured a couple of disruptive incursions
by the stock market bear in December and again in Feb-Mar 2003.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was up 40.9%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was up on
this weekend in 2004 by a paltry 5.0% from that year’s meandering bear
market, but finished up by 8.6%. This was congruent with election year
bullishness, although shy of magnitude standards.
It was up
2.4% on this weekend in 2005’s post-election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during
post-election years. This was an excellent year, based on post-election
year historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and
2005 were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up by 10.9% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%,
which again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was up by 9.2% at this time in 2007, finishing that year
up by 9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The
stock market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took
control of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as
opposed to repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to
its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 44.1% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was up
39.1% on this weekend in 2009 and finishing that year up by 43.9%. Keep in
mind, the extraordinary bullish cycle in 2009 finished that year down by
20.6% from its prior Mid-term cyclical peak on October 31, 2007. The 2008
bear market more accurately reflected economic fundamentals than the 2009
bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 10.8% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%,
which was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially
in the second half of such years.
The Dow is up
1.9% this year. The S&P500 is down 3.3% and the NASDAQ is down 3.0%,
respectively, this year. Dynamic bullish behavior the past few weeks has
moved the stock market back into a more conventional position of
bullishness associated with pre-election years. As you can see, the stock
market bull has been shying away from the idea that historical standards
should repeat this year.
The Dow is
down 16.7% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 10.0% since its last cyclical peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is
down 22.3% since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. This coincides with political
coziness in Washington D.C., which solidified in early 2007.
Bull market
expirations are not as obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear
markets are with simultaneous bottoming among the major indices. As you
can see, the stock market continues to struggle beyond where it was prior
to the great bear market of 2007-2008. In spite of that, though, a few
indices have eclipsed pre-crash highs, as noted by the S&P600 20-weeks
ago. That was the second time this year such accomplishment was enjoyed.
Eclipsing and holding above 2007 cyclical peaks remains elusive with the
exception of the NAS100. However, it is up by only 0.7% since its cyclical
peak of Oct 31, 2007.
Several
indices have never challenged those peak prices. The weakest index,
S&P100,
continues lagging. It is down by 24.9% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly
closing peak and nearing Yellow Bear status. As you can see from recent
stock market behavior, suspicions about the 2009-2011 bull leg had merit.
It still does. The reason for those suspicions was near maximal
incongruence between political leadership and the underlying principles of
capital markets.
The Dec 12, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
The
NASDAQ100
catapulted above its 2007 peak six weeks ago along the Mid-term cycle. It
is the only major index conquering that configuration. It is now 0.7%
above that weekly closing peak on Oct 31, 2007. It will be interesting to
see if it can hold above its 2007 peak. Last week’s bearish aggression
demonstrates the difficulty in holding above that 2007 peak. Even though
the NASDAQ100 was bearish the past four weeks, it continues holding above
that potential point of resistance.
Most major
last cyclical bottoms occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the four
major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The only
exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical bottom
on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view and increasingly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
If prices fall below reverse tangential
projections, new pivot points will be defined.
The Dow is up
80.2% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 102.8% and the S&P500 is up
79.7% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 120.0% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-current bull leg was/is indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. Such a successor bear cycle may now
be underway in spite of recent bull/buy signals, although not expected to
continue as Washington DC has a propensity to stalemate during
presidential pre-election years. This is especially true when the
president is unpopular. Both of those conditions persist and favorable to
the stock market bull. The primary problem confronting the stock market
bull is Europe.
The bull
cycle, originating in March 2009, is believed to be the classical mid-term
election year bullish starting point ahead of the presidential
pre-election year, which is now underway. The pre-election year is the
most bullish along the four-year cycle. In essence, the firing of
incumbent politicians in the U.S. generally arouses the bull. It takes a
while for the newly elected to follow their paths of corruption and learn
the ease of spending other people’s money. The stock market bull takes
advantage during such phenomena. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull discontinued expressing its delight
in that the past several weeks with heightened political chatter. However,
that chatter has been countered with arguing political chatter. That
suggests little political accomplishment. That is bullish. Unfortunately,
political chatter and support of the lazy is international. Although U.S.
politicians are stalemated, foreign politicians are influencing the stock
market’s directional intensity.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull in the long-run with pressure
to reduce government waste. Anticipating that is bullish. The short-term
and mid-term cycles are increasingly supportive of the bull at this time.
A potential of defaults by Greece and other European countries, promoting
and catering to laziness, add to threats to the stock market bull. The
Standard and Poor’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating adds new threats
to the stock market bull. On the contrary, though, Spain has legislated
balanced budget requirements, which supports the idea of a bullish theme.
The problem is how plastic political agreements are. Europe continues
treating debt like play money and the jury is still out on that. Prior
configurations suggesting defaults are not on the immediate horizon are
now being challenged. The capital markets have demonstrated abilities to
sniff out such events before they actually occur. Last week’s bearish
behavior suggests an odor of default.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
Although this
paragraph has remained unchanged for a couple of years, do not fall
asleep. It will change. It will be significant and dramatic when it does
change. The markets both free and controlled are not constant. This will
result in a massive bear market, depending on the magnitude of combined
interest rates and inflation. As you have seen the past several weeks, the
potential for a massive and long-lasting bear is possible, as dilettantes,
worldwide, continue converting their currencies to meaningless
expressions. Interestingly, an “instinctive” resistance to this is
manifesting, which could obsolete the previous sentence. Unfortunately,
the dilettantes have not been locked-up, yet.
As promised by Bernanke in late 2008, the
discount rate (and prime) rate continue holding flat in their depressed
levels. The fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and
very depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any
other value. Bernanke continues
with his promise of more of the same for through 2012. Policy settings
typically remain fixed during the second half of a president’s term. That
stability is one reason why the historical record demonstrates stock
market bullishness from the mid-term election year through the election
year. Fortunately, U.S. politicians are losing influence on the shrinking
world stage. Unfortunately, foreign politicians are made of the same DNA,
which is unfavorable to any economic activity. Unfortunately, the paper
currency basis of worldwide economies is under threat, as the culmination
of
OPM disease
by politicians may be approaching the “critical dimension.”
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
They have been yielding zero for the past 15-weeks.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status 44-weeks ago. It lost that Red Bull status nine
weeks ago with a continuing sharp drop against the greenback. It was
solidly bearish this past week, as the U.S. economy is much stronger than
that of Europe.
The
Canadian dollar
also strengthened the past few days, but remains within the tolerances of
its cycle of weakening. It is more solidly resuming a cycle of weakness.
The
Japanese Yen
continued its strengthening cycle. The CA$ moved in the neutral zone
(between Red and Yellow) eleven weeks ago. It is remains as a Red Bull
(bearish for the CA$), which threatens its cycle of strengthening. The
Japanese yen remains extraordinarily strong due to that country’s superior
management in the private sector.
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull. Despite solid bearish behavior in five of the past nine weeks,
it continues trading well above the 2012 yearend forecast curve. The
$2,000/oz.-forecast by 2014 remains challenged, based on political
dynamics. For example, reduced government spending should strengthen paper
currencies and with that, the price of gold would decrease. So far, this
thesis remains weak. It may take a few more years before this political
influence manifests. Statistical bullishness remains intact along the
mid-term cycle. At the same webpage, you will notice oil is less stable
with a mild, but with deepening bearish bias. It fell below yellow
15-weeks ago on souring economic news, but rebounded the four weeks ago
and weakening again the past two weeks. It escaped Yellow Bear status, as
expected. It is now in the neutral zone.
Commodity
prices continue falling from their recent record highs due to souring
economic forecast. None are Red Bulls. Their potential contribution to
inflationary pressures remains absent, as most are now Yellow Bears or
within the zone of neutrality. Their mid-term cycle remains bullish but
under attack by the commodities bear.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, the
CRB Bridge Futures
fell prey to bearish economic pressures the past few weeks. It is
approaching Yellow Bear status, but it continues resisting that condition
with a strong rebound in two of the last four weeks. It fell last week on
the U.S. strengthening behavior.
Commodity
prices, overall, are favoring potential for a bearish cycle. If it
manifests, some elements of inflationary threats will be dampened.
Mortgage rates are moving bearishly.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011. They continue along a bearish cycle.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
are computing unfavorable results. Inflationary threats are now being
computed. However, the combined absolute value of interest rates and
inflation or deflation remains relatively safe at this time.
Overall, hard
economic data is supportive of lackluster economic behavior and currently
non-threatening toward inflation or deflation.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 0.1%, annualizing at 0.1% since then. Gold has demonstrated
lackluster performance this past year.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received an MTI buy signal on Jul 22, 2011. It is down 8.2% since that buy
signal. If Force falls into bearish domains, it will receive a sell
signal.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late
2008. It received a buy signal on Oct 28, 2011 after missing an 18%
opportunity in the last 12-months with most due to rapid bullishness ahead
of Force Vector justification to signal buy. It is down 6.7% since that
buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 28, 2011 after missing about 20% of
opportunity. It is down 6.8% since that buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct
28, 2011 after missing about 20% of opportunity. It is down 7.8% since
that buy signal, offering even more opportunity for growth.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010 and was basically flat until the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell
on Sep 30, 2011. It again signaled buy on Oct 28, 2011 after missing about
24% of opportunity. It is down 8.1% since that buy signal.
The Near-term
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Oct 10, 2011. It is down by 0.6% since then, annualizing at -0.6%. The
slower moving Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct 21, 2011. It is up
7.1% since then, annualizing at 65.1%. It was up 242.4% (annualized at
44.8%) since the Quick-term buy signal on March 26, 2003 until the
September 2008 sell signal. It was up over 25.0%, annualized at 29.0% from
its Quick-term buy signal on Sep 15, 2010 and the Quick-term sell signal
on Aug 8, 2011.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 107.8% since that buy signal, annualizing
at 36.2%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It enjoyed an approximate 7.0%
gain since the Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18, 2011. The NTI
signaled buy on Jul 6, 2011. It was up about 10% until the NTI signaled
sell on Sep 23, 2011. It was flat since that sell signal and its most
recent buy signal on Oct 26, 2011. It is up 0.1% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 2.1%.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling bull for all major indices. They are down by an
average of 0.8%, annualizing at -0.8% since their bull signals an average
of 9.6-weeks ago.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$29,982,957. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,794,637 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $139,156. That beats buy and hold’s $119,076 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $220,040. That beats buy and hold’s $89,199 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1,570.7%, 16.9%, and 136.9%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid bear markets. That is why it beat buy and hold
by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post-election year, 2009, which is the historical
standard.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 78.1% since then. Although this is
classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable to
signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation for
the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a thoroughbred
in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting the stock
market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal, which approximates the normal
time to buy this fund.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
307.5% (annualized at 15.3%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,046-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report – Summary
As stated
since Monday, Oct 31, 2011,“if configurations sour in favor of the stock
market bear, appropriate actions will be advised herein. Right now, the
stock bull remains solid.”
Unfortunately,
the NASDAQ100 index received a bear signal today, as it fell below NTI
Green. All of the other major non-contrarian indices remain as near-term
bulls. Therefore, there are several significant potential resistance
points to argue with the ambition of a stock market bear.
As stated on
this past Nov 10, “the Near-term Green price is a focal point, as Force
across the board has fallen below Pressure and few into bearish domains.
Until prices fall below NTI Green, the bear cannot regain solid cyclical
dominance. Just as QTI Yellow Curve triggered significant price
turbulence, price interaction with NTI Green will not. Prices will either
bounce north off the NTI Green curve or fall below it. The former will be
a solid bullish attribute and the latter will certainly arouse the bear.
Currently, NTI Green is increasing, which should settle the issue within a
few days.” This is getting close; real close.
Oscillating
Force just below the bull/bear domain demarcation is unusual. 80% of the
time, they are directionally clear on the charts. They are disfiguring as
bullish and bearish Force are pushing them with near equal Pressure.
The lack of
volume support continues to pester the near-term bullish cycle. It is now
into seasonal slowness, which could continue to inspire volatile behavior
until after Thanksgiving in the U.S.
The Mid-term
Indicant did not signal any bears this weekend, as last week’s bearish
behavior did not shift enough attributes to signal bear. The weekly report
will elaborate in more detail about what to monitor.
Spain could
not sell all of its bond offerings this past Thursday, triggering a
bearish stock market. If leeches are allowed to continue sucking, the
stock market bear will be delighted.
California,
whose economy has lived off profound real estate prices for a couple of
generations will probably pay the price for easy money for a couple of
generations. However, it is big enough to have a bearish influence on the
stock market.
Finally, the
current near-term bull cycle is counter trend and counter cyclical to the
short-term and mid-term cycle. Most of the QTI Red and Yellow curves are
trending south. That is another reason for the volatility. Reversing trend
is never easy regardless of the phenomenon under study.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
Index
Report Card Summary
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and one new bear.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull for ten of the eleven major non-contrarian
indices and contrarian VIX. They are down an average of 1.3% since the NTI
bull signals an average of 3.7-weeks ago. That annualizes at -1.3%. The
Near-term Indicant signaled bull for contrarian VIX this past Thursday, as
it crossed above NTI Blue with Force in bullish domains and above
Pressure.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bull for eleven non-contrarian indices
and contrarian VIX. Those with bull signals are down by 1.5% since their
bull signals 3.7-weeks ago.
Indicant Volume Indicators
Volume
indicators need to improve their configurations to help propel the stock
market bull onward and upward. Recent relationships are indeed bullish,
but the short-term cyclical configurations need to be more supportive of
the bull for sustainability. Both IVI’s sloped downward on recent
bullishness, which suggests a lack of bullish inspiration. This is a bit
troubling. Adding to that concern is the NASDAQ’s IVI falling into low
interest domains during the current near-term bull cycle. Some of that,
however, is due to seasonal volume.
Nov 18-Fri-Low
volume on mixed behavior offers no interpretation. Yesterday’s aggressive
support for the bear remains influential.
Nov
17-Thu-Aggressive volume on bearish aggression suggests serious challenges
to the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
Nov 16-Wed-Low
volume on late day bearish aggression is not the complete story.
Tomorrow’s volume and stock market behavior will be more telling.
Nov
15-Tue-Same as yesterday, but on mild bullish behavior.
Nov 14-Mon-Low
volume on bearish behavior is not encouraging to the stock market bear.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and four sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 26-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 0.9%
since their buy signals an average of 4.3-weeks ago, annualizing at 10.8%.
The NTI is
avoiding two-ETF’s. They are down by an average of 0.5% since their
near-term sell signals an average of 4.8-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and one sell signal.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 24-ETF’s. They are up by an
average of 4.2% since their buy signals an average of 10.6-weeks ago. This
annualizes at 20.5%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding seven-ETFs. They are flat since the QTI
sell signals an average of 1.2-weeks ago.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on
Oct 21, 2011. It is down 0.6% since then. The Near-term Indicant signaled
buy on Oct 10, 2011. It is up 7.1% since that buy signal, annualizing at
65.1%. Its Force Vector is no longer behaving bullishly, as it fell into
bearish domains this past Thursday. Its price remains above NTI Green and
QTI Yellow. With oil vacillating around $100/bbl, those two curves should
offer bullish bounce points in the event the stock market bear continues
pestering energy’s NTI bull cycle. Sell signals will occur when price
contacts NTI Green.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 107.8% since the QTI signaled
buy on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 36.2%. Bearish yellow is
a good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is
at $149.87 and still rising. Relaxation remains in order, since your buy
price approximates $80.65 versus today’s closing price of $167.62. The
Quick-term Indicant will not signal sell until interaction with QTI Yellow
Curve.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 26, 2011, as Force catapulted itself into
bullish domains and above Pressure. Since then Force has fallen below
both, enhancing a near-term bearish bias. It is up 0.1% since that buy
signal, annualizing at 2.1%. It will be interesting if this near-term
bullish cycle can hold up in the face of potential profit taking.
Near-term bullish configurations are being challenged by the NTI gold
bear. Judgments on the bear’s success or failure cannot be assessed until
price falls to NTI Green. That is when a near-term sell signal will occur.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
All prior comments in this section remain
in effect, but eliminated here for brevity purposes. You will be notified
when and if such commentary requires adjustment.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received buy signals from the Near-term
Indicant and Quick-term Indicant this past Thursday. Price crossed above
NTI Blue this past Thursday with Force in bullish domains. Therefore, buy
signals had to be generated.
Tracking from
Oct 28, 2011 informal forecast. That forecast predicted TLT would fall to
QTI Yellow in this near-term cycle before end Dec 2011. Price today was
$119.34. QTI Yellow is $100.46. This forecast was threatened on Thu, Nov
3, with Force crossing above Pressure and residing in bullish domains.
Behavior the next few days will be interesting for this contrarian ETF.
The forecast will be withdrawn if Force does not quickly retreat to a more
bearish bias. Force nudged above Pressure this past Thu. If it moves
robustly to the north, this forecast will have to be withdrawn. So far,
Force has been timid, offering mild hope for this forecast to manifest.
ETF#31-QID
received a sell signal on Oct 10, 2011 from both the Quick-term Indicant.
It is down 0.7% since then. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy this past
Thursday, as price climbed above NTI Blue with rising Force in bullish
domains. Keep in mind, its Force Vector was disfigured and passive.
However, it accelerated this Friday with noticeable behavior consistent
with bullish robustness.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled buy this past Thursday, for
ETF#32-VXX.
Its price crossed above NTI Blue today, forcing this buy signal. Its Force
Vector moved south this Fri, but still remains above Pressure and inside
bullish domains.
Major ETF
Events
Nov 18-Fri-A
few more sell signals were triggered for non-contrarian ETF’s with a
Near-term bear signal for the NASDAQ100.
Nov 17-Thu-All
contrarian funds either received buy signals and/or retained hold signals.
Stock market divergence is manifesting with recent bearish incursions with
rising near-term curves.
Nov
16-Wed-None
Nov
15-Tue-None
Nov
14-Mon-Bearish behavior did not shift attributes in support of the stock
market bear.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-Nov
18, 2011-Most, not all, short-term attributes continue favoring a bullish
stock market, albeit weakening the past two weeks. As stated the past
three weeks, “continue buying on bearish days.” Discontinue this and
consider buying contrarian funds. Hold non-contrarians until you see a
sell signal for those that you may have bought. The near-term stock market
bull will not expire until prices fall below NTI Green, which continues to
increase.
Reverse
Tangential Projections
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market enjoyed bullish convergence for four consecutive weeks through
weekending Oct 28, 2011. That remains influential on bullish expectations
and consistent with originations of the heart and soul of bullish
seasonality despite disruptive divergent behavior the past three weeks.
The four consecutive weeks of bullish convergence trumps recent volatility
with a bearish tint to it. However, the past three weeks have endured a
combination of bearish convergence and divergence. Last week was
configured with solid bearish convergence. A bearish stock market next
week will obsolete the influence of weekending Oct 28, 2011 phenomena.
Indicant
Conclusion
As stated
last week, the NASDAQ100 again toppled its 2007 peak six weeks ago along
the Mid-term cycle. This is the third time in the past year this has
occurred. Each time it retreated. Although the NAS100 was solidly bearish
last week, the other major indices were equally bearish. The NAS100 held
its ground during stock market bearishness and volatility the past three
weeks. As long as it does that, the bear cannot dominate. Unfortunately,
the NAS100 is less than 1% above the 2007-cyclical peak. Secular bear
considerations will manifest if the NAS100 is solidly bearish next week.
The other
major indices remain below the 2007 levels. However, all mid-term
attributes are bullish, but no longer solid. With that, the mid-term cycle
cannot support the major indices surpassing those 2007 peaks along the
current mid-term cycle.
Political
stalemate and austerity against nonsensical waste in Europe should
encourage the stock market bull. Unfortunately, that desired conclusion
may not manifest. The stock market bull may not continue for the next
three to five months. In addition to European problems, California is now
imposing problems similar to that of Greece.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
11/20/2011
Nov 13, 2011
Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 11, Issue 02 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Regarding
Recent Cyclical Peaks
The major
indices continued challenge toward eclipsing 2007 cyclical peaks offers
some inspiration to the stock market bull. An inability to do so offers
the stock market bear inspiration. Both phenomena are underway. The
question is which will win.
Four years
after the democratically controlled congress and a liberal leaning
president, George W. Bush, colluded in their nonsensical “help the weak
policies,” the stock market bull has been too timid to proclaim things are
better now than when those lunatics took power. Nancy Pelosi continues
expressing her lunacy, proclaiming unemployment would be at 15% if it were
not for the democrats. Where is the proof? Where is the proof the economy
would have fallen into a deep depression without the 2008/9 bailouts?
Without proof, those little three pound brains from political circles will
continue barking their claims. Their barking is not scary. The fact that
people listen and believe is scary.
The biggest
threat to the stock market bull is politicians. Natural business cycles
always correct while political meddling extends and delays those
corrections. The biggest threat to your financial prosperity is
politicians. Every now and then, an egomaniac can fool 50+% of the masses
and gain power. History clearly demonstrates periods where the masses are
weak. When that happens, the egomaniacs take over and invoke destructive
behavior.
The founding
fathers of the United States lived history. They pulled their pants all
the way up, wore a belt, and were not brain-dead from i-Pods, i-Pads, and
i-Looney Tunes. Historians wrote with less personal bias two-hundred years
ago than today, where liberal artsy types think they know how it “should
have been” as opposed to how it was. Those founding fathers went to
significant lengths to prevent one individual from having complete power.
They knew how power can corrupt a simple mortal. Their system is designed
to prevent that from occurring. The stock market bull has enjoyed that for
over 250-years. The only time the stock market does not display its
ecstasy is during the presidential post-election year, where politicians
coalesce into a harmonistic relationship. That is always bearish.
A huge number
of contemporary politicians continue to hold their incumbency based on how
much they can take from you and give to their constituents. Leeches have
no choice but to continue leeching until their host dies. Once one becomes
a leech, they will always be a leech. Killing the host is 100% inevitable.
The stock market knows this threat and behaves in a manner consistent with
the magnitude of such threats.
The heart and
soul of bullish seasonality occurs every year. It originates sometimes
between late September and early November. The point of origination
coincides with reduced political bantering due to the long number of
political holidays during that period. Also, the nature of the season
tends to pacify most politicians with a celebratory theme of Thanksgiving
and Christmas.
That
phenomenon extends through January. The heart and soul of bullish
seasonality tends to expire around the time of the president’s state of
the union address. Since WWII, most of those speeches contain
proclamations of “give away programs.” The stock market bear is generally
aroused around the time of the state of the union speech. That arousal
typically expires the bullish cycle that is referred to as the heart and
soul of bullish seasonality.
The
pre-election year is the most bullish along the four-year presidential
election cycle. The reason for this is simple. Political contrarianism
occurs with groups of politicians barking proclamations against other
groups of politicians. The absence of political harmony inspires the stock
market bull. That typically carries through the election-year, which is
the second most bullish along the four-year cycle. Once the elections are
completed, political harmony manifests and the stock market bear is again
aroused. That is why the post-election year has not made any stock market
money since 1832.
This is a
presidential pre-election year. It is historically the most bullish year
along the four-year cycle. New stock market highs are typically
established in pre-election years. The stock market has endured
significant trouble in doing so this year. That is abnormal, which is
somewhat consistent with secular bears. Until 2007-peak prices are
eclipsed one cannot argue that the current stock market could be in a
secular, long-term bear.
This weekend,
the S&P500 regained a bullish position for the year. It is now up 0.5%
this year. The DJIA did this a few weeks ago. It is the only major index,
of the Big-3, that is above its 2000 peak price, while the NASDAQ is still
down 46.9% since its weekly closing peak on Mar 9, 2000.
The only
major index of the ten tracked by the Mid-term Indicant above its 2007
peak is the NASDAQ100. It is up 5.2% since its last cyclical peak on Oct
31, 2007. As long as it holds above that peak, the stock market bull
should be inspired. If not, the stock market bear will find inspiration.
The weakest index, the S&P100, is down 22.2% since its Oct 9, 2007 peak.
Of course, it has the highest concentration of dilettantes in its
management ranks.
Prior
political damage is not always calculable by the stock market bull. In
essence the 2007-Congress’ damage may carry forward for a generation or
two. Their meddling with the idea that everyone should live in a mansion
actually pushes nearly everyone closer to living in teepees except them
and their pals on Wall Street and in Corporate America. This phenomenon
may shed light on why the founding fathers granted the populace the right
to bear arms.
All of the major indices can be accessed by clicking this sentence.
You want each major index to cross above its 2007 peak prices in this
mid-term cycle. The first step in this process is for the major indices to
cross above their 2011-peaks.
All but one
of the major indices remains below their 2011 peaks. The only major index
at its 2011-peak, right now, is the
Dow Jones Utilities. As long as
this index continues resisting bearish incursions, the stock market cannot
completely dominate.
In
conclusion, this year’s heart and soul of bullish seasonality needs to
eclipse 2007 peaks. The stock market will do this if it senses political
weakness; that is, politicians undoing their prior damage. You do not need
to keep up with politicians to monitor this. All you have to do is watch
the stock market. It will tell you how well this is being accomplished.
Corruption is
increasing. If you decide the stock market is not the way to make money,
do the following. Start up a solar panel company. Donate a couple of
hundred thousand dollars to a democrat. In return, that democrat will loan
you hundreds of millions from the government. Upon receipt, elevate your
salary and officer draws. Get as rich as you can and then file bankruptcy
for the company. You will be just fine. Five years in country club prison
would be the worse you could expect. Of course, if you shave, you will
have to look at yourself in the mirror. Apparently, some do not mind doing
that.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market report.
Whipsawed
– Review of Wild Swings Last Week
This
section highlights last week’s biggest gainers and losers within each
group of stocks and funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant.
Last week’s
behavior was mild even though the stock market compared with massive
cardiac arrest. Those wild pluses and minuses offset one another.
NAS#46-DISH was up 9.8% last
week. It is up 23.9% since MTI-buy signal a year ago on Nov 5, 2010. You
may notice on the same page that
NAS#47-DTV has been much more
aggressive in the current bullish cycle. It is up 89.0% since the MTI-buy
signal in April 2009.
NAS#77-VRTX was down 14.3% last week.
It received a sell signal this weekend, as it fell below MTI-Yellow with
declining Force. Its long-term trend is bullish. Therefore, last week’s
punishment may not be everlasting. In spite of that, however, all stocks
that currently exist and in the future will eventually endure everlasting
punishment. It is better to re-buy than endure everlasting punishment.
Holding yellow bears has significant risks. One never knows when the
dilettantes influence policy, which by the way, is pure corporate leeching
and/or massive stupidity with a complete and absolute emphasis on the
first.
ISTK#35-PLUGD was 16.0% last
week. It is down 93.4% since the MTI sell signal in early 2008. If the
worldwide economy ever becomes solidly bullish and more politically
stable, companies such as this enjoy significant potential. However,
always keep an eye on the management. Periodically, a majority of
hirelings can be dilettantes. It is currently a MTI Yellow Bear with
negative Pressure.
ISTK#38-ENER was down 35.7%
last week. It is down 99.6% since the MTI-sell signal in Oct 2008. This
stock traded as high at $79.38 and now considered a penny stock with
Friday’s close at thirty cents. It is unusual for the biggest gainer and
loser to be within the same sector and industry on the same week. Nothing
dramatic can be drawn from that, but worthy of mention.
DJIA#27-MRK was up 5.7% last
week. It is up 7.9% since the MTI-buy signal last month. This stock has a
long-term bearish trend, but does enjoy some periodic bullish/bearish
cycles from time to time along a short-term cycle. This company is,
however, dilettante infested with significant expense and time practicing
legalized extortion in Washington DC. Just hobnobbing around with
politicians will contaminate one beyond repair. The purpose is always
simple; that is, gain as much unearned wealth as possible without regard
to ethics.
DJIA#06-BAC was down 4.3% last
week. As you can see, it is also a MTI-Yellow Bear. It is down 83.0% since
the MTI-sell signal in Jan 2008. As you can see, as earlier stated, it is
better to re-buy a stock than hold MTI Yellow Bears.
DJU#13-EXC was Utilities
biggest gainer last week. It was up 2.4%. It is up 1.1% since the MTI-buy
signal last month. It has a very interesting and narrow trading range.
Although it is an MTI Yellow Bear, the short-term Green curve is the focal
point of the next sell signal in this cycle.
DJU#14-CNP was Utilities
biggest loser last week with a drop of 2.5%. It is up 53.9% since the
MTI-buy signal two years ago. This stock has been enduring a long-term
bearish trend, but has trended nicely to the north since the Y2K bear
concluded in 2002.
MF#34-FSHOX was up 2.9% as
mutual funds biggest gainer. This fund enjoys a relatively mild, but
consistent, long-term bullish trend. It is up 4.5% since the MTI-buy
signal last month.
MF#74-FSEAX was the biggest
loser of those mutual funds tracked by the Mid-term Indicant. It was down
2.5%. It is down 3.4% since the MTI buy signal three weeks ago. Foreign
investments are struggling with Asian related funds being confronted with
currency related problems. This fund remains, however, with a hold signal
since it is not a MTI Yellow Bear.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
two-buy
signals and
two-sell
signals. That brings the total
number of buy-signals to 109 in the past five weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 283 of the 339-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
52.5%. That annualizes to 40.4%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 280-stocks and funds for an average of 67.6-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 48-stocks and funds of 339-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 39.9% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 77.0-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Nov 12, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 286-stocks and funds
out of 339 tracked for an average of 47.6-weeks. They were up by an
average of 38.9% (annualized at 42.6%). There were 53-avoided stocks and
funds at that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of
48.6% since their respective sell signals an average of 98.6-weeks earlier
one year ago. There were no buy signals and no sell signals on this
weekend last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for 193-stocks and funds of the 317-tracked
two years ago on Nov 13, 2009. They were up by an average of 27.7%,
annualized at 54.3%, since their respective buy signals an average of
26.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 122-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 32.2% since their
respective sell signals an average of 79.6-weeks earlier. There was one
buy signal in addition to the 159-buy signals in the prior 16-weeks. There
was one sell signal on this weekend in 2009.
There were
only 24-stocks and funds with hold signals of the 344-tracked by the
Mid-term Indicant on Nov 7, 2008 since their buy signals an average of
49.1-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of 83.0% (annualized at
87.9%). There were 313-avoided stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 30.9% from their respective sell signals an average
of 24.7-weeks earlier. There were no sell signals on this weekend in 2008
in addition to the 562-sell signals in the prior 52-weeks, as the bear
market was nearing its ultimate depth, but still incomplete in its final
destruction. There were seven-buy signals on this weekend in 2008 with the
weighted influence of the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
On Nov 9,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 261-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 138.8% (annualized at
60.4%) since their buy signals an average of 119.5-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 59-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 19.6% since their sell signals an average of
26.7-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and 25-sell signal on this
weekend in 2007. The 2003-Mid-term bull cycle was past its peak at this
time in 2007, as the democratic congress was implementing their “take from
the productive and give to the non-productive” policies.
Five years
ago, on Nov 10, 2006, there were 310-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 345 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 103.5% (annualized at 65.8%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 81.8-weeks earlier. There were 34-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 11.8% since their respective sell
signals an average of 24.1-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and no
sell signals on this weekend in 2006. The bull was solid, for the most,
part in 2006.
On Nov 11,
2005, there were 253-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 93.4%, annualizing at 58.6%, since their respective buy signals
an average of 82.9-weeks earlier. There were 54-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down by an average of 16.1% since their sell signals an
average of 25.5-weeks earlier. There were 13-buy signals and no sell
signals on this weekend in 2005.
There were
297-stocks and funds with hold signals on Nov 12, 2004. They were up by an
average of 68.7%, annualizing at 69.1%, since their buy signals 51.7-weeks
earlier. The 17-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 45.6%
since their respective sell signals an average of 54.6-weeks earlier.
There were five-buy signals and one sell signal on this weekend in 2004.
The 2004-meandering bear market that pestered throughout most of 2004 was
giving way to the heart and soul of bullish seasonality at this time in
2004.
On Nov 14,
2003, there were 264-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 54.9%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 31.9-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 89.6%. There were only 22-avoided stocks at that time.
They were down by an average of 24.3% since their sell signals an average
of 33.3-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 264 stocks and
funds from 2002 through late 2004. There were two-buy signals in addition
to 394-buy signals in the prior 34-weeks. There were eight-sell signals on
this weekend in 2003, as the stock market concluded its classical late
summer sell-off. The 2003 bull market was 37-weeks old on this weekend in
2003.
On Nov 15,
2002, there were 268-stocks and funds with hold signals. They were up
14.4% since their buy signals an average of 8.4-weeks earlier, annualizing
at 88.5%. There were 23-stocks and funds avoided since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell an average of 14.1-weeks earlier. The avoided
stocks and funds were down 22.4%. There were two-buy signals in addition
to 485-buy signals in the prior 16-weeks. Although the stock market bear
remained in effect, it was beginning to display weakness. Some of the Aug
buy signals retained hold signals through late 2007 and early 2008, while
others endured sell signals before the conclusion of calendar year 2002
and in early 2003. Energy related buy signals in Aug 2002, however, held
strongly through the December 2002-record-bear and lasted until late 2008.
There were three-sell signals on this weekend in 2002.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain appropriate security, you can
see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals for stocks and funds for this
week by clicking here. It is in
the member’s only section.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Bull and Bear Signals This Weekend
All major
indices are configuring with bullish attributes. Several mutual funds and
stocks garnished similar configurations the past four weeks. The heart and
soul appears to be manifesting in spite of last week’s stock market
bearish behavior.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest. Right after buying, set the stop
loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve values, depending on your
personal preferences.
For your
longer-term holdings, where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are signaled on the Near-term,
Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are updated daily.
These shorter-term models attempt participation in significant bullish
spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is focused on fundamentals
and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
66.8% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
140.4% and the S&P500 is up 62.7% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 141.4% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months.
Configurations shifted in support of normal pre-election year bullishness
the past two weeks.
The NASDAQ is
down 46.9% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 17.3% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 3.7% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025. One should
note that buy and hold so far this century is a loser, as the stock market
has been flat to bearish the last eleven years.
The Dow has
stumbled three times when encountering its 2000 peak value. Will it do
that again? The S&P500 topped its 2000 peak for a few brief weeks in 2007.
The NASDAQ has never come close, as its prior peak price was hype driven.
The DOTCOM sector does not perform agriculture, manufacture, or extract.
Therefore, no wealth was created and it remains appropriately bearish
relative to the 2000 phony peak prices.
If socialism
expands, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050 and that
depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by politicians.
Significant downsizing of federal governments and related regulatory
shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous sentence. If the
opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies, the NASDAQ will
never return to its 2000 peak. Look at the resumes of intellectual elites
who argue against these points. You will detect they are pure economic
leeches arguing on behalf of such regulations, which is a source of their
livelihoods. None has ever produced anything of value.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 26.0% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness. The heart and soul of bullish
seasonality manifested at this time of year in spite of dynamic
bearishness in 2001.
The NASDAQ
was down by 32.4% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with historical standards of finding bottoms during
mid-term election years. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality was
solid at this time in 2002, but endured a couple of disruptive incursions
by the stock market bear in December and again in Feb-Mar 2003.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was up 44.6%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was up on
this weekend in 2004 by a paltry 2.9% from that year’s meandering bear
market, but finished up by 8.6%. This was congruent with election year
bullishness, although shy of magnitude standards.
It was up
1.2% on this weekend in 2005’s post-election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during
post-election years. This was an excellent year, based on post-election
year historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and
2005 were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up by 8.4% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%,
which again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was up by 8.8% at this time in 2007, finishing that year
up by 9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness. The
stock market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats took
control of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as
opposed to repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to
its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 40.4% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was up
37.4% on this weekend in 2009 and finishing that year up by 43.9%. Keep in
mind, the extraordinary bullish cycle in 2009 finished that year down by
20.6% from its prior Mid-term cyclical peak on October 31, 2007. The 2008
bear market more accurately reflected economic fundamentals than the 2009
bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 12.6% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%,
which was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially
in the second half of such years.
The Dow is up
5.0% this year. The S&P500 is up 0.5% and the NASDAQ is up 1.0%,
respectively, this year. Dynamic bullish behavior the past few weeks has
moved the stock market back into a more conventional position of
bullishness associated with pre-election years. As you can see, the stock
market bull has been shying away from the idea that historical standards
should repeat this year.
The Dow is
down 14.2% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 6.3% since its last cyclical peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is
down 19.3% since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. This coincides with political
coziness in Washington D.C., which solidified in early 2007.
Bull market
expirations are not as obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear
markets are with simultaneous bottoming among the major indices. As you
can see, the stock market continues to struggle beyond where it was prior
to the great bear market of 2007-2008. In spite of that, though, a few
indices have eclipsed pre-crash highs, as noted by the S&P600 19-weeks
ago. That was the second time this year such accomplishment was enjoyed.
Eclipsing and holding above 2007 cyclical peaks remains elusive with the
exception of the NAS100.
Several
indices have never challenged those peak prices. The weakest index,
S&P100,
continues lagging. It is down by 22.2% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly
closing peak and nearing Yellow Bear status. As you can see from recent
stock market behavior, suspicions about the 2009-2011 bull leg had merit.
The reason for those suspicions was near maximal incongruence between
political leadership and the underlying principles of capital markets.
The Dec 12, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
The
NASDAQ100
catapulted above its 2007 peak five weeks ago along the Mid-term cycle. It
is the only major index conquering that configuration. It is now 5.2%
above that weekly closing peak on Oct 31, 2007. It will be interesting to
see if it can hold above its 2007 peak. Even though the NASDAQ100 was
bearish the past three weeks, it held above that potential point of
resistance.
Most major
last cyclical bottoms occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the four
major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The only
exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical bottom
on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view and increasingly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
If prices fall below reverse tangential
projections, new pivot points will be defined.
The Dow is up
85.6% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 111.2% and the S&P500 is up
86.8% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 126.7% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-current bull leg was/is indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. Such a successor bear cycle may now
be underway in spite of recent bull/buy signals, although not expected to
continue as Washington DC has a propensity to stalemate during
presidential pre-election years. This is especially true when the
president is unpopular. Both of those conditions persist and favorable to
the stock market bull. The primary problem confronting the stock market
bull is Europe.
The bull
cycle, originating in March 2009, is believed to be the classical mid-term
election year bullish starting point ahead of the presidential
pre-election year, which is now underway. The pre-election year is the
most bullish along the four-year cycle. In essence, the firing of
incumbent politicians in the U.S. generally arouses the bull. It takes a
while for the newly elected to follow their paths of corruption and learn
the ease of spending other people’s money. The stock market bull takes
advantage during such phenomena. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull discontinued expressing its delight
in that the past several weeks with heightened political chatter. However,
that chatter has been countered with arguing political chatter. That
suggests little political accomplishment. That is bullish.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull in the long-run with pressure
to reduce government waste. Anticipating that is bullish. The short-term
and mid-term cycles are increasingly supportive of the bull at this time.
A potential of defaults by Greece and other European countries, promoting
and catering to laziness, add to threats to the stock market bull. The
Standard and Poor’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating adds new threats
to the stock market bull. On the contrary, though, Spain has legislated
balanced budget requirements, which supports the idea of a bullish theme.
The problem is how plastic political agreements are. Europe continues
treating debt like play money and the jury is still out on that. However,
current configurations suggest defaults are not on the immediate horizon.
The capital markets have demonstrated abilities to sniff out such events
before they actually occur.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
Although this
paragraph has remained unchanged for a couple of years, do not fall
asleep. It will change. It will be significant and dramatic when it does
change. The markets both free and controlled are not constant. This will
result in a massive bear market, depending on the magnitude of combined
interest rates and inflation. As you have seen the past several weeks, the
potential for a massive and long-lasting bear is possible, as dilettantes,
worldwide, continue converting their currencies to meaningless
expressions. Interestingly, an “instinctive” resistance to this is
manifesting, which could obsolete the previous sentence. Unfortunately,
the dilettantes have not been locked-up, yet.
As promised by Bernanke in late 2008, the
discount rate (and prime) rate continue holding flat in their depressed
levels. The fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and
very depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any
other value. Bernanke continues
with his promise of more of the same for through 2012. Policy settings
typically remain fixed during the second half of a president’s term. That
stability is one reason why the historical record demonstrates stock
market bullishness from the mid-term election year through the election
year. Fortunately, U.S. politicians are losing influence on the shrinking
world stage. Unfortunately, foreign politicians are made of the same DNA.
Also, unfortunately, the paper currency basis of worldwide economies is
under threat as the culmination of
OPM disease
by politicians may be approaching the “critical dimension.”
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
They have been yielding zero for the past 14-weeks.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status 43-weeks ago. It lost that Red Bull status eight
weeks ago with a continuing sharp drop against the greenback.
The
Canadian dollar
also strengthened the past few days, but remains within the tolerances of
its cycle of weakening. It is more solidly resuming a cycle of weakness.
The
Japanese Yen
continued its strengthening cycle. The CA$ moved in the neutral zone
(between Red and Yellow) eleven weeks ago. It is now above Red (bearish
for the CA$), which threatens its cycle of strengthening. The Japanese
yen remains extraordinarily strong.
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull. Despite solid bearish behavior in four of the past eight weeks,
it continues trading well above the 2012 yearend forecast curve. The
$2,000/oz.-forecast by 2014 remains challenged, based on political
dynamics. For example, reduced government spending should strengthen paper
currencies and with that, the price of gold would decrease. So far, this
thesis remains weak. It may take a few more years before this political
influence manifests. Statistical bullishness remains intact along the
mid-term cycle. At the same webpage, you will notice oil is less stable
with a mild, but with deepening bearish bias. It fell below yellow
14-weeks ago on souring economic news, but rebounded the three weeks ago
and weakening again this past week. It remains as a Yellow Bear, but
threatening to escape that weakness.
Commodity
prices continue falling from their recent record highs due to souring
economic forecast, but they rebounded solidly this past three weeks.
However, none are Red Bulls. Their potential contribution to inflationary
pressures remains absent, as most are now Yellow Bears. Their cycle
remains bullish but under attack by the commodities bear.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, the
CRB Bridge Futures
fell prey to bearish economic pressures the past few weeks. It is
approaching Yellow Bear status, but it continues resisting that condition
with a strong rebound in two of the last three weeks.
Commodity
prices, overall, are favoring potential for a bearish cycle. If it
manifests, some elements of inflationary threats will be dampened.
Mortgage rates are moving bearishly.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011. They continue along a bearish cycle.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
are computing unfavorable results. Inflationary threats are now being
computed. However, the combined absolute value of interest rates and
inflation or deflation remains relatively safe at this time.
Overall, hard
economic data is supportive of lackluster economic behavior and currently
non-threatening toward inflation or deflation.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 7.7%, annualizing at 6.6% since then. Gold is no longer enduring
short-term trouble, but obviously lackluster in performance this past
year.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received an MTI buy signal on Jul 22, 2011. It is down 0.3% since that buy
signal. If Force falls into bearish domains, it will receive a sell
signal.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late
2008. It received a buy signal on Oct 28, 2011 after missing an 18%
opportunity in the last 12-months with most due to rapid bullishness ahead
of Force Vector justification to signal buy. It is down 1.8% since that
buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 28, 2011 after missing about 20% of
opportunity. It is down 1.5% since that buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct
28, 2011 after missing about 20% of opportunity. It is down 1.6% since
that buy signal, offering even more opportunity for growth.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010 and was basically flat until the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell
on Sep 30, 2011. It again signaled buy on Oct 28, 2011 after missing about
24% of opportunity. It is down 1.5% since that buy signal.
The Near-term
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Oct 10, 2011. It is up 13.5% since then, annualizing at 152.0%. The
slower moving Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct 21, 2011. It is up
5.4% since then, annualizing at 92.8%. It was up 242.4% (annualized at
44.8%) since the Quick-term buy signal on March 26, 2003 until the
September 2008 sell signal. It was up over 25.0%, annualized at 29.0% from
its Quick-term buy signal on Sep 15, 2010 and the Quick-term sell signal
on Aug 8, 2011.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 115.7% since that buy signal, annualizing
at 39.1%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It enjoyed an approximate 7.0%
gain since the Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18, 2011. The NTI
signaled buy on Jul 6, 2011. It was up about 10% until the NTI signaled
sell on Sep 23, 2011. It was flat since that sell signal and its most
recent buy signal on Oct 26, 2011. It is up 3.9% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 88.2%.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling bull for all major indices. They are up by an
average of 2.6%, annualizing at 15.5% since their bull signals an average
of 8.6-weeks ago.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$30,891,686. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,849,031 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $144,673. That beats buy and hold’s $123,798 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $229,128. That beats buy and hold’s $92,883 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1,570.7%, 16.9%, and 136.9%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid bear markets. That is why it beat buy and hold
by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post-election year, 2009, which is the historical
standard.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 80.3% since then. Although this is
classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable to
signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation for
the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a thoroughbred
in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting the stock
market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal, which approximates the normal
time to buy this fund.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
319.9% (annualized at 15.9%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,045-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report – Summary
As stated
since Monday, Oct 31, 2011,“if configurations sour in favor of the stock
market bear, appropriate actions will be advised herein. Right now, the
stock bull remains solid.”
Several
short-term attributes increased their support for the stock market bull
earlier this week and held up in last Wednesday’s attack by the stock
market bear.
Europeans must
pay the price for their socialistic methods. All societies eventually bear
the brunt of supporting laziness and economic leeches. Societal
recognition of that can be bullish. As long as prices remain above NTI
Green, the bear cannot dominate along the near-term cycle, which is the
current focal point.
As stated last
Thursday, “the Near-term Green price is a focal point, as Force across the
board has fallen below Pressure and few into bearish domains. If prices
fall to NTI Green, the bear will regain solid cyclical dominance.
Currently, NIT Green is increasing, which should settle the issue within a
few days.”
The lack of
volume support continues to pester the near-term bullish cycle. It is now
into seasonal slowness, which could invigorate continued volatility until
after Thanksgiving in the U.S.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
Index
Report Card Summary
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull for all of the major non-contrarian indices.
They are up by an average of 2.5% since the NTI bull signals an average of
3.0-weeks ago. That annualizes at 42.5%. The Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear only for contrarian VIX. It is up 2.7% since its bear
signal 2.6-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bull for all non-contrarian indices.
Their performance is the same as the Near-term Indicant since the bull
signals occurred, simultaneously, with prices climbing above QTI Yellow
with qualifying near-term bullish attributes. The lone bear signal is for
contrarian VIX, which has the same performance as noted above by the
Near-term Indicant.
Several of
the troubling short-term attributes recovered late this week, solidifying
the stock market bull’s position.
Indicant Volume Indicators
Volume
indicators need to improve their configurations to help propel the stock
market bull onward and upward. Recent relationships are indeed bullish,
but the short-term cyclical configurations need to be more supportive of
the bull for sustainability. Both IVI’s sloped downward on recent
bullishness, which suggests a lack of bullish inspiration. This is a bit
troubling.
Nov
11-Fri-Timid volume with strong bullishness is not a confidence booster to
the stock market bull, but seasonal factors are kicking in as we approach
the holiday season. Regardless though, the stock market bull solidified
its position today.
Nov
10-Thu-Again low volume and little support for today’s bullish behavior.
However, the near-term bull cycle remains intact. Volume surges,
paralleling stock market bullishness, are a bullish requirement that
remains absent.
Nov 09-Wed-Low
volume on bearish aggression does not support bearish continuation, but
the lack of support on recent bullishness remains bothersome.
Nov 08-Tue-Low
volume on above average bullish behavior is also irrelevant. With that,
there is no threat to the stock market bull.
Nov
07-Mon-Below average volume irrelevant. At least the stock market bear is
not finding encouragement here.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 28-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 4.0%
since their buy signals an average of 3.8-weeks ago, annualizing at 54.9%.
The NTI is
avoiding four-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 3.4% since their
near-term sell signals an average of 2.7-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 28-ETF’s. They are up by an
average of 6.0% since their buy signals an average of 8.8-weeks ago. This
annualizes at 35.3%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding four-ETFs. They are up by an average of
4.1% since the QTI sell signals an average of 2.6-weeks ago.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on
Oct 21, 2011. It is up 5.4% since then, annualizing at 92.8%. The
Near-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct 10, 2011. It is up 13.5% since that
buy signal, annualizing at 152.4%. As stated the past several days, its
Force Vector is behaving bullishly with some mild oscillations in bullish
domains. It is above QTI bearish yellow. All of this is bullish in spite
of recent bearish incursions.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 115.7% since the QTI signaled
buy on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 39.1%. Bearish yellow is
a good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is
at $149.00 and still rising. Relaxation remains in order, since your buy
price approximates $80.65 versus today’s closing price of $173.96. The
Quick-term Indicant will not signal sell until interaction with QTI Yellow
Curve.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 26, 2011, as Force catapulted itself into
bullish domains and above Pressure. It is up 3.9% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 88.2%. It will be interesting if this near-term bullish
cycle can hold up in the face of potential profit taking. So far,
configurations remain favorable to the gold bull. Force was dropping, but
displayed an increase in three of the past four days.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
All prior comments in this section remain
in effect, but eliminated here for brevity purposes. You will be notified
when and if such commentary requires adjustment.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received a sell signal from the Near-term
Indicant on Oct 24, 2011. It is up 2.1% since then. The QTI signaled sell
on Oct 27, 2011. It is up 4.9% since then.
Tracking from
Oct 28, 2011 informal forecast. That forecast predicted TLT would fall to
QTI Yellow in this near-term cycle before end Dec 2011. Price today was
$115.65. QTI Yellow is $99.88. The forecast was threatened on Thu, Nov 3,
with Force crossing above Pressure and residing in bullish domains.
Behavior the next few days will be interesting for this contrarian ETF.
The forecast will be withdrawn if Force does not quickly retreat to a more
bearish bias. It is now dropping in bullish domains but not yet committed
to supporting the forecast, while improving configurations to do so.
ETF#31-QID
received a sell signal on Oct 10, 2011
from both the Near-term and Quick-term Indicant as Force fell into bearish
domains. It is down 8.5% since then. Force crossed into bullish domains on
Nov 4, but price remains below NTI Blue and it fell below NTI Green. As
stated since Nov 4, all of this is bearish.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled sell on Oct 27, 2011, for
ETF#32-VXX.
It is up 19.5% since that sell signal. QTI Yellow is resisting
bearishness. Force Vector is assisting that resistive behavior, which rose
from deep inside bearish domains into bullish domains on Fri, Nov 4, but
too risky to buy at this point. Its Force Vector behavior in the next few
days will be interesting. If it does not fall, the stock market bear will
be inspired. Its Force discontinued its incline this past Monday and
started falling on Tuesday and continued doing so yesterday in spite of
yesterday’s profound bullishness and stock market bearishness. That
remains bearish for VIX/VXX and bullish for the stock market.
Major ETF
Events
Nov
11-Fri-Stock market bullishness solidified, supporting more of the same.
Nov
10-Thu-Bullish responses to yesterday’s dynamic bearish demonstrates the
bull’s desire to dominate, but the lack of volume of weakening bullishly
supporting attributes is increasingly challenging to the stock market
bull.
Nov
9-Wed-Aggressive stock market bearish behavior did not distort short-term
bullish attributes.
Nov
8-Tue-Sevearal short-term attributes increased in their support of stock
market
bullishness.
Nov
7-Mon-Staid behavior and thus no major events.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-Nov
11, 2011-Most, not all, short-term attributes continue favoring a bullish
stock market, albeit weakening this past week, but regained strength on
this Friday’s strong bullishness. As stated the past two weeks, “continue
buying on bearish days.”
Reverse
Tangential Projections
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market enjoyed bullish convergence for four consecutive weeks through
weekending Oct 28, 2011. That remains solidly bullish and consistent with
originations of the heart and soul of bullish seasonality despite
disruptive divergent behavior the past two weeks. The four consecutive
weeks of bullish convergence trumps recent volatility with a bearish tint
to it.
Indicant
Conclusion
As stated
last week, the NASDAQ100 again toppled its 2007 peak five weeks ago along
the Mid-term cycle. This is the third time in the past year this has
occurred. Each time it retreated. Although the NAS100 was mildly bearish
last week, the other major indices were equally bullish. The NAS100 held
its ground during stock market bearishness and volatility the past two
weeks. As long as it does that, the bear cannot dominate. The other major
indices remain below the 2007 levels. However, all mid-term attributes are
solidly bullish. With that, the mid-term cycle supports the major indices
surpassing those 2007 peaks along the current mid-term cycle.
Political
stalemate and austerity against nonsensical waste in Europe should
encourage the stock market bull. As long as these events remain consistent
with commonsense, the stock market bull should continue for the next three
to five months.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
11/13/2011
Nov 6, 2011
Indicant Weekly Stock Market Report
Volume 11, Issue 01 ISSN 1526 6516 © The
Indicant Stock Market Report
Stock
Market Secularism
People
rioting in the streets without a leader can be inspirational to
anarchists. The leaderless search for a leader, who may have the name,
Adolph.
Where will
the destruction of other people’s property end? The effort required to
destroy assets is little; very little. The effort required to create an
asset is high; very high.
Low character
does not create assets. Good character does. Low character has only two
relationships with assets; they either destroy it or live off it. Good
character also only has two relationships with assets; they create it and
then work hard to make it more valuable.
Where did
slums come from? People with low character moved into existing assets.
Those assets then lowered in value. The inhabitants did not create those
assets, but they lived off them. After their close proximity with those
assets, they depreciated to worthlessness. Just take a look around. It is
easy to spot sub-cultures of low character.
Some
politicians cater to the populace of low character. Regardless of the
destructive nature in that relationship, politicians encourage a
continuation of low character. They construct legislation to encourage it.
Their model suggests more votes for them (the politicians) will help them
retain power, regardless of the destructive behavior to assets. Some
politicians and their constituents are of low character. They exist by
extracting assets from those of high character.
All people
interact daily with two types of assets; their own and those belonging to
others. Lacking respect for one’s own asset and the assets of others is a
low character attribute. If 51% of the voting populace in any democracy is
of low character, a secular decline in their culture manifests. History
clearly reveals this obvious fact, but unfortunately, very few understand
or even aware of history.
The problem
with secular declines is an inherent inability to recognize it at the
beginning of its tortuous cycle. Predicting a democracy’s last days is
difficult. Much depends on the countermeasures that may prop up from time
to time, delaying the expiration of that culture.
Identifying a
secular decline is much easier in corporations. The only problem is you
have to be on the inside to recognize it. Unfortunately, most on the
inside do not detect secular declines, but some do. That is because most
of the insiders are the problem. Those who do see it, leave in a state of
disgust. Good managers, leaving a company, are usually a clear sign of
excessive stupidity. Competent managers have a strong disdain for
incompetence. Those who remain are basic economic leeches that drain their
employers’ assets. Dilettantes are usually so egotistically blind, they
cannot detect their destruction. Massive ego is a low character attribute;
especially when emanating from someone who gains employment simply writing
resumes and passing an interview process. In other words, hirelings who
walk the halls of bankrupt Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are just that. Many
enjoy salaries exceed one-half million dollars per year and including wild
bonuses, all of which are approved by your elected politicians. Of course,
some of those excessive salaries and bonuses are returned to your elected
politicians in the form of campaign contributions. One group of economic
leeches takes from you, while those leeches feed those you elect.
An example of
corporate secular decline can be viewed, directly, from a chart. There are
plenty of examples. For the sake of brevity, just one is discussed.
Eastman Kodak is the chosen one as it is currently seeking huge loans. It
is
ISTK#18-EK, which is a former
DJIA stock. As you can see from the chart, it has been moving steadily to
the south for over ten years. Eastman needs loans to pay its bills. That
means it assets have not been increasing in value. The Japanese took it to
them. None of those Japanese attended America’s so called great
educational institutions. For years, Eastman recruited the finest
graduates from the finest educational institutions in the U.S. and Canada.
And look at the results; secular decline.
Many of the
ISTKS are former NASDAQ100 stocks and a few former DJIA stocks. Scrolling
down the list on this page and picking a few charts,
you can find many more examples of corporate secular decline. The reason
these former “good companies” are tracked, every now and then they are
transferred back to their former indices. Also, a few do find
resurrection, but that is rare. Finally, the Indicant has several members
who create their own mutual funds and it is difficult to delete a stock
with an avoid or sell signal. Some even use the charts to short stocks.
So, we are slow to abandon a stock, once tracked.
The Wall
Street protestors are a culmination of the unemployed, socialists, union
members, etc. In other words, with the exception of some frustrated
unemployed, most are of low character. They destroy the assets of others.
That is all the proof one needs with respect to their character. The
troubling element of this is the encouragement of this destructive process
from politicians, ranging from mayors, governors, and even the President
of the United States. A culture is in trouble when formal leadership
encourages asset destruction. Disrespecting assets by formal leadership is
a strong clue any bearish reaction is not temporary, but the beginning of
a long and painful decline in any culture and anytime at any place in the
universe.
Some of the
protestors desire to have their student loans forgiven because they cannot
get a job to pay for their loans. Well, if one has a PhD in social
studies, one just wasted a good portion of their life. This is especially
true when the professors promulgated course content with a bent on
personal opinion and fiction. Those desiring loan forgiveness are purebred
economic leeches.
If a
politician campaigns on the promise to forgive student loans and is
elected, sell all common stocks and funds owning stocks. The purpose of
capitalization will be lost in that circumstance. Chaos and poverty will
accelerate. Such a circumstance would be unheard of only one generation
ago. It would not be surprising today.
The great
Shigeo Shingo of the infamous Toyota Production Systems development once
said, “the faster the feedback function, the fewer the defects.” An errant
operation along a process should be detected on a real time basis with its
construction of a defect. That is why one could buy a Toyota Tercel in the
1970’s only to enjoy watching their children drive that same car ten years
later with very few maintenance problems. Of course, the cultural elite do
not impose that on their grandchildren, but the fact that many ordinary
folks did, clearly illustrates Shingo’s success.
The problem
in detecting any secular decline is identifying the errant operation along
a process. When formal leaders encourage those with a propensity to be
destructive to any asset, one could argue “defect detection.” Toyota had
subsystems to prevent the production of more than one defect at a time.
This is commonly referred to as Pokayoke or mistake proofing. Subsystems
would auto-stop production so that a second defect would not be produced.
All of this is possible when engaging in physical objects, such as a
piston pin or gear. Unions discourage this sort of developed efficiency
because it threatens the masses of their brotherhood.
Unfortunately, when engaging abstract objects, such as the Communist
Manifesto or a union handbook, defective behavior is not detected by those
who believe in those sort of abstract concepts. On the contrary, the wrong
will argue vehemently against those who are correct. Therein lies the
problem. The wrong, usually of weak character, either do not care they are
wrong or believe they are right. Universal law always punishes wrong, but
that punishment can last for long periods, as the culture endures its
secular decline.
Nancy Pelosi
without any proof recently claimed unemployment would be at 15% if it were
not for the democrats. Her making that statement is a form of lunacy. And
she is an elected official, representing those who vote for her. Formal
leadership, who are lunatics, reflects very high probabilities of secular
declines in a democracy.
The stock
market has been enduring significant difficulty in eclipsing its 2007
highs and its 2000 highs. Some of the major indices 2007 highs were lower
than their 2000 highs. That is an obvious secular bear. Ten years or more
without additive stock market wealth is of concern. Coupling that to
contemporary political and societal behavior should be acknowledged by
anyone who is interested in investing in the capital markets.
In the late
1800’s and early 1900’s news was dominated by those of high character,
such as Henry Ford, Nicola Tesla, Harvey Firestone, Thomas Edison, Alfred
P. Sloan, etc. None of those high character folks would march in any group
and protest any conflict with individual freedom. Most worked 14-hour days
creating assets and expanding the value of their assets. The interest
level was high in their new products and thus enjoying plentiful news
coverage. More recently, Steven Jobs and a few others have enjoyed similar
news coverage. However, such news coverage is very limited who engage in
the production of physical objects, which is by far significantly more
difficult than creating abstract objects (or concepts of avoiding 15%
unemployment).
Contemporary
news is mostly dominated by politicians around the world, rioting
government bureaucrats, rioting 50-year old retirees in Europe, union
members, socialists, news media personalities, most of which are liberal
arts types and could not solve the most basic of real problems. Such news
can have a bearish effect on the capital markets. Wandering three-pound
brains within political circles encumbered with an extraordinary absence
of required skills solving any problem are directing behavior every day.
On a daily
basis, one can be creating assets. One can be increasing the value of
assets. One can be merely consuming assets (leeches) to the point of real
accelerated depreciation. Or one can be destroying assets. It seems
society is increasingly unaware of who is doing what to what.
In the case
of Eastman Kodak, some probably interpreted each bullish spurt, during its
cycle of a bearish secular decline, as “we’re on the rebound.” Many
executives at General Motors would loudly proclaim their lost market share
was abated at 40%-share, then a few years later they would proclaim, “we
have stopped it at 30%-share.” And then, “20% share a few years later”,
etc. Secular declines, even when obvious, are seldom recognized even when
deep into the cycle of decline. The conclusions of such cycles are always
obvious, though.
In spite of
all that, the heart and soul of bullish seasonality remains intact.
However, if is a lazy one or with narrowed time breadth, you can interpret
a continuation of secular decline and bearish stock market behavior. In
other words, it is possible the 2003-2007 bull leg and the 2009-current
bull leg were merely cyclical bullish spurts embedded in a long path of
decline. Force Vector behavior, coupled other attributes will keep you
informed.
Each week,
this report discusses the stock market’s secular behavior in the section
entitled, The Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend.
If the major indices, during this year’s heart and soul of bullish
seasonality continue in struggling fashion and failing to eclipse 2007
and/or 2000 peaks, do not expect a bullish continuation. The wrong are
dominating the news with a few brief comments from time to time about
Steve Jobs, who recently passed away. Interestingly, the Wall Street
protestors use some of the products developed at Steve Jobs company,
Apple, but yet are critical of “corporate profits.” Many of them stood in
long lines to buy Apple products. Some could refer to that as being
hypocritical, which is another one of those low character attributes.
Keep your eye
on the
daily stock market report.
Whipsawed
– Review of Wild Swings Last Week
The following
discusses the biggest gainers and losers with each group tracked by the
Mid-term Indicant. Those groups are the NASDAQ100 stocks, Indicant Select
Stocks, which are primarily energy and former NASDAQ100 stocks, the Dow
Jones Industrial Average stocks, the Dow Utility stocks and conventional
mutual funds. The securities with gains were the biggest gainers last week
and those with losses were the biggest losers last week.
NAS#72-STX was up 11.9% last
week. It is up 18.9%, annualized at 486.9% since the MTI buy signal on Oct
21, 2011. Last week,
NAS#77-VRTX was down 11.9%. It
is up 3.7% since the MTI buy signal a little over a year ago.
ISTK#87-LAMR was up in last
week’s bearish stock market by 13.1%. That triggered an MTI buy signal, as
its Force Vector skyrocketed into bullish domains. Such behavior in Force
is seldom followed by bearish behavior.
ISTK#08-RNWKD was down 20.2%
last week. It is down 71.7% since the MTI sell signal in July 2007.
Although its Force Vector is in bullish domains, price remains below the
short-cycle curves. It shied to the south of those short-cycle curves in
last week’s bearish stock market.
DJIA#10-HD was up a paltry 0.7%
last week. That is the weakest biggest gainer in all groups since the past
few weeks. Home Depot’s earnings relate to the housing bubble.
Consequently, it is up only 33.5% since the MTI buy signal in July 2009.
DJIA#06-BAC was down 11.7% last
week. It is down 82.3% since the MTI sell signal in Jan 2008. Bank of
America is one of those pathetic organizations that has defied its natural
expiration with socialistic help. Saving them weakens the rest of the
country.
DJU#05-AES was up 2.2% in last
week’s bearish stock market. It is up 6.4% since the MTI signaled buy on
this past Oct. It is annualized at 165.5% due to its recent buy signal.
Although it may not perform to that level a year from now, one could
consider buying on weakness due to the newness of the MTI cycle. DJU#07-PCG
was down 4.8%, paralleling stock market bearishness. It has been somewhat
disappointing as it is up only 1.2% since the MTI buy signal in July 2009.
MF#22-USPIX up was 3.2% in last
week’s bearish stock market. That is because this fund is purely
contrarian to the NASDAQ100. Therefore, it will move bullishly during
stock market bearishness. It is QID’s cousin with the same basic rules for
shorting the NAS100 Index. It is down 79.7% since the MTI sell signal in
April 2009. Although this fund was configuring bullishly a few weeks ago,
its Vector Pressure remained in bearish domains and its Force has recently
collapsed deep into bearish domains.
MF#71-FNORX was down 6.8% last
week. It is down by that same amount since last week’s buy signal. Its
bearishness last week relates to European craziness. Scrolling all six
funds on the same page will reveal the stock market bear since 2007
remains in effect. Although it is difficult to set stop losses on such
funds, keep your eye on Europe. If Greece defaults and/or economic leeches
increase their influence in Europe, sell signals will ensue even though
the Mid-term Indicant attempts to minimize trade signals for mutual funds.
Its Force Vector remains in bullish domains and thus no sell signal in
spite of last week’s bearishness.
Weekly
Buy/Sell Summary – Stocks and Funds – Mid-term Indicant
Click this sentence for a graphical summary
of what follows. Simply scroll
down the page to see graphical and detail content of this section.
The Mid-term Indicant generated
five-buy
signals and
no
sell signals.
That brings the total number of
buy-signals to 107 in the past four weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 280 of the 339-stocks and funds tracked by
the Indicant. The stocks and funds with hold signals are up an average of
52.4%. That annualizes to 41.0%. The Mid-term Indicant has been signaling
hold for these 280-stocks and funds for an average of 66.5-weeks.
The Mid-term
Indicant is avoiding 54-stocks and funds of 339-tracked by the Indicant.
The avoided stocks and funds are down an average of 31.6% since the
Mid-term Indicant signaled sell an average of 76.0-weeks ago.
One year ago,
on Nov 5, 2010, the Mid-term Indicant was holding 272-stocks and funds out
of 339 tracked for an average of 47.3-weeks. They were up by an average of
43.8% (annualized at 48.1%). There were 53-avoided stocks and funds at
that time. The avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 47.8%
since their respective sell signals an average of 97.6-weeks earlier one
year ago. There were 14-buy signals and no sell signals on this weekend
last year.
The Mid-term
Indicant was signaling hold for 194-stocks and funds of the 317-tracked
two years ago on Nov 6, 2009. They were up by an average of 24.5%,
annualized at 49.9%, since their respective buy signals an average of
25.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 122-stocks and
funds at that time. They were down an average of 30.4% since their
respective sell signals an average of 78.6-weeks earlier. There were
no-buy signals in addition to the 159-buy signals in the prior 15-weeks.
There was one sell signal on this weekend in 2009. The stock market bear
originating in late 2007 continued its retreat in defeat at this time in
2009. Of course, in retreat, the stock market bear was accumulating energy
for its next attack. It always does that. Bears typically do not last too
long. They have a history of undoing years of work by the stock market
bull in a matter of just a few weeks.
There were
only 12-stocks and funds with hold signals of the 344-tracked by the
Mid-term Indicant on Oct 31, 2008 since their buy signals an average of
91.7-weeks earlier. They were up by an average of 163.6% (annualized at
92.8%). There were 319-avoided stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 27.8% from their respective sell signals an average
of 23.3-weeks earlier. There was one-sell signal on this weekend in 2008
in addition to the 562-sell signals in the prior 51-weeks, as the bear
market was now maturing at this point in 2008, but still incomplete in its
final destruction. There were 12-buy signals on this weekend in 2008 with
the weighted influence of the heart and soul of bullish seasonality.
On Nov 2,
2007, the Mid-term Indicant was signaling hold for 286-stocks and funds
out of 345-tracked. They were up by an average of 143.2% (annualized at
65.4%) since their buy signals an average of 113.8-weeks earlier. The
Mid-term Indicant was avoiding 58-stocks and funds at that time. They were
down by an average of 17.2% since their sell signals an average of
26.2-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and one sell signal on this
weekend in 2007. The Mid-term bull cycle was beginning to struggle at this
time in 2007, as the democratic congress was implementing their “take from
the productive and give to the non-productive” policies.
Five years
ago, on Nov 3, 2006, there were 310-hold signals for stocks and funds out
of the 345 tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 102.8% (annualized at 66.1%) since their respective buy signals
an average of 80.8-weeks earlier. There were 33-avoided stocks and funds
then. They were down an average of 13.7% since their respective sell
signals an average of 23.9-weeks earlier. There were no buy signals and
one sell signal on this weekend in 2006. The bull was solid, for the most,
part in 2006.
On Nov 4,
2005, there were 209-stocks and funds with hold signals from the listing
of 320-tracked by the Mid-term Indicant at that time. They were up an
average of 113.6%, annualizing at 57.0%, since their respective buy
signals an average of 103.6-weeks earlier. There were 60-avoided stocks
and funds then. They were down by an average of 17.2% since their sell
signals an average of 28.7-weeks earlier. There were 44-buy signals and
seven-sell signals on this weekend in 2005.
There were
277-stocks and funds with hold signals on Nov 5, 2004. They were up by an
average of 69.8%, annualizing at 67.7%, since their buy signals 53.6-weeks
earlier. The 21-avoided stocks and funds were down an average of 41.0%
since their respective sell signals an average of 53.7-weeks earlier.
There were 21-buy signals and one sell signal on this weekend in 2004. The
2004-meandering bear market that pestered throughout most of 2004 was
giving way to the heart and soul of bullish seasonality at this time in
2004.
On Nov 7,
2003, there were 267-stocks and funds with a hold signal, enjoying a 55.3%
gain since their respective buy signals an average of 30.7-weeks earlier.
That annualized at 93.6%. There were only 23-avoided stocks at that time.
They were down by an average of 24.5% since their sell signals an average
of 32.6-weeks earlier. The Mid-term Indicant was tracking 266 stocks and
funds from 2002 through late 2004. There were five-buy signals in addition
to 389-buy signals in the prior 33-weeks. There was one-sell signal on
this weekend in 2003, as the stock market concluded its classical late
summer sell-off. The 2003 bull market was 36-weeks old on this weekend in
2003.
On Nov 8,
2002, there were 249-stocks and funds with hold signals. They were up
12.7% since their buy signals an average of 8.9-weeks earlier, annualizing
at 74.8%. There were 21-stocks and funds avoided since the Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell an average of 13.9-weeks earlier. The avoided
stocks and funds were down 25.4%. There were 42-buy signals in addition to
443-buy signals in the prior 15-weeks. Although the stock market bear
remained in effect, it was beginning to display weakness. Some of the Aug
buy signals retained hold signals through late 2007 and early 2008, while
others were reversed with sell signals before the conclusion of calendar
year 2002 and in early 2003. Energy related buy signals in Aug 2002,
however, held strongly through the December 2002-record-bear and lasted
until late 2008. There were four-sell signals on this weekend in 2002.
Summary of
Stocks and Funds with Buy and Sell Signals This past Week
To maintain appropriate security, you can
see the Mid-term Indicant "buy/sell" signals for stocks and funds for this
week by clicking here. It is in
the member’s only section.
As repeatedly
stated, do not hold more than 10% of your investment resources in a single
stock and do not hold more than 20% of your investment resources into a
single mutual fund. Also, never fall in love with a stock or fund. Only
love the value of your portfolio. Never love its contents. Management
stupidity can wreak havoc on any stock or fund at any time. Socio-economic
interference can devastate your holdings from time to time. Governmental
and political behavior can have immediate and long-lasting unfavorable
influences on the capital markets.
Some
companies will perform well, regardless of the depth of stock market
bears. Buy signals will be muted if Congressional action threatens the
capital markets. Legislation, regulation, and politicians are the biggest
threat to the stock market bull and the related quality of life for the
productive and honest.
Comments
about Mid-term Indicant Bull and Bear Signals This Weekend
All major
indices are configuring with bullish attributes. Several mutual funds and
stocks garnished similar configurations the past four weeks. The heart and
soul appears to be manifesting in spite of last week’s stock market
bearish behavior.
Click the
following link that will take you to the Near-term, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant models.
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/STI-Mkts/STI-10-Indices/STI08.htm
Stop Loss
Management
The Mid-term
Indicant recommends a trailing stop loss of 8% for holds with less than a
20% unrealized gain. Of course, this includes new buys. Stop losses
shortly after buying are the trickiest. Right after buying, set the stop
loss at the lesser value of 8% or green curve values, depending on your
personal preferences.
For your
longer-term holdings, where you are enjoying triple and quadruple digit
gains, you may want to set your stop at the bearish yellow price. Do not
worry if you stop out. New opportunities always emerge. The idea is to
minimize losses.
Floor traders
are aware of stop loss positions. If prices near those stop losses against
the grain of directional bias, the floor traders will drive the price down
to those stop losses and then buy for themselves and then quickly sell for
profits at your expense. Although seemingly immoral, it is the nature of
free markets and contributes to the desired liquidity of stock markets.
This is one reason why stop losses should be well below prevailing prices
but well above your buy price. That perfection, of course, is not
attainable shortly after buying, which is the most dangerous period for
holding. Use the Blue and Green curves or a combination thereof for stop
loss management shortly after buying.
Long after a
successful buy, monitor prices relative to the bearish yellow curve. That
will minimize the number of trades, while protecting portfolio values.
For new buys,
set stop losses at the blue or green values in the tables. If green is
deeply lagging the prevailing price, you may want to average the blue and
green prices for your stop losses. If the green curve is rising and above
your buy price, set the stop loss just below it. Green is a common
bouncing point. Consider a stop loss a percentage below its value. Once
green passes above your buy price, then adjust your stop losses,
periodically, say weekly, at or just below green. Once yellow passes above
your buy price, you should set the stop loss at the yellow price. That is
a good tactic when longer-term holding positions are supported with
expected fundamentals and your enjoyment of owning a piece of a great
company or fund.
If your stop
loss triggered sell, while Indicant continues signaling hold, normal
advice would be to buy again. However, if the Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear/avoid in related sectors, it is better to wait for specific
buy signals from the Mid-term Indicant. In other words, other
opportunities will emerge.
The ETF’s are signaled on the Near-term,
Quick-term, and Short-term Indicant and are updated daily.
These shorter-term models attempt participation in significant bullish
spurts and rallies, while the Mid-term Indicant is focused on fundamentals
and longer-term technical data.
The
Indicant Stock Market Report’s Secular Market Blend
The Dow is up
64.2% since its secular weekly low on October 9, 2002. The NASDAQ is up
141.1% and the S&P500 is up 61.3% since then. The small cap index, S&P600,
is up 140.8% since October 9, 2002. All of the major indices were at new
lows on the same week in 2002, which is a common attribute for bottoming.
That will again be an attribute to monitor in coming months.
Configurations shifted in support of normal pre-election year bullishness
the past two weeks.
The NASDAQ is
down 46.8% since its last weekly secular peak on March 9, 2000. The S&P500
is down 18.0% since its similar secular peak on March 23, 2000. The Dow is
up by 2.2% since January 13, 2000 when it peaked from the 1990’s roaring
bull. As stated the past several years in this report, do not be surprised
at the NASDAQ equaling its March 9, 2000 high until after 2025. One should
note that buy and hold so far this century is a loser, as the stock market
has been flat to bearish the last eleven years.
The Dow has
stumbled three times when encountering its 2000 peak value. Will it do
that again? The S&P500 topped its 2000 peak for a few brief weeks a few
years ago. The NASDAQ has never come close as its peak price was hype
driven. The DOTCOM sector does not perform agriculture, manufacture, or
extract. Therefore, no wealth was created and it remains appropriately
bearish relative to the 2000 phony peak prices.
If socialism
expands, the NASDAQ may not hit its 2000 peak until after 2050 and that
depends on a resumption of entrepreneurial support by politicians.
Significant downsizing of federal governments and related regulatory
shrinkage will stimulate a reassessment of the previous sentence. If the
opposite occurs with increasing federal bureaucracies, the NASDAQ will
never return to its 2000 peak. Look at the resumes of intellectual elites
who argue against these points. You will detect they are pure economic
leeches arguing on behalf of such regulations, which is a source of their
livelihoods. None has ever produced anything of value.
The NASDAQ
year-to-date performance was bearish by 29.3% through this week in 2001.
The NASDAQ finished 2001 down by 21.1%, which was congruent with standards
of post-election-year-bearishness. The heart and soul of bullish
seasonality manifested at this time of year in spite of dynamic
bearishness in 2001.
The NASDAQ
was down by 28.4% through this weekend in 2002. Some of you recall the
dynamic bear market in 2002, where the NASDAQ finished that year down by
31.5%. The NASDAQ stock market bear cycle found bottom in October 2002,
which was consistent with historical standards of finding bottoms during
mid-term election years. The heart and soul of bullish seasonality was
solid at this time in 2002, but endured a couple of disruptive incursions
by the stock market bear in December and again in Feb-Mar 2003.
The NASDAQ
YTD 2003 performance was up 46.6%. It finished up by 50.0% in 2003, which
was consistent with historical pre-election year results. It was up on
this weekend in 2004 by a paltry 1.0% from that year’s meandering bear
market, but finished up by 8.6%. This was congruent with election year
bullishness, although shy of magnitude standards.
It was down
03% on this weekend in 2005’s post-election year, which was consistent
with historical standards of losses and/or minimal gains during
post-election years. This was an excellent year, based on post-election
year historical standards of bearishness. Many of you recall that 2004 and
2005 were meandering bear markets.
In 2006, the
NASDAQ was up by 5.7% on this weekend. It finished up in 2006 by 9.5%,
which again maintained congruency of historical bullishness for a mid-term
election year. It was up by 16.4% at this time in 2007, finishing that
year up by 9.8%, which was consistent with pre-election year bullishness.
The stock market peaked in 2007 from the 2003 bull leg after democrats
took control of Congress in early 2007. George W. went along with them as
opposed to repelling them. That accelerated the bear and added depth to
its decline.
The NASDAQ
was down by 32.9% on this weekend in 2008. It finished 2008 down by 40.5%.
That was extreme contrarian performance to the standards of historical
election year bullishness. It was the most bearish presidential election
year since related records from 1832.
It was up
30.3% on this weekend in 2009 and finishing that year up by 43.9%. Keep in
mind, the extraordinary bullish cycle in 2009 finished that year down by
20.6% from its prior Mid-term cyclical peak on October 31, 2007. The 2008
bear market more accurately reflected economic fundamentals than the 2009
bull market.
Much of the 2009 bull market correlated
well with declining political popularity.
The NASDAQ
was up 13.6% on this weekend last year. It finished 2010 up by 16.9%,
which was consistent with mid-term election year bullishness; especially
in the second half of such years.
The Dow is up
3.5% this year. The S&P500 is down 0.4% and the NASDAQ is up 1.3%,
respectively, this year. Dynamic bullish behavior the past few weeks has
moved the stock market back into a more conventional position of
bullishness associated with pre-election years. As you can see, the stock
market bull has been shying away from the idea that historical standards
should repeat this year.
The Dow is
down 15.4% since its last weekly closing peak on Oct 9, 2007. The NASDAQ
is down 6.0% since its last peak on Oct 31, 2007. The S&P500 is down 19.9%
since its Oct 9, 2007 peak. This coincides with political coziness in
Washington D.C., which solidified in early 2007.
Bull market
expirations are not as obviating with simultaneous peaking like bear
markets are with simultaneous bottoming among the major indices. As you
can see, the stock market continues to struggle beyond where it was prior
to the great bear market of 2007-2008. In spite of that, though, a few
indices have eclipsed pre-crash highs, as noted by the S&P600 18-weeks
ago. That was the second time this year such accomplishment was enjoyed.
Eclipsing and holding above 2007 cyclical peaks remains elusive.
Several
indices have never challenged those peak prices. The weakest index,
S&P100,
continues lagging. It is down by 23.0% since its Oct 9, 2007 weekly
closing peak and nearing Yellow Bear status. As you can see from recent
stock market behavior, suspicions about the 2009-2011 bull leg had merit.
The reason for those suspicions was near maximal incongruence between
political leadership and the underlying principles of capital markets.
The Dec 12, 2010 Indicant Weekly Stock
Market Report discussed this phenomenon.
The
NASDAQ100
catapulted above its 2007 peak four weeks ago along the Mid-term cycle. It
is the only major index conquering that configuration. It is now 5.2%
above that weekly closing peak on Oct 31, 2007. It will be interesting to
see if it can hold above its 2007 peak. Even though the NASDAQ100 was
bearish the past two weeks, it held above that potential point of
resistance.
Most major
last cyclical bottoms occurred on March 9, 2009. That includes the four
major Dow Indices, the NASDAQ and all of the major S&P Indices. The only
exception is the NASDAQ100. It encountered its last weekly cyclical bottom
on November 20, 2008.
Although
exact simultaneous bottoming did not occur on March 9, 2009, tracking from
that pivot-point has been and will continue to be appropriate. This
inexactness lends credence to the reverse tangential projections with a
short-term view and increasingly so. Consequently, March 9, 2009 is the
pivot date to monitor performance since the March 2009 bottoming from the
2007-2008 bear cycle.
If prices fall below reverse tangential
projections, new pivot points will be defined.
The Dow is up
83.0% since March 9, 2009, which is the “bottoming” pivot date from the
great bear market of 2007/8. The NASDAQ is up 111.7% and the S&P500 is up
85.2% since then. The S&P600, Small Cap Index, is up 126.2% since March 9,
2009. That March 2009-current bull leg was/is indeed powerful, but such
cycles have occurred many times in the past only to be followed by bear
cycles of varying breadth and depth. Such a successor bear cycle may now
be underway in spite of recent bull/buy signals, although not expected to
continue as Washington DC has a propensity to stalemate during
presidential pre-election years. This is especially true when the
president is unpopular. Both of those conditions persist and favorable to
the stock market bull. The primary problem confronting the stock market
bull is Europe.
The bull
cycle, originating in March 2009, is believed to be the classical mid-term
election year bullish starting point ahead of the presidential
pre-election year, which is now underway. The pre-election year is the
most bullish along the four-year cycle. In essence, the firing of
incumbent politicians in the U.S. generally arouses the bull. It takes a
while for the newly elected to follow their paths of corruption and learn
the ease of spending other people’s money. The stock market bull takes
advantage during such phenomena. The stock market bull recognized this
potential in August 2010 and major congressional employee turnover
manifested in November 2010. The bull discontinued expressing its delight
in that the past several weeks with heightened political chatter. However,
that chatter has been countered with arguing political chatter. That
suggests little political accomplishment. That is bullish.
Political
behavior is favoring the stock market bull in the long-run with pressure
to reduce government waste. Anticipating that is bullish. The short-term
and mid-term cycles are increasingly supportive of the bull at this time.
A potential of defaults by Greece and other European countries, promoting
and catering to laziness, add to threats to the stock market bull. The
Standard and Poor’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating adds new threats
to the stock market bull. On the contrary, though, Spain has legislated
balanced budget requirements, which supports the idea of a bullish theme.
The problem is how plastic political agreements are. Europe continues
treating debt like play money and the jury is still out on that. However,
current configurations suggest defaults are not on the immediate horizon.
The capital markets have demonstrated abilities to sniff out such events
before they actually occur.
Keep your eye
on the daily stock market report.
Economic Conditions – Inflation,
Currency, Interest Rates
Click the
above heading for a summary of hard economic indicators.
Although this
paragraph has remained unchanged for a couple of years, do not fall
asleep. It will change. It will be significant and dramatic when it does
change. The markets both free and controlled are not constant. This will
result in a massive bear market, depending on the magnitude of combined
interest rates and inflation. As you have seen the past several weeks, the
potential for a massive and long-lasting bear is possible, as dilettantes,
worldwide, continue converting their currencies to meaningless
expressions. Interestingly, an “instinctive” resistance to this is
manifesting, which could obsolete the previous sentence. Unfortunately,
the dilettantes have not been locked-up, yet.
As promised by Bernanke in late 2008, the
discount rate (and prime) rate continue holding flat in their depressed
levels. The fed funds closing rate and call money also continue flat and
very depressed. The 2012 forecast suggests values closer to zero than any
other value. Bernanke continues
with his promise of more of the same for through 2012. Policy settings
typically remain fixed during the second half of a president’s term. That
stability is one reason why the historical record demonstrates stock
market bullishness from the mid-term election year through the election
year. Fortunately, U.S. politicians are losing influence on the shrinking
world stage. Unfortunately, foreign politicians are made of the same DNA.
Also, unfortunately, the paper currency basis of worldwide economies is
under threat as the culmination of
OPM disease
by politicians may be approaching the “critical dimension.”
The 3-month T-Bill remains flat and
depressed, along with short-term CD’s.
They have been yielding zero for the past 13-weeks.
The
Euro
jumped to Red Bull status 42-weeks ago. It lost that Red Bull status seven
weeks ago with a continuing sharp drop against the greenback. There has
been a mild bullish response the last four weeks, but still not returned
to Red Bull status. It was down sharply two Friday’s ago due to yet more
bailout packages for Greece and other cultures of the subspecies groups in
Europe. It has since rebounded with vacillating broadcasts from European
politicians, but down slightly again late last week.
The
Canadian dollar
also strengthened the past few days, but remains within the tolerances of
its cycle of weakening. However, it remains in the neutral zone, but
cyclically attempting to resume weakness. The
Japanese Yen
continued its strengthening cycle. The CA$ moved in the neutral zone
(between Red and Yellow) ten weeks ago. It is now above Red (bearish for
the CA$), which threatens its cycle of strengthening. The Japanese yen
remains extraordinarily strong in spite of sovereign intervention by the
Japanese government.
Gold’s optimistic forecast remains at
$1600/oz by 2012. As you can
see, it is tracking above its high-end forecasted value and it remains a
Red Bull. Despite solid bearish behavior in four of the past seven weeks,
it continues trading well above the 2012 yearend forecast curve. The
$2,000/oz.-forecast by 2014 remains challenged, based on political
dynamics. For example, reduced government spending should strengthen paper
currencies and with that, the price of gold would decrease. So far, this
thesis remains weak. It may take a few more years before this political
influence manifests. Statistical bullishness remains intact along the
mid-term cycle. At the same webpage, you will notice oil is less stable
with a mild, but with deepening bearish bias. It fell below yellow
13-weeks ago on souring economic news, but rebounded the two weeks ago and
weakening again this past week. It remains as a Yellow Bear, but
threatening to escape that weakness.
Commodity
prices continue falling from their recent record highs due to souring
economic forecast, but they rebounded solidly this past two weeks.
However, none are Red Bulls. Their potential contribution to inflationary
pressures remains absent, as most are now Yellow Bears. Their cycle
remains bullish but under attack by the commodities bear.
Scrolling
down a bit on the aforementioned webpage, the
CRB Bridge Futures
fell prey to bearish economic pressures the past few weeks. It is
approaching Yellow Bear status, but it continues resisting that condition
with a strong rebound the past two weeks.
Commodity
prices, overall, were bearish in nineteen of the last 27-weeks. They were
bullish the past two weeks, based on bailouts in Europe. Souring economic
forecasts continue dampening commodities bullish cycle despite recent
commentary suggesting otherwise. Current configurations are no longer
expecting a bullish surge. Their recent bearish aggression reflects a
strengthening U.S. dollar and souring economic conditions.
Mortgage rates are moving bearishly.
They did not find comfort at their first Red Curve interaction since late
2008 on Feb 11, 2011. After falling sharply 13-weeks ago on souring
economic news, they enjoyed nice bullish bounces eleven-weeks ago, but
down in six of the past eight weeks. After bouncing solidly to the north
the past few weeks, they bounced south off of bearish Yellow curve. That
is bearish.
The
consumer price index
and
producer price index
are computing unfavorable results. Inflationary threats are now being
computed. However, the combined absolute value of interest rates and
inflation or deflation remains relatively safe at this time.
Overall, hard
economic data is supportive of lackluster economic behavior and currently
non-threatening toward inflation or deflation.
Fear
Metrics: Economics and Terrorism
Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals (VGPMX) -
#19 was up 162.2% from its
April 13, 2001 buy signal until the Mid-term Indicant sell signal on
October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant again signaled buy on Sep 17, 2010.
It is up 8.7%, annualizing at 7.6% since then. Gold is no longer enduring
short-term trouble, but obviously lackluster in performance this past
year.
Fidelity Gold, Fund #28
received an MTI buy signal on Jul 22, 2011. It is down 2.0% since that buy
signal. If Force falls into bearish domains, it will receive a sell
signal.
Vanguard Energy #18, VGENX,
was up 144.9% from since the Mid-term Indicant buy signal April 5, 2003
until its sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term Indicant signaled
buy on Sep 17, 2010, following a couple of buy/sell cycles since late
2008. It received a buy signal last weekend after missing 18% opportunity
in the last 12-months with most due to rapid bullishness ahead of Force
Vector justification to signal buy. It is down 2.7% since that buy signal.
Fidelity Energy Services #40,
FSESX, was up 107.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on December
6, 2003 until the next sell signal on October 3, 2008. The Mid-term
Indicant signaled buy last weekend after missing about 20% of opportunity.
It is down 2.8% since that buy signal.
State Street Research Global #9, SSGRX,
was up 174.2% from its August 16, 2002 buy signal to the Mid-term Indicant
sell on October 3, 2008. It was down 18.4% since that sell signal and the
buy signal on January 8, 2010. The Mid-term Indicant signaled buy last
weekend after missing about 20% of opportunity. It is down 1.2% since that
buy signal, offering even more opportunity for growth.
Fidelity Energy #39, FSENX,
was up 81.2% since the Mid-term Indicant signaled buy on August 16, 2003
and the sell signal on October 3, 2008. After a few disappointing buy/sell
cycles since late 2008, the Mid-term Indicant again signaled, buy, on Sep
17, 2010 and was basically flat until the Mid-term Indicant signaled sell
on Sep 30, 2011. It again signaled buy last weekend after missing about
24% of opportunity. It is down 1.7% since that buy signal.
The Near-term
signaled buy for
ETF#03 – Energy and Natural Resources
on Oct 10, 2011. It is up 11.9% since then, annualizing at 171.9%. The
slower moving Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct 21, 2011. It is up
4.0% since then, annualizing at 101.7%. It was up 242.4% (annualized at
44.8%) since the Quick-term buy signal on March 26, 2003 until the
September 2008 sell signal. It was up over 25.0%, annualized at 29.0% from
its Quick-term buy signal on Sep 15, 2010 and the Quick-term sell signal
on Aug 8, 2011.
The
Quick-term Indicant signaled buy for the
GLD-ETF#11
on December 11, 2008. It is up 111.8% since that buy signal, annualizing
at 38.1%. It gained 81.4% from its August 3, 2005 buy signal until the
September 8, 2008 sell signal. Its annualized gain during that hold period
amounted to 27.1%. The Near-term Indicant signaled buy on April 24, 2009
and it gained 17.3% until its sell signal on Feb 4, 2010. It received a
sell signal from the Near-term Indicant on Jul 27, 2010, but received a
new buy signal on Aug 9, 2010. It was up by 12.0% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 28.0% at the time of the Near-term sell signal on Jan 20,
2011. It was up 2.0% since that sell signal when the Near-term Indicant
signaled buy on Fri, Feb 18, 2011. The near-term model lost an opportunity
of about 2% between Jul 27 and Aug 9, 2010. It enjoyed an approximate 7.0%
gain since the Near-term Indicant buy signal on Feb 18, 2011. The NTI
signaled buy on Jul 6, 2011. It was up about 10% until the NTI signaled
sell on Sep 23, 2011. It was flat since that sell signal and its most
recent buy signal on Oct 26, 2011. It is up 2.1% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 82.4%.
Mid-term Indicant Positions – Ten U.S.
Indices
There were no new
bull signals and no new bear signals.
The Mid-term
Indicant is signaling bull for all major indices. They are up by an
average of 2.0%, annualizing at 13.8% since their bull signals an average
of 8.4-weeks ago.
The Mid-term Indicant Dow Jones Industrial
Average performance is at
$30,458,469. That beats buy and hold performance of $1,823,101 on a
$10,000 investment in the Dow stocks in 1900. The
MTI S&P500
is at $143,458. That beats buy and hold’s $122,757 on a December 31, 1971
$10,000 investment. The
MTI-NASDAQ
is at $229,761. That beats buy and hold’s $93,140 on an October 18, 1985
$10,000 investment. The Mid-term Indicant model beats buy and hold by
1,570.7%, 16.9%, and 136.9%, respectively, for these indices as of this
past week.
The
Indicant’s percentage advantage over buy and hold does not change during
bull signals. The advantage changes only during bear signals. That is
because the buy and hold model has to keep holding, while the Mid-term
Indicant model avoids bear markets. The only purpose of the Mid-term
Indicant model is to avoid bear markets. That is why it beat buy and hold
by approximately 2,000% covering the past 100+ years. It will not be
surprising to see the Mid-term Indicant outperform buy and hold by over
3,000% before the end of this decade. The stock market did not succumb to
the bear during the post-election year, 2009, which is the historical
standard.
Click here for a tour of the Mid-term
Indicant for major market indices.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - NASDAQ100 Stocks
Click here to see NASDAQ100 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of NASDAQ 100
Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks
Click here to see Dow 30 report card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Table of Dow Jones
Industrial Average Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Dow Jones 15 Utility Stocks
Click here to see Dow Utilities Report Card
history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant - Dow Jones Utility
Stocks Table.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Indicant Selected Stocks
Click here to see Indicant Select Stock
Report Card history.
Click here
for
Mid-term Indicant Table of Indicant
Selected Stocks.
Mid-term
Indicant Positions - Mutual Funds
Click here to see Mutual Fund Report Card
history.
Click here for the Mid-term Table of Mutual
Funds.
The Mid-term
Indicant signaled sell for
MF#22-ProFunds Ultra Short
on April 3, 2009. It is down 80.3% since then. Although this is
classically a post-election-year hold, the Mid-term Indicant was unable to
signal buy in 2009, as the stock market bear remained in hibernation for
the most part. The Short-term Bull displayed attributes of a thoroughbred
in 2009 and thus no opportunities were available to shorting the stock
market since the April 3, 2009 sell signal, which approximates the normal
time to buy this fund.
Click here for Mid-term Indicant Table of
Mutual Funds
Remember
never to keep more than 20% of your investment resources into a single
mutual fund. Sector investing in mutual funds is an extremely good way to
mix your investments.
Long Term Indicant Positions - Dow Jones
Industrial Average
The blue-chip
Long-term Indicant Bull signal was at 2895 for the DJIA in November 1991.
Keep in mind the Long-term Indicant generated only five bull/bear cycles
since 1920.
The Dow is up
314.0% (annualized at 15.6%) since the Long-term Indicant signaled bull
1,044-weeks ago. Economic data is the primary influence on the Long-term
Indicant. Recessions, deflation, inflation, and unreasonable interest
rates have not been strong enough to signal bear since that bull signal,
including relative performance since that bull signal. Even with today’s
economy and stock market position, the 1991 investor is still up triple
digit amounts, which remains above average performance when considering
long-term planning.
Influencing
parameters in the LTI include prior bull cycles. The great bull market in
the 1990’s was powerful enough to offset the 2008-2009 recessionary bear
market in this long-term modeling.
The
Short-term Indicant Stock Market Report
The Indicant website maintains the last
twelve months of daily reports on an annual basis.
These weekly reports are maintained on the website for much longer
periods. Beginning in March 2006, the daily stock market report for the
last trading day of each week is included in this weekly report. This
allows web-based retention records of the daily report for much longer
than the last twelve months. This report is in the next section and a mere
repeat of the daily report you received on the last trading day of the
week, which is usually on Friday evening or Saturday afternoon.
Short-term
Indicant Stock Market Report – Summary
As stated
since last Monday, “if configurations sour in favor of the stock market
bear, appropriate actions will be advised herein. Right now, the stock
bull remains solid.”
In spite of
bearish aggression this past Monday, Tuesday, and Friday, the above
comment remains in effect.
Four QTI,
among the major indices, and five ETF’s are QTI Red Bulls. Just one Red
Bull prohibits dominance by the stock market bear. Stock market volatility
will continue as long as European problems persist. That is why the
Indicant continues advising to buy on bearish days, as the heart and soul
of bullish seasonality is present.
Near-term,
Quick-term, Short-term Indicant Stock Market Details
Index
Report Card Summary
The Near-term
Indicant signaled no new bulls and no new bears.
Click this sentence to see table leading
to the charts.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling bull for all of the major non-contrarian indices.
They are up by an average of 1.9% since the NTI bull signals an average of
2.0-weeks ago. That annualizes at 50.2%. The Near-term Indicant is
signaling bear only for contrarian VIX. It is up 3.1% since its bear
signal 1.6-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling bull for all non-contrarian indices.
Their performance is the same as the Near-term Indicant since the bull
signals occurred, simultaneously, with prices climbing above QTI Yellow
with qualifying near-term bullish attributes. The lone bear signal is for
contrarian VIX, which has the same performance as noted above by the
Near-term Indicant.
There are
four Red Bulls. Just one Red Bull prevents the stock market bear from
unleashing its potential. All of the major non-contrarian indices are NTI
Blue Bulls, offering added protection against bearish depth and
sustainability. All major index’s Vector Pressure enjoys residence in
bullish domains.
There are a
few problems though. Volume is not supportive of bullish sustainability.
That does not mean there will be no sustainable bull, but it does mean the
bull remains vulnerable to bearish incursions.
VIX’s Vector
Pressure remains in bullish domains and its Force Vector is misbehaving
with bullish behavior (for the VIX), which is contrarian.
Several Force
Vectors fell into bearish domains on Friday. However, all retained blue
bull status and not a major confrontation to bullish bias. It does deserve
mention. If the markets are bearish on Monday and QTI Red Bulls and NTI
Blue Bulls perish, there is a good chance bullish bias will be withdrawn.
Social leaders, mainly from Europe, continue pestering the capital
markets.
Overall,
short-term attributes are more bullish than bearish, but there is a mild
mix.
Indicant Volume Indicators
Volume
indicators need to improve their configurations to help propel the stock
market bull onward and upward. Recent relationships are indeed bullish,
but the short-term cyclical configurations need to be more supportive of
the bull for sustainability. Recent robustness has correlated with bearish
behavior, which is not encouraging to the stock market bull. Both IVI’s
sloped downward on recent bullishness, which suggests a lack of bullish
inspiration. This is a bit troubling.
Nov
04-Fri-Light volume on solid bearish behavior is certainly not motivating
the bear to attack more. The stock market and all related Forces, both
technical and fundamental, are in a state of confusion. However, the
short-term bias remains in favor of the stock market bull.
Nov
03-Thu-Mildly above average volume, coupled to the bullish aggression,
offers a bit of encouragement to the stock market bull.
Nov
02-Wed-Mediocre volume, coupled with bullish aggression, is not that
encouraging to the stock market bull.
Nov
01-Tue-Average volume on bearish aggression suggests bearishness will not
be long lasting with impending bullishness wiping out the bear’s damage
rather quickly. Greece can perish and the world’s economy will do just
fine. This is similar to 1998’s Russian defaults, but not nearly as
significant.
Oct
31-Mon-Light volume on bearish aggression relates to simple profit-taking.
More are holding than selling. The supply-demand law portends continued
bullishness.
Short-term ETF Report Card, Status, and
Charts
The Near-term
Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The Near-term
Indicant is signaling hold for 28-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 3.8%
since their buy signals an average of 2.8-weeks ago, annualizing at 70.6%.
The NTI is
avoiding four-ETF’s. They are up by an average of 3.6% since their
near-term sell signals an average of 2.2-weeks ago.
The
Quick-term Indicant generated no buy signals and no sell signals.
The
Quick-term Indicant is signaling hold for 27-ETF’s. They are up by an
average of 6.0% since their buy signals an average of 8.1-weeks ago. This
annualizes at 38.5%.
The
Quick-term Indicant is avoiding five-ETFs. They are up by an average of
4.1% since the QTI sell signals an average of 1.3-weeks ago.
Contrarian
Funds
ETF#03-Natural Resources.
The Quick-term Indicant signaled buy on
Oct 21, 2011. It is up 4.0% since then, annualizing at 101.7%. The
Near-term Indicant signaled buy on Oct 10, 2011. It is up 11.9% since that
buy signal, annualizing at 171.9%. As stated the past few days, its Force
Vector is behaving bullishly with some mild oscillations in bullish
domains. It is above QTI bearish yellow. All of this is bullish in spite
of recent bearish incursions.
ETF#11-Gold and Precious Metals
is up 111.8% since the QTI signaled
buy on December 11, 2008. Annualized growth is at 38.1%. Bearish yellow is
a good price to set stop losses for a longer-term hold position, which is
at $148.50 and still rising. Relaxation remains in order, since your buy
price approximates $80.65 versus today’s closing price of $170.85. The
Quick-term Indicant will not signal sell until interaction with QTI Yellow
Curve.
The Near-term
Indicant signaled buy on Oct 26, 2011, as Force catapulted itself into
bullish domains and above Pressure. It is up 2.2% since that buy signal,
annualizing at 82.4%. It will be interesting if this near-term bullish
cycle can hold up in the face of potential profit taking. So far,
configurations remain favorable to the gold bull. Force is dropping. Its
interaction with Pressure will be interesting. That should occur sometimes
next week.
Click this sentence for additional
charting and current forecasting of the actual price of gold.
All prior comments in this section remain
in effect, but eliminated here for brevity purposes. You will be notified
when and if such commentary requires adjustment.
ETF#14-TLT-Long Government
received a sell signal from the Near-term
Indicant on Oct 24, 2011. It is up 2.8% since then. The QTI signaled sell
on Oct 27, 2011. It is up 5.6% since then.
Tracking from
Oct 28, 2011 informal forecast. That forecast predicted TLT would fall to
QTI Yellow in this near-term cycle before end Dec 2011. Price today was
$116.48. QTI Yellow is $99.35. Forecast threatened this past Thu, Nov 3,
with Force crossing above Pressure and residing in bullish domains.
Behavior the next few days will be interesting for this contrarian ETF.
The forecast will be withdrawn if Force does not quickly retreat to a more
bearish bias.
ETF#31-QID
received a sell signal on Oct 10, 2011
from both the Near-term and Quick-term Indicant as Force fell into bearish
domains. It is down 7.9% since then. Force crossed into bullish domains on
Friday, but price remains below NTI Blue.
The
Quick-term and Near-term Indicant signaled sell on Oct 27, 2011, for
ETF#32-VXX.
It is up 18.7% since that sell signal. QTI Yellow is resisting
bearishness. Force Vector is assisting that resistive behavior, which rose
from deep inside bearish domains into bullish domains on Fri, Nov 4, 2011,
but too risky to buy at this point. Its Force Vector behavior in the next
few days will be interesting. If it does not fall, the stock market bear
will be inspired.
Major ETF
Events
Nov 4-Fri-Some
major index Force Vectors fell into bearish domains, which threatens the
short-term cycle with bullish bias. However, prices remained above NTI
Blue. If price fall to NTI Green with bearishly positioned Force, the
heart and soul of bullish seasonality could endure a rare unfavorable
variance.
Nov 3-Thu-None
Nov
2-Wed-Bullish stock market behavior in the face of unknown European
conclusions is a testament to the strength of the bull’s desire.
Nov
1-Tue-Again strong bearish behavior is not supported by short-term
attributes. The stock market is enduring an overbought condition. That
coupled with European chaos, led to the selloff the past few days, but
with limited volume.
Oct
31-Mon-Strong bearish behavior is not supported by short-term attributes.
Configurations suggests simple profit taking even though, fundamentally,
the Japanese are attempting to weaken their currencies.
Current
Strategy-Short-term Indicant-Nov
4, 2011-Most, not all, short-term attributes continue favoring a bullish
stock market. Continue buying on bearish days, such as this past Mon, Tue
and Fri. Avoid financials as long as it remains as a Yellow Bear. If you
bought XLF or related ETF’s on the near-term buy signal, it is okay to
hold and take cues from the Near-term Indicant’s signaling, which
continues with hold. Keep in mind, volatility will continue until Greece
is removed from the headlines.
Reverse
Tangential Projections
Click this sentence to the table,
highlighting RTP’s (Reverse Tangential Projections).
The values and magnitudes are
expressed in the table on the website.
Keep in mind there is 100% confidence in
these bearish projections.
Click the
Short-term Indicant
to see the combined table of the Near-term Indicant, Quick-term, and
Short-term Indicant. The table has links to charts for each. Each chart
contains all three models and there are two separate buy and sell signals
for the Near-term and/or Quick-term Indicant.
The tour is
still being developed, but most of you are now familiar with the Near-term
bull/bear cycles as well as the tangential protections and reverse
tangential bearish detectors.
Click
Quick-term Indicant, Near-term, and
Short-term for all 31-ETF’s.
Other links:
Short-term Indicant for DJIA and NASDAQ
Short-term Indicant Tables for the Dow
Jones Industrial Average Index
Short-term Indicant Table for the NASDAQ
Composite Index
Indicant Volume Indicator
Near-term, Quick-term, and Short-term
Indicant for Major Indices
Divergence
versus Convergence
The stock
market enjoyed bullish convergence for four consecutive weeks through week
before last. That remains solidly bullish and consistent with originations
of the heart and soul of bullish seasonality despite last week’s
interruption with divergent bearishness.
Indicant
Conclusion
As stated
last week, the NASDAQ100 again toppled its 2007 peak four weeks ago along
the Mid-term cycle. This is the third time in the past year this has
occurred. Each time it retreated. The other major indices still remain
below the 2007 levels. However, all mid-term attributes are solidly
bullish. With that, the mid-term cycle supports the major indices
surpassing those 2007 peaks on the immediate horizon.
Political
stalemate and austerity against nonsensical waste in Europe should
encourage the stock market bull. As long as these events remain consistent
with commonsense, the stock market bull should continue for the next three
to five months.
Keep up with
the daily stock market report as the Quick-term and Near-term attributes
can shift quickly.
Do not get
lazy and set those stop losses for those stocks and funds that continue to
enjoy hold signals.
The daily
updates are on the following link.
http://www.indicant.net/Non-Members/Back%20Issues/QT.htm
Hyperlinks
To access all
major markets, stocks, funds, economic data, charts, statuses, etc, click
the following hyperlink:
http://www.indicant.net/Members/Updates/All%20Update%20Forms/UD%20Summary.htm
Once you are
inside the website, click on "members update" or simply log in. It is on
the top of every page in the web site so you can always find your way
back.
Happy
Investing,
www.indicant.net
11/06/2011